Jump to content

What would likely happen to the Yingluck government Wednesday May 7, 2014?


george

Recommended Posts

What would likely happen to the Yingluck government Wednesday May 7, 2014?
By Asiancorrespondent.com

Tomorrow afternoon [Wednesday], the Court will issue its decision regarding the Thawil transfer case. Matichon has outlined 4 possible outcomes per the graphic below:

matichon-349x217.jpg

Below is a rough summary:

1. Yingluck is removed, but the current Cabinet survives intact and we wait for the election

2. Yingluck is removed together with the Cabinet in office at the time of the Thawil decision [so non-Thawil which includes Pongthep] Cabinet Ministers continue as the surviving Cabinet and we wait for an election

3. Yingluck and entire Cabinet is removed which leads to a political vacuum

4. Only Yingluck is removed, but the Court doesn’t apply Section 181 and instead applies Section 172 and allows Senate to take place of House of Representative and to choose a new PM.

Full story: http://asiancorrespondent.com/122409/what-is-the-likely-court-decision-tomorrow-regarding-the-tawil-transfer/

Source: Asiancorrespondent.com 2014-05-06

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

They can't let the cabinet stay as well. They want them all out like last time. Fake leaders. No democracy. Bangkok elite get to rule until the reds rise up again.

The only thing that is guaranteed is that they won't have an election.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They can't let the cabinet stay as well. They want them all out like last time. Fake leaders. No democracy. Bangkok elite get to rule until the reds rise up again.

The only thing that is guaranteed is that they won't have an election.

Well the court follows the law. That the cabinet is evil is true but they can't remove the people not involved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

option 5 : Yingluck and the entire cabinet are removed, but since they have announced already that they will not recognize the court ruling, they just carry on as if nothing happened.

very possible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are a myriad of possibilities as to where the court could go. It seems that among the strongest is the possibility where Yingluck and the entire cabinet could be removed, and the power of nominating a prime minister given to the Senate - something that the constitution clearly allows. At that point, there would be a rush to elect a Senate speaker and nominate a prime minister by Saturday - when the present session of the Senate closes. Of course, if this option was taken, then Thaksin's influence would effectively be over.

Not really, he would mobilize his red mob to burn and loot the country. Remember what happened in 2010. That was just the warm up.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reds are going to win the next election, whenever it is finally allowed to occur. That isn't a good or bad thing, it's just inevitable. Like all nations, Thais reserve the right to fork up their country as they see fit.

Sharing power, at the crux and unsolved problem in western countries too, does not seem to be in anyone's vocabulary here or abroad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just enjoying the thought of all them politicians (from both sides) not getting a good night's sleep.

Not like they're working for the money they get, but at least getting a bit stressed out for once. Plus time zone difference with Dubai must be a pain too - bonus!.

No idea if they'll actually remove her from office, guilty or not. Seems like the constitution is hard rock one instance, than gets rubbery on the next.

Seriously doubt there will be anything close to the "civil war" threats, if she's made to resign, though. Some violence, yes, pretty sure. Hotheads and extremists need to be kept in line. So far, every time they got dissolved or whatever, they gave a lot of lip, but at the end cleared the premises. Hope they'll stick with this tradition if the court rules against them.

More curious about PDRC's reaction if court says she can stay on. They do have the NACC rice thing as backup, so maybe will just wait, but would still be interesting to see how they'll treat the court in such an event.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Demroracy is the worst form of government!

Except for all the others!

The same guy said:

The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter

-- Winston Churchill

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

all of the cabinet removed - airports locked down to stop cabinet doing a runner - senate elects new PM - current cabinet plus DSI and police heads under house arrest - redshirt leaders arrested - team investigates were the Thai peoples billions have gone - jail time for those involved - army steps in to maintain order - reforms take place including massive reform of the police.................

Link to comment
Share on other sites

all of the cabinet removed - airports locked down to stop cabinet doing a runner - senate elects new PM - current cabinet plus DSI and police heads under house arrest - redshirt leaders arrested - team investigates were the Thai peoples billions have gone - jail time for those involved - army steps in to maintain order - reforms take place including massive reform of the police.................

None of this will happen.

As soon as the first item is attempted (removal of the cabinet) all hell is going to break loose.

The anti-democrats simply cannot win.

The only questions how many people are they willing to kill before they accept their inevitable defeat.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

all of the cabinet removed - airports locked down to stop cabinet doing a runner - senate elects new PM - current cabinet plus DSI and police heads under house arrest - redshirt leaders arrested - team investigates were the Thai peoples billions have gone - jail time for those involved - army steps in to maintain order - reforms take place including massive reform of the police.................

......appointed government continues to rule indefinitely no sign of any intention to hold an election, civil disobedience on the rise in North and Issaan, army becomes increasingly reluctant to apply force outside of Bangkok, possibly large scale desertion or even mutiny amongst conscripts, government writ no longer runs outside Bangkok, tourism collapses, economy enters a recessionary spiral.

Just thought I would finish the scenario off for you mate. But hey, Mark will be prime minister for life, and the economic collapse will mean that the girls will be cheaper, so for a lot of Falangs things will be looking up!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm glad to see the BangokPundit finally made an appearance here.

Better than all the garbage from The Nation.

Everything…….every…single….thing that the Pundit writer is supported by facts and links.

The Nation has a lot to learn from this journalist (as do the TVF yellows).

beat me to it. glad to see bangkok pundit on here, and hope to see more in the future.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In Thailand there are those who want freedom to give their opinions and their political policies any where in the country

In Thailand there are those who want a dictator democracy by only allowing what they believe in to be said

On T VF we have similar points of view by many members

Today is the day of decision, and nothing we say will make any difference

No matter what the court decides there will be those who will party and those that will hate

but in the end Thais need to learn from todays judgment

and many members on TVF as well

to do what you can for Thalland

Not Thailand do what is best for you

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most international news reported on this day of reckoning and called it another judiciary coup by the establishment. They can see that our courts have again been compromised and partisan.

well it's the Chang in the room

even ardent yellow fellow's cannot claim this is not a judicial coup - every leader in all democratic countries can remove their Security Chief as they see fit - even if the replacement choice is unwise

it would be a good idea if they allowed the Pm to replace as he/she thinks fit BUT the replacement has to go through a committee (as in the US) tat scrutinizes the PM's choice

but to say the PM has no authority to choose the Security Chief and remove someone they do not trust is absurd

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...