But just to make it clear, would you consider someone a homosexual if they have sex with a male donkey as opposed to a female donkey?

Scott

You took the liberty to post this, directed at me.

Why did you delete my response ?

Here it is again.

NO. I would call him the sick @@@@@@@ that he is. Perhaps he was traumatized after being kicked by a donkey when he was a child. That would surely justify his actions, would it not ?

He didn't.

I did.

Then perhaps you could take the liberty to explain why you deleted a perfectly reasonable response. If that is not too much to ask.

Thanking you in advance

It was profane.

It takes a lot to shock me these days ... I'd thought I'd seen, heard and read a lot ... but this disgusting act, is proven to be factual, takes the cake.

Speechless ...

That's a big "is"

(I presume you meant "if" )

<script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script>

John Mann MP says scale of historical child abuse claims 'too many for state'

The number of victims claiming historical child abuse could reach the tens of thousands and is too many for the state to cope with, an MP says.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30647646

Extremely good article MJP, which in a way highlights the problems faced, or more importantly the inaction by authorities from the POV of the victims against people in privileged positions or authority. One wonders what pressure has been put on the two chair people to stand down already, i see it as being only partially explained here.

IMHO, the cases mentioned which were previously reported (at the time of the incidents) and ignored, should be the first ones investigated. Its time for everyone to see the results of first world country justice and government.

I think Baroness Butler-Sloss and Dame Fiona Woolf took one look at the evidence, did a bunny in the headlights routine and made it safely to the nearest hedge.

This is worth keeping an eye on for updates of this ongoing dodging of justice . . .

https://childsexualabuseinquiry.independent.gov.uk/

Nothing to do with "a bunny in the headlights". Everything to do with not being impartial and being far too close to those that may be shown by a credible enquiry to have done serious wrong. It beggars the question, "Why were these people put forward in the first place to head an enquiry?"

<script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script>

John Mann MP says scale of historical child abuse claims 'too many for state'

The number of victims claiming historical child abuse could reach the tens of thousands and is too many for the state to cope with, an MP says.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30647646

Extremely good article MJP, which in a way highlights the problems faced, or more importantly the inaction by authorities from the POV of the victims against people in privileged positions or authority. One wonders what pressure has been put on the two chair people to stand down already, i see it as being only partially explained here.

IMHO, the cases mentioned which were previously reported (at the time of the incidents) and ignored, should be the first ones investigated. Its time for everyone to see the results of first world country justice and government.

I think Baroness Butler-Sloss and Dame Fiona Woolf took one look at the evidence, did a bunny in the headlights routine and made it safely to the nearest hedge.

This is worth keeping an eye on for updates of this ongoing dodging of justice . . .

https://childsexualabuseinquiry.independent.gov.uk/

Nothing to do with "a bunny in the headlights". Everything to do with not being impartial and being far too close to those that may be shown by a credible enquiry to have done serious wrong. It beggars the question, "Why were these people put forward in the first place to head an enquiry?"

They could have challenged the challenge. But chose not to. Although Butler-Sloss is making noises about this now.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30640879

It was an easy get out at the time though.

Prince Andrew sex case claim denied

Buckingham Palace has denied "any suggestion of impropriety with underage minors" by Prince Andrew, after he was named in US court papers.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30659629

Prince Andrew sex case claim denied

Buckingham Palace has denied "any suggestion of impropriety with underage minors" by Prince Andrew, after he was named in US court papers.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30659629

The story is running here:

http://www.thaivisa.com/forum/topic/788733-buckingham-palace-denies-sex-claim-against-prince-andrew/

This is competely unrelated, MJP. No link whatsoever to the original news piece.

This is competely unrelated, MJP. No link whatsoever to the original news piece.

New topic already running.

http://www.thaivisa.com/forum/topic/788733-buckingham-palace-denies-sex-claim-against-prince-andrew/

Thatcher confidant raped boy and police covered crime up

One of Margaret Thatcher’s closest confidantes raped a teenage boy 30 years ago but escaped justice when Scotland Yard covered up the crime, it has been alleged.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/11323146/Thatcher-confidant-raped-boy-and-police-covered-crime-up.html

I'm not sure what is more disturbing, the clearly fabricated topic or some of the highly spuriously sourced material/claims being posted here as ''evidence''.

I think now is clearly the time to start that tin foil hat online store....

I'm not sure what is more disturbing, the clearly fabricated topic or some of the highly spuriously sourced material/claims being posted here as ''evidence''.

I think now is clearly the time to start that tin foil hat online store....

That last link is to The Sunday Telegraph. Not Infowars.

I fail to see how the topic is fabricated. There's a public inquiry about to start, if they can actually get someone to chair it.