Jump to content

Koh Tao murder suspects retract confessions: 'interpreter assaulted us'


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 445
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

they say,

every picture tells a story

it is clear why Scotland Yard pulled the surprise early arrival move

Well, they could both be doing Jeremy Beadle impersonations, although it is more likely to be a physical gimp. Interesting.

Posted

Then I would implore you to consider giving to the fund set up to help these two boys and their families to fight corruption and have a fair and transparent trial. I have posted and posted on TVf however it is continuously taken down.

It may prove detrimental to the fabric of Thai society to help clear the names of and thus allow two innocents to live I guess!

You ll find the site now up on csi la.

Posted

Then I would implore you to consider giving to the fund set up to help these two boys and their families to fight corruption and have a fair and transparent trial. I have posted and posted on TVf however it is continuously taken down.

It may prove detrimental to the fabric of Thai society to help clear the names of and thus allow two innocents to live I guess!

You ll find the site now up on csi la.

It's not through any sort of malice Number 3, it's just . . .

Forum rule 22) Members are forbidden to ask for or accept donations, gifts or commissions from other members, any charities must contact support for approval before joining. before joining to be approved.

. . . one of the TVF rules.

Posted

Then I would implore you to consider giving to the fund set up to help these two boys and their families to fight corruption and have a fair and transparent trial. I have posted and posted on TVf however it is continuously taken down.

It may prove detrimental to the fabric of Thai society to help clear the names of and thus allow two innocents to live I guess!

You ll find the site now up on csi la.

I have contributed, and I am sure if people can use google they can too.....

Hint .... You caring

  • Like 2
Posted

The parents are here, they have confirmed that their sons are innocent.

I believe them

LOL.. They confirmed it?? They were in Thailand, on KT, with the 2 Burmese men when they were murdering 2 and raping 1?

Posted

The parents are here, they have confirmed that their sons are innocent.

I believe them

LOL.. They confirmed it?? They were in Thailand, on KT, with the 2 Burmese men when they were murdering 2 and raping 1?

jd in asia,

John is it?

how long have you been friends with the A/C bar owner?

how well do you know him?

what do you think about the other girls who have come forward to say they were drugged and raped in Kho Tao?

Posted

The parents are here, they have confirmed that their sons are innocent.

I believe them

LOL.. They confirmed it?? They were in Thailand, on KT, with the 2 Burmese men when they were murdering 2 and raping 1?

jd in asia,

John is it?

how long have you been friends with the A/C bar owner?

how well do you know him?

what do you think about the other girls who have come forward to say they were drugged and raped in Kho Tao?

Not John.

Actually in Thailand (unlike the fong)

Not friends with anyone associated with the AC bar.

Don't know him.

Not relevant.

Not drunk enough to ask stupid questions :)

Posted

You mentioned, "3 should be plenty." 3 is a small number, particularly when squared up against the full force of Thai police and army brass, all of whom are locking arms to maintain the cover-up.

By all indications, the UK specialists are in Thailand as observers only. That could mean; they can look at things, but can't do anything tangible to further the investigation. When I go to an art museum, I'm an observer. I'm not participating in creating art or how the paintings are displayed.

In sum, there are 3 hamstrung observers versus dozens of police brass supported by dozens of army brass. All the brass can make decisions re; the case. The Brits are essentially helpless. I hope I'm wrong, but to allow the Brits to do anything tangible would risk derailing the cover-up, and you get one guess re; whether Thai brass want to do that.

Yes. 3 observers.

They get to observe /evaluate, not interfere.

That sounds like wishful thinking on your part. But you're backed by the self-appointed Thai PM, so you're probably right.

Note: PM Cameron thought he had an agreement with the Thai PM (during their recent meeting) that UK experts would be allowed to contribute to (or aid) the investigation. However, when the Thai PM returned to Thailand, he declared the Brit experts would only be allowed as 'observers.' In other words, 'you can look at the data we've collected, you can look over our shoulders, but don't do any investigative processes without prior approval by us. And by all means: DON'T EVEN MENTION THE HEADMAN'S PEOPLE! They've already been removed from the investigation.'

Posted

You mentioned, "3 should be plenty." 3 is a small number, particularly when squared up against the full force of Thai police and army brass, all of whom are locking arms to maintain the cover-up.

By all indications, the UK specialists are in Thailand as observers only. That could mean; they can look at things, but can't do anything tangible to further the investigation. When I go to an art museum, I'm an observer. I'm not participating in creating art or how the paintings are displayed.

In sum, there are 3 hamstrung observers versus dozens of police brass supported by dozens of army brass. All the brass can make decisions re; the case. The Brits are essentially helpless. I hope I'm wrong, but to allow the Brits to do anything tangible would risk derailing the cover-up, and you get one guess re; whether Thai brass want to do that.

Yes. 3 observers.

They get to observe /evaluate, not interfere.

That sounds like wishful thinking on your part. But you're backed by the self-appointed Thai PM, so you're probably right.

Note: PM Cameron thought he had an agreement with the Thai PM (during their recent meeting) that UK experts would be allowed to contribute to (or aid) the investigation. However, when the Thai PM returned to Thailand, he declared the Brit experts would only be allowed as 'observers.' In other words, 'you can look at the data we've collected, you can look over our shoulders, but don't do any investigative processes without prior approval by us. And by all means: DON'T EVEN MENTION THE HEADMAN'S PEOPLE! They've already been removed from the investigation.'

I seriously doubt that the Thai PM said any of those things,

I think the opposite happened, that the leader of arguably the european side of the British American empire told the PM that the people of the UK are demanding the truth, and, we will send a team to "help you" since, you have enough on your plate, ok? yes, thanks lad

Posted

I'll paraphrase it again, the way I observed it:

PM Cameron and the Thai PM met in person. Among other things, the Brit PM asked if British investigative experts could be allowed to aid in the investigation. It would seem obvious, the Brit PM was referring (among other things) to looking at (and perhaps collecting) evidence, and possibly checking out leads which might lead toward more viable suspects. In a phrase: 'assisting with the investigation.'

However, when the Thai PM returned hours later to Thailand, he emphasized the word 'observers.' There's a difference. Observing only means; watching and perhaps asking a few questions. That's different than pursuing evidence.

In sum, the Thai PM is trying to limit British involvement in the investigation as much as diplomatically possible. No surprise (to me) as it fits snugly in with the cover-up scenario.

Posted

Post considered in breach of the following rule was removed ..

11) You will not post slurs, degrading or overly negative comments directed towards Thailand, specific locations, Thai institutions such as the judicial or law enforcement system, Thai culture, Thai people or any other group on the basis of race, nationality, religion, gender or sexual orientation.

Posted

Your "paraphrase" does not match reality nor what was reported. It is based on assumptions.

Actually, it's a very good summary of what happened. I would love to see the alternate version you're proposing, no need to be coy.

I will give you this: you are tireless.

  • Like 1
Posted

Your "paraphrase" does not match reality nor what was reported. It is based on assumptions.

Actually, it's a very good summary of what happened. I would love to see the alternate version you're proposing, no need to be coy. I will give you this: you are tireless.

It's interesting how different people can look at the same thing, and get such varied interpretations.

There could be a brown loaf of bread on a table with 5 people sitting around, each asked to describe what they see.

>>> one sees a Congolese birthday cake

>>> one sees something elitist

>>> one sees glutten, which she's allergic to

>>> one sees a rhino turd

>>> one sees a loaf of bread

Posted

Your "paraphrase" does not match reality nor what was reported. It is based on assumptions.

Actually, it's a very good summary of what happened. I would love to see the alternate version you're proposing, no need to be coy. I will give you this: you are tireless.

It's interesting how different people can look at the same thing, and get such varied interpretations.

There could be a brown loaf of bread on a table with 5 people sitting around, each asked to describe what they see.

>>> one sees a Congolese birthday cake

>>> one sees something elitist

>>> one sees glutten, which she's allergic to

>>> one sees a rhino turd

>>> one sees a loaf of bread

It is nice being the one that sees the bread. The other 4 are wearing tin foil hats. Of them..

1 sees Sean and a push knife

1 sees the uncle and a gun

...

Dad and 120 million

...

But there are more than just 4 of them.

Posted

Your "paraphrase" does not match reality nor what was reported. It is based on assumptions.

Actually, it's a very good summary of what happened. I would love to see the alternate version you're proposing, no need to be coy. I will give you this: you are tireless.

It's interesting how different people can look at the same thing, and get such varied interpretations.

There could be a brown loaf of bread on a table with 5 people sitting around, each asked to describe what they see.

>>> one sees a Congolese birthday cake

>>> one sees something elitist

>>> one sees glutten, which she's allergic to

>>> one sees a rhino turd

>>> one sees a loaf of bread

It is nice being the one that sees the bread. The other 4 are wearing tin foil hats. Of them..

1 sees Sean and a push knife

1 sees the uncle and a gun

Dad and 120 million

But there are more than just 4 of them.

I wrote some paragraphs, 2 weeks ago, describing how I saw the crime happening (I don't have link on hand). For starters, I don't see the Burmese involved more than minimal (heard noises or helped dispose of evidence, etc). I see NomSod and friends as perps. Some of those friends could be: Mon, the cop with Mon (who threatened Sean), perhaps one or two others. I see Sean as peripherally involved, perhaps coming to see what was going on, and then getting stabbed by knuckle blade in arm (same weapon which killed David). Perhaps Sean was involved with clandestinely supplying date-rape drug (prior, along with other perps) to Hannah.

I could elaborate, but that's it in a gory nutshell.

Posted (edited)
Your "paraphrase" does not match reality nor what was reported. It is based on assumptions.

Actually, it's a very good summary of what happened. I would love to see the alternate version you're proposing, no need to be coy. I will give you this: you are tireless.

It's interesting how different people can look at the same thing, and get such varied interpretations.

There could be a brown loaf of bread on a table with 5 people sitting around, each asked to describe what they see.

>>> one sees a Congolese birthday cake

>>> one sees something elitist

>>> one sees glutten, which she's allergic to

>>> one sees a rhino turd

>>> one sees a loaf of bread

It is nice being the one that sees the bread. The other 4 are wearing tin foil hats. Of them..

1 sees Sean and a push knife

1 sees the uncle and a gun

Dad and 120 million

But there are more than just 4 of them.

I wrote some paragraphs, 2 weeks ago, describing how I saw the crime happening (I don't have link on hand). For starters, I don't see the Burmese involved more than minimal (heard noises or helped dispose of evidence, etc). I see NomSod and friends as perps. Some of those friends could be: Mon, the cop with Mon (who threatened Sean), perhaps one or two others. I see Sean as peripherally involved, perhaps coming to see what was going on, and then getting stabbed by knuckle blade in arm (same weapon which killed David). Perhaps Sean was involved with clandestinely supplying date-rape drug (prior, along with other perps) to Hannah.

I could elaborate, but that's it in a gory nutshell.

LOL, sitting with you I would see bread and you would see all the rest

.

Edit -you do know that suggesting someone is guilty who is not a suspect is actionable. I sincerely hope you are using a VPN.

Edited by jdinasia
Posted

he is not aa sociopath

he is someone who has a personal interest in the "killers of Kho Tao" remaining free

there is no need to speculate, who and what he is, as, he is clearly acting in the interests of the "rapists on Kho Tao"

he is also working to get as many people as he can to violate the terms of service, so the threads will calm down during this critical two week period,

do NOT fall for this ploy as he is already getting long term posters banned for losing their cool

  • Like 1
Posted

question for JDinasia: if evidence showed the headman's people were the culprits, would you accept that?

Absolutely. Real evidence not the crap from conspiracy theorists.

Posted

question for JDinasia: if evidence showed the headman's people were the culprits, would you accept that?

Absolutely. Real evidence not the crap from conspiracy theorists.

Question back at you. If the semen DNA matches will you accept the guilt of the 2 Burmese men? (it is a little unreasonable to think that they raped but didn't kill- there is still the rest of the circumstantial evidence)

Posted

question for JDinasia: if evidence showed the headman's people were the culprits, would you accept that?

Absolutely. Real evidence not the crap from conspiracy theorists.

Question back at you. If the semen DNA matches will you accept the guilt of the 2 Burmese men? (it is a little unreasonable to think that they raped but didn't kill- there is still the rest of the circumstantial evidence)

Absolutely if the DNA the British Police have from the body matches the DNA the Thai Police Farce have.....would I accept the Thai Police DNA without external verification....would I <deleted>@kk!!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...