Popular Post GentlemanJim Posted January 27, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted January 27, 2014 Quote "He said the actions would be taken by the CMPO and would have nothing to do with the prime minister," adding "I'll take responsibility myself". Unquote I take it Chalerm does not understand how the chain of command works and if this really is nothing to do with the Prime Minister then how is he doing it? The man is a buffoon. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lingba Posted January 27, 2014 Share Posted January 27, 2014 so he's finally realizing that he can't arrest Sutthep in spite of all the yak yak yakking the last few weeks..and instead goes after the pawns just to satisfy his ego...He has to go after someone so it may as well be them...and this will only escalate things... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonclark Posted January 27, 2014 Share Posted January 27, 2014 Assault Units...or Red Shirt assassins? Anti Idiots. Anti Idiots....Chalerm had better be careful these assault units don't come after him !!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackrich Posted January 27, 2014 Share Posted January 27, 2014 so he's finally realizing that he can't arrest Sutthep in spite of all the yak yak yakking the last few weeks..and instead goes after the pawns just to satisfy his ego...He has to go after someone so it may as well be them...and this will only escalate things... You realize that it's not Suthep who is blocking the entire city. He's not that fat. It's his pawns who are blocking it, so obviously if you want to open the city you have to go after them. Makes sense? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scamper Posted January 27, 2014 Share Posted January 27, 2014 " He said the actions would be taken by the CMPO and would have nothing to do with the prime minister," adding "I'll take responsibility myself. " Didn't Nattawut utter those words ? I wonder how that's going ? Why the attempt to free Yingluck from responsibility ? But really - what's with the 72 hours schtick ? Is anyone supposed to be still taking notice of Chalerm's perennial application of the future tense ? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Mosha Posted January 27, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted January 27, 2014 Assault units? So he does want violence. Can't wait till he gets his cold plate of karma served up to him. What a sick, drunken parasite. What do to think would happen if a group of thugs occupied the White House or the Elysee Palace? Do you think other countries would send clowns to join the party and provide entertainment? Nope. Assault teams. And much sooner. They wouldn't wait 3 months. We were asking that in 2010, funny old world isn't it? 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomross46 Posted January 27, 2014 Share Posted January 27, 2014 The dreaded third hand, or the Men in Black. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gemini81 Posted January 27, 2014 Share Posted January 27, 2014 Assault units? So he does want violence. Can't wait till he gets his cold plate of karma served up to him. What a sick, drunken parasite. What do to think would happen if a group of thugs occupied the White House or the Elysee Palace? Do you think other countries would send clowns to join the party and provide entertainment? Nope. Assault teams. And much sooner. They wouldn't wait 3 months. They also have the right to gather and protest. The USA? Ever heard of 1776? Anyway, all of that has nothing to do with this...apples & oranges. If we go by your standards, then thousands of red shirts would theoretically have been eradicated 3 years ago, right? Nice drinking, I mean, thinking, on your part... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thait Spot Posted January 27, 2014 Share Posted January 27, 2014 72 hours too long. It should be 24 hours. Send from my Mobile It's all bluster. It will be all over tomorrow Sent from my Nexus 4 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mentors Posted January 27, 2014 Share Posted January 27, 2014 Maybe for the first time Chalerm will do something useful for this country and stop this whistle fanatics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonneke breda Posted January 27, 2014 Share Posted January 27, 2014 Assault Units...or Red Shirt assassins? Anti Idiots. Not Anti-idiots, but realistic readers... An Anti-idiot is someone who do not understand the word Assault. So special for you some education…... In common law, assault is the act of creating apprehension of an imminent harmful or offensive contact with a person. [1] An assault is carried out by a threat of bodily harm coupled with an apparent, present ability to cause the harm. It is both a crime and a tort and, therefore, may result in either criminal and/or civil liability. Generally, the common law definition is the same in criminal and tort law. There is, however, an additional criminal law category of assault consisting of an attempted but unsuccessful battery. The term is often confused with battery, which involves physical contact. The specific meaning of assault varies between countries, but can refer to an act that causes another to apprehend immediate and personal violence, or in the more limited sense of a threat of violence caused by an immediate show of force.[2][3] Assault in many US jurisdictions[which?] andScotland is defined more broadly still as any intentional physical contact with another person without their consent; but in England and Wales and in most[citation needed] other common law jurisdictions in the world, this is defined instead as battery. Some jurisdictions have incorporated the definition of civil assault into the definition of the crime making it a criminal assault to intentionally cause another person to apprehend a harmful or offensive contact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rijb Posted January 27, 2014 Share Posted January 27, 2014 Maybe he should hire them. Then, we can see how serious they are about getting rid of corruption... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post gemini81 Posted January 27, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted January 27, 2014 so he's finally realizing that he can't arrest Sutthep in spite of all the yak yak yakking the last few weeks..and instead goes after the pawns just to satisfy his ego...He has to go after someone so it may as well be them...and this will only escalate things... You realize that it's not Suthep who is blocking the entire city. He's not that fat. It's his pawns who are blocking it, so obviously if you want to open the city you have to go after them. Makes sense? No, you don't; not whatsoever. Consider sobering up before posting. Pawns? The more educated tend to vote the democratic direction. So red shirts are intellectuals by far and large, and pro democrats with masters or doctorates are probably the pawns? Listen to yourself. Clueless. You arrived yesterday? 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asiantravel Posted January 27, 2014 Share Posted January 27, 2014 Assault units? So he does want violence. Can't wait till he gets his cold plate of karma served up to him. What a sick, drunken parasite. What do to think would happen if a group of thugs occupied the White House or the Elysee Palace? Do you think other countries would send clowns to join the party and provide entertainment? Nope. Assault teams. And much sooner. They wouldn't wait 3 months. its thailand.why do you keep bringing up other countries which have nothing to do with this topic......stay on topic eh.. because the principles of democracy are universal 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
firestar Posted January 27, 2014 Share Posted January 27, 2014 Suthep wants the army to protect a mob breaking the law against potential attacks from voters Maybe Mr S. you should consider this, Sunday in Northearstern Thailand where yellow shirts protested peacefully and PTP has a huge majority there was no incident. Only in the South and Bangkok where yellow flaunted the SOE and besieged polling stations did any violence break out. Shouldn't that tell you something Mr Suthep? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gemini81 Posted January 27, 2014 Share Posted January 27, 2014 Assault Units...or Red Shirt assassins? Anti Idiots. Not Anti-idiots, but realistic readers... An Anti-idiot is someone who do not understand the word Assault. So special for you some education…... In common law, assault is the act of creating apprehension of an imminent harmful or offensive contact with a person. [1] An assault is carried out by a threat of bodily harm coupled with an apparent, present ability to cause the harm. It is both a crime and a tort and, therefore, may result in either criminal and/or civil liability. Generally, the common law definition is the same in criminal and tort law. There is, however, an additional criminal law category of assault consisting of an attempted but unsuccessful battery. The term is often confused with battery, which involves physical contact. The specific meaning of assault varies between countries, but can refer to an act that causes another to apprehend immediate and personal violence, or in the more limited sense of a threat of violence caused by an immediate show of force.[2][3] Assault in many US jurisdictions[which?] andScotland is defined more broadly still as any intentional physical contact with another person without their consent; but in England and Wales and in most[citation needed] other common law jurisdictions in the world, this is defined instead as battery. Some jurisdictions have incorporated the definition of civil assault into the definition of the crime making it a criminal assault to intentionally cause another person to apprehend a harmful or offensive contact. Thanks. Indeed that guy needs to be in the special education program. Or get off the sauce and spend day 3 in Thailand outside Khao San road pubs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lingba Posted January 27, 2014 Share Posted January 27, 2014 so he's finally realizing that he can't arrest Sutthep in spite of all the yak yak yakking the last few weeks..and instead goes after the pawns just to satisfy his ego...He has to go after someone so it may as well be them...and this will only escalate things... You realize that it's not Suthep who is blocking the entire city. He's not that fat. It's his pawns who are blocking it, so obviously if you want to open the city you have to go after them. Makes sense? yeah..but they are doing what he tells them to do...he has all the power and voice to steer the whole ship if he chooses Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thailand Posted January 27, 2014 Share Posted January 27, 2014 "Ukraine state of emergency warning Ukraine's justice minister warns anti-government protesters occupying her ministry that she will call for a state of emergency if they do not leave." Any similarities? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Tywais Posted January 27, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted January 27, 2014 Assault units? So he does want violence. Can't wait till he gets his cold plate of karma served up to him. What a sick, drunken parasite. What do to think would happen if a group of thugs occupied the White House or the Elysee Palace? Do you think other countries would send clowns to join the party and provide entertainment? Nope. Assault teams. And much sooner. They wouldn't wait 3 months. Yes, but the difference is they have effective assault (police) teams that would actually perform their duties. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Artisi Posted January 27, 2014 Share Posted January 27, 2014 Assault units? So he does want violence. Can't wait till he gets his cold plate of karma served up to him. What a sick, drunken parasite. What do to think would happen if a group of thugs occupied the White House or the Elysee Palace? Do you think other countries would send clowns to join the party and provide entertainment? Nope. Assault teams. And much sooner. They wouldn't wait 3 months. What do you think would happen if Barack Obama was tried and convicted of abuse of power and ran overseas from a prison sentence and then managed to get his Sister in his place to get him off of his crimes? If his Sister was democratically elected by the majority of the people, I don't see any problem. His sister hasn't been convicted of anything and you don't have any proof of Thaksin giving any orders to her to run the country. Do you have any evidence you're withholding or is it just an opinion in your head? Now, back to the point ...would the US or France send clowns or an assault team? Think you need to read up on how YL became PM, she certainly wasn't elected by the majority of Thai people. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lingba Posted January 27, 2014 Share Posted January 27, 2014 so he's finally realizing that he can't arrest Sutthep in spite of all the yak yak yakking the last few weeks..and instead goes after the pawns just to satisfy his ego...He has to go after someone so it may as well be them...and this will only escalate things... You realize that it's not Suthep who is blocking the entire city. He's not that fat. It's his pawns who are blocking it, so obviously if you want to open the city you have to go after them. Makes sense? No, you don't; not whatsoever. Consider sobering up before posting. Pawns? The more educated tend to vote the democratic direction. So red shirts are intellectuals by far and large, and pro democrats with masters or doctorates are probably the pawns? Listen to yourself. Clueless. You arrived yesterday? anyone who follows anybody elses balbbering..I don't give a sh_t what color shirt you where..is a pawn...and thats why this world is in the condition its in...mindless idiots who are just as guilty as those they are waving their fingers at...feeding the bored and confused masses with worthless BS...Suttep does it and so does Yingluk...all the "GREAT" leaders do it..with I would say maybe a few exceptions...Don't get fooled by this hogwash...ask yourself who is really benefiting from all this>>>who? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evolare Posted January 27, 2014 Share Posted January 27, 2014 Suthep wants the army to protect a mob breaking the law against potential attacks from voters Maybe Mr S. you should consider this, Sunday in Northearstern Thailand where yellow shirts protested peacefully and PTP has a huge majority there was no incident. Only in the South and Bangkok where yellow flaunted the SOE and besieged polling stations did any violence break out. Shouldn't that tell you something Mr Suthep? yes it tells me you have no idea what your talking about! The conflict thay jave happend have been when the government have told the redshirt to fight the anti government protesters and they instigated it by going to the anti government sites that fault falls on the reds and the government. Also most of the violence have been instigated by the reds or by MIB if you chose to believe in that or not. Your talking about violent protests have you been to any of the sites and seen it with your ow two eyes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robroona Posted January 27, 2014 Share Posted January 27, 2014 how about give then 12 hours. And then move in and move them if necessary. Could you please then move them away from Asoke-Sukhumvit intersection and then from Silom Rd. I just took a walk along both sites today. It was early morning at Asoke and not much happening. Silom on the other hand is an absolute circus. Screeching karaoke grandmas and opportunistic vendors flogging fake watches and hello kitty knock-offs. The face of the democratic movement. What a joke. An excuse for some karaoke from some under-empoyed grannies, thugs, bullies and layabouts - and of course the street vendors, to f@#$k up life for ordinary citizens. And you are an "ordinary citizen?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
worgeordie Posted January 27, 2014 Share Posted January 27, 2014 He should send his sons around,they used to like a fight, maybe they could go in guns blazing ! regards Worgeordie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rogerdee123 Posted January 27, 2014 Share Posted January 27, 2014 how about give then 12 hours. And then move in and move them if necessary. Could you please then move them away from Asoke-Sukhumvit intersection and then from Silom Rd. I just took a walk along both sites today. It was early morning at Asoke and not much happening. Silom on the other hand is an absolute circus. Screeching karaoke grandmas and opportunistic vendors flogging fake watches and hello kitty knock-offs. The face of the democratic movement. What a joke. An excuse for some karaoke from some under-empoyed grannies, thugs, bullies and layabouts - and of course the street vendors, to f@#$k up life for ordinary citizens. And you are an "ordinary citizen?" I think he must be new to Thailand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boxclever Posted January 27, 2014 Share Posted January 27, 2014 And about time too... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
webfact Posted January 27, 2014 Share Posted January 27, 2014 Protesters ordered to retreat from govt property within 72 hoursBy Digital ContentBANGKOK, Jan 27 – Caretaker Labour Minister Chalerm Yubamrung today warned of tough action against protesters unless they withdraw from occupying government buildings within 72 hours.“If they refuse to move back to their rally sites before the deadline, an attack unit, which will be specially set up today, will round them up on charges of violating the Emergency Decree and intrusion,” declared Mr Chalerm, who is director of the Centre for Maintaining Peace and Order (CMPO).His newest position came on the heels of the government’s invocation of the state of emergency.He blasted protest leader Suthep Thaugsuban, secretary general of the People’s Democratic Reform Committee (PDRC), for motivating the public to disrupt the advance election and intimidating intending voters at polling stations.He expressed condolences for a slain protest leader at a polling booth inside Wat Sri-eam in Bang-na area yesterday and said the national police chief was instructed to hunt for the gunmen involved in the shooting.He charged PDRC and the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration (BMA) with collaborating in obstructing the election in the capital – an activity disapproved by international rights organisations.Mr Chalerm said police have issued an arrest warrant for a group of Chumphon residents for involvement in a weapons robbery at Nong Kham police station, and warned actors and entertainers against joining the anti-government protests.“The prime minister will instantly revoke the Emergency Decree if the situation is back to normal,” he said, claiming an official report which blamed a third party for creating violence and putting the blame on the government.Meanwhile, Thaworn Senneam, PDRC leader in charge of the Victory Monument rally site, filed a lawsuit with the Civil Court today against caretaker Prime Minister/Defence Minister Yingluck Shinawatra, Mr Chalerm and National Police Chief Adul Saengsingkaew, in his capacity as CMPO deputy director, for infringement of the protesters' rights.He asked the court to nullify the state of emergency and prohibit the use of weapons in dealing with protesters.The Constitutional Court has ruled that the PDRC demonstrations were peaceful without any weapons involved, thus it would not be necessary to invoke the Emergency Decree, said Mr Thaworn.He asked the court to hold an urgent hearing to provide safety to protesters and return democratic rule to the people.The court later opened an urgent trial of the case with Mr Thaworn appearing for the hearing. (MCOT online news)-- TNA 2014-01-27 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoePai Posted January 27, 2014 Share Posted January 27, 2014 He looks clueless Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keemapoot Posted January 27, 2014 Share Posted January 27, 2014 He looks clueless I'll drink to that. Come to think of it, so will Chalerm. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonneke breda Posted January 27, 2014 Share Posted January 27, 2014 "Ukraine state of emergency warning Ukraine's justice minister warns anti-government protesters occupying her ministry that she will call for a state of emergency if they do not leave." Any similarities? But in Ukraine you can not talk about peaceful protest, police and demonstrators are really causing violence to each other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now