No we dont. Obviously, you think that poverty and breeding are not related.
Another hundred million from everyone else should cover the shortfall. Although half will still be wasted. Charity dude drives a Mercedes, poor people eat a bag of millet.
Oh yes wasn't that Adam Ant? I think I slept through the 70s
https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftse1.mm.bing.net%2Fth%2Fid%2FOIP.PGQJRVwAf8PNGaczkhE3_gHaJq%3Fpid%3DApi&f=1&ipt=ce607f320298cd47e3bea59df6d5cf57df924431bbecdb15500d09062b32fdab&ipo=images
"Trump’s Foreign Aid Cuts Could Result in Millions of Preventable Deaths"
What this statement is in effect saying is that United States aid had hitherto (and despite its corruption and "politicisation") been saving millions of preventable deaths.
The onus to do this should not be on one single country but on all countries able to contribute, whether through funding or directly-applied services.
There should be an international organisation to oversee and organise this, with oversight by all nations that contribute and receive aid. With a view to eliminating corruption and the furtherance of foreign policies through 'colour revolutions'.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now