MJP Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 MJP No. Posting 88 Yes I know,but sometimes you have to put the followers in their place. Is it bite or bight? I just don't know any more. That Gates Merkin with his dodgy spell checker keeps dicking about with the English language so much I've lost track. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClutchClark Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 (edited) MJP No. Posting 88 Yes I know,but sometimes you have to put the followers in their place. As you sit on your perch you seem to miss the irony that it is only America that has not "followed" Great Britain and the rest of the world by adapting the metric system with its origins in French Bureaucracy. ;-) Edited October 1, 2014 by metisdead 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJP Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 (edited) MJP No. Posting 88 Yes I know,but sometimes you have to put the followers in their place. As you sit on your perch you seem to miss the irony that it is only America that has not "followed" Great Britain and the rest of the world by adapting the metric system with its origins in French Bureaucracy. ;-) Imperial confuses me. Inches, fathoms . . . under the sea . . . leagues . . . dunno . . . Ounces. Wot? Edited October 1, 2014 by MJP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClutchClark Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 MJP No. Posting 88 Yes I know,but sometimes you have to put the followers in their place. As you sit on your perch you seem to miss the irony that it is only America that has not "followed" Great Britain and the rest of the world by adapting the metric system with its origins in French Bureaucracy. ;-) Imperial confuses me. Inches, fathoms . . . under the sea . . . leagues . . . dunno . . . Ounces. Wot? There is little doubt that the Metric unit of measure offers a simplicity that the old systems could never match--particularly now that we have a global economy. It is often thought that Americans did not want to adopt while others suggest Corporate America was against the transition due to the cost of retooling. When you consider the influence that corporations have on the American Public, the latter seems more reasonable an explanation. One consolation for our lack of adaptability, the US "Dollar" was based on tenths long before other Nations' currencies (ala Thomas Jefferson) and both he and Ben Franklin were seated at the tables when a Universal system of Measurement was originally discussed between England, France and the US. Unfortunately, the US Congress failed to act on Jefferson's suggestion to adapt the system. An early example of how our Congress has historically failed the American people? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJP Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 MJP No. Posting 88 Yes I know,but sometimes you have to put the followers in their place. As you sit on your perch you seem to miss the irony that it is only America that has not "followed" Great Britain and the rest of the world by adapting the metric system with its origins in French Bureaucracy. ;-) Imperial confuses me. Inches, fathoms . . . under the sea . . . leagues . . . dunno . . . Ounces. Wot?There is little doubt that the Metric unit of measure offers a simplicity that the old systems could never match--particularly now that we have a global economy. It is often thought that Americans did not want to adopt while others suggest Corporate America was against the transition due to the cost of retooling. When you consider the influence that corporations have on the American Public, the latter seems more reasonable an explanation.One consolation for our lack of adaptability, the US "Dollar" was based on tenths long before other Nations' currencies (ala Thomas Jefferson) and both he and Ben Franklin were seated at the tables when a Universal system of Measurement was originally discussed between England, France and the US. Unfortunately, the US Congress failed to act on Jefferson's suggestion to adapt the system. An early example of how our Congress has historically failed the American people? Well it would have meant that spaceship wouldn't have crashed into the moon, eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sustento Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 MJP No. Posting 88 Yes I know,but sometimes you have to put the followers in their place. As you sit on your perch you seem to miss the irony that it is only America that has not "followed" Great Britain and the rest of the world by adapting the metric system with its origins in French Bureaucracy.;-) Imperial confuses me. Inches, fathoms . . . under the sea . . . leagues . . . dunno . . . Ounces. Wot? A fathom is 6 feet. A nautical mile is a minute of arc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJP Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 MJP No. Posting 88 Yes I know,but sometimes you have to put the followers in their place. As you sit on your perch you seem to miss the irony that it is only America that has not "followed" Great Britain and the rest of the world by adapting the metric system with its origins in French Bureaucracy.;-) Imperial confuses me. Inches, fathoms . . . under the sea . . . leagues . . . dunno . . . Ounces. Wot? A fathom is 6 feet. A nautical mile is a minute of arc Dunno, might have been Mars. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rhythmworx Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 Whenever has this balloon head used a measuring tape or scales or a speedometer? I would guess never, he needs a good slap on his fod with a bamboo pole and telling to go back to sleep. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manarak Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 Cameron knows a huge percentage of British voters are over 60. This silly statement might win thousands of votes as it resonates with those who grew up before 1971. ow, base 10 measures are so difficult to get used to ! IQ < 80 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJP Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 Whenever has this balloon head used a measuring tape or scales or a speedometer? I would guess never, he needs a good slap on his fod with a bamboo pole and telling to go back to sleep. You ever think this is how they're preparing this all giving pre-election budget? Fifteen fourths of <deleted> all is still <deleted> all. Maybe Guideon's getting his fractions mixed up with his kilogrammes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KarenBravo Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 MJP No. Posting 88 Yes I know,but sometimes you have to put the followers in their place. As you sit on your perch you seem to miss the irony that it is only America that has not "followed" Great Britain and the rest of the world by adapting the metric system with its origins in French Bureaucracy.;-) Imperial confuses me. Inches, fathoms . . . under the sea . . . leagues . . . dunno . . . Ounces. Wot? A fathom is 6 feet. A nautical mile is a minute of arc You're absolutely right, which is why nautical miles are still used to measure distance at sea by sea-going vessels. Only very old charts still use fathoms as a measure of depth. Pretty much all modern sea charts use metres, now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJP Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 MJP No. Posting 88Yes I know,but sometimes you have to put the followers in their place. As you sit on your perch you seem to miss the irony that it is only America that has not "followed" Great Britain and the rest of the world by adapting the metric system with its origins in French Bureaucracy.;-) Imperial confuses me. Inches, fathoms . . . under the sea . . . leagues . . . dunno . . . Ounces. Wot? A fathom is 6 feet. A nautical mile is a minute of arc You're absolutely right, which is why nautical miles are still used to measure distance at sea by sea-going vessels. Only very old charts still use fathoms as a measure of depth. Pretty much all modern sea charts use metres, now. Nah, nah I was right the first time. Definitely crashed into the moon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boomerangutang Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 Yes, now if they would just learn to drive on the proper side of the road. We do. If you were riding a horse and met strangers going the other way, wouldn't you like to be able to use your sword arm, just-in-case? If not, you will be following a certain short, French-speaking General's dictate. Outside of L.A. freeways, car drivers don't really need to brandish swords out their car windows. Britain and Thailand should drive on the right. US should go metric, and so should Land of the Beefeaters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manarak Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 Yes, now if they would just learn to drive on the proper side of the road. We do. If you were riding a horse and met strangers going the other way, wouldn't you like to be able to use your sword arm, just-in-case? If not, you will be following a certain short, French-speaking General's dictate. Outside of L.A. freeways, car drivers don't really need to brandish swords out their car windows. Britain and Thailand should drive on the right. US should go metric, and so should Land of the Beefeaters. Thank God we aren't in barbarian times anymore when a rider had to wield a sword ! In these modern times, it's the job of the front passenger to handle the assault rifle. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boomerangutang Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 Ok, you can keep 'hands' for horses. We'll allow that. What's this 'stone' stuff for weight? If Americans used stone, they'd have to change it to 'boulder' because they're all getting so fat. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJP Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 Aus, Japan . . . loads of countries drive on the left. I mean the steering wheel is on the right when you're sat in the car . . . facing forwards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClutchClark Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 (edited) A fathom is 6 feet. A nautical mile is a minute of arc You're absolutely right, which is why nautical miles are still used to measure distance at sea by sea-going vessels. Only very old charts still use fathoms as a measure of depth. Pretty much all modern sea charts use metres, now. Don't forget aviation also used NM...and its a "second" of arc. Edited October 1, 2014 by ClutchClark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sustento Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 You're absolutely right, which is why nautical miles are still used to measure distance at sea by sea-going vessels. Only very old charts still use fathoms as a measure of depth. Pretty much all modern sea charts use metres, now. Apart from those published by NOAA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJP Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 You're absolutely right, which is why nautical miles are still used to measure distance at sea by sea-going vessels. Only very old charts still use fathoms as a measure of depth. Pretty much all modern sea charts use metres, now. Apart from those published by NOAA. The Arc was designed using the metric system? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KarenBravo Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 "So....what have the Romans ever done for us?" Started the left-hand drive system. Their armies used to march on the left (swords an' all that). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJP Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 They made aquaducts too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boomerangutang Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 Actually, Thais use both. I've done construction with Thais, and they switch between one and the other seamlessly. Plywood still comes in 4 x 8 sheets, and it's similar for many other construction materials - standard sizes. I've been a carpenter and grew up with inches/feet/yards, yet have adapted to metric somewhat. I use inches/feet when working alone, but usually metric when working with others. Metric is the sensible way forward. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJP Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 8x4ft sheets are standard in the UK too. You just need to trim a bit to make them into metric, using a circular saw measured in radians. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClutchClark Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 Actually, Thais use both. I've done construction with Thais, and they switch between one and the other seamlessly. Plywood still comes in 4 x 8 sheets, and it's similar for many other construction materials - standard sizes. I've been a carpenter and grew up with inches/feet/yards, yet have adapted to metric somewhat. I use inches/feet when working alone, but usually metric when working with others. Metric is the sensible way forward. The big question is have you found tapes in both meters & inches? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rhythmworx Posted October 2, 2014 Share Posted October 2, 2014 How then are you going to fund your lust for technology? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJP Posted October 2, 2014 Share Posted October 2, 2014 How then are you going to fund your lust for technology? Tax evasion. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metisdead Posted October 2, 2014 Share Posted October 2, 2014 I think we're getting a bit off topic here with the discussion of NHS etc. Posts have been removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elmer Gantry Posted October 2, 2014 Share Posted October 2, 2014 Typical TV posters,give them an inch and they will take a metre or even a gas,electric or water meter, 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boomerangutang Posted October 2, 2014 Share Posted October 2, 2014 Actually, Thais use both. I've done construction with Thais, and they switch between one and the other seamlessly. Plywood still comes in 4 x 8 sheets, and it's similar for many other construction materials - standard sizes. I've been a carpenter and grew up with inches/feet/yards, yet have adapted to metric somewhat. I use inches/feet when working alone, but usually metric when working with others. Metric is the sensible way forward.The big question is have you found tapes in both meters & inches?It's rare to find a tape measure without both (each side of tape reading). Incidentally. 15 years ago I bought a carpenter's tape measure made in China. It had both meters and inches/feet, but the inches were split in 5 increments instead of 4. I wish I still had it, it was such an oddity. Imagine: "Yea Bob, cut me a two by four, eleven feet, eleven and four fifths inches." Those Chinese are pretty good at copying all things western, but they're got a-ways to go with precision. I wonder if their subs and aircraft carrier are as shoddily made as their smaller fabricated items. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Deerhunter Posted October 2, 2014 Share Posted October 2, 2014 "Whatever he weighs in pounds, shillings and ounces, he always seems bigger because of the bounces." A.A.Milne. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now