fab4 Posted June 15, 2014 Posted June 15, 2014 Thus proving International pressure from the public outrage works. This is called pressure of popular public opinion. Are we learning yet ? Well the last government didn't try to fix it. Or the one before that. You'd have thought this new one would have the gumption to take this opportunity to chip away at international perception the first time round - not make an embarrassing U turn when it's too late. Nice try, was the agreement up for signing when the before-last government was running the show? No, it wasn't.Place blame at feet of former (your hero) government that got tossed for being jerks. Thankyouverymuch. Oh, I thought you were against slave labour and trafficking in general but you just want to play politics instead. For a minute there I thought you were sincere. FYI http://www.hrw.org/news/2010/05/05/letter-prime-minister-abhisit-thailands-candidacy-un-human-rights-council
rubl Posted June 15, 2014 Posted June 15, 2014 With some things planned months if not years in advance it's not immediately clear to me if the stance reversed was originally set, or approved by the NCPO, or just leftover (and forgotten) from the Yingluck government. Any pointer to the truth in this?
englishoak Posted June 15, 2014 Posted June 15, 2014 How embarrassing to be the ONLY non signatory in the entire organisation of 4700. I mean honestly. What a farce... Na Taak springs to mind
Jonmarleesco Posted June 15, 2014 Posted June 15, 2014 Coincidence that this follows the Thai prawn fishing slavery revelation?
Emster23 Posted June 15, 2014 Posted June 15, 2014 Hey, they are talking about forced labor, not slavery...... I thought forced labor was early baby delivery.... As far as last government didn't fix it.... let's just extend that. No government here ever tried to "fix it". Slavery suits the unique cultural values of Thailand that are just not understood by the diplomats who attempt to impose cultural imperialism on this fine Buddhist land of smiles.
allan michaud Posted June 15, 2014 Posted June 15, 2014 "Thai law provided all workers in Thailand with protection in relation to working conditions as well as related benefits regardless of nationality, she said" I am sure the numerous Burmese and Cambodian's being held on Thai fishing boats will be glad to know this.
bigbamboo Posted June 15, 2014 Posted June 15, 2014 OK, better late than never and they got it right in the end....... a bit backing the good guys in WW2. It's all a bit embarrassing but at least we didn't get any 'the ILO is not my father'.
sprq Posted June 15, 2014 Posted June 15, 2014 The initial position had the merit of honesty: Thailand has no serious intention of abolishing forced labour. The new position has the demerit of being unbelievable: Thailand has no serious intention of abolishing forced labour. 2
zappalot Posted June 15, 2014 Posted June 15, 2014 Thailand gives a damn shit on human rights, always did and at least for a long time it will, they did not sign the UN refugee charta, they work together with countries like North Korea to keep North korean refugees locked in the IDC without access to lawyers or any help. And all parties agreed to that... So not surprising what happens in the fishing industries...
Seastallion Posted June 15, 2014 Posted June 15, 2014 "the new legally binding ILO Protocol on Forced Labour, which aims to advance prevention, protection and compensation measures, " I'd like to know what those are. It would be a very strong incentive to abolish slavery for ship owners if they have to pay compensation to the poor men whenever they are caught with slaves.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now