At the risk of over-simplifying your post, I agree that Brexit was a vote against the EU. And therein lies the problem, Brexit was not a 'positive' vote in favour of anything other than, perhaps, a naive belief that the UK would regain full sovereignty over its policies and affairs once it left the EU (something that is only possible imo if you live in a closed, planned economy). To lay the blame for Brexit's failure at the feet of "pro-EU politicians and civil servants" is disingenuous. Notwithstanding the fact that the shape - let alone the detail - of any Brexit deal was unknown in June 2016, I am still unclear what policies could have been/be enacted to ensure Brexit's success. You suggest that "a Singapore-on-Thames (lite) approach" would have reaped rewards but wrt financial services this is effectively what has happened since Brexit. In itself this was not the result of proactive policy making but a reaction to the loss of 'passporting rights', etc which has meant that the EU and UK have moved further away from each other in terms of regulation: The fact that the City of London has, to date, managed to survive Brexit might, I suppose, be seen as some sort of success.
Create an account or sign in to comment