Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

A quick question to the mods, why is it ok to use the emoticon

:jerk:

to describe a poster but if you make a personal remark your post is deleted?

Not looking to get banned or anything just a reasonable question. :wai:

Posted

I never noticed that one, :unsure:

Really. It's surely the best one out there. Hit 'Show All' and its around a dozen from the bottom... thusly: :jerk: :jerk: :jerk: :jerk: :jerk: :jerk:

Posted

Don't worry. I'm sure Jingthing can fix it. Just make sure to point out that yellow symbols are just as offensive as red and green ones.;-)

Nope. Not related in the least.

Next ...

Posted

Haha just joking with you. I read the thread were you specificly wrote that you had nothing to do with it.

My main objection to the red/green game was the TALLYING of them to specific people/posters, rather than keeping it at the post level only, about the post content only, going no further than that.

Posted

Haha just joking with you. I read the thread were you specificly wrote that you had nothing to do with it.

My main objection to the red/green game was the TALLYING of them to specific people/posters, rather than keeping it at the post level only, about the post content only, going no further than that.

I think its a shame they have gone was kinda fun and lets face it TV is not that much fun these days

DK

Posted (edited)

Haha just joking with you. I read the thread were you specificly wrote that you had nothing to do with it.

My main objection to the red/green game was the TALLYING of them to specific people/posters, rather than keeping it at the post level only, about the post content only, going no further than that.

If that was the case Jing why did you write this on your opening post on the poll about the reputation feature?

"Personally, the reputation thing is a nasty distraction for me. Yes, I do use it, but I would much prefer the OPTION to be able to TURN IT OFF so that I couldn't give or get reds or greens, and my reputation would be stuck eternally at ZERO"

Edited by 473geo
Posted

Haha just joking with you. I read the thread were you specificly wrote that you had nothing to do with it.

My main objection to the red/green game was the TALLYING of them to specific people/posters, rather than keeping it at the post level only, about the post content only, going no further than that.

If that was the case Jing why did you write this on your poening post on the poll about the reputation feature?

"Personally, the reputation thing is a nasty distraction for me. Yes, I do use it, but I would much prefer the OPTION to be able to TURN IT OFF so that I couldn't give or get reds or greens, and my reputation would be stuck eternally at ZERO"

I see no contradiction at all and not only that I addressed that before, more than once, so leave it be. BTW, stop beating a DEAD HORSE.

Posted

Haha just joking with you. I read the thread were you specificly wrote that you had nothing to do with it.

My main objection to the red/green game was the TALLYING of them to specific people/posters, rather than keeping it at the post level only, about the post content only, going no further than that.

If that was the case Jing why did you write this on your poening post on the poll about the reputation feature?

"Personally, the reputation thing is a nasty distraction for me. Yes, I do use it, but I would much prefer the OPTION to be able to TURN IT OFF so that I couldn't give or get reds or greens, and my reputation would be stuck eternally at ZERO"

I see no contradiction at all and not only that I addressed that before, more than once, so leave it be. BTW, stop beating a DEAD HORSE.

You can't see the difference between TURN IT OFF..... and..... use at post level?

And who said the horse is dead....maybe not in his box.......but could be out in the paddock grazing.......awaiting his call back into the game......:D

Posted

Oh, now I get your point. Sorry. I previously asked for the option for users to turn off the feature only for themselves only, when I thought we were stuck with the feature. Now that the feature is disabled for all, there is always the chance it will be reinstated. In that case, I have been suggesting that the tallying at the user level be kept off, with the reds and greens only to be used to disapprove or approve of specific post content. So no more reputation at all, more like popular or unpopular posts, that's it. I'm done with this now, please don't reply, it's tiresome.

Posted

A certain poster (Thai) who noticed that her reputation was at -53 or so, made a comment in her comments noting that her reputation was sooo bad. Haven't seen her post since then, mind you the mindless posts she did aren't really missed.

Posted (edited)

to the OP:

The correct answer is because moderation at ThaiVisa is arbitrary.

Good lord, in a roundabout way i agree with UG.

Edited by nocturn
Posted (edited)
A quick question to the mods, why is it ok to use the emoticon

:jerk:

I've often wondered that myself. I can't type "hel_l", yet an emoticon with erect penis pleasuring it's self to completion, complete with "money shot" is not only allowed, but provided by Thaivisa. Definitely in the Thai spirit of contradictions. Great emoticon tho. :)

Edited by ScubaBuddha

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...