chooka Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 (edited) Well, its completely legal what they did because the courts said so. I agree but apparently to some it is only legal if Suthep takes over a government office. Let's not forget that Suthep and his Government said protestors have no right to take over government offices or block/disrupt the streets. Edited February 26, 2014 by chooka Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3NUMBAS Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 the judges have strings attached to their mouth and limbs as theyre puppets for the highest bidders ,impartial is not in their lexicon ,they is working for da man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post pmugghc Posted February 26, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted February 26, 2014 (edited) If you recall along with the amended amnesty bill there was a bill to make the senate fully elected, incl relatives etc. The reason: The senate appoints the independent agencies like NACC. With a rubberstamp senate you'd control NACC etc, so you'd get a DSI-like wolfpack of agencies to hound the PTP opponents. Sent from my Nexus 5 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app Edited February 26, 2014 by pmugghc 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chooka Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 This is genuinely perplexing? When did the police ever force ably disperse a red shirt protest - please, someone, anyone got a link? And now they complain 'double standards' when the police are ordered to show the same method of protest handling (non violent dispersal) as they have with the redshirts in the past, with the PDRC.now Seems to me to be all equal - why complain, unless an uneven playing field is what the reds seek? Perplexing? Red shirts don't want an even playing field, they want it all to themselves. Actually Suthep said, his way or no way. Suthep wants the country and he is fighting with Thaksin who also wants the country. Two of the biggest morons and dangerous people on the planet fighting for total control 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kimamey Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 the judges have strings attached to their mouth and limbs as theyre puppets for the highest bidders ,impartial is not in their lexicon ,they is working for da man Interesting. Who do we know who has a lot of money and could be 'da man'? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robby nz Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Don't see how this is testing the NACC's neutrality. If anything it is testing the police and Chalerm by seeing if they will be treated any differently from the other protesters. Of course they are being treated differently for by setting a fire they are acting differently, but being on the side of the Govt they will always be treated more leniently than anyone else. Great to see more examples of how red democracy will work by kicking out any judges that gives a verdict against them and replacing them with ones who will rule in their favor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShannonT Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 I am laughing my bum off here at the judges, because they apparently didn't think their decisions through before approving them. They thought that they could block the government by preventing them from removing protesters from the streets and now they're blocked themselves because they can't get the police or army to remove the protesters from their own front door due to their very own decision. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ggold Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Its a smart move, expose these pathetic old yellow judges for the bias fools that they are. When the government implements reforms, cleaning up this elite serving trash should be first on the list. You must really be disappointed! the Red thugs were allowed to protest. Even allowed to burn the street without interference. You would have preferred they were chased away or arrested, Then your little rant might have had some truth to it. Instead yours is a nothing comment. There is no Bias for you to rant about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davidhere Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Its a smart move, expose these pathetic old yellow judges for the bias fools that they are. When the government implements reforms, cleaning up this elite serving trash should be first on the list. I suppose it depends what they replace it with. Red Shirts proposed new Chairman of the National Anti-Corruption Commission? along with proposed new NACC board members 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post kimamey Posted February 26, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted February 26, 2014 I am laughing my bum off here at the judges, because they apparently didn't think their decisions through before approving them. They thought that they could block the government by preventing them from removing protesters from the streets and now they're blocked themselves because they can't get the police or army to remove the protesters from their own front door due to their very own decision. Or maybe they did think them through and aren't as biased as you'd like to think. Truly independent bodies make decisions regardless of the consequences to themselves. I'm not saying they definitely aren't biased but your comment isn't necessarily true either. If I see less posts from you I'll assume you've actually laughed your bum off. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Why ask Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Did anybody find a lucky tooth within the burnt coffin? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TVGerry Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Does this mean falangs dont have to appear in court if charged with a crime in thailand? If you are ever charged with murder, you may use the excuse that you are currently busy with something, just like Suthep does. If you're ever charged with anything, you can just run off to Chiang Mai and just ignore the charges completely, just like Poo does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hawkman Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Does this mean falangs dont have to appear in court if charged with a crime in thailand? If you are ever charged with murder, you may use the excuse that you are currently busy with something, just like Suthep does. Or just hide and run away and avoid all criminal charges and still use thugs and bribes to run a country, just like Thaksin does. Sent from my iPhone using ThaiVisa app Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chooka Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Does this mean falangs dont have to appear in court if charged with a crime in thailand? If you are ever charged with murder, you may use the excuse that you are currently busy with something, just like Suthep does. If you're ever charged with anything, you can just run off to Chiang Mai and just ignore the charges completely, just like Poo does. How has she ignored them? Today is only Wednesday? She could also surround herself with heavily armed thugs and shoot police if they come within 500 metres like Suthep does. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TVGerry Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Does this mean falangs dont have to appear in court if charged with a crime in thailand? If you are ever charged with murder, you may use the excuse that you are currently busy with something, just like Suthep does. If you're ever charged with anything, you can just run off to Chiang Mai and just ignore the charges completely, just like Poo does. How has she ignored them? Today is only Wednesday? She could also surround herself with heavily armed thugs and shoot police if they come within 500 metres like Suthep does. I'm sure she'll be back on time. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petedk Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 I'm sure she'll be back on time. I doubt it. The helicopter she uses doesn't have night radar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crushdepth Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Does this mean falangs dont have to appear in court if charged with a crime in thailand? If you are ever charged with murder, you may use the excuse that you are currently busy with something, just like Suthep does. We shall see if the PM turns up to acknowledge the charges against her tomorrow. She probably has a hectic day of vegetable inspection lined up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pedro01 Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Does this mean falangs dont have to appear in court if charged with a crime in thailand? If you are ever charged with murder, you may use the excuse that you are currently busy with something, just like Suthep does. We shall see if the PM turns up to acknowledge the charges against her tomorrow. She probably has a hectic day of vegetable inspection lined up. Well, seeing as those veggies are the main passenger on her 2 trillion baht train set, she probably should make sure they are ok Sent from my iPhone using Thaivisa Connect Thailand Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fat Haggis Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Well she's are sure as shyt not going to the same beauty saloon as her Lt to get her nails done for tomorrow!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MunterHunter Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 We shall see if the PM turns up to acknowledge the charges against her tomorrow. She probably has a hectic day of vegetable inspection lined up. Cant be the Cabinet meeting already? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djjamie Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 I am laughing my bum off here at the judges, because they apparently didn't think their decisions through before approving them. They thought that they could block the government by preventing them from removing protesters from the streets and now they're blocked themselves because they can't get the police or army to remove the protesters from their own front door due to their very own decision. You're laughing while the country slips into lawlessness. Irrespective of what "team" you support this is a pretty serious situation I would have thought. I live in Thailand and have many Thai and westerner friends in Bangkok. I wish them all well. Before you "laugh your bum off", think of how many others may die and hopefully that will make your bum re-attach itself in somber thought of the people in Thailand trying to realign themselves. Your first 2 posts tonight were great. I clicked like. Please think before you post as it is very troubling times in Thailand. Your precipitous comment of "laughing my bum off" is not a mature way to approach this difficult time. I wish you well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
airconsult Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Well, its completely legal what they did because the courts said so.They are quite entitled to protest peacefully, no one is disagreeing with that.However, based on democracy, which means having a rule of law, can you provide us reasons as to why Yingluck not attending a hearing is democratic? I may be missing something, but I look forward to hearing the democratic principles that PTP adhere to and promote. In the same vein, please remind me exactly when Suthep turned up to the criminal court to hear the charges against him? Sent from my GT-N7000 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robby nz Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Is the NACC actually a court or is it as the name suggests a commission to investigate corruption ? I get the impression that they are not actually a court and that their members are not judges rather investigators. Once they have come to a conclusion they can summons a person (in this case Yingluck) they deem to be corrupt to give evidence on their own behalf. They then consider that evidence then pass the case on to a court or in this case (I think) the senate. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrTuner Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 The fire brigade might want to use water cannons to put out those fires. Lets hope the fireman wielding the cannon has problems aiming straight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigbamboo Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Does this mean falangs dont have to appear in court if charged with a crime in thailand? If you are ever charged with murder, you may use the excuse that you are currently busy with something, just like Suthep does. If you're ever charged with anything, you can just run off to Chiang Mai and just ignore the charges completely, just like Poo does. How has she ignored them? Today is only Wednesday? She could also surround herself with heavily armed thugs and shoot police if they come within 500 metres like Suthep does. Or wait until they come within five feet like the son of one of her ministers does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baerboxer Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Does this mean falangs dont have to appear in court if charged with a crime in thailand? If you are ever charged with murder, you may use the excuse that you are currently busy with something, just like Suthep does. If you're ever charged with anything, you can just run off to Chiang Mai and just ignore the charges completely, just like Poo does. How has she ignored them? Today is only Wednesday? She could also surround herself with heavily armed thugs and shoot police if they come within 500 metres like Suthep does. We'll see tomorrow won't we. Has she answered the Ombudsman yet? No of course not. Shins see themselves as above all this legal, judicial and parliamentary accountability crap. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
casualbiker Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Does this mean falangs dont have to appear in court if charged with a crime in thailand? If you are ever charged with murder, you may use the excuse that you are currently busy with something, just like Suthep does. If you're ever charged with anything, you can just run off to Chiang Mai and just ignore the charges completely, just like Poo does. How has she ignored them? Today is only Wednesday? She could also surround herself with heavily armed thugs and shoot police if they come within 500 metres like Suthep does. When has that happened then? When have the Police gone within 500 metres of Suthep ?? oh yes, i remember every time he has been walking the streets passed numerous police stations. Actually wasn't he outside the main police HQ just this morning....Did his guards shoot them...NO ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dogmatix Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 (edited) Its a smart move, expose these pathetic old yellow judges for the bias fools that they are. When the government implements reforms, cleaning up this elite serving trash should be first on the list. I suppose it depends what they replace it with. Red Shirts proposed new Chairman of the National Anti-Corruption Commission? along with proposed new NACC board members You forgot this one. Another Southern belle. Edited February 26, 2014 by Dogmatix Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
casualbiker Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Its a smart move, expose these pathetic old yellow judges for the bias fools that they are. When the government implements reforms, cleaning up this elite serving trash should be first on the list. I suppose it depends what they replace it with. Red Shirts proposed new Chairman of the National Anti-Corruption Commission? along with proposed new NACC board members You forgot this one. Another Southern belle. Yes it is strange how not ONE of the core leaders of the UDD are actually from ISSAN??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seajae Posted February 26, 2014 Share Posted February 26, 2014 Well, its completely legal what they did because the courts said so. Yes, so they must terrorists for doing the same thing as the PDRC did, right? actually I think that should be fascist scum, but I am sure manoa and shannont can correct it if needed, they seem to know all the big words needed to describe this sort of thing and of course they are not biased so of course they will call the reds exactly the same names I am sure, over to you two now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now