Far-right activist Tommy Robinson has triggered fresh controversy after travelling to Moscow, meeting Elon Musk's father, Errol Musk, and declaring that "Russia is not the enemy of Britain".

The visit quickly drew attention after Robinson shared a video apparently filmed in a Moscow hotel alongside Errol Musk. In the clip, Robinson can be heard saying: "We are going to go and cause some trouble."

His visit also comes against the backdrop of a long-running relationship between Robinson and billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk.

Elon Musk has previously expressed support for Robinson, and both men have called for people to take to the streets following the knife attack in Belfast.

The Belfast incident prompted a wave of online activity from Robinson.

Sharing details of demonstrations that were said to be taking place at 7pm on Tuesday, Robinson posted: "The whole of the United Kingdom is hitting the streets tonight at 7pm following yet another invader attack on our people."

That message added further attention to his public campaigning and online presence. The latest focus, however, shifted from Britain to Russia after Robinson surfaced in Moscow alongside Errol Musk.

The appearance of Elon Musk's father in the video added another layer of intrigue to the visit. According to reports, Errol Musk attended the annual Kremlin-backed economic forum last week. The forum is one of Russia's highest-profile international events and regularly attracts business and political figures.

Robinson's own explanation for the trip quickly became one of the most talked-about aspects of the visit.

Speaking to The Guardian, he outlined what he said were his reasons for travelling to the Russian capital.

"I've come to see how this country got itself so well on to the straight and narrow and see the beauty of a civilised society here," Robinson said.

He also challenged perceptions of Russia's relationship with Britain. "Russia is not the enemy of Britain. That narrative has long since died a natural death," he said.

Robinson went further, claiming that some people continue to benefit from portraying Russia as an adversary.

"There are those who benefit from pushing Russia as an enemy but everyone laughs at those people now," he added.

The comments are likely to fuel further discussion among supporters and critics alike.

His remarks about Russia, combined with his appearance alongside Errol Musk, have ensured the trip has attracted widespread attention.

Tommy Robinson meets Elon Musk’s father in Moscow hotel | The Independent

Up to his neck in it:

https://bylinetimes.com/2026/06/10/revealed-the-russian-neo-nazi-network-pushing-white-lives-matter-division-in-britain-promoted-by-tommy-robinson/

Wonder how long he appears with Steven Seagal flashing a Russian passport.

While your there in Paradise Tommy,

you might want to ask the man without a

face if he can send those kids back?

Lady M wants to know ?

The racist and the nutter. Stir up violence among the common people to no purpose.

A good visit would have been with Edward Snowden,,,who did make a difference.

Wattaya think Dad was doing in Moscow anyway, going to the ballet?

On 6/11/2026 at 11:45 PM, unblocktheplanet said:

The racist and the nutter. Stir up violence among the common people to no purpose.

A good visit would have been with Edward Snowden,,,who did make a difference.

Wattaya think Dad was doing in Moscow anyway, going to the ballet?

It’s not without purpose.

Yaxley Lennon is coining it on the back of hate mongering and the Russians know a useful idiot when they see one.

1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

It’s not without purpose.

Yaxley Lennon is coining it on the back of hate mongering and the Russians know a useful idiot when they see one.

Do you call Nigerian Muslim Con leader Kemi Badenoch by her birth name (Olukemi Olufunto Adegoke) or is it just Tommy?

Two tier Chomper, white folks aren't allowed to change their name, black people it's OK.

Edited June 13Jun 13 by BritManToo

8 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

Do you call Nigerian Muslim Con leader Kemi Badenoch by her birth name (Olukemi Olufunto Adegoke) or is it just Tommy?

Two tier Chomper, white folks aren't allowed to change their name, black people it's OK.

If Yaxley Lennon is in Russia he used his Yaxley Lennon passport to get there.

I doubt his bank account into which he stashed his profits of hate mongering has any other name than Yaxley Lennon.

Yaxley Lennon is his name.

The leader of the Tory Party married a guy called Badenoch, her fist name is Olukemi, shortened to Kemi, like Peter shortened to Pete and Elizabeth shortened to Liz.

Take your fabricated outrage elsewhere.

Edited June 13Jun 13 by Chomper Higgot

On 6/11/2026 at 2:59 AM, bannork said:

Far-right activist Tommy Robinson has triggered fresh controversy after travelling to Moscow, meeting Elon Musk's father, Errol Musk, and declaring that "Russia is not the enemy of Britain".

Russia is not the enemy of the West, although leaders in the West have an unabashed strategic goal of overthrowing the Russia government and breaking up Russia into easily manageable states and then literally taking the natural resources for the benefit of Western corporations. And they are quite willing to provoke World War 3 to accomplish that strategic goal. In the meanwhile, the plebs are showered with anti-Russian information warfare. The same for China, the DPRK, Iran, Cuba, and any other country which the West wants to wrap and package in Neocolonialism.

8 hours ago, connda said:

Russia is not the enemy of the West, although leaders in the West have an unabashed strategic goal of overthrowing the Russia government and breaking up Russia into easily manageable states and then literally taking the natural resources for the benefit of Western corporations. And they are quite willing to provoke World War 3 to accomplish that strategic goal. In the meanwhile, the plebs are showered with anti-Russian information warfare. The same for China, the DPRK, Iran, Cuba, and any other country which the West wants to wrap and package in Neocolonialism.

This is a conspiracy theory masquerading as geopolitics.

First, modern Russia is not some ancient, homogeneous victim-state. It is the Russian Federation, an empire whose borders were built through centuries of conquest, colonisation and forced incorporation of non-Russian peoples. Tatars, Chechens, Circassians, Bashkirs, Kalmyks and many others did not simply volunteer to become part of Russia. Entire populations were deported from their ancestral lands under Soviet rule, most notoriously the Chechens, Crimean Tatars and others.

To portray Russia as merely a target of Western colonialism while ignoring Russian colonialism is historical amnesia.

Second, there is no serious Western policy of "breaking up Russia" or "stealing its resources". If that were the objective, NATO would have intervened directly in Ukraine years ago. Instead, Western governments have repeatedly gone out of their way to avoid direct military confrontation with Russia precisely because they want to avoid a wider war. The claim that Western leaders are willing to provoke World War III is absurd; they have spent most of the conflict carefully calibrating support to Ukraine to prevent escalation.

Third, opposing the invasion of a sovereign country is not "anti-Russian information warfare". It is a response to Russia's actions. The easiest way to stop negative coverage of Russian aggression would be for Russia to stop invading its neighbours.

And finally, it is curious to hear lectures about peace and compassion from people who claim to follow Buddhist principles while endlessly excusing military aggression, authoritarianism and imperial conquest whenever the perpetrators happen to be anti-Western. If your moral compass only points towards condemning one side, it isn't a moral compass at all, it's an ideology.

8 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

If Yaxley Lennon is in Russia he used his Yaxley Lennon passport to get there.

Which one, his British passport or his "Oirish" EU Citizen one? Or one he borrowed from a mate, which he used to enter the US on.

3 hours ago, Roadsternut said:

This is a conspiracy theory masquerading as geopolitics.

First, modern Russia is not some ancient, homogeneous victim-state. It is the Russian Federation, an empire whose borders were built through centuries of conquest, colonisation and forced incorporation of non-Russian peoples. Tatars, Chechens, Circassians, Bashkirs, Kalmyks and many others did not simply volunteer to become part of Russia. Entire populations were deported from their ancestral lands under Soviet rule, most notoriously the Chechens, Crimean Tatars and others.

To portray Russia as merely a target of Western colonialism while ignoring Russian colonialism is historical amnesia.

Second, there is no serious Western policy of "breaking up Russia" or "stealing its resources". If that were the objective, NATO would have intervened directly in Ukraine years ago. Instead, Western governments have repeatedly gone out of their way to avoid direct military confrontation with Russia precisely because they want to avoid a wider war. The claim that Western leaders are willing to provoke World War III is absurd; they have spent most of the conflict carefully calibrating support to Ukraine to prevent escalation.

Third, opposing the invasion of a sovereign country is not "anti-Russian information warfare". It is a response to Russia's actions. The easiest way to stop negative coverage of Russian aggression would be for Russia to stop invading its neighbours.

And finally, it is curious to hear lectures about peace and compassion from people who claim to follow Buddhist principles while endlessly excusing military aggression, authoritarianism and imperial conquest whenever the perpetrators happen to be anti-Western. If your moral compass only points towards condemning one side, it isn't a moral compass at all, it's an ideology.

Did you look that up on Wikipedia. What a laugh. Well there ya go. When you're too stupid to form a counterargument, pull "conspiracy theory" out of you bungholio and run with it. 🤯

Edited June 13Jun 13 by connda

38 minutes ago, connda said:

Did you look that up on Wikipedia. What a laugh. Well there ya go. When you're too stupid to form a counterargument, pull "conspiracy theory" out of you bungholio and run with it. 🤯

No I did not. What you call "Russia" (or privately, probably Mother Russia) is called the Russian Federation, formed after the dissolution of the Soviet Union. Putin is essentially propped up by Kadyrov, head of the Chechen Republic, a Republic that wasn't exactly on board with being a Russian fiefdom. The ethnic Russian repression of non-Russian people isn't some distant half forgotten bit of history. It reached industrial levels during the Soviet Union days. Its pretty recent behaviour.

You not really a Buddhist are you? Just another Communist Barsteward inserting himself into free societies to spread hate.

You pretend to be a Buddhist, presumably because you think it gives you some kind of shield from criticism, claiming 30 years of being a Buddhist. Utter nonsense, based on your postings. Given your attachment to Beavis and Butthead. I'd put your aged at about 55-60

You have referred in the past to "Christian religious fanatic crazies in Congress", referred to statements as "nonsense", repeatedly referred to the West as the same as Nazi Germany, ie using non-ethical speech in conflict with the Buddhist concept of "Right Speech".

You have frequently expressed your hatred of people, one of the three poisons.

You frequently involve yourself in political and contentious argument, at odds with your supposed principles of non-attachment and equanimity.

You often use mockery, such as just now, which is not speech that is helpful nor beneficial.

You are a fake Buddhist. You still embrace Western conceits and prejudices. Time to pack up, shave the head, bugger off to a monastery for a bit.

You make a bunch of unfounded statements, and then expect everyone to take your word for it, because you are going. There isn't an argument to counter. You just spouted a bunch of <deleted> out of the Communist International Propaganda Book. So don't you <deleted> dare accuse me of using Wikipedia.

Present reasoning and logic to support all of your positions, then I will present to you a counter-argument.

Why don't you think the Russian Federation is a repressive empire masquerading as a nation. Start with that.

Russia's political structure resembles an empire in that power is concentrated in the capital, regional autonomy is tightly constrained, and strategic decisions are imposed from the centre. All the wealth flows disproportionately towards Moscow and St Petersburg, while peripheral regions often provide raw materials, manpower and military recruits. This pattern would be familiar to historians of empires throughout history. Kremlin narratives routinely deny the legitimacy of neighbouring nations, portray surrounding territories as belonging naturally within Russia's sphere of influence, and treat the independence of former Soviet republics as a historical mistake rather than a settled reality. It views neighbouring countries as lost territories to be reclaimed, one way or the other. Empires are perpetually concerned about separatism, loyalty and territorial integrity. Nation-states are generally secure in the legitimacy of their borders. Moscow's constant fear of fragmentation, regional nationalism and centrifugal forces suggests that beneath the surface lies a political reality closer to an empire than a conventional nation-state.

Because of that Empire thinking, of not accepting countries like Ukraine, Georgia, the Baltic States, have any right to exist, Russia sees itself as the enemy of the West because it never truly accepted the world that emerged after the Cold War. Russia is not an enemy of the West, that is true, but the West is an enemy of Russia, or more particularly, Putin. His mentor, Alexsandr Dugin, has called for the complete elimination of all "Atlanticist Nations", the Anglo-Saxon peoples, the peoples he defines by the Atlantic Maritime trade, ie. the British, the Americans, the Canadians, and by extension, the colonial peoples of Australia and New Zealand.

Yes, Russia is very hostile to the West, and is willing to risk WW3 in order to achieve its own imperial ambitions. Putin's psychotic thinking is shown by his statement on the prelude to war in Europe:

Why do we need a world if Russia is not in it?

https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2022/02/28/why-do-we-need-a-world-if-russia-is-not-in-it-state-tv-presenter-opens-show-with-ominous-address-a76653

Well, ok. Most people would pick up an Atlas, and point to Russia and its boundaries, and say "that's Russia". I might not like Russia, but I'm not seeking to end the Russian Federation/Empire; I think it will dissolve itself, and a new Russian Republic will emerge in the Moscow-St Petersberg region, and a normal republic at that, with normal problems and normal relationships. Russia is fundamentally a European state, its not this "Eurasian state", where its trying to impose the philosophy of a long dead German on Asiatic peoples with their own heritage.

But how does Putin define Russia?

In 2005, to the Russian Federal Assembly, he came up with this line:

The Soviet Union was the same Russia, only called by a different name

ie. he considered the USSR and Russia to be one and the same, so no real recognition of the sovereignty of the breakaway states.

In 2016;

https://www.euronews.com/2016/11/25/the-borders-of-russia-do-not-end-says-putin-during-awards-ceremony?utm_source=chatgpt.com

The borders of Russia do not end

He claimed it was a joke, but at the root of it, it indicates that he thinks where ever there are so-called ethnic Russian people, then that should be Russian. The would be like Britain thinking America is still British. We don't. And yes, you can challenge on mindsets about Irish relationships. And I would respond we are now quite settled about that.

At the 2023 Valdai Club meeting, he stated that "borders do not end anywhere", and he talked up of a Greater Russia beyond its current borders.

What is more, he arranged for the message "Russia's borders do not end anywhere" to be plastered on billboards all over Russia during the 2024 election campaign.

https://x.com/BBCSteveR/status/1746784252312891463

And before you critique that, don't come back criticising Rosenthal because he is Jewish and works for the BBC. There are other sources

In 2021 and 2022, in the run up to the invasion of Ukraine and after, he repeatedly made speeches, questioning the legitimacy of Ukraine, calling it a mistake. In Feb 2022, he repeatedly asked his minister to recognise the Ukrainian breakaway republics, thus delegitimising the sovereignty of Ukraine

http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/67825

So when Putin utters "Why do we need a world if Russia is not in it?", and believes, by his own words, that the borders of Russia are NOT settled, how on earth do you have the temerity to suggest the Western nations are willing to start WW3. This guy wants to start World War 3 over some clapped out coal mines and steel works that were in a toxic landscape. That he hasn't (started WW3) isn't because he has held back, but because his armed forces are the proverbial tiger, being held, very credibly, by a Ukrainian defence (the fact they are mounting such a stout defence undermines any notion that Ukraine is not a real country). The Americans made mistakes in Iran, for sure, but the Russians must be looking at the firepower on display, which is nothing more than a shrug for the Americans.

Putin literally said, if he doesn't get his way, doesn't achieve his imperialist ambitions, he will kill me, he will kill you, he will kill your dog/cat/significant other, everyone you have ever known and will know. And then you wheel out the old infantile "you only used Wikipedia" argument to mock someone who disagrees with you, and you lack the aptitude to respond properly.

Was it infantile rhetoric? Possibly. Possibly he is mad and means it. Bit he doesn't want to be your friend nor mine.

I'm confident, still, there are people in Russia who are not insane, who want a normal life, and will put a stop to this nonsense. That confidence sometimes wobbles, and initially, I thought the non-involvement of the Russian Air Force over Ukraine was some sort of indicator there was a break in the ranks, but it seems the top brass is so corrupted, and clearly, they don't care about their men, in the way commanding officers should be caring about their troops.

Back to the topic. Many use the acronym "FAFO" with glee.

Yaxley-Lennon detained at Heathrow under Anti-Terrorism legislation

https://metro.co.uk/2026/06/14/tommy-robinson-detained-heathrow-begs-supporters-money-28769076/

Straight away begging for money. He currently has an income of about £2 million per year.

For Americans not understanding why Tommy Robinson is referred to a Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, its because Tommy Robinson is not his legal name. It a nomme de guerre, a stage name, a name he picked after getting done for a few frauds, and realising he had a bit of a reputation.

Its a name he picked out after his favourite Luton Town football MIG ("Men In Gear") Firm Organiser. The real Tommy Robinson wrote a book about how his Crew took on the bigger Crews, particularly from nearby Watford, QPR and Millwall. Luton Town FC are known as the Hatters. This illiterate mob probably thought it was the Haters.

9 minutes ago, Roadsternut said:

Back to the topic. Many use the acronym "FAFO" with glee.

Yaxley-Lennon detained at Heathrow under Anti-Terrorism legislation

https://metro.co.uk/2026/06/14/tommy-robinson-detained-heathrow-begs-supporters-money-28769076/

Straight away begging for money. He currently has an income of about £2 million per year.

For Americans not understanding why Tommy Robinson is referred to a Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, its because Tommy Robinson is not his legal name. It a nomme de guerre, a stage name, a name he picked after getting done for a few frauds, and realising he had a bit of a reputation.

Its a name he picked out after his favourite Luton Town football MIG ("Men In Gear") Firm Organiser. The real Tommy Robinson wrote a book about how his Crew took on the bigger Crews, particularly from nearby Watford, QPR and Millwall. Luton Town FC are known as the Hatters. This illiterate mob probably thought it was the Haters.

Whose turn is it to list all his convictions ?

Far right activist or a better known normal bloke who asks uncomfortable questions.

31 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

Whose turn is it to list all his convictions ?

1. Violent Offences & Public Order

**2005 – Assault on an Off-Duty Police Officer: Convicted of assaulting an off-duty police officer during a drunken argument. 

Sentence: 12 months' imprisonment.

2011 – Public Order Offence (Football Brawling): Convicted of using "threatening, abusive or insulting behaviour" for leading a group of Luton Town football fans and taking part in a 100-man brawl in 2010. 

Sentence: 12-month community rehabilitation order, 150 hours of unpaid work, and a 3-year football banning order.

**2011 – Assaulting an EDL Member: Convicted of common assault after headbutting a fellow English Defence League (EDL) member at a rally in Blackburn. 

Sentence: 12 weeks' imprisonment, suspended for 12 months.

2. Financial Fraud & Identity Offenses

2013 – Using a False Passport: Pleaded guilty to using someone else's passport to travel illegally to the United States in late 2012. 

Sentence: 10 months' imprisonment.

**2014 – Mortgage Fraud: Pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit fraud by false representation regarding a £145,000 mortgage application. 

Sentence: 18 months' imprisonment.

3. Contempt of Court & Libel Injunctions

A significant portion of his modern legal record stems from Contempt of Court—meaning the disruption of active judicial proceedings or the direct violation of High Court orders. 

2017 – Canterbury Crown Court Contempt: Arrested and found in contempt for attempting to film defendants inside the court building during a sensitive trial. 

Sentence: 3 months' imprisonment, suspended for 18 months.

**2018/2019 – Leeds Crown Court Contempt: Filmed a Facebook Live broadcast outside a major "grooming gang" trial, aggressively addressing defendants and breaching strict court reporting restrictions (endangering the trial's validity). He was initially jailed for 13 months (which activated the 2017 suspended sentence), but the conviction was successfully appealed due to procedural rush. A retrial by the Attorney General in 2019 found him guilty on three counts of contempt. 

Sentence: 9 months' imprisonment (served roughly 9 weeks before release).

2021 – Libel Lawsuit Loss: Lost a high-profile libel lawsuit brought against him by a Syrian schoolboy, Jamal Hijazi, whom Robinson had falsely defamed online. The High Court ordered Robinson to pay £100,000 in damages and issued an injunction strictly banning him from repeating the defamatory claims. 

2022 – Non-Attendance Fine: Found in contempt for failing to attend an oral examination regarding his finances and the unpaid libel damages.

Sentence: Fined £900 (with a 28-day prison term threatened if unpaid; he paid the fine).

2024 – High Court Injunction Breach: Arrested and prosecuted by the Solicitor General for systematically violating the 2021 libel injunction. He had commissioned, broadcasted, and promoted a film titled Silenced repeating the banned defamatory claims at a major London rally and online. 

Sentence: 18 months' imprisonment (handed down on October 28, 2024).

4. Other Legal Issues

2021 – Stalking Injunction: Handed a five-year stalking protection order after harassing independent journalist Lizzie Dearden and her partner by showing up at their home late at night and making false allegations. 

2024 – Terrorism Act Offence: Charged under Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act 2000 for failing to provide the PIN/access code to his mobile phone when requested by police during a border stop.

On 6/13/2026 at 3:17 AM, Chomper Higgot said:

If Yaxley Lennon is in Russia he used his Yaxley Lennon passport to get there.

I doubt his bank account into which he stashed his profits of hate mongering has any other name than Yaxley Lennon.

Yaxley Lennon is his name.

The leader of the Tory Party married a guy called Badenoch, her fist name is Olukemi, shortened to Kemi, like Peter shortened to Pete and Elizabeth shortened to Liz.

Take your fabricated outrage elsewhere.

Hey' Tommy More romper chomper outrage keep up the good work.

1 hour ago, Roadsternut said:

Back to the topic. Many use the acronym "FAFO" with glee.

Yaxley-Lennon detained at Heathrow under Anti-Terrorism legislation

https://metro.co.uk/2026/06/14/tommy-robinson-detained-heathrow-begs-supporters-money-28769076/

Straight away begging for money. He currently has an income of about £2 million per year.

For Americans not understanding why Tommy Robinson is referred to a Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, its because Tommy Robinson is not his legal name. It a nomme de guerre, a stage name, a name he picked after getting done for a few frauds, and realising he had a bit of a reputation.

Its a name he picked out after his favourite Luton Town football MIG ("Men In Gear") Firm Organiser. The real Tommy Robinson wrote a book about how his Crew took on the bigger Crews, particularly from nearby Watford, QPR and Millwall. Luton Town FC are known as the Hatters. This illiterate mob probably thought it was the Haters.

Dangerous job being an investigative journalist in sir Kier woke 2 tier country. If they keep locking him in solitary for smashing woke narratives he will end up as PM one day. Cant come soon enough if Britain is to be saved.

1 hour ago, Roadsternut said:

Back to the topic. Many use the acronym "FAFO" with glee.

Yaxley-Lennon detained at Heathrow under Anti-Terrorism legislation

https://metro.co.uk/2026/06/14/tommy-robinson-detained-heathrow-begs-supporters-money-28769076/

Straight away begging for money. He currently has an income of about £2 million per year.

For Americans not understanding why Tommy Robinson is referred to a Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, its because Tommy Robinson is not his legal name. It a nomme de guerre, a stage name, a name he picked after getting done for a few frauds, and realising he had a bit of a reputation.

Its a name he picked out after his favourite Luton Town football MIG ("Men In Gear") Firm Organiser. The real Tommy Robinson wrote a book about how his Crew took on the bigger Crews, particularly from nearby Watford, QPR and Millwall. Luton Town FC are known as the Hatters. This illiterate mob probably thought it was the Haters.

So just like Ringo Starr or Englebert Humperdinck. People can call themselves whatever they want. A man can claim to be a woman.

Not sure what your point was.

1 hour ago, MIke B Bad said:

1. Violent Offences & Public Order

**2005 – Assault on an Off-Duty Police Officer: Convicted of assaulting an off-duty police officer during a drunken argument. 

Sentence: 12 months' imprisonment.

2011 – Public Order Offence (Football Brawling): Convicted of using "threatening, abusive or insulting behaviour" for leading a group of Luton Town football fans and taking part in a 100-man brawl in 2010. 

Sentence: 12-month community rehabilitation order, 150 hours of unpaid work, and a 3-year football banning order.

**2011 – Assaulting an EDL Member: Convicted of common assault after headbutting a fellow English Defence League (EDL) member at a rally in Blackburn. 

Sentence: 12 weeks' imprisonment, suspended for 12 months.

2. Financial Fraud & Identity Offenses

2013 – Using a False Passport: Pleaded guilty to using someone else's passport to travel illegally to the United States in late 2012. 

Sentence: 10 months' imprisonment.

**2014 – Mortgage Fraud: Pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit fraud by false representation regarding a £145,000 mortgage application. 

Sentence: 18 months' imprisonment.

3. Contempt of Court & Libel Injunctions

A significant portion of his modern legal record stems from Contempt of Court—meaning the disruption of active judicial proceedings or the direct violation of High Court orders. 

2017 – Canterbury Crown Court Contempt: Arrested and found in contempt for attempting to film defendants inside the court building during a sensitive trial. 

Sentence: 3 months' imprisonment, suspended for 18 months.

**2018/2019 – Leeds Crown Court Contempt: Filmed a Facebook Live broadcast outside a major "grooming gang" trial, aggressively addressing defendants and breaching strict court reporting restrictions (endangering the trial's validity). He was initially jailed for 13 months (which activated the 2017 suspended sentence), but the conviction was successfully appealed due to procedural rush. A retrial by the Attorney General in 2019 found him guilty on three counts of contempt. 

Sentence: 9 months' imprisonment (served roughly 9 weeks before release).

2021 – Libel Lawsuit Loss: Lost a high-profile libel lawsuit brought against him by a Syrian schoolboy, Jamal Hijazi, whom Robinson had falsely defamed online. The High Court ordered Robinson to pay £100,000 in damages and issued an injunction strictly banning him from repeating the defamatory claims. 

2022 – Non-Attendance Fine: Found in contempt for failing to attend an oral examination regarding his finances and the unpaid libel damages.

Sentence: Fined £900 (with a 28-day prison term threatened if unpaid; he paid the fine).

2024 – High Court Injunction Breach: Arrested and prosecuted by the Solicitor General for systematically violating the 2021 libel injunction. He had commissioned, broadcasted, and promoted a film titled Silenced repeating the banned defamatory claims at a major London rally and online. 

Sentence: 18 months' imprisonment (handed down on October 28, 2024).

4. Other Legal Issues

2021 – Stalking Injunction: Handed a five-year stalking protection order after harassing independent journalist Lizzie Dearden and her partner by showing up at their home late at night and making false allegations. 

2024 – Terrorism Act Offence: Charged under Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act 2000 for failing to provide the PIN/access code to his mobile phone when requested by police during a border stop.

2024 – Terrorism Act Offence: Charged under Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act 2000 for failing to provide the PIN/access code to his mobile phone when requested by police during a border

What has UK become?

You can be jailed for saying hurty words. Or left to bleed to death on the pavement for similar.

Orwell would be so proud of his book.

You lot seem so brainwashed allowing this dystopia by stealth to infest the once proud Great Britain.

Time for another revolution/ civil war.

Edited June 14Jun 14 by emptypockets

46 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Dangerous job being an investigative journalist in sir Kier woke 2 tier country. If they keep locking him in solitary for smashing woke narratives he will end up as PM one day. Cant come soon enough if Britain is to be saved.

• He is not an investigative journalist.

• He's never been locked up for "smashing woke narratives". He has been locked up for fraud, several violent offences, contempt of court etc.

• What the hell does "smashing woke narratives" mean anyway? Just cliched word soup.

• Britain does need saving, I agree, from scum buckets like Yaxley-Lennon and all the division and trouble he causes. But hey, don't forget to donate - no publicity is bad publicity as far as he is concerned. Cha-ching!!

Edited June 14Jun 14 by josephbloggs

On 6/13/2026 at 3:03 AM, BritManToo said:

Do you call Nigerian Muslim Con leader Kemi Badenoch by her birth name (Olukemi Olufunto Adegoke) or is it just Tommy?

Two tier Chomper, white folks aren't allowed to change their name, black people it's OK.

Call him by what his mum calls him. Its what his ex-wife called him. Its what his kids know him as.

He can change his name. Its called by deed poll.

"Kemi" is a contraction like Maggie is a contraction of Margaret, Tony; Anthony. I think its weird to refer to Maggie Thatcher to Margaret Hilda Roberts, but up to you. We can call him "Thomas Robinson, aka Stephen Yaxley aka Stephen Lennon, aka Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, aka Andrew McMaster aka Paul Harris aka Wayne King" if you prefer the formal way to address personalities. Maybe stick to his alta ego of Wayne King to raise a laugh.

https://web.archive.org/web/20151211044804/http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015/12/10/stephen-yaxley-lennon-describes-the-making-of-tommy-robinson_n_8747794.html

His children – two girls, four and eight, and a boy, six, don’t know about their Dad’s alter-ego, “sometimes I just go away for work” – code for Dad’s in the clink – and his wife doesn’t want to know (Tommy Robinson, the alter-ego, isn’t welcome at the Yaxley-Lennon household). According to Robinson, his name “just depends where you met me”.

He was born Stephen Yaxley, to an Irish immigrant mother and an English father, but when his mother re-married, his surname became double barrelled – Yaxley-Lennon – although, often he is just Stephen Lennon. Like most things concerning Robinson – a convicted fraudster - his real name isn’t clear.

In September 2012 Robinson pretended to be Andrew McMaster – a friend he bore some resemblance to – so he could illegally enter the US. He can’t travel there because he’s been convicted of possessing a Class A drug.

Sentencing him to 10 months jail in January 2013, Judge Alistair McCreath, noted Robinson’s legitimate passport lists him as Paul Harris, a matter he chose not to delve into. Robinson confirmed to Huffington Post UK his passport lists him as Harris

Turns out he wished he never used the Tommy Robinson ID, but he's stuck with it now.

I used (Tommy’s name) due to the influence of a poisonous uncle I had, who were jealous of Tommy his whole life. And it was his influence telling me, when I was using different names (they included Mikey and Wayne King – “it sounds like <deleted>, when you say it. Victoria Derbyshire introduced me, ‘now we have Wayne King’, and I was cracking up” Robinson explained). He was like, ‘use Tommy Robinson, use Tommy Robinson, it will get all the heat on him’.

“I shouldn’t of done it.

Kemi is married. Maybe you grew up in a godless household without a dad, or maybe lots of siblings all with different dads, not understanding when a lady loves a man and they get married, social convention is for the lady to change her maiden name, and that is legally recognised.

Stephen had two dads.

You can call him Walter as well,

What's with the desert DPM with the ISAF badge? Pretending to be a veteran? Before you buy surplus gear because you are too brassic for a new coat, the MOD takes off all the badges. I doubt he couldn't afford a new coat from M&S. He's actually had to add that badge himself. Add Spec Ops wrap arounds, and he's Walting.

Edited June 14Jun 14 by Roadsternut

2 hours ago, Tidal wave said:

Far right activist or a better known normal bloke who asks uncomfortable questions.

I don't anyone who's been to prison or, attempted illegal immigration, convicted for possessing Class A drugs or lied on mortgage applications. Is that what it means to be normal in your world, to be a criminal?

1 hour ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Dangerous job being an investigative journalist in sir Kier woke 2 tier country. If they keep locking him in solitary for smashing woke narratives he will end up as PM one day. Cant come soon enough if Britain is to be saved.

Don't be a hypocrite. You hate Europeans. You hate the British even more because we once ruled over you. You sing it in your national anthem about killing us. You couldn't give a flying fig about us.

1 hour ago, emptypockets said:

So just like Ringo Starr or Englebert Humperdinck. People can call themselves whatever they want. A man can claim to be a woman.

Not sure what your point was.

Learn to read, if you didn't understand the text.

1 hour ago, emptypockets said:

2024 – Terrorism Act Offence: Charged under Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act 2000 for failing to provide the PIN/access code to his mobile phone when requested by police during a border

What has UK become?

You can be jailed for saying hurty words. Or left to bleed to death on the pavement for similar.

Orwell would be so proud of his book.

You lot seem so brainwashed allowing this dystopia by stealth to infest the once proud Great Britain.

Time for another revolution/ civil war.

Ah, you missed off "Northern Ireland". Obviously a supporter of Irish unification, by force. When did you stop donating to NORAID? Corbyn would love your sort.

Or is it you don't actually know the name of the country that you are rabbiting on about?

And you cheerfully end the posting by effectively calling for regicide.

We have had one Revolution, the Glorious One, which was actually an invasion. So you want another invasion. Confused.

Edited June 14Jun 14 by Roadsternut

13 hours ago, Roadsternut said:

Ah, you missed off "Northern Ireland". Obviously a supporter of Irish unification, by force. When did you stop donating to NORAID? Corbyn would love your sort.

Or is it you don't actually know the name of the country that you are rabbiting on about?

And you cheerfully end the posting by effectively calling for regicide.

We have had one Revolution, the Glorious One, which was actually an invasion. So you want another invasion. Confused.

You certainly are.

On 6/14/2026 at 11:09 AM, SunnyinBangrak said:

Dangerous job being an investigative journalist in sir Kier woke 2 tier country. If they keep locking him in solitary for smashing woke narratives he will end up as PM one day. Cant come soon enough if Britain is to be saved.

There has seldom been a better argument for a coup to preserve democracy that that shopping list of grievances and untruths.

On 6/15/2026 at 2:43 AM, emptypockets said:

You certainly are.

Dot Com.