37 minutes ago, RayC said:

Even if it was a 'lone wolf' attack, don't you think that the act itself is worthy of condemnation? And if you agree with that it is, why then make flippant and tangential remarks?

Errrrrr, yeah, I don't think people should try to cut other peoples heads off .

Didn't realise it needed stating

14 hours ago, Bday Prang said:

well i suppose technically speaking she actually "asked" him rather than told him , surely as a "nazi" a request of that nature should have seen her charged with conspiracy to commit genocide, I mean "all the jews and muslims"

In reality it just shows her up as a nutter rather than a nazi

Are neo-nazis not nutters? 😃

19 hours ago, candide said:

Hardly a neo-nazi! 😂

Quote from the BBC article:

Detectives later found notes at her home on how to use fertiliser to manufacture explosives and nuclear weapons

My god ..... You can make nukes from fertilizer?

19 hours ago, candide said:

https://www.epa.gov/radtown/radioactive-material-fertilizer-production

(Of course, it's stupid from her to think that she may have been able to produce a nuclear bomb, but one cannot expect her to be smart)

13 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

My god ..... You can make nukes from fertilizer?

Already replied.

13 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

Errrrrr, yeah, I don't think people should try to cut other peoples heads off .

Didn't realise it needed stating

Doesn't explain the flippant and tangential remarks though, does it?

Attacks on Jews in the UK shouldn't warrant a mention either if they unfortunately take place. It shouldn't need stating that they are wrong.

On 5/15/2026 at 7:20 PM, Chomper Higgot said:

Which of course is justification for an extremist rightwing neo Nazi to attempt to behead one of them.

What if she was from the opposite side of the political spectrum?

The sentence in this case doesn't correlate with sentences handed out to brown people who attack whites whilst declaring their hatred for infidels. From an outsider's point of view, and reading articles about the incident, the sentence has more to do with political thought than damage done to the victim.

52 minutes ago, flaming dragon said:

What if she was from the opposite side of the political spectrum?

The sentence in this case doesn't correlate with sentences handed out to brown people who attack whites whilst declaring their hatred for infidels. From an outsider's point of view, and reading articles about the incident, the sentence has more to do with political thought than damage done to the victim.

She wasn’t and she would have been very rightly prosecuted just the same regardless of which alternative side of the political spectrum you wish to imagine her being in.

Her sentence correlates with the sentencing guidelines.

If you have evidence to the contrary produce it.