-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Topics
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
Latest posts...
-
0
Crime Villagers File DSI Complaint Over Funeral Fund Scam Worth 1.4 Billion Baht
Picture courtesy of Matichon More than 100 residents from Maha Sarakham province gathered today at the Department of Special Investigation (DSI) headquarters in Bangkok to file a formal complaint, calling for an investigation into an alleged large-scale fraud involving a funeral welfare association and a local welfare fund. The total estimated losses exceed 1.4 billion baht. The group, led by Mr. Banchart Jansuwan, honorary adviser to the Senate Committee on Legal and Justice Affairs, and legal representative Mr. Siri Ekchote of the Legal Environmental Protection Association (LEPA), submitted the petition to Pol. Lt. Col. Yuthana Praedam, Director-General of the DSI. The letter demands a probe into the actions of the Wapi Pathum District Funeral Welfare Association and the Wapi Pathum Welfare Fund. According to Mr. Banchart, the victims fall into three categories: 1. The deceased: Around 4,800 members who had paid their funeral premiums but whose families never received compensation. 2. Former members: Thousands who stopped payments in August–September 2023 after suspecting mismanagement. In October 2023, the registrar ceased further payouts, disqualifying many. 3. Current members: Over 20,000 who are still contributing monthly but have seen the fund abruptly stop receiving or disbursing money. Many are now seeking refunds, feeling they were misled. Concerns have also been raised about the association’s lack of transparency. In 2022, while claiming to have collected over 200 million baht from its 40,000 members, only 53 million baht was paid out. The destination of the remaining funds remains unknown. The scandal is further complicated by the fund’s heavy promotion, with advertisements posted online and agents visiting funerals to recruit new members. Promised payouts of up to 400,000 baht per death attracted elderly and vulnerable individuals, many of whom were in poor health or of advanced age. Despite this, the association continued to accept applications and monthly fees, 400 baht per fund. Mr. Banchart said the pattern of operation raises concerns about a potential Ponzi-like structure. The association allegedly encouraged relatives of deceased members to recruit new members in order to receive death benefits, further undermining confidence in the scheme. He also questioned the credibility lent by the fund’s leadership, many of whom are retired civil servants, teachers, or former school directors, giving the operation an appearance of legitimacy that misled the public. Calculations suggest that with 45,000 members paying 400 baht monthly, the fund should have seen annual revenues exceeding 400 million baht, totalling into the tens of billions nationwide. Yet many grieving families have received no payment at all. The association and fund reportedly operated from the same office as a cooperative which also accepted savings deposits. Victims were allegedly told they could not withdraw their cooperative savings unless they first resigned from both the funeral association and the welfare fund, causing further complications and discontent. Mr. Siri Ekchote urged the DSI to classify the matter as a special casedue to the complex and potentially nationwide impact. He argued that justice must still prevail and that the case warrants full legal and financial scrutiny. Ms. Maliwan, 54, a member since 2018, said she had placed her hopes on the death benefit to help support her family, only to be left devastated. Despite making regular contributions, she was never informed of problems until the fund was shut down. “I just want justice,” she said, “but the police investigation has gone nowhere, and the prosecutor claimed the case was too weak. That’s why we’re here today.” The DSI has acknowledged receipt of the complaint and supporting evidence. A decision is expected soon on whether the case will be accepted as a special investigation. Adapted by Asean Now from Matichon 2025-05-30. -
7
Community Chinese Man Rescued from Pattaya Rooftop Water Tank
So what's this water tank used for? To generate pressure in everyone's taps? I sure hope he didn't urinate in it. If so another reason you shouldn't drink tap water in Thailand, -
84
Things that annoy you in Thailand
I'm a foreigner, and in a foreign land where we are the minority, and sometimes looked at with hate and prejudice, we should stick together. You can see all the thumbs down you get when you say things like that, as it isn't only me. There's enough prejudice in the world, and putting down others because of their nationality, race or creed only makes it worse. And it's mainly foreigners against foreigners. -
1
Community Teacher Beats 7-Year-Old with Metal Ruler, Says “Let Her Die” , Mother Files Police Report
Sadistic bullies should not be in the teaching profession...... -
7
Community Chinese Man Rescued from Pattaya Rooftop Water Tank
Now being in danger of having to remove my own posts for being off topic. In Thailand, a “High-Rise Building” is defined under the Ministerial Regulation No. 33 (B.E. 2535 / 1992) issued under the Building Control Act B.E. 2522 (1979). Definition: A High-Rise Building is defined as: “A building which is used or intended to be used for human occupancy, and has a height of 23.00 meters or more, measured from the ground level to the highest floor of the building.” This definition excludes: Certain parts of buildings such as roofs, parapets, or decorative tops that do not contain usable floors. Reference: Ministerial Regulation No. 33 (B.E. 2535) Issued under the Building Control Act B.E. 2522 Thai: “กฎกระทรวง ฉบับที่ 33 (พ.ศ. 2535) ออกตามความในพระราชบัญญัติควบคุมอาคาร พ.ศ. 2522” Published in the Royal Gazette in 1992. The height is crucial, same as the UK building regulations, as it for determines which safety and design regulations apply, such as additional fire safety, evacuation, structural, and inspection requirements compared to low-rise buildings. Not sure if Pattaya has any other local regulations, which are different.- 1
-
-
84
-
-
Popular in The Pub
-
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now