4 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

Ah, so all Muslims countries stone people to death? News to me and the approximately 1.5 billion Muslims who live in countries that don't have any kind of stoning whatsoever.

That’s because their 9 year old wives won’t let them.

1 minute ago, crouchpeter said:

I think you missed the joke.

At 82, 3 marriages and many relationships later, I've come to the conclusion that if I'd grown up with Sharia law, I'd be richer and happier.

Having 4 Wifes all at the same time ?

13 hours ago, harvardgrad said:

You're thinking about samurai i think with the swords. Japanese men could also learn from the way muslims handle women. Their population issue would be solved without even having to bring in immigrants. The only muslims living there are the ones selling kebab which the people there are tired of anyway

And Turkish ice cream.

5 minutes ago, FlorC said:

If you don't stop them from getting in and give them "benefits" , you are inviting them in.

That’s not the definition of an invite.

6 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

Ah, so all Muslims countries stone people to death? News to me and the approximately 1.5 billion Muslims who live in countries that don't have any kind of stoning whatsoever.

The 1.5 Billion Muslims who live in Western Countries ?

2 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

Having 4 Wifes all at the same time ?

Stop! I'm having a panic attack!

However, 4 dogs at the same time seems to make life worth living.

6 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

The 1.5 Billion Muslims who live in Western Countries ?

Nope, I excluded them.

25 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:

White guy for civility in discourse. No, you are not free to incite hate and this is not a public forum.

If you can't handle opposing views perhaps discussion forums are not for you. 😄

Best you jog on...

4 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

It’s not a such a stupid question, as I demonstrate in my previous post above, some here display some some stark similarities.

The Venn diagram of pejoratively assumed Muslim attributes towards women and those of the illiberal rightwing approaches a unitary circle.

What a ridiculous comparison. Like all lefties, your thinking and logic is limited by your parochial and uneducated beliefs.

26 minutes ago, Wingate said:

My two previous posts in your silly Incel-ish thread have kind of held up a mirror to weak men like you and those who agree with your misogynistic view of women.

Your failure with women is solely the fault of the guy in your bathroom mirror....and no, I don't mean Lindsey Graham when he stands behind you.

You are so weak you hide behind a keyboard to insult people. Complete coward.

30 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I hate to break it to you Jonny, but two things can be true at the same time.

Discover more

economic

Online forum software

Thailand travel guides

In other words "Black people can be English, but Jews will always be Jewish"

Take your antisemitism elsewhere, Higgot. We're tired of it.

3 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

If you can't handle opposing views perhaps discussion forums are not for you. 😄

Best you jog on...

Lefties love forums. They can abuse people all year without getting harmed.

16 hours ago, harvardgrad said:

The way they treat women is on point. Prove me wrong

They're also very wary of jews / see through their BS so that's at least 2 things.

PS. Imagine if this subject was about the grabblers instead of Muzzies - would be shut down in 2 seconds.

6 hours ago, Wingate said:

Ooooooh, the misogyny and insecurity runs deep. You poor "little" guy.

So some female---likely one you tried to pay for her pleasures---made fun of the joke the impish, albeit economical Universe played upon you. So now you hate all females for your own "shortcomings". I see you've also attracted a self-claimed disgustingly fat old man who boasts of paying for rural Cambodian girls to service him. PeeWeecocks of a feather, eh?

No wonder you are a Trump supporter. The REAL syndrome is SDS...small (nickname for Richard) syndrome. I suspect one of the reasons Trump has allegedly---including mentions in the Epstein Files---abused young girls is because maybe he thought they would see his enoki mushroom as something other than laughable. I guess that's also why he's envious of Arnold Palmer, and why he hates Jimmy Kimmel (who had Stormy as a guest and presented her with a tray of mushrooms to identify the tiny one most closely resembling Trump).

Anyway, if women scare and intimidate you, because they like real men, you could go full MAGA like Matt Schlapp, the late Lindsey Graham, Speaker Johnson, Josh Hawley, Stephen Miller, Max Miller. Scott Bessent and others. There's plenty of room in that closet. And don't worry about getting thrown off a building. That was only ISIS, and they're gone.

Best you leave lovely and accomplished women to men who both appreciate women and are capable of pleasing them in relationships in and out of bed.

Your criticism of the size of a blokes penis determining his attitude to life is so illogical and insulting, that you're obviously way down the evolutionary and intellectual scale. Try reading a book now and then.

34 minutes ago, Keeenok Powell said:

I don’t think burying you up to your shoulders then having rocks thrown at your head until you die (for adultery) would be an enjoyable experience .

It's not supposed to be enjoyable u donut

2 minutes ago, crouchpeter said:

Your criticism of the size of a blokes penis determining his attitude to life is so illogical and insulting, that you're obviously way down the evolutionary and intellectual scale. Try reading a book now and then.

He is likely a fan of big ones. He perves on dudes in gyms.

2 hours ago, JonnyF said:

You said he's Jewish.

How can he be Jewish if he was born in Manchester? Surely he's English now. He's even got an English name, Dave Paulden...

Jews can say and do what they like (for now) since something allegedly happened on a mass scale over 80 years ago - though the maths don't add up. And all you people on here accusing me of antisemitism are antiseptic yourselves since I believe that the 6 million figure is way to small - it was at least 60 million - and you should all hang your heads in shame for denying that u disgusting nazis.

PS. They change their names to fool whites and blend in. Sontag had a jewy name (Warberg or Moneystien or Grabblerman IIRC) but changed it to 'Sunday' (Sontag) in German. Fooled a LOT of idiots then too.

12 minutes ago, Rockyroad said:

He is likely a fan of big ones. He perves on dudes in gyms.

It's not perving, it's jealousy.

32 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

In other words "Black people can be English, but Jews will always be Jewish"

Take your antisemitism elsewhere, Higgot. We're tired of it.

Jonny once again demonstrates the use of the non sequiteur, and adds a strawman for good measure.

Yor DARVO is expected given your own ethno purity criteria excluding Jews from being English (plays well to the dual loyalty antisemitic trope).

25 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Jonny once again demonstrates the use of the non sequiteur, and adds a strawman for good measure.

Yor DARVO is expected given your own ethno purity criteria excluding Jews from being English (plays well to the dual loyalty antisemitic trope).

You were the one saying Dave Paulden is Jewish (despite being born in Manchester), not me.

Nice try though, Higgot. Unfortunately, you aren't fooling anyone with your "Once a Jew, always a Jew" rhetoric. 😄

We see you.

15 hours ago, josephbloggs said:

Christ, is this another Harris account?

I have a strong feeling you're right. Desperately seeking Susan no more.😆

2 hours ago, connda said:

Why not complain about Amish women and their choice of dress?

When Westerners complain about "women's rights" regarding conservative dress, the will almost always point to Iran and scream - "SEE! EVIL IRANIANS." Yet Saudi Arabia is much worse, but because the KSA is a "US ally" and "American's friend," Americans are blind to the forced dress codes for women in Saudi Arabia - AND - they fail to realize that Iran has loosened up their conservative dress codes as Gen Z Persian women come of age and push back.

I'd definitely include Kuwait in this. Kuwait is arguably more conservative than KSA. I used to have work in Kuwait.

15 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

Keep their faces covered because if anybody saw their faces they would go absolutely wild with sexual urges and they just might not be able to control themselves.

Don't let them drive because who knows what kind of trouble they could get into if they were allowed to go somewhere on their own.

And always make sure they walk at least five feet behind you rather than beside you.

Deeply spiritual stuff for sure.

They put their women in black tents....in Saudi......where it regularly reaches 50 C.

12 hours ago, harvardgrad said:

I'd prefer to live in Israel than anywhere in the middle east or Europe regardless and if you have white skin you'd be smart to as well if had no other choice. You might not have another choice between israel and US in the future if you can see things like I do

That's if you aren't old already

You prefer to live in Israel???

With every post your claim that you are a Saudi Arabian becomes more and more ridiculous.🤣

19 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

You were the one saying Dave Paulden is Jewish (despite being born in Manchester), not me.

Nice try though, Higgot. Unfortunately, you aren't fooling anyone with your "Once a Jew, always a Jew" rhetoric. 😄

We see you.

Yes Jonny, people born to Jewish parents are Jewish wherever they are born.

There is no contradiction between being Jewish, English or indeed a Mancunian.

It doesn’t fit with your racist ethno-purity test but that’s a problem relating to your racism.

Zack Polanski is Jewish, English, British and a Mancunian all at the same time.

Antisemites and other racists struggle with that, but then they struggle with a lot of stuff that requires thought.

Abuse toward others will not be tolerated.

Content and Poster removed

4 hours ago, JonnyF said:

Born in Manchester, Higgot. Therefore, ethnically English. As English as I am. Don't believe me? ask @RayC 😄

Sorry, Jonny. I have to disappoint you and disagree once again.

As I have repeatedly said, probably only a handful, if any, of living Englishmen are 100% ethnically English. The Jewish people originated in the southern Levant of the ancient Middle East so Mr.Polanski, a Jew, is not ethnically English.

8 minutes ago, Tourist2 said:

deleted

Those ill educated third Worlders are no match for your intellect and wisdom .

Your eloquent and articulate posts show just how superior you are

Edited August 5Aug 5 by Nick Carter icp

1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

If you can't handle opposing views perhaps discussion forums are not for you. 😄

Best you jog on...

I handle opposing views just fine, but ignorant ones are not worth my time.

3 hours ago, JonnyF said:

But @RayC said if you are born in England you are ethnically English. All the black English football players are ethnically English.

Yet Dave Paulden is still Jewish. How so?

Are "Jews" excluded from this inclusive ethnicity swapping? Seems kinda racist, Higgot.

Jonny, you introduced this concept of 'ethnic English' in a futile attempt to justify your own racism.

I did NOT say that if you are born in England you are ethnically English. What I said was to be ethnically English, an individual would have to trace their bloodlines exclusively back to the indigenous tribes of England. Black English players cannot do that, therefore, they are NOT ethnically English.

However, given that England has been invaded by Saxons, Romans, Vikings and Normans, and that immigrants have been arriving constantly in England for centuries, it is extremely unlikely that any of the white English players can trace their bloodlines exclusively back to the indigenous tribes, therefore they are NOT ethnically English either.

All of the current England squad - black and white - are English by birth (expect for Guehi who is English by naturalisation). They are all English no matter how hard you try to wish otherwise.

Again, as I have stated previously, 'Ethnic English' when applied to Englishmen who are alive today is little more than a theoretical concept unless you try - as you have done - to redefine 'Ethnic English' to include immigrant groups such as Romans and Normans. Unfortunately for you, this begs the question if these white immigrant groups are 'Ethnically English', why can't black immigrant groups also be considered 'Ethnically English'?

Hope that this helps and that you now understand.

No need to apologise for your error and misrepresentation of my position.