Jump to content

Suthep To Face His Critics At Military-Organised Forum


Lite Beer

Recommended Posts

Suthep To Face His Critics At Military-Organised Forum
13869397581386939884l.jpg

BANGKOK: -- Rival political factions have agreed to meet and exchange their opposing ideas about Thailand′s future at the dialogue panel organised by the Royal Thai Armed Forces.

Mr. Suthep Thaugsuban, leader of the People′s Committee for Absolute Democracy With the King as Head of State (PCAD), has previously demanded that Gen. Thanasak Patimakorn, Chief of Defence Forces, grant him private audience so he can explain his idea of ′People′s Council′ as the solution to Thai political crisis.

The meeting never took place, but Gen. Thanasak′s staff later announced that the military will host an open forum in which many groups and organisations will be invited, including the PCAD. Reports suggest that Gen. Thanasak himself will attend the forum, scheduled to be held tomorrow (14 December).

Other organisations invited to the dialogue panel include the newly appointed Election Committee, the Lawyers Council of Thailand, representatives of the private sector, and the Assembly for Defence of Democracy (AFDD), a group formed by prominent academics opposed to Mr. Suthep′s demands of unelected People′s Council.

The AFDD is led by Thammasat law academic Worachet Pakeerat who has branded Mr. Suthep′s campaign as anti-democratic, and has urged the anti-government protesters to respect the legitimacy of electoral politics by participating in the upcoming election next year.

Tomorrow′s forum would mark the first face-to-face meeting between the leaders of PCAD and AFDD.

The official leadership of the pro-government Redshirts, the United Front of Democracy Against Dictatorship (UDD) has also been invited, but its chairwoman, Ms. Thida Thawornseth, has declined to participate. Nevertheless, she said other UDD leaders are free to attend the forum on their own.

Earlier today, PCAD leaders have insisted their stance in a press conference that their blueprint for Thailand′s "reform" must be implemented by the government before the next general election takes place.

Mr. Suthep argued that Thailand′s current political system is rigged in favour of Ms. Yingluck′s faction, especially her brother former PM Thaksin Shinawatra. His solution is the formation of 400-seat People′s Council which would function as a de facto transitional government of Thailand, amending laws and restructuring the nation to eradicate Mr. Thaksin′s corrupt influence.

300 members of the Council would be selected from different occupations, while other 100 would be delegated to "experts" appointed by the PCAD.

Mr. Suthep said he expected the "reform" would last for 8-14 months. A new election would be allowed to take place only after the "reform" is completed.

He also threatened to escalate his protests if Ms. Yingluck still refuses to resign from her position as a caretaker Prime Minister; Mr. Suthep had envisioned a transitional Prime Minister appointed by His Majesty the King to replace Ms. Yingluck and subsequently form the People′s Council.

"If the Prime Minister stubbornly clings to her position, PCAD will force her out with the power of the Great Mass of the People," Mr. Suthep told reporters, "PCAD will continue the rallies until People′s Council is formed".

In the same press conference, another PCAD leader, Mr. Satit Wongnongtoey, also accused the international media of harbouring bias toward the anti-government movement. He warned that foreign correspondents working in Thailand should be careful not to end up turning themselves into tools of "Thaksin′s Regime".

Meanwhile, Ms. Thida, the chairwoman of the UDD, said Mr. Suthep′s call for Ms. Yingluck to resign would lead to a dangerous "power vacuum".

"The Prime Minster has been tasked with the power from the majority of the people. She cannot abandon this responsibility," Ms. Thida said, "I′d like to ask the Prime Minister and her government to stay until the election date of 2 February 2014."

Source: http://www.khaosod.co.th/en/view_newsonline.php?newsid=TVRNNE5qa3pPVGMxT0E9PQ==&sectionid=TURVd01BPT0=

kse.png
-- Khaosod English 2013-12-13

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

When I look the international press, I must say, it not show the situation here real. The Shin-Clan is a criminal Network and was going to undermining the Constitution for get full power. Normaly they must condemned for high treason. Taksin manipulate the rural people in a manner that should people remember on Hitler. He sow a lot of hate in their heads, look at the red mob, remember 2010.facepalm.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"In the same press conference, another PCAD leader, Mr. Satit Wongnongtoey, also accused the international media of harbouring bias toward the anti-government movement. He warned that foreign correspondents working in Thailand should be careful not to end up turning themselves into tools of "Thaksin′s Regime"."

____________________________

Wow, this is called threatening? I doubt journos are such pussies to get scared by remarks like that.

In fact, if they want to adhere to being objective reporters of facts, they will not want to be seen as siding with the one or the other side, aka "Tools of Taksin (ToT)". Or Tools of Suthep (ToS)? How trustworthy is a text by a journo known to take sides, e.g. Nick Nostiz? Nice for the people, who like him, but unlikely to swing the believe of anybody else.

ThaiVisa is full of complaints about biased reporting by BBC AFP etc, so if Khun Sathit says something in the same way, it is a completely different thing? Gimme a break!

Let's face it, many journos write up some text, maybe not even their own, because they have to deliver home some text. And at the same, they know precious little about the country or the story they are to write about. Today here, tomorrow somewhere else, that comes with the job. It wouldn't be worthwhile a discussion, if not so many people read and believe the stuff that is written, wrong or right in content.

Much more important is, what will come out of the military-sponsored meeting... As it looks, the military is eager to show, that they have not taken sides so far.

Sam M.

Edited by SamMunich
Link to comment
Share on other sites

'Meanwhile, Ms. Thida, the chairwoman of the UDD, said Mr. Suthep′s call for Ms. Yingluck to resign would lead to a dangerous "power vacuum".'

I thought that Yingluck was the "power vacuum"!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes us foreigners! Let's all go home tomorrow! Let's all take our cash out of Thailand! Let no foreigner enter Thailand! <deleted>! You make me laugh! People moaning about farang, farang came, saw, invested and when people see success they want to ship you out! Thailand is a wonderful country, filled with mainly wonderful people. It's a shame a few let the side down with corruption and greed! Start thinking long term you muppets!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An excellent initiative by the generals! They stimulate dialogue and discussion. Let's hope the meeting will be broadcasted live and will not result in shouting oneliners, but in content from the different groups.

Mr. Suthep seems to be wanting to halt democracy for a long while. How does he explain that? Why did ms. Yingluck give a diplomatic passport to her fugitive brother? How does she explain the rice scheme? Many questions can be asked. I hope people will try to answer them.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As much as I dislike PT and all the hairbrain schemes (ohh <deleted> rice pledging), democracy is messy, Ask the Egyptians, clearly they got i wrong and army had to 'correct' their mistake. This is the same pattern in Thailand, happens over and over again. Best thing Mr Crazy Suthep could do, is beat Abbhisit over the head with a piece of 2x4 and get him to actually win once in a while

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can attend Yingluck's Sunday chat which she does not have the care or grace to attend herself. Or attend the military's forum where the real power broker is.

Yingluck can either learn now that she needs to be in attendance at the military forum or wait until later after the dictatorial hand that her criminal brother wishes has been played, to be forced to attend an Army forum to understand how it is going to be.

Her call as to whether that process is implemented now while she has some control of it, or later where the Military has full control. Her thick brained criminal brother should now understand that. But then he does not care for others, only how much power and wealth he and his can grab. Ca cera cera.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, great. Now threatening foreign journalists. Is anyone surprised? Anyone doubting the anti-foreigner sentiments associated with this movement should pay close attention.

Let me speak on behalf of all apologists...

It could happen anywhere. I've lived here for 100 years and I've never witnessed any ant-foreigner sentiments. coffee1.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"In the same press conference, another PCAD leader, Mr. Satit Wongnongtoey, also accused the international media of harbouring bias toward the anti-government movement. He warned that foreign correspondents working in Thailand should be careful not to end up turning themselves into tools of "Thaksin′s Regime"."

____________________________

Wow, this is called threatening? I doubt journos are such pussies to get scared by remarks like that.

In fact, if they want to adhere to being objective reporters of facts, they will not want to be seen as siding with the one or the other side, aka "Tools of Taksin (ToT)". Or Tools of Suthep (ToS)? How trustworthy is a text by a journo known to take sides, e.g. Nick Nostiz? Nice for the people, who like him, but unlikely to swing the believe of anybody else.

ThaiVisa is full of complaints about biased reporting by BBC AFP etc, so if Khun Sathit says something in the same way, it is a completely different thing? Gimme a break!

Let's face it, many journos write up some text, maybe not even their own, because they have to deliver home some text. And at the same, they know precious little about the country or the story they are to write about. Today here, tomorrow somewhere else, that comes with the job. It wouldn't be worthwhile a discussion, if not so many people read and believe the stuff that is written, wrong or right in content.

Much more important is, what will come out of the military-sponsored meeting... As it looks, the military is eager to show, that they have not taken sides so far.

Sam M.

The implied threat is pretty obvious and while I agree that most journalists would not be intimidated by it, it does reflect the anti-foreign bias of this would-be regime. Not a single credible media source is supporting any of their proposals, nor academic, legal, busiiness, trade, tourism groups. Mr Suthep has no credibility, no support, a dubious past, interesting close relatives. Most significantly, Thais are leaving him in droves. No doubt many hate Thaksin, some with good cause. If Suthep is the answer, <deleted> is the question?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that the basis of the Suthep proposal is that he will run Thailand with his committee of "friends" and a members house of four hundred (selected) representatives. This formula is not proffered with good will it is to be implemented by him with threats and menaces if Thailand does not accept his offer.

This has been tried in Thailand 1n the 1950's it is utter insanity, as all dictatorships are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you actually read any of the foreign media ? They are correct that it is bias towards the government, probably because they still see the government as 'legitimate' despite their crimes and they believe the bs propaganda that comes out of the Bureau Of Thaksin Propaganda and don't bother to even try and research whether it is all true or not since what happens here isn't really important to the rest of the world....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I look the international press, I must say, it not show the situation here real. The Shin-Clan is a criminal Network and was going to undermining the Constitution for get full power. Normaly they must condemned for high treason. Taksin manipulate the rural people in a manner that should people remember on Hitler. He sow a lot of hate in their heads, look at the red mob, remember 2010.facepalm.gif

Spirit47, from my study I do realize that the PM Taksin was not without big problems so I do not dismiss Thai concerns along this line. However, in my view, what is currently proposed is anti - democratic and does wrong to Thailand and her people. I was extremely unhappy with having G. Bush in the American White House but my native country is a democracy and the majority of the voters elected Bush (ha! At least the second term election) so I had to wait until he was out of office. Now some of my American friends are extremely unhappy that Obama has been elected to two terms as President. Other western democratic nations have experienced the same. That is the difference in a democracy and other forms of government. I wish the Thai well in their search to see if they want a democracy. Right now, the world is watching and Thailand is losing face. It saddens me greatly.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

PrBKK wrote:


...

Well, it doesn't make me smile to see a country ( one for which we all have affection) paralysed and divided by this guy. Ordinary people are losing their livelihoods as a consequence of these actions, foreign investors losing confidence, tourists cancelling, thugs fighting in the streets. ...

____________________________________________________________________________

To me the remark of Khun Sathit sounds more like somebody frustrated, that when trying to explain things to a foreigner, the foreigner does not really want to listen or even try to understand. I know that feeling from explaning "back home", that I live in Thailand...

And the same I read from PrBKK's comments, when he writes that it makes him NOT smile to read about the current upheaval (?) in Thailand.

Hey, live is not a smooth ride, as much as everybody would like it to be. I wasn't happy, that Thailand was run by a liar and criminal (as we can say now) for several years, but I had to grin and bear it. But try to look at the bright side of what is happening these days. You might (like I did) see some old friends again at the demonstration site, you might make new friends, a business opportunity might arise from such talks, who knows? If you see all in bleak colors, you don't do yourself a favour, mate. Unlike Buddhists, we only live once, so use it, enjoy it. Are you from the USofA or Europe? Then be glad about the good weather here and the better food.

And then, when you feel better again, then take a fresh look at the problems of this country and figure out, how you can help make this place a better one. And just between you and me: Believing a liar is nonsense, the same as taking a 1,000 Baht bill from the person, that steals 2,000 Baht from your wallet.

Now I hope you (all of you) have a nice weekend,

Sam

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Makes me smile every time I see someone calling Suthep an idiot, stupid, as bad or worse than Thaksin or any of the other silly things they say about him.

Consider what he has achieved in the last 45 days.

He has got hundreds of thousands of ordinary Thais from all walks of life out on the streets to vent their previously hidden feelings about the corrupt PT Government.

He has got the Amnesty bill scrapped, a bill that would have exonerated all the red shirt leaders and their boss Thaksin, would have dropped over 25 thousand corruption cases at present under investigation, corruption that has cost the country billions of baht. A bill that would have set a president that corruption can be excused. He did this even though the same bill would have also excused him of any charges against him.

He has got the PT Govt to resign.

He has got every group in the country realalising that there needs to be some sort of reform to clean up politics.

And now he has got these groups talking about it and in most cases coming together to talk about it.

Sure they are not all coming together as yet, but give it time it will happen.

In the mean time there are those who have vested interests in keeping things the same and they are the ones who will eventually have to be pushed out in order for the country to move forward.Who

Who will reform Suthep's government if he is successful at becoming dictator?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.









×
×
  • Create New...
""