Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Iranian Embassy Issues Statement: Nuclear Programs

Featured Replies

Iranian embassy in Thailand issues statement on nuclear programs

We got this strange news item in our news feed, not sure if I want to post it in the news clippings forum. What's your thoughts?

/George

BANGKOK: -- The Iranian embassy in Thailand issued a statement on Saturday regarding Iran's nuclear programs, to wit:

"The Islamic Republic has fulfilled its commitments under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and compliance with its rules and regulations have been verified over the past two years through its cooperation with International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspectors displaying tolerance in the process in order to build confidence and remove misunderstanding.

"Despite such cooperation, the IAEA's Governing Board issued an unfair resolution against Iran's nuclear programs on September 25 due to pressure from certain powers," the statement said.

"The Islamic Republic considers it an absolute right to complete the fuel cycle based on NPT regulations. It considers the illegal conditions imposed on it as against the legal interests of all IAEA member states.

"Iran sees the IAEA and its Articles of Association as the only competent authority for safeguarding nuclear activities and believes any dual position on the part of the agency will strengthen nuclear apartheid in this world.

"Iran welcomes any proposal to arrive at a solution and consensus on the nuclear issue as only within the framework of IAEA rules and regulations and the safeguards regime.

"Insistence on the part of certain countries on sending Iran's nuclear dossier to the UN Security Council will not only be unhelpful in resolving the issue but will also cause no change in Iran's firm stance."

The statement noted the Western states' failure to reach a consensus against Iran in the IAEA Board of Directors' meeting, saying it was an achievement of Iran's active diplomacy and showed that "despite the outcry made by certain states to have the resolution passed there was really no international concern over Iran's nuclear program."

It said Iran welcomes efforts for a resumption of negotiations with various countries, including the three European states, without preconditions and expects the IAEA to move in a direction that would guarantee member states' access to nuclear technology, including Iran's right to pursue its nuclear programs.

--Islamic Republic News Agency 2005-10-08

http://www.irna.ir/en/news/view/menu-236/0...85679140150.htm

Hardly a rattling of sabres, more a rearrangement of the matchboxes.

Most certainly hoping for some considerations in the light of Mohamed ElBaradei's Nobel Peace Prize.

More smoke & mirrors from our I-Rainian friends. :o

Things will reach 'critical mass' (no pun intended) and Israel will step in - and away we go! :D

I feel it's better to keep in the confines of Bedlam as it's not Thai-related. Just a news blurb from the Iranian news agency and likely re-issued by every Iranian embassy in the world... but there's no definitive connection to Thailand itself.

George, This news article seems to me to be consistent with Irans stated position concerning the nuclear fuel cycle and its right to develop that fuel cycle in its entirety to avoid dependence on external supplies.

Chownah

and these articles seem to be consistent with what the west might be up against if they keep ignoring and appeasing unstable islamic republics.

Iran puts radicals in charge of nuclear programme

By Philip Sherwell in Washington

(Filed: 09/10/2005)

Iran's new hardline president has placed his country's nuclear programme under the control of militant commanders of the Revolutionary Guards, the military's most committed wing.

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who has launched a purge of moderates in national and provincial government since his election two months ago, has drafted in fellow radical revolutionaries to top administrative posts - a move that will heighten Western fears over Iran's nuclear ambitions.

  

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

Many of the new power-brokers are veterans of the Revolutionary Guards' Quds (Jerusalem) Force, in which Mr Ahmadinejad held the rank of brigadier general. The unit is linked to a series of international terrorist attacks and the main backer of Hezbollah in Lebanon.

The National Council of Resistance in Iran (NCRI), a leading opposition group that has previously exposed clandestine nuclear sites, gave details of the appointment of high-ranking Quds Force officers to senior positions to The Sunday Telegraph. Other Iranian exiles with contacts inside the country are also tracking the purges.

Most significantly, the country's nuclear programme, which Iran claims is for civilian purposes, is in the hands of hardliners who, like Mr Ahmadinejad, were young radicals at the time of the 1979 Islamic revolution.

American and British intelligence are certain that Teheran is trying to develop atomic weapons. "This is not like the pre-war debate about whether Iraq was working on weapons of mass destruction," an American intelligence official said. "Iran has a nuclear weapons programme. There are no doubts."

The disclosures come days after Tony Blair said that explosives used by insurgents to kill British soldiers in Iraq "lead us either to Iranian elements or to Hezbollah", effectively ending a long-running diplomatic effort to woo Iran.

Now we know the truth about Iran, we must act

By Con Coughlin

(Filed: 09/10/2005)

It was not the outcome the Foreign Office had been planning. When it was announced early last week that a senior British diplomat in Baghdad was flying back to London to give a briefing on Iraq's constitutional referendum, the general expectation in Whitehall was that the following day's headlines would focus exclusively on whether sufficient numbers of Iraqis would turn out to validate the exercise.

Imagine the surprise, then, of Jack Straw and his officials the following morning when they opened their newspapers to discover that the future constitutional arrangements for Iraq had been completely superseded by official British confirmation that Iran's Revolutionary Guards were behind the deadly attacks that have recently claimed the lives of eight British soldiers.

For the past two years it has been a Foreign Office mantra that not a word should be uttered that could in any way be construed as criticising the Iranian government. Having voiced his last-minute opposition to the invasion of Iraq, Mr Straw had taken it upon himself to find a "negotiated solution" to the West's stand-off with Teheran over its clandestine nuclear programme as an alternative to military confrontation.

Indeed, when The Sunday Telegraph two weeks ago revealed that agents working for the Revolutionary Guards had linked up with the Iraqi groups responsible for the attacks on British troops, the Foreign Office continued to insist that there was no firm evidence.

But now the cat is out of the bag.

Not realising the sensitivity that Mr Straw attaches to Britain's dealings with Teheran, the unfortunate diplomat unwittingly strayed from his referendum brief and started laying into the Iranians with a gusto not seen in the British diplomatic service for decades.

The Iranians, said the diplomat, were colluding with Sunni Muslim insurgent groups in southern Iraq. They were providing them with deadly terrorist technology that has been perfected by the Iranian-funded Hizbollah militia in southern Lebanon against the Israeli army.

And their motivation was to deter Britain from insisting that Teheran abandon its controversial nuclear programme. "It would be entirely natural that they would want to send a message 'don't mess with us'. It would not be outside the policy parameters of Teheran."

This is diplomat-speak for, if Britain wants to confront Iran over its nuclear weapons programme, then Iran feels entitled to blow up young British soldiers.

The off-message tone of the unnamed diplomat's comments sent shock-waves through the oak-panelled walls of the Foreign Office. "It was all very amusing," said one official.

"For years diplomats have been under strict instructions not to say anything in public that might upset the Iranians. And then someone gives it to them straight between the eyes."

Perversely, this undiplomatic bout of straight-talking may turn out to have done Mr Straw and the Foreign Office an enormous favour. By baldly stating what the Iranians are really up to in southern Iraq, the diplomat has freed his employers from the obligation of persisting with the charade of constructive engagement with a regime whose only interest in construction appears to be directed at building an atom bomb.

The policy of kowtowing to the Iranians goes back a long way. It started in the late 1980s when Sir Geoffrey Howe, the then foreign secretary, attempted to establish a constructive dialogue with the mullahs in what proved a futile attempt to persuade Teheran to free British hostages in Lebanon. As part of this policy, the British government took the shameful decision to drop its claim that the Iranians had masterminded the Lockerbie bombing that killed 270 people in December 1988, even though British intelligence uncovered significant evidence of Iranian involvement.

Fast forward to 2005, and the British Government continues to play the supplicant while Iran continues to do as it pleases. For the past two years, Mr Straw and his French and German colleagues have argued that the best way to persuade the Iranians to give up their nuclear programme is to pursue a "negotiated solution". As the Foreign Secretary insisted earlier this year, it was "inconceivable" that the US and Britain would take military action against Teheran.

Mr Straw's pacifist tendencies were music to the mullahs' ears, so much so that they expressed their gratitude by breaking the seals at the Isfahan nuclear processing plant and resumed their uranium enrichment programme. This action alone should have convinced the European negotiators to activate their long-standing threat to report Iran to the Security Council for its persistent failure to cooperate with the requirements of the International Atomic Energy Agency, the UN's nuclear watchdog body.

But that was far too confrontational for Foreign Office sensitivities and, at the request of Mohammed ElBaradei, the head of the IAEA, the Europeans gave Iran one last chance to comply. That was in July. Since then, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the new Iranian president, has gone out of his way to humiliate both the Europeans and the IAEA.

When Ahmadinejad addressed the UN general assembly last month, far from offering a compromise on the nuclear issue, he laid into the US and its allies, including Britain, accusing them of sponsoring terrorism.

Mr Straw's response? To reassure the Iranians that the crisis between Iran and the West would "not be resolved by military means, let's be clear about that". And even when the IAEA finally agreed to refer Iran to the security council, the timing and manner of reporting Iran was deliberately left open "to allow room for more negotiation", as one IAEA official explained.

Mr ElBaradei's disinclination to make Iran fulfil its international obligations is, of course, one of the reasons that he has been awarded the Nobel peace prize, a decision that will have the mullahs falling about with laughter in Teheran this weekend. This, after all, was the same ElBaradei who said he had no evidence that Libya was building an atom bomb until Colonel Gaddafi saw the light after the Iraq war and publicly renounced his nuclear weapons programme.

Certainly, the longer the West prevaricates over Iran, the more inclined the Iranians are to think they can get their way by resorting to the tactics of the bully. The Iranians clearly do not share Mr Straw's aversion to military action: the moment we try to call them to account, they kill and maim our soldiers in southern Iraq.

With the help of last week's unscripted remarks by that diplomat, Britain and its European allies should face up to the reality of dealing with modern Iran and accept that their policy of appeasement towards the mullahs now lies in shreds.

   News: Iran puts radicals in charge

thomas merton

Most certainly hoping for some considerations in the light of Mohamed ElBaradei's Nobel Peace Prize.

yeah , right.

hope will get us nowhere against these people.

© Copyright of Telegraph Group Limited 2005

(I-Ran's)...its right to develop that fuel cycle in its entirety to avoid dependence on external supplies. 

Chownah

Unbelieveable...

Bet you still believe in Santa Claus & the Tooth Fairy too. :o

(I-Ran's)...its right to develop that fuel cycle in its entirety to avoid dependence on external supplies. 

Chownah

Unbelieveable...

Bet you still believe in Santa Claus & the Tooth Fairy too. :o

This post makes me believe that you are incapable of understanding written English. You have not made any indication that you have understood my post at all. George posted that the article seemed a bit strange....I was just trying to point out that it wasn't really unusual in that it was the same stuff that Iran has been saying all along.....this news item is consistent with what they have been saying all along and is not out of place relative to what they have been saying. I have made no comment about believing any of it...or liking any of it. I made no indication that I supported anything here. What's your problem...knee jerk of the brain?

(I-Ran's)...its right to develop that fuel cycle in its entirety to avoid dependence on external supplies. 

Chownah

Unbelieveable...

Bet you still believe in Santa Claus & the Tooth Fairy too. :o

What's your problem...knee jerk of the brain?

:D:D:D

The problem is I can't tell when you're 'Chownah' or in your old 'Stroll' mode! :D

iaea.gif

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.