billd766 Posted November 4, 2014 Share Posted November 4, 2014 Umm...Just about everybody's poor compared to the General and his Cabinet. The Shinawatras are not and neither are ANY of the PTP MPs. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metisdead Posted November 4, 2014 Share Posted November 4, 2014 Off topic posts and replies have been removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robby nz Posted November 4, 2014 Share Posted November 4, 2014 Umm...Just about everybody's poor compared to the General and his Cabinet. The Shinawatras are not and neither are ANY of the PTP MPs. But don't forget billd766 they are the (self styled) champions of the poor so they are allowed to be rich and elite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ikke Posted November 4, 2014 Share Posted November 4, 2014 Well... this is what the Gen calls reforms, More populism, more corruption more rich politicians and headman.......reforms.my *ss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fab4 Posted November 4, 2014 Share Posted November 4, 2014 Umm...Just about everybody's poor compared to the General and his Cabinet. The Shinawatras are not and neither are ANY of the PTP MPs. But don't forget billd766 they are the (self styled) champions of the poor so they are allowed to be rich and elite. Is there a rule that to champion poor peoples causes you have to be as poor as the people you're trying to help? If that's true it kind of blows a big hole in the theory of Philanthropy, doesn't it?.................................... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CharlieH Posted November 4, 2014 Share Posted November 4, 2014 bating post removed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JacChang Posted November 4, 2014 Share Posted November 4, 2014 There is a reason why the poor can't afford the lands with their own power. With great power comes great responsibility - Spiderpig With land to those who can't manage their financial responsibility = more debt= taking land in exchange for money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mancub Posted November 4, 2014 Share Posted November 4, 2014 " people will get free stuff ".... Prayut said yesterday ! Oh Happy days are here again ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrjohndub Posted November 4, 2014 Share Posted November 4, 2014 Umm...Just about everybody's poor compared to the General and his Cabinet. The Shinawatras are not and neither are ANY of the PTP MPs. Did I say they were honest, followed through on their promises or offered hope? Sometimes not agreeing with the status quo doesn't mean advocating the supporting the other side. I think they're ridiculous <deleted>. Get that around your thick head. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
englishoak Posted November 4, 2014 Share Posted November 4, 2014 Boot the rich landowners out and off the forest grounds they have stolen and make the poor communities stewards of that land already ruined by these resorts and available to use, theres plenty of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joecoolfrog Posted November 4, 2014 Share Posted November 4, 2014 Political bribery is only acceptable when we say so , no arguments tolerated ok ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billd766 Posted November 5, 2014 Share Posted November 5, 2014 Umm...Just about everybody's poor compared to the General and his Cabinet. The Shinawatras are not and neither are ANY of the PTP MPs. But don't forget billd766 they are the (self styled) champions of the poor so they are allowed to be rich and elite. Sorry I forgot that part. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billd766 Posted November 5, 2014 Share Posted November 5, 2014 Umm...Just about everybody's poor compared to the General and his Cabinet. The Shinawatras are not and neither are ANY of the PTP MPs. Did I say they were honest, followed through on their promises or offered hope? Sometimes not agreeing with the status quo doesn't mean advocating the supporting the other side. I think they're ridiculous <deleted>. Get that around your thick head. Where in my post did I mention honesty or dishonesty. I merely answered your comment with one of my own. Nothing about the status quo or supporting any side. BTW please don't make personal comments about me as it is not polite and no I don't have a thick head. Do try to have a nice day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
.thumb.jpg.bc523c85a8d558dbc282dca7a2e602c9.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now