17 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

You said he's Jewish.

How can he be Jewish if he was born in Manchester? Surely he's English now. He's even got an English name, Dave Paulden...

If the English football team are all English, why isn't your mate the tit whisperer, Dave Paulden?

As you keep reminding everyone, Jews even briefly lived in England for a few years centuries ago. Remember? 😄

Jonny demonstrates his ignorance again.

There is nothing about being born in Manchester that excludes Polansk being Jewish, nor being born anywhere in else in England for that matter.

The reason you struggle with that fact is rooted in your own racist ethno-purity criteria.

4 hours ago, Wingate said:

Best you leave lovely and accomplished women to men who both appreciate women and are capable of pleasing them in relationships in and out of bed.

Muslim men don't appreciate women more than you but they are more attractive to them than you are for that reason

And thay doesn't mean they are more physically attractive or wealthier, just more masculine because your entire post was very feminine. Which is the essence of social justice warriors and why it has failed men like you

12 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

Keep their faces covered because if anybody saw their faces they would go absolutely wild with sexual urges and they just might not be able to control themselves.

Don't let them drive because who knows what kind of trouble they could get into if they were allowed to go somewhere on their own.

And always make sure they walk at least five feet behind you rather than beside you.

Deeply spiritual stuff for sure.

Having lived in a fundamentalist Muslim city for a couple of years living with terrorist threats regularly, having several friends/co-workers shot at a stop light right behind me and my wife, and seeing how they treat women is hard to believe that any thinking person would agree that all women should be treated as slaves is ridiculous IMHO. When I first arrived there, driving from the airport late evening, going by numerous coffee houses, at first wondered what the strange scenes were then recalled yeah not one female at the coffee houses but lots of men hanging all over each other no exaggeration either.

2 hours ago, Smokey and the Bandit said:

Could you elucidate a tad?

Muslims across dozens of countries, cultures, and levels of religiosity. Treatment of women varies enormously.

Was there anything in particular you were referring to?

Just the no rights and no freedom bit of their culture. If you give them an inch they will take a mile. And that's what has happened. It's a woman's world now. This chaos you see has a lot to do with that. Women wanted this and now they are getting it. Not sure if its what they really wanted

Don't want men getting excited by seeing her hair.

Edited August 5Aug 5 by emptypockets

3 hours ago, JonnyF said:

Unfortunately, western Liberal women suffering from toxic empathy are finding out about the dangers of befriending/dating Muslim men.

Jamey Carney is a recent example.

It seems that the bizarre alliance between Liberal progressives and conservative Muslims is starting to unravel. Which is a shame.

Progressives have made it difficult to even discuss the controversy.

2 minutes ago, riclag said:

Progressives have made it difficult to even discuss the controversy.

Progressives haven’t robbed you of the ability to construct a coherent argument that is not rooted in ignorance.

The way a man thinks of women reveals a lot about his socio economic class, like common laborers or truck drivers. Lower class guys tend to think guys should lord over females. They are unable to accept women might be smart, skilled and successful, perhaps because their experience has been other “trailer park” types, or else first cousins or sisters. Most likely these men are insecure and know deep down they cannot compete fairly with women. Rather they require the anachronism of “male privilege”.

 

Men from higher socio economic levels of society have seen the skills and talents women bring to the table and do not view females as manipulative money grubbers better kept barefoot and pregnant. The higher up a man’s socio economic standing is, the more he tends to respect women and treat them as the equals they are. The women in his social class seek a man for a loving relationship, not for money. She earns her own. She wants a man who is her intellectual and economic equal, and who gives her the respect she deserves.

 

It’s clear from this thread who the lower class unaccomplished males are.

3 minutes ago, Wingate said:

The way a man thinks of women reveals a lot about his socio economic class, like common laborers or truck drivers. Lower class guys tend to think guys should lord over females. They are unable to accept women might be smart, skilled and successful, perhaps because their experience has been other “trailer park” types, or else first cousins or sisters. Most likely these men are insecure and know deep down they cannot compete fairly with women. Rather they require the anachronism of “male privilege”.

 

Men from higher socio economic levels of society have seen the skills and talents women bring to the table and do not view females as manipulative money grubbers better kept barefoot and pregnant. The higher up a man’s socio economic standing is, the more he tends to respect women and treat them as the equals they are. The women in his social class seek a man for a loving relationship, not for money. She earns her own. She wants a man who is her intellectual and economic equal, and who gives her the respect she deserves.

 

It’s clear from this thread who the lower class unaccomplished males are.

7 minutes ago, Wingate said:

The way a man thinks of women reveals a lot about his socio economic class, like common laborers or truck drivers. Lower class guys tend to think guys should lord over females. They are unable to accept women might be smart, skilled and successful, perhaps because their experience has been other “trailer park” types, or else first cousins or sisters. Most likely these men are insecure and know deep down they cannot compete fairly with women. Rather they require the anachronism of “male privilege”.

 

Men from higher socio economic levels of society have seen the skills and talents women bring to the table and do not view females as manipulative money grubbers better kept barefoot and pregnant. The higher up a man’s socio economic standing is, the more he tends to respect women and treat them as the equals they are. The women in his social class seek a man for a loving relationship, not for money. She earns her own. She wants a man who is her intellectual and economic equal, and who gives her the respect she deserves.

 

It’s clear from this thread who the lower class unaccomplished males are.

Thanks for your contribution and further reinforcing my point about the one thing muslims do right

49 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Jonny demonstrates his ignorance again.

There is nothing about being born in Manchester that excludes Polansk being Jewish, nor being born anywhere in else in England for that matter.

The reason you struggle with that fact is rooted in your own racist ethno-purity criteria.

But @RayC said if you are born in England you are ethnically English. All the black English football players are ethnically English.

Yet Dave Paulden is still Jewish. How so?

Are "Jews" excluded from this inclusive ethnicity swapping? Seems kinda racist, Higgot.

25 minutes ago, riclag said:

Progressives have made it difficult to even discuss the controversy.

Anything that exposes their cognitive dissonance is "hate Speech". 😄

16 minutes ago, Wingate said:

Men from higher socio economic levels of society have seen the skills and talents women bring to the table and do not view females as manipulative money grubbers better kept barefoot and pregnant. The higher up a man’s socio economic standing is, the more he tends to respect women and treat them as the equals they are.

Makes sense. Good point, well made.

That must be why Epstein, Weinstein, Al Fayed, Cosby, Toback etc. respected women so much.

Those dirty, uncouth, working class, neanderthal men you despise could never be so respectful. 😄

Why not complain about Amish women and their choice of dress?

When Westerners complain about "women's rights" regarding conservative dress, the will almost always point to Iran and scream - "SEE! EVIL IRANIANS." Yet Saudi Arabia is much worse, but because the KSA is a "US ally" and "American's friend," Americans are blind to the forced dress codes for women in Saudi Arabia - AND - they fail to realize that Iran has loosened up their conservative dress codes as Gen Z Persian women come of age and push back.

Just now, connda said:

Why not complain about Amish women and their choice of dress?

When Westerners complain about "women's rights" regarding conservative dress, the will almost always point to Iran and scream - "SEE! EVIL IRANIANS." Yet Saudi Arabia is much worse, but because the KSA is a "US ally" and "American's friend," Americans are blind to the forced dress codes for women in Saudi Arabia - AND - they fail to realize that Iran has loosened up their conservative dress codes as Gen Z Persian women come of age and push back.

Dress code for women visitors to the KSA: https://arabiandiaries.com/a-guide-to-the-saudi-arabia-dress-code-for-female-tourists/#What_is_the_Saudi_Arabia_Dress_Code

1 hour ago, emptypockets said:

Don't want men getting excited by seeing her hair.

Hilarious AI pic.

16 hours ago, harvardgrad said:

The way they treat women is on point. Prove me wrong

Roti

Massaman

24 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Makes sense. Good point, well made.

That must be why Epstein, Weinstein, Al Fayed, Cosby, Toback etc. respected women so much.

Those dirty, uncouth, working class, neanderthal men you despise could never be so respectful. 😄

Jack the Ripper was a member of the Brit big wig family.

24 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Makes sense. Good point, well made.

That must be why Epstein, Weinstein, Al Fayed, Cosby, Toback etc. respected women so much.

Those dirty, uncouth, working class, neanderthal men you despise could never be so respectful. 😄

What he said was true, although he left out the other side. The higher up a man gets in power and money, the more likely they think they can do whatever they want and get away with it.

12 hours ago, harvardgrad said:

You're thinking about samurai i think with the swords.

No. A saif, but you wouldn’t know this due to the simplicity of ignorance

12 hours ago, harvardgrad said:

Japanese men could also learn from the way muslims handle women.

Japanese have no interest in any of the debased abjects of the despicable filth way Arabs treat women.

12 hours ago, harvardgrad said:

Their population issue would be solved without even having to bring in immigrants.

The ignorance here is utterly astounding.

12 hours ago, harvardgrad said:

The only muslims living there are the ones selling kebab which the people there are tired of anyway

They’re the only ones allowed to live there due to their unusual well behaved manners, yet still, it’s not the kebab that the Japanese population are avoiding, it’s the vendors.

I would like to make complaint about the Amish woman's clothes . So old fashioned and George O,Dowdy

4 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

No. They just execute them, stone them to death, and mock them.

They do it to women as well. They have a knack for disparaging, degrading and physically harming women for simple perceived notions, and by ideological laws do so without recourse.

41 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

But @RayC said if you are born in England you are ethnically English. All the black English football players are ethnically English.

Yet Dave Paulden is still Jewish. How so?

Are "Jews" excluded from this inclusive ethnicity swapping? Seems kinda racist, Higgot.

I hate to break it to you Jonny, but two things can be true at the same time.

2 hours ago, JonnyF said:

I take it you're not a huge advocate of freedom of speech? 😄

"I don't agree with that, I will label it as hate speech and shut it down immediately".

Let me guess... White guy for Harris?

White guy for civility in discourse. No, you are not free to incite hate and this is not a public forum.

I don’t think burying you up to your shoulders then having rocks thrown at your head until you die (for adultery) would be an enjoyable experience .

44 minutes ago, harvardgrad said:

Thanks for your contribution and further reinforcing my point about the one thing muslims do right

My two previous posts in your silly Incel-ish thread have kind of held up a mirror to weak men like you and those who agree with your misogynistic view of women.

Your failure with women is solely the fault of the guy in your bathroom mirror....and no, I don't mean Lindsey Graham when he stands behind you.

16 hours ago, harvardgrad said:

The way they treat women is on point. Prove me wrong

Western women seem to agree, that is why they keep voting

for parties that invite the muslims in.

Just now, FlorC said:

Western women seem to agree, that is why they keep voting

for parties that invite the muslims in.

Where’s your evidence of any political party ‘inviting Muslims in’ to any western country?

Edited August 5Aug 5 by Chomper Higgot

6 minutes ago, Keeenok Powell said:

I don’t think burying you up to your shoulders then having rocks thrown at your head until you die (for adultery) would be an enjoyable experience .

Ah, so all Muslims countries stone people to death? News to me and the approximately 1.5 billion Muslims who live in countries that don't have any kind of stoning whatsoever.

7 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Where’s your evidence of any political party ‘inviting Muslims in’ to any western country?

If you don't stop them from getting in and give them "benefits" , you are inviting them in.

13 hours ago, Yagoda said:

ok. hang them from cranes. stone them.

you probably support that, you love iran

I think you missed the joke.

At 82, 3 marriages and many relationships later, I've come to the conclusion that if I'd grown up with Sharia law, I'd be richer and happier.