For those struggling with genocide issues' and what comes next open your eyes🤔

50 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

Lol. History not your forte, is it? Canaanites, Natufians, Philistines all predated the Jews and were there before them.

You're clueless.

Modern Jews aren't claiming to descend only from one ancient tribe, either.

Genetic and archaeological evidence shows substantial continuity between ancient Levantine populations, including the Canaanites, and later groups such as the Israelites.

If you're going to lecture people about history, at least get the timeline right.

47 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

That's rather debatable if you look at the Proms or an England football match. Britain just doesn't have the means anymore. But the response to the Falklands nonsense by Argentina seems to suggest that the British empire mentality is alive and kicking. Britain is still occupying the Falklands, which it defended with violence in the 80s, Gibraltar, and many, many other territories around the world are still occupied by Britain. If it had the means, Britain would no doubt be as violent as it was not so long ago. It just can't be.

Here we go,

It's coming out now, a British hater, go away silly man.

Get yourself in the fresh air, I bet your fingers are hurting in such a desperate attempt to get to the keyboard with your silly answers.

1 hour ago, Cameroni said:

You hardly need brainwashing when you can see you live in a land stolen by an occupying, vicious, criminal army, the IDF, that treats you like an Apartheid class. Yes, their minds are poisoned against Israel, but because of the actions of Israel and Israelis. Israel reaped what it sowed. If I were a Palestinian kid, which thankfully I'm not, I too would be carrying a gun looking for Israelis. The Israelis stole their land. They started it.

Get back to cuckooland, you can't debate, you're not intelligent enough.

Bye, bye.

4 minutes ago, sammieuk1 said:

For those struggling with genocide issues' and what comes next open your eyes🤔

"Israel deliberately targets innocent hungry kids waiting for food in a breadline "

57 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

Lol. History not your forte, is it? Canaanites, Natufians, Philistines all predated the Jews and were there before them.

You're clueless.

The Philistines don't support your argument.

They arrived in the southern Levant around the 12th century BC, probably from the Aegean, at roughly the same time the Israelites were emerging.

They certainly weren't an indigenous population that "predated the Jews" in the way you're implying.

😂OK Mr clueless! 😂

Off you pop now, go have a lie down after taking your meds!

Edited July 30Jul 30 by Scouse123

To the leftist idiots on here defending those ' poor kids in Gaza ' you silly people.

There's your pathetic argument blown right out of the water.

We told you, they are brainwashed and brought up to be terrorists!

Edited July 30Jul 30 by Scouse123

18 minutes ago, sammieuk1 said:

For those struggling with genocide issues' and what comes next open your eyes🤔

What an inspirational sight those armed Palestinians are.

These people will never be exterminated by the Israelis.

9 minutes ago, DaddyWarbucks said:

What an inspirational sight those armed Palestinians are.

These people will never be exterminated by the Israelis.

Like...........you see those buildings in the background, well, that rubble that used to be buildings in the back ground?

Guns arent a match for bombs

9 minutes ago, DaddyWarbucks said:

What an inspirational sight those armed Palestinians are.

These people will never be exterminated by the Israelis.

Sure they would love you to go there and tell them that in person .. but beware there is at least one tall building left standing in the background 🤔

1 hour ago, Cameroni said:

That's rather debatable if you look at the Proms or an England football match. Britain just doesn't have the means anymore. But the response to the Falklands nonsense by Argentina seems to suggest that the British empire mentality is alive and kicking. Britain is still occupying the Falklands, which it defended with violence in the 80s, Gibraltar, and many, many other territories around the world are still occupied by Britain. If it had the means, Britain would no doubt be as violent as it was not so long ago. It just can't be.

I read your posts like I'm singing along to Billy Joels "We didn't start the fire "

Just waiting for Belgium's in the Congo bit

6 hours ago, MeRakThai said:

israel having at least 170 nuclear bombs and a "soloman" mandate

I believe it's called the Sampson option.

3 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

The British Empire mentality is no longer the mentality of British people today .

There is violence in many Muslims Countries around the World in the present day .

British Empire is a previous generation , Muslims violence is the current generation

And the 600,000 civilians killed in Iraq was not American violence? How about over 2 million civilians killed in Vietnam, that was also not American violence?

3 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

We were talking about whether war crimes were committed , the above is a different ruling .

The above doesn't show Israel committed war crimes .

Israel didn't get found to be guilty in that trial .

You are mixing up two different Court cases

I am afraid you are misinformed. Proceedings are still ongoing.

International courts have taken monumental actions regarding alleged war crimes by Israel, operating through two separate international tribunals in The Hague.

The International Criminal Court (ICC) issued formal arrest warrants for top leaders, while the International Court of Justice (ICJ) is currently trying a case regarding allegations of genocide.

Pre-Trial Chamber I officially ruled that there are "reasonable grounds to believe" that war crimes and crimes against humanity were committed.

The ICC issued arrest warrants for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant.

The court cited criminal responsibility for the war crimes of using starvation as a method of warfare and intentionally directing attacks against a civilian population. It also included crimes against humanity such as murder and persecution.

Current Status: Because Israel is not a member of the Rome Statute, it rejects the court's jurisdiction. However, all 125 ICC member states are legally obligated to arrest Netanyahu and Gallant if they enter their territories.

On a separate note - The ICJ case.

The Ruling: In the ongoing case brought by South Africa accusing Israel of violating the 1948 Genocide Convention, the ICJ did not issue a final definitive verdict on whether genocide has occurred. However, it ruled that South Africa’s claims that Palestinians face a plausible risk of genocide are valid.

The court issued several binding "provisional measures" ordering Israel to take all actions within its power to prevent acts of genocide, allow unhindered humanitarian aid into Gaza, and halt specific military offensives, such as the one in Rafah.

Current Status: A final, definitive ruling by the ICJ on whether Israel legally breached the Genocide Convention is a lengthy judicial process and is expected to take until roughly 2028.

2 hours ago, Scouse123 said:

It's coming out now, a British hater

I don't hate the British at all. In fact I felt a bit bad for them that they didn't make it to the World Cup final, losing, of all teams, against the criminal Argentinians. Which must have made it even worse. I was of course rooting for England. See, I have the ability to distinguish between who commits acts of criminal barbarism and everyone else. Hence I have no problem to be friends with Brits, American Jews, Spaniards, Frenchmen, Belgians, Thais and Russians. You, however, want to use these acts of barbaric cruelty, which are found in every nation's history, as a reason to fuel hatred of ALL Muslims, no less, which is kind of sick in the head. Pure incitement to hatred, that list of Nigerian and other crimes you published. Really quite despicable.

5 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

I've been listening to your side keep telling me about how Israel's actions in Gaza will create a new generation of terrorists.

About how the youngers now living in Gaza will grow up seeking revenge any way they can .

Maybe. But who gave them that thirst for revenge, HaShoMer to IDF.

3 hours ago, Scouse123 said:

To the leftist idiots on here defending those ' poor kids in Gaza ' you silly people.

There's your pathetic argument blown right out of the water.

We told you, they are brainwashed and brought up to be terrorists!

We told you! Israeli kids are brainwashed from birth to become good little soldiers and kill Arabs. Without you, Israel would be destroyed by Muslim hordes. You silly genocide supporter.

3 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

Like...........you see those buildings in the background, well, that rubble that used to be buildings in the back ground?

Guns arent a match for bombs

And bombing house into rubble is a good thing, Nick?

2 hours ago, johng said:

I believe it's called the Sampson option.

Solomon. Samson. Sheesh!

5 hours ago, Scouse123 said:

Jewish land, always has been.

And Palestinian land. Always has been. Can't two peoples inhabit the same space peacefully?

55 minutes ago, unblocktheplanet said:

And Palestinian land. Always has been. Can't two peoples inhabit the same space peacefully?

The Israelis offered to on many occasions, it was Yassar Arafat that turned it down.

Anyway, I ain't commenting on it any further, no point getting worked up, it won't change anything.

1 hour ago, unblocktheplanet said:

We told you! Israeli kids are brainwashed from birth to become good little soldiers and kill Arabs. Without you, Israel would be destroyed by Muslim hordes. You silly genocide supporter.

No answers to that video, have you really in all honesty?

I am done now and no further commenting from me.

2 hours ago, Cameroni said:

I don't hate the British at all. In fact I felt a bit bad for them that they didn't make it to the World Cup final, losing, of all teams, against the criminal Argentinians. Which must have made it even worse. I was of course rooting for England. See, I have the ability to distinguish between who commits acts of criminal barbarism and everyone else. Hence I have no problem to be friends with Brits, American Jews, Spaniards, Frenchmen, Belgians, Thais and Russians. You, however, want to use these acts of barbaric cruelty, which are found in every nation's history, as a reason to fuel hatred of ALL Muslims, no less, which is kind of sick in the head. Pure incitement to hatred, that list of Nigerian and other crimes you published. Really quite despicable.

Weird calling facts despicable.

But there we have it, each to their own.

Not answering any more of your incoherent rants. I noticed you were quiet regarding your poor little Gaza kids, when you see them armed to the teeth in the videos.

They didn't look so innocent there, did they.

Bye.

Edited July 30Jul 30 by Scouse123

6 hours ago, Cameroni said:

I am afraid you are misinformed. Proceedings are still ongoing.

International courts have taken monumental actions regarding alleged war crimes by Israel, operating through two separate international tribunals in The Hague.

The International Criminal Court (ICC) issued formal arrest warrants for top leaders, while the International Court of Justice (ICJ) is currently trying a case regarding allegations of genocide.

Pre-Trial Chamber I officially ruled that there are "reasonable grounds to believe" that war crimes and crimes against humanity were committed.

The ICC issued arrest warrants for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant.

The court cited criminal responsibility for the war crimes of using starvation as a method of warfare and intentionally directing attacks against a civilian population. It also included crimes against humanity such as murder and persecution.

Current Status: Because Israel is not a member of the Rome Statute, it rejects the court's jurisdiction. However, all 125 ICC member states are legally obligated to arrest Netanyahu and Gallant if they enter their territories.

On a separate note - The ICJ case.

The Ruling: In the ongoing case brought by South Africa accusing Israel of violating the 1948 Genocide Convention, the ICJ did not issue a final definitive verdict on whether genocide has occurred. However, it ruled that South Africa’s claims that Palestinians face a plausible risk of genocide are valid.

The court issued several binding "provisional measures" ordering Israel to take all actions within its power to prevent acts of genocide, allow unhindered humanitarian aid into Gaza, and halt specific military offensives, such as the one in Rafah.

Current Status: A final, definitive ruling by the ICJ on whether Israel legally breached the Genocide Convention is a lengthy judicial process and is expected to take until roughly 2028.

I am not misinformed at all .

What I said was completely correct .

Israel wasn't found to be guilty of war crimes at the recent trial

5 hours ago, unblocktheplanet said:

And bombing house into rubble is a good thing, Nick?

To kill hostile people with guns, guns they want to kill you with yes it is

1 minute ago, Nick Carter icp said:

I am not misinformed at all .

What I said was completely correct .

Israel wasn't found to be guilty of war crimes at the recent trial

There has never been an actual criminal trial of Israel for war crimes by an international tribunal, though active legal proceedings and investigations exist at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and the International Criminal Court (ICC).

The ⁠International Court of Justice (ICJ) handles disputes between states rather than individual criminal trials. It is currently adjudicating a landmark case brought by South Africa (South Africa v. Israel).

The case is still in its preliminary, written pleading stages. The ICJ extended deadlines for legal submissions, granting Israel until March 2026 to file its Counter-Memorial, followed by a deadline of November 2027 for South Africa to file its reply. A final judgment on the merits of the case is not expected until 2028 or later.

Edited July 30Jul 30 by Cameroni

7 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

How about over 2 million civilians killed in Vietnam, that was also not American violence?

Although the USA ws involved, the war was between North Vietnam and South Vietnam

5 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

There has never been an actual criminal trial of Israel for war crimes by an international tribunal, though active legal proceedings and investigations exist at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and the International Criminal Court (ICC).

The ⁠International Court of Justice (ICJ) handles disputes between states rather than individual criminal trials. It is currently adjudicating a landmark case brought by South Africa (South Africa v. Israel).

The case is still in its preliminary, written pleading stages. The ICJ extended deadlines for legal submissions, granting Israel until March 2026 to file its Counter-Memorial, followed by a deadline of November 2027 for South Africa to file its reply. A final judgment on the merits of the case is not expected until 2028 or later.

Yes, Israel hasn't been found guilty of war crimes in an Intenational Court

6 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

Although the USA ws involved, the war was between North Vietnam and South Vietnam

It was a decolonization war and a Cold War proxy war.

8 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

Although the USA ws involved, the war was between North Vietnam and South Vietnam

"Involved", you say? Who knew?