1 minute ago, klaikangwon said:

"Agenda of own against UK population" appears to be being borderline British nationalist ...?

Of course some people disagree with that agenda, even if they have the UK passport, but how is it "private agenda against UK"? It is opposite by definition...?

I'm guessing that English isn't your first language but I genuinely have no idea what your posts are about. Run them through Chat GPT before posting perhaps?

And my whole post was 'an agenda of their own and which are against the UK population' - which means something completely different to what you are trying to infer.

Just now, johnnybangkok said:

I'm guessing that English isn't your first language but I genuinely have no idea what your posts are about. Run them through Chat GPT before posting perhaps?

And my whole post was 'an agenda of their own and which are against the UK population' - which means something completely different to what you are trying to infer.

Chakrit Sakunkrit consistenyly take nationalist or at least "separatist" side of UK politics. How that private agenda " against population"?

Even if many UK people do not like this agenda, whole intent of agenda is promote their interests and the strength of their country.

It is collectivist agenda focused on UK welfare, by definition, not individual agenda focused on welfare of Chakrit Sakunkrit.

It is like saying Socialism, even if I myself do not support it, is somehow "pro-poverty" agenda if I argue many poor people are not Socialist themselves... which is nonsense...

9 minutes ago, johnnybangkok said:

So you HOPE it will blow over because he's 'your man' regardles of the illegality of it all? You are quite ok with a potential PM being bribed by individuals who have an agenda of their own and which are against the UK population?

Pretty much tells us all we need to know about you and your ilk.

It will be investigated and no doubt he'll be cleared, similar to the dodgy Rayner. Labour seems to be against the UK population, seem to support spongers and i include public sector workers in that, Labour supports migrants and spongers over British workers

Just now, klaikangwon said:

Just now, klaikangwon said:

1 minute ago, klaikangwon said:

Chakrit Sakunkrit consistenyly take nationalist or at least "separatist" side of UK politics. How that private agenda " against population"?

Even if many UK people do not like this agenda, whole intent of agenda is promote their interests and the strength of their country.

It is collectivist agenda focused on UK welfare, by definition, not individual agenda focused on welfare of Chakrit Sakunkrit.

It is like saying Socialism, even if I myself do not support it, is somehow "pro-poverty" agenda if I argue many poor people are not Socialist themselves... which is nonsense...

Harborne (his real name) wants (unsurpriseingly) the deregulation of crypto. That's his 'agenda'. That agenda suits his personal purpose and NOT the interest of the vast majority of the UK population, hence my statement 'an agenda of their own and which are against the UK population'

Get it?

4 hours ago, josephbloggs said:

Ah, so it's the left's fault. Got it.

Nothing to do with the grifter taking millions from a crypto billionaire when he has pledged to slash taxes and duties on crypto transactions if he becomes PM. Nothing to do with him not declaring a £5m "gift". Nothing to do with him lying about it and playing the victim when found out by saying it's for his security as - waah waah waah - he can't live a normal life. And nothing to do with him then changing his mind (because it's easy to check and find out it wasn't spent on security but on a house) and saying it was a reward for Brexit.

Yeah, all the nasty left.

He's bent as a two bob note, always has been, and now it is finally catching up with him. Nasty lefties.

Just another piece of SH T to throw at the blanket hoping it will stick. When he was a Euro minister they had 5 attemts to accuse him of curruption all dropped like Farage say's its just another attempt to make things up against him. There will be more crap thrown his way now there will be a by Election where Burnham will be up against Reform who are already 85% winners in Ashton in Makerfield in the local Elections. Polankski has been found guilty of avoiding Coucil Tax are they gunning for him.

8 minutes ago, scubascuba3 said:

It will be investigated and no doubt he'll be cleared, similar to the dodgy Rayner. Labour seems to be against the UK population, seem to support spongers and i include public sector workers in that, Labour supports migrants and spongers over British workers

Straw man fallacy

2 hours ago, josephbloggs said:

It wasn't for security. He didn't spend it on security. He keeps changing his mind on what it was for.

We all know what it was for.

Two MP'S were Murdered because there security was not taken seriously, Farage is a Target by some nutters and requires security 24/7. Why was he denied security by the Government ? Its a good job he is not in a passenger driving through a Tunnel, bad things happen in Tunnels to high ranking names in the UK.

6 minutes ago, johnnybangkok said:

Harborne (his real name) wants (unsurpriseingly) the deregulation of crypto. That's his 'agenda'. That agenda suits his personal purpose and NOT the interest of the vast majority of the UK population, hence my statement 'an agenda of their own and which are against the UK population'

Get it?

He has business interest in cryptocurrency, as does lunch lady have business interest in lunch. Consistent over many years,his donations all follow topic of Brexit, not cryptocurrencies. He also have big business interest in airline refuelling... so maybe he caused Iran War with donation somehow too ?

As Thai citizen, Sakunkrit is in fact legal name, especially as Thailand does not accept dual and require naturalized person to renounce other passport... but maybe "real" mean something else...

1 hour ago, josephbloggs said:

Er, he does keep changing his mind. First of all he said it was purely for his security. Then when he realised that people knew he paid for a £1.4m house in cash shortly after he said it was an unconditional gift, ie not just for security. And come on, an "unconditional gift" from a crypto billionaire to someone who has said he would cut taxes and duties of crypto transactions if he becomes PM. Come on Scuba, surely no one can be that naive.

He changed his mind. Every time he gets caught in a lie he changes his mind, changes his answers.

I am sure he appreciates that he has blind loyalists like you that will try to defend the indefensible though and even go to the lengths of backing his lies based on zero evidence. Nice.

Once this is dropped will you come on here and Apologise Joe.?

1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

Just like Starmer voters aren't worth 10 million quid with free access to covent garden penthouses amongst other freebies like arsenal corporate boxes, taylor swift tickets and designer clothes.

Don't forget the Free Suits and desighner gear for his missus Johnny all paid for by the British Tax Payer.

1 minute ago, BarraMarra said:

Once this is dropped will you come on here and Apologise Joe.?

Will you come back and apologise if it isn't?

Whether he gets off on a technicality or not I won't apologise for questioning his honesty or integrity, no. I still think it's extremely whiffy - he decides to run for parliament and pledges to deregulate cryptocurrency trading, slash capital gains tax on crypto transactions, remove banking protections......some time just coincidentally around receiving £5m from a crypto billionaire.......which he forgot to declare.

His only real policy apart from shouting at boats is his proposed Crypto Assets and Digital Finance Bill. Coincidence?

Are you ok with that level of corruption? You don't think that's ever so slightly worth looking at? Or you can overlook it purely because he shouts at boats?

Cryptocurrency angle is fun conspiracy theory. And surely he would indeed want government to promote technology he thinks is useful, even without financial interest. With financial interest,more so. But some facts:

1. He is not "crypto billionaire". He was already billionaire from normal industries (air line services, defense, private banking, real estate...) before cryptocurrency was invented. He invented some, probably minority, of billionaire wealth into cryptocurrency, he did not get rich from and is not dependent on the crypto.
   

2. UK is, pardon my observation, not major market for cryptocurrency(!) Man with cryptocurrency holdings, whcih are stateless by definition, will not make huge money from mega economy UK change its regulations. USA, China, maybe Japan, maybe EU... but UK only one percent of the world economy. It just not that big a deal. WOuld it even return the tens of millions donated, for no loss and also no profit? Maybe not. And this in extreme scenario of one man personally changing ruling party and government. As pure business idea, just absurd.
   

3. Further to that, he seems much more interested in UK politics in particular, than Thai politics (where he lives) or US politics (bigger "lever" in world economy and many other thigns)... possibly because he is actually UK patriot, and not just fraudster buying more money by buying politician...

So you won't be Voting Reform then Joe ?

There is also simple fact cryptocurrency "ideology" aligns with Reform/Thatcherite "ideology". It is supposed to make banking less " insider" and more "private". I do not comment on whether that idea valid or not, but fact is Nigel Farage has been libertarian-type right capitalist his whole career... which aligns completely with "crypto ideology". And Harborne... has also been libertarian-type right capitalist his whole career... so wonder why he invested some of his airport services money in crypto ? It is just two people who agree, agreeing.

11 minutes ago, klaikangwon said:

Cryptocurrency angle is fun conspiracy theory. And surely he would indeed want government to promote technology he thinks is useful, even without financial interest. With financial interest,more so. But some facts:

1. He is not "crypto billionaire". He was already billionaire from normal industries (air line services, defense, private banking, real estate...) before cryptocurrency was invented. He invented some, probably minority, of billionaire wealth into cryptocurrency, he did not get rich from and is not dependent on the crypto.
   

2. UK is, pardon my observation, not major market for cryptocurrency(!) Man with cryptocurrency holdings, whcih are stateless by definition, will not make huge money from mega economy UK change its regulations. USA, China, maybe Japan, maybe EU... but UK only one percent of the world economy. It just not that big a deal. WOuld it even return the tens of millions donated, for no loss and also no profit? Maybe not. And this in extreme scenario of one man personally changing ruling party and government. As pure business idea, just absurd.
   

3. Further to that, he seems much more interested in UK politics in particular, than Thai politics (where he lives) or US politics (bigger "lever" in world economy and many other thigns)... possibly because he is actually UK patriot, and not just fraudster buying more money by buying politician...

Can't Harborne pay for someone with better English to advocate for him - I will work for crypto - PM me for detatils !

8 minutes ago, beautifulthailand99 said:

Can't Harborne pay for someone with better English to advocate for him - I will work for crypto - PM me for detatils !

No he cannot, because as anti-immigrant man he want to stop skilled English speakers entering at Brighton beach, and UK will become low skill economy. But, Bitcoin price will increase...

1 hour ago, BarraMarra said:

So you won't be Voting Reform then Joe ?

I am of the same opinion as this guy:

https://www.instagram.com/reels/DXO5217CNyn/

3 hours ago, JonnyF said:

Just like Starmer voters aren't worth 10 million quid with free access to covent garden penthouses amongst other freebies like arsenal corporate boxes, taylor swift tickets and designer clothes.

Not of envy going on there Jonny?

Or are you simply demonstrating that you really have no idea how much a £5 million bung is?

26 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Not of envy going on there Jonny?

Or are you simply demonstrating that you really have no idea how much a £5 million bung is?

Secret as well until he was caught and he's running scared now. He has to deliver on his bung(s) it won't be the only one.

7 hours ago, scubascuba3 said:

More dirt on the lefties. He needs money for security because of the rabid lefties

No such thing as lefties in the U.K. now, all centralist, you obviously don’t live in the U.K., watch GB News and read the Daily Mail/Express/Telegraph etc.

2 hours ago, josephbloggs said:

I am of the same opinion as this guy:

https://www.instagram.com/reels/DXO5217CNyn/

Winker didn't even shut the gate after himself. Ill mannered savage.

29 minutes ago, Jumbo1968 said:

No such thing as lefties in the U.K. now, all centralist, you obviously don’t live in the U.K., watch GB News and read the Daily Mail/Express/Telegraph etc.

I also read garbage Guardian, if you don't think there are lefties you must be one of the crazies

7 hours ago, klaikangwon said:

No he cannot, because as anti-immigrant man he want to stop skilled English speakers entering at Brighton beach, and UK will become low skill economy. But, Bitcoin price will increase...

Thought they were landing at Dover not Brighton ?

Brighton is "Eagle's Nest" of Greeen Party, so natural that Brighton becomes new Landing Beach...

Never heare'd of that and i live in the UK. If you have evidence of Rubber boats landing on Brigton Beach post them or stop making things up.

6 hours ago, klaikangwon said:

Brighton is "Eagle's Nest" of Greeen Party, so natural that Brighton becomes new Landing Beach...

Fear. Fear. Fear.

That’s all you have.

Everything is about poor fu€ers in boats rather than the true criminals ripping you off. You are all blinded by propaganda that tells you that a guy or girl fleeing persecution is the reason you’re unsuccessful, unfulfilled and basically a sad motherfu€ker

And it’s never your fault.

But here’s the thing. It IS your fault. Your own inadequacy is why you think this way. You believe that your issues are because of others. That you’re not successful, productive and an active member of society because of a brown person. So then You find refuge in the idea of someone being “lesser” to you. Somehow they’ve got a nefarious agenda to topple you from your pathetic perch rather than the reality that they’re actually just trying to survive. Like all of us.

It’s not them. It’s you.

You and you ilk are all pathetic.

6 hours ago, BarraMarra said:

Never heare'd of that and i live in the UK. If you have evidence of Rubber boats landing on Brigton Beach post them or stop making things up.

Probably saw part of this video, and thought it was real.

Well any Evidence yet from you Klaikangwan ??

23 hours ago, BarraMarra said:

Don't forget the Free Suits and desighner gear for his missus Johnny all paid for by the British Tax Payer.

you kidding?? he has a missus?? and I thought the guy played on/with the "mans" team LOL

Just a feeling in my bones but this Klaikangwan isn't who he is supposed to be. Feel we have heared and seen this trolling before.