16 hours ago, gamb00ler said:

Staying informed requires diligence.

That's one thing we agree on.

CNN doing what CNN does.

On 5/1/2026 at 8:26 PM, Dan O said:

Still wauting for all those 100's of millions to die as your group had clained so many times.

Those deaths are expected to occur at the same time as the Second Coming of Jesus.

So should be any time now.

13 minutes ago, cdemundo said:

the Second Coming of Jesus.

Hence the war with Iran.

19 minutes ago, cdemundo said:

Those deaths are expected to occur at the same time as the Second Coming of Jesus.

I believe Jesus will come back, but through Pattaya. Not Jerusalem.

He's not stupid enough to put himself in a war zone.

4 hours ago, cdemundo said:

Those deaths are expected to occur at the same time as the Second Coming of Jesus.

So should be any time now.

Everyone who took the toxic vaxx will die.

5 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Everyone who took the toxic vaxx will die.

Fear-mongering is a beautiful thing

4 hours ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Everyone who took the toxic vaxx will die.

News flash everyone born will die at some point

1 hour ago, Dan O said:

News flash everyone born will die at some point

Who wants to live forever

4 hours ago, Dan O said:

News flash everyone born will die at some point

True enough.

Dr D Cahill reckons anyone having a 'hot' jab will have serious health problems within 5 years.

And when those problems do arise, might the unfortunate say; "It was the jab." Or will they insist; "It couldn't have been the safe and effective jab. Would have been much worse if I'd caught COVID without it."

A lot of 'soul searching, to come for some for sure.

5 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

And when those problems do arise, might the unfortunate say; "It was the jab." Or will they insist; "It couldn't have been the safe and effective jab. Would have been much worse if I'd caught COVID without it."

That's what it comes down to. This very forum is representative of the issue: you have people who claim they suffered zero side effects from their jabs, and then some time later you see them posting in the health section, about a serious problem which is a known and documented consequence of the jab. There is one right now, he has a serious heart problem and he claimed back in the Covid days that he had had three Pfizer shots (probably several more by now).

On 5/1/2026 at 8:34 PM, johng said:

Cancer and impotency can take a while ☹️

Any specific cancer the most likely one.?

17 hours ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Everyone who took the toxic vaxx will die.

Eventually.

8 hours ago, Stiddle Mump said:

True enough.

Dr D Cahill reckons anyone having a 'hot' jab will have serious health problems within 5 years.

And when those problems do arise, might the unfortunate say; "It was the jab." Or will they insist; "It couldn't have been the safe and effective jab. Would have been much worse if I'd caught COVID without it."

A lot of 'soul searching, to come for some for sure.

Most of the posters here are above 65, and will likely have some health problems in 5 years because of that one inescapable thing. Getting old. Most of their problems have likely been a long time coming, and until the vaccines have proven to do as much damage as some say, there's no way of telling if it's what caused the problems, as each person is an individual, with all different DNA and lifestyles. When someone passes right after the vaccine, you could think it was related, but not a definitive conclusion, unless there are again, many dying right after the vaccine.

On 5/9/2026 at 12:42 PM, Stiddle Mump said:

Everyone who took the toxic vaxx will die.

Everyone who didn't get ANY vaccine will die.

18 hours ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Dr D Cahill reckons anyone having a 'hot' jab will have serious health problems within 5 years.

It's been 5 years already.... how many more years will you be fooling yourself?

18 hours ago, Stiddle Mump said:

True enough.

Dr D Cahill reckons anyone having a 'hot' jab will have serious health problems within 5 years.

And when those problems do arise, might the unfortunate say; "It was the jab." Or will they insist; "It couldn't have been the safe and effective jab. Would have been much worse if I'd caught COVID without it."

A lot of 'soul searching, to come for some for sure.

She also said this, in December 2020, in relation elderly people receiving the COVID-19 vaccine:

“most of the elderly, most of those people will have serious adverse events or will die in the next few months.”

https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid-19-health/strange-case-dr-cahill-and-ms-hyde

Since that claim was clearly proven to be false, she has simply resorted to shifting the goalposts.

Why should we believe her later pronouncements, when the earlier ones were so obviously wrong?

And as pointed out, we're already past the five year mark, and the 5.5 billion people who received a COVID vaccine are definitely not all showing signs of serious health problems.

Edited May 10May 10 by GroveHillWanderer

18 hours ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Dr D Cahill reckons anyone having a 'hot' jab will have serious health problems within 5 years.

I bet the D stand for Dunce? Where do I collect my winnings?

On 5/5/2026 at 8:31 AM, Stiddle Mump said:

My credentials are sound enough. In saying that, I must add that I possess a couple of things that others on AN do not have.

Sure... sound enough to be an armchair general or quarterback. I do agree you have a 'couple of things that others on AN do not'........

1. a seriously overinflated ego allowing you to presume that with so little experience and training you 'know' more than all the non-quack virology researchers and practitioners combined.

2. an insatiable desire to stand out from the pack even if that goal forces you to hold some bizarre beliefs and consume your own urine.

You are definitely and thankfully one of a kind.

On 5/4/2026 at 8:24 PM, Hummin said:

The problem is not asking questions. The problem is pretending every unanswered question proves the whole thing was fake.

You can criticise mandates, pharma influence, and bad public messaging without jumping all the way to “no virus, no pandemic.” That is where scepticism stops being scepticism and becomes denial.

What is your background, and what is the reason you are so sceptical?

On 5/5/2026 at 8:31 AM, Stiddle Mump said:

My credentials are sound enough. In saying that, I must add that I possess a couple of things that others on AN do not have. Firstly common sense, and secondly an inquisitive nature.

What a wimpy response to an important question. Nothing compares to bolstering your own opinion with a double down. Did you pay Trump, the master of such, for lessons?

You're only inquisitive about finding others who are equally deluded and willing to put their nonsense on the internet.

2 hours ago, gamb00ler said:

Everyone who didn't get ANY vaccine will die.

Eventually we all will die,

On 5/6/2026 at 8:40 AM, Stiddle Mump said:

Really!! Where did you grab that jem from? There was/is no such thing as what you describe. Simply posting utter nonsense.

All the science papers, that I've researched on this,

yes.... at least in this message you included the crucial phrase: All the science papers, that I've researched

We all can clearly see how you studiously manage to 'not find' information that disagrees with your archaic biases and opinion.

2 hours ago, gamb00ler said:

It's been 5 years already.... how many more years will you be fooling yourself?

@Red Phoenix I'll bet you have an absolute treasure trove of statistics as proof of your

SHORT TERM. MEDIUM TERM LONG TERM

disastrous outcomes?

And of course from the most prestigious sources like, Substack, YouTube and X?

Edited May 10May 10 by gamb00ler

Good thing Trump pulled out of this globalist mechanism of coercion and slavery.

Gotta love the WHO symbols (with the flat Earth in the background, nice touch): nothing says "trust me, I'm a doctor" like a needle and a snake, eh?

Edited May 10May 10 by rattlesnake

That's what it comes down to. This very forum is representative of the issue: you have people who claim they suffered zero side effects from their jabs, and then some time later you see them posting in the health section, about a serious problem which is a known and documented consequence of the jab. There is one right now, he has a serious heart problem and he claimed back in the Covid days that he had had three Pfizer shots (probably several more by now).

My symptoms started the morning after my 2nd Pfizer. But it took over 2 years and on my 3rd visit to the ER for the nurses and doctors to concede that my symptoms were a commonly reported side effect of the Pfizer. For the first 2 years, the line was "we don't know what it is, but it's not the Pfizer".

When I looked at the data from my 1st and 2nd shot by batch number, the first batch wasn't flagged as being from a "hot lot". The second shot came from a hot lot. So it wouldn't surprise me if a lot of people reported no side effects at all- if they got injected with benign lot.

Edit: The wingnut in me wonders if they were experimenting with various formulations, or if they just sucked at QA.

Edited May 11May 11 by impulse

2 hours ago, impulse said:

My symptoms started the morning after my 2nd Pfizer. But it took over 2 years and on my 3rd visit to the ER for the nurses and doctors to concede that my symptoms were a commonly reported side effect of the Pfizer. For the first 2 years, the line was "we don't know what it is, but it's not the Pfizer".

When I looked at the data from my 1st and 2nd shot by batch number, the first batch wasn't flagged as being from a "hot lot". The second shot came from a hot lot. So it wouldn't surprise me if a lot of people reported no side effects at all- if they got injected with benign lot.

Edit: The wingnut in me wonders if they were experimenting with various formulations, or if they just sucked at QA.

Yes, the reason why many jabbed people are doing fine is because their shots didn't have critical toxicity levels.

What happened to you (gaslighting) happened to a lot of people. Can't challenge the dogma. And celebrities are no exception:

On 5/9/2026 at 9:58 PM, rattlesnake said:

On 5/9/2026 at 9:49 PM, Stiddle Mump said:

And when those problems do arise, might the unfortunate say; "It was the jab." Or will they insist; "It couldn't have been the safe and effective jab. Would have been much worse if I'd caught COVID without it."

That's what it comes down to. This very forum is representative of the issue: you have people who claim they suffered zero side effects from their jabs, and then some time later you see them posting in the health section, about a serious problem which is a known and documented consequence of the jab. There is one right now, he has a serious heart problem and he claimed back in the Covid days that he had had three Pfizer shots (probably several more by now).

Incredible isn't it - I mean... 5 years on and people have some health issues.

My knees have been giving me trouble for the last couple of years - must have been the Pfizer jab - no other explanation. Nothing to do with decades of running, carrying extra weight, or the radical concept of being a human body that has been used.

A clean colonoscopy - the mRNA vaccine clearly polished the hoop - no other explanation. Couldn't possibly be diet, lifestyle, or just basic genetic / biological fortune.

Father, 88 years old, developing some health issues - definitely the vaccine - no other explanation. Not the 88 years of existing, gravity, and general wear and tear that affects literally every human who has ever lived long enough.

Friend's mother developing dementia - surely the AstraZeneca vaccine - no other explanation. Nothing to do with age, or genetics.

Let's face it - the logic is airtight, frankly Nobel Prize worthy. You had a vaccine. Later, at some unspecified point in your continued existence, something happened. Therefore: vaccine - can't not have been.

The methodology is crystal clear and frankly I'm stunned it took us this long to see it. Umbrellas cause rain. Roosters cause sunrise. Elon Musk's dog; Floki is personally responsible for the 2008 financial crisis, digestive biscuits are responsible for my bad posture. The evidence is there for all to see, its irrefutable.

My Son was vaccinated in 2020 - the growth hormones in those vaccines have forced him to stretch by 25 cms.

My wife wore socks in 2017 and her knees have never recovered. I ate a Tim Tam in 2019 and now I have to wax my back. These are facts.

So - thats it, I'm done with doctors, done with hospitals, done with the entire sinister apparatus of people who spent a decade training to understand the human body. What would THEY know. Instead I'll be consulting Facebook, a man called TruthWarrior99, and whatever AI tells me when I ask it to generate a vaccine-reversing chocolate bar - which, by the way, I fully expect to also cure my back hair, prolong errections, and sort out whatever the dog did to the global economy.

The science is in. We're done here.

And.. Forget the guy who just died from rabies after being bitten by a dog - modern medicine had absolutely nothing to offer - "nature had the answers" - hand-washing in rubber plant bark and newt's pish, followed by a brisk walk and a positive attitude, and he'd have been absolutely fine. Rabies is basically just inflammation and we all know inflammation is caused by seed oils.

Those ancient healers never died of rabies, did they? Well, they did, constantly, in enormous numbers, before the age of 40, but that's not the point. The point is they were doing it NATURALLY - following nature.

Big Pharma doesn't want you to know about the newt. They have actively suppressed centuries of newt-based medicine because you cannot patent a newt. The moment you can't patent it, they lose interest - funny that, almost suspicious, almost like there's a financial incentive at play, but I'm sure it's nothing.

Anyway, condolences to the family of the man who died from Rabies. He died as he lived - free from the tyranny of vaccines and very, very unnecessarily.

22 hours ago, gamb00ler said:

On 5/5/2026 at 8:31 AM, Stiddle Mump said:

My credentials are sound enough. In saying that, I must add that I possess a couple of things that others on AN do not have.

Sure... sound enough to be an armchair general or quarterback. I do agree you have a 'couple of things that others on AN do not'........

1. a seriously overinflated ego allowing you to presume that with so little experience and training you 'know' more than all the non-quack virology researchers and practitioners combined.

2. an insatiable desire to stand out from the pack even if that goal forces you to hold some bizarre beliefs and consume your own urine.

You are definitely and thankfully one of a kind.

There could be a very strong case against pregnant women being vaccinated here - we have a living, breathing, posting-on-the-internet case study right in front of us.

Exhibit A. Fully formed. Typing with fingers and everything, an absolute weapons-grade numpty of quite breathtaking proportions - so spectacularly, magnificently, architecturally stupid that scientists would pee a little bit with excitement just to study him.

Someone who makes flat earthers look like they're splitting atoms at CERN.

If this is what vaccines do to developing brains, then honestly, perhaps the anti-vaxxers were onto something all along.

Or, is this level of stupidity entirely organic and self-generated ? has this level of monumental, gold-plated, dumfluckery evolved naturally ?

I can see why he'd want to blame vaccines instead of genetics.....

54 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

Yes, the reason why many jabbed people are doing fine is because their shots didn't have critical toxicity levels.

What happened to you (gaslighting) happened to a lot of people. Can't challenge the dogma. And celebrities are no exception:

Not quite - just another daft meme you hang your hat-on without digging deeper.

This one's actually a little nuanced than 'blame covid' - but a meme-and brainless bias is just too easy to copy and paste.

Rolling Stone's 2011 list was compiled by a panel of musicians, mostly older classic rockers.

On that list, Clapton ranked number 2, behind only Jimi Hendrix.

The 2023 expanded list was made entirely by the editors and writers of Rolling Stone, and Clapton landed at 35.

The new 2023 Rolling Stone list prioritised different criteria such as invention, risk-taking, and contributions to landmark recordings over pure technical proficiency. The entire methodology changed.

Brian May landed at 33 and David Gilmour at 28 too, neither of whom are known anti-vaxxers.

There was no targeted Clapton hit job, it was a wholesale editorial rewrite that scrambled dozens of rankings - your copy and paste is once again misleading bias distorting facts of history.

Your one grain of truth that you clung onto desperately: Rolling Stone's write-up did include a snarky COVID reference, which handed anti-vaxxers the narrative they wanted on a plate - and you just used it without thought.

The Clapton ratings dropped because a completely different group of people rebuilt a list from scratch using different criteria. But one snarky sentence in the write-up was enough to make it a vaccine conspiracy. Which is, fittingly, exactly the same logic applied throughout these anti-vaxx threads - the tiniest shred of information and wider context removed.