Jump to content

Report on CIA details 'brutal' post-9/11 interrogations


webfact

Recommended Posts

<script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script>

No surprise here. The Bush-Cheney administration was lawless. Why hide your torture techniques and try to cover up any investigation into them? Al Qaeda publicizes its beheadings on youtube. No reason for secrecy, unless what was being done violated US laws. International law is irrelevant in the US as the US wisely does not allow the Euros to have jurisdistic supremacy through its weak-kneed international agencies like the UN and ICC.

You are proving just how clueless you are my friend, none of this was done in the U.S. smile.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script>

If it smells like a terrorist, acts like a terrorist, looks like a terrorist, torture it as a terrorist. You can always say your sorry later. If one life was saved by doing this I am all for it. Screw the Democratic liberals.

Good thinking! Let's see, if I chop off one of these hydra heads, two more sprout up in its place. I know, let's chop off MORE hydra heads at a faster rate, that will solve the problem!

Something is working. US feels all warm fuzzy this holiday season with no concerns of planes being jacked or buses being blown up.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Non-violent good cop psychological techniques DON'T produce better results with hardened terrorists. That is why the CIA used enhanced interrogation on them.

Wrong, UG!

The use of enhanced interrogation techniques was not an effective means of acquiring intelligence
The report says other detainees who were not subjected to the techniques or else were questioned before they were subjected to them “provided significant accurate intelligence”. It also says multiple CIA detainees that did undergo the techniques fabricated information, which resulting in faulty intelligence.
"There is almost no scientific evidence to back up the U.S. intelligence community's use of controversial interrogation techniques in the fight against terrorism, and experts believe some painful and coercive approaches could hinder the ability to get good information, according to a new report from an intelligence advisory group.|
"Experts advising the Bush administration on new interrogation rules warn that harsh techniques used since 2001 terrorist attacks are outmoded, amateurish and unreliable"
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script>

If it smells like a terrorist, acts like a terrorist, looks like a terrorist, torture it as a terrorist. You can always say your sorry later. If one life was saved by doing this I am all for it. Screw the Democratic liberals.

Good thinking! Let's see, if I chop off one of these hydra heads, two more sprout up in its place. I know, let's chop off MORE hydra heads at a faster rate, that will solve the problem!

Something is working. US feels all warm fuzzy this holiday season with no concerns of planes being jacked or buses being blown up.

So no more terrorist threats then, your words may come back to haunt you, it isn't even Christmas yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script>

Note to terrorists and would be terrorists.. no body promise you a rose garden, you knew

very well what are the risks associated with those terrorist actives, we see you on Al-Jazeera

looking so smug and macho walking around with the ninja outfits and tone of emmo and guns,

now take it like the piece of crap that you're,

just say thanks to your Allah the Israelis didn't interrogate you...

Or the Jordanians, the Saudiis, the Egyptians ect. ect. ect. the list is almost endless wai2.gif

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Non-violent good cop psychological techniques DON'T produce better results with hardened terrorists. That is why the CIA used enhanced interrogation on them.

The use of enhanced interrogation techniques was not an effective means of acquiring intelligence

Nonsense!

Q) You’re not going to recall all the details, but you’re saying that there was most certainly useful and even actionable intelligence produced after the enhanced interrogation techniques were employed?

A) Absolutely.

Q) No question?

A) No question. And it’s not just me saying it. Subsequent investigations by the CIA inspector general and other independent bodies confirmed that there was valuable, actionable intelligence derived first from Abu Zubaydah and later by other high-value detainees that were subjected to the enhanced techniques. I don’t think there’s any dispute about that.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/iraq-war-on-terror/the-interrogator/john-rizzo-cias-enhanced-interrogation-necessary-and-effective/

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe Americans need to ask more questions about their government's interference in other countries' affairs

+1

This.......

I know most accept the simple party line such as this....

Jealousy breeds resentment. Resentment breeds hate. Hate breeds terrorism.

All starts with jealousy so unless the US became pathetic like many of the countries that target us,

there will always be losers from those countries targeting us.

But even OBL's manifesto spelled out their reason & jealousy was not it.

I am in no way saying terrorist acts are acceptable

But I am saying it is equally unacceptable from any country/side

Instead it is always a "they" started it argument & it is not easy

for folks at our level of available truth to discern the truth

as we are given only bits of what is allowed to be given information wise.

But a simplistic claim like ...they hate us because their jealous is rather...simplistic

Edited by mania
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The moral dilemma is how to treat your enemies. If you lower yourself to adopt their tactics, you have removed the difference between you.

Interesting to note that UG is always present in these topics, defending all and every action of the US Government.

He loves America so much, yet refuses to live there......

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script>

No surprise here. The Bush-Cheney administration was lawless. Why hide your torture techniques and try to cover up any investigation into them? Al Qaeda publicizes its beheadings on youtube. No reason for secrecy, unless what was being done violated US laws. International law is irrelevant in the US as the US wisely does not allow the Euros to have jurisdistic supremacy through its weak-kneed international agencies like the UN and ICC.

You are proving just how clueless you are my friend, none of this was done in the U.S. smile.png

Wrong there. Most of it was done within US jurisdiction. Those bases are under US jurisdiction per recent US Supreme Court rulings. Bushie's crack legal team thought they weren't, and they lost every jurisdictional battle they fought in the US Supreme Court.

Edited by zaphod reborn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script>

Note to terrorists and would be terrorists.. no body promise you a rose garden, you knew
very well what are the risks associated with those terrorist actives, we see you on Al-Jazeera
looking so smug and macho walking around with the ninja outfits and tone of emmo and guns,
now take it like the piece of crap that you're,
just say thanks to your Allah the Israelis didn't interrogate you...


Your post reflects badly on you and maybe attitudes like yours are the reason USA is targeted in the first place.

Jealousy breeds resentment. Resentment breeds hate. Hate breeds terrorism.

All starts with jealousy so unless the US became pathetic like many of the countries that target us, there will always be losers from those countries targeting us.
I remember Dubya chanting a similar mantra after 911..."America was targeted for attack because we're the brightest beacon for freedom and opportunity in the world."
The terrorists didn't give a hoot about the American way of life. They attacked because USA was sticking its nose into their way of life.

Geez Dex you really drink that koolaid by the gallon don't you rolleyes.gif Let me remind you of a few facts there young man (I say young man not to be condescending but due to the fact that any educated grownup would not spew forth the nonsense you seem to post) it was Saddam who invaded Kuwait and had eyes on the entire Arabian peninsula, it was the House of Saud who invited the U.S. into their country, it was not the U.S. sticking its nose in their way of life. Poor little usaama got mad because the House of Saud did not invite him and his cave dwellers into the Kingdom to fight off Saddam tongue.png Now go back and watch some more MSNBC so you can spew forth some more lies here, we do so like exposing you left wing nuts for the dupes that you always prove yourselves to be thumbsup.gif

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script>

<script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script>

No surprise here. The Bush-Cheney administration was lawless. Why hide your torture techniques and try to cover up any investigation into them? Al Qaeda publicizes its beheadings on youtube. No reason for secrecy, unless what was being done violated US laws. International law is irrelevant in the US as the US wisely does not allow the Euros to have jurisdistic supremacy through its weak-kneed international agencies like the UN and ICC.


You are proving just how clueless you are my friend, none of this was done in the U.S.

Wrong there. Most of it was done within US jurisdiction. Those bases are under US jurisdiction per recent US Supreme Court rulings.

Wrong again, NONE of this was done on U.S. soil or where the U.S. Justice Department would have any jurisdiction. Back to the drawing board for you Zap smile.png

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Non-violent good cop psychological techniques DON'T produce better results with hardened terrorists. That is why the CIA used enhanced interrogation on them.

The use of enhanced interrogation techniques was not an effective means of acquiring intelligence

Nonsense!

Q) You’re not going to recall all the details, but you’re saying that there was most certainly useful and even actionable intelligence produced after the enhanced interrogation techniques were employed?

A) Absolutely.

Q) No question?

A) No question. And it’s not just me saying it. Subsequent investigations by the CIA inspector general and other independent bodies confirmed that there was valuable, actionable intelligence derived first from Abu Zubaydah and later by other high-value detainees that were subjected to the enhanced techniques. I don’t think there’s any dispute about that.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/iraq-war-on-terror/the-interrogator/john-rizzo-cias-enhanced-interrogation-necessary-and-effective/

Well, he would say that would't he?...and the CIA Inspector General agreed with him...surprise surprise.
John Rizzo, the lawyer at the CIA for 34 years who gave advise to Dubya and Rumsfeld that torture was legal, would obviously try to cover himself. The $40m Senate report has more veracity.
This is what they did to Abu Zubaydah after he had already been in isolation for 47 days:
"He was squeezed into tiny boxes for 300 hours and waterboarded no fewer than 80 times. Emails seen by investigators showed some of those involved asked to be transferred, so disturbed were they by what they witnessed. The waterboarding left Abu Zubaydah “completely unresponsive, with bubbles rising through his open, full mouth”
so much for the "beacon of freedom and democracy"
Edited by dexterm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script>

Exactly. The "report" is a partisan hoax. NO ONE in the CIA - past or present - was even interviewed.

U.G., Once again the left wing nuts here do not want to hear the truth, they just want to regurgitate the lies they hear on MSNBC or NPR or the Obama administration disinformation dept. Anyone who takes even one minute to look at this objectively knows that this is a pure partisan attack that was put forward as a misdirection ploy after the absolute beating the Dems took at the polls last month and the abysmal job that the Obama administration is doing wink.png The American public is fed up with this Obamcare mess now that they finally realize that they have been lied to time and again by Obama and his lackeys, thank God In less than 4 weeks the new Congress will be seated and this spring the Supreme court will hear the Obamacare subsidy and state exchange case, when the Supreme court rules it will be the begining of the end for Obamacare. RIP thumbsup.gif

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe Americans need to ask more questions about their government's interference in other countries' affairs

+1

This.......

I know most accept the simple party line such as this....

Jealousy breeds resentment. Resentment breeds hate. Hate breeds terrorism.

All starts with jealousy so unless the US became pathetic like many of the countries that target us,

there will always be losers from those countries targeting us.

But even OBL's manifesto spelled out their reason & jealousy was not it.

I am in no way saying terrorist acts are acceptable

But I am saying it is equally unacceptable from any country/side

Instead it is always a "they" started it argument & it is not easy

for folks at our level of available truth to discern the truth

as we are given only bits of what is allowed to be given information wise.

But a simplistic claim like ...they hate us because their jealous is rather...simplistic

The resent our way of life and want to cause fear and disruption to our way of life. Perhaps not all, but most of this terrorist stuff is jealousy or envy at its core.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe Americans need to ask more questions about their government's interference in other countries' affairs

+1

This.......

I know most accept the simple party line such as this....

Jealousy breeds resentment. Resentment breeds hate. Hate breeds terrorism.

All starts with jealousy so unless the US became pathetic like many of the countries that target us,

there will always be losers from those countries targeting us.

But even OBL's manifesto spelled out their reason & jealousy was not it.

I am in no way saying terrorist acts are acceptable

But I am saying it is equally unacceptable from any country/side

Instead it is always a "they" started it argument & it is not easy

for folks at our level of available truth to discern the truth

as we are given only bits of what is allowed to be given information wise.

But a simplistic claim like ...they hate us because their jealous is rather...simplistic

The resent our way of life and want to cause fear and disruption to our way of life. Perhaps not all, but most of this terrorist stuff is jealousy or envy at its core.

you left school at what age ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it smells like a terrorist, acts like a terrorist, looks like a terrorist, torture it as a terrorist. You can always say your sorry later. If one life was saved by doing this I am all for it. Screw the Democratic liberals.

You can expect US citizens to receive the same treatment in future. Now fully sanctioned by America itself.

If a US citizen was in Russia blowing up buses or train stations, Russians have just as much right as anyone to do whatever it takes to extract information to discovery cells or other plans to do harm to civilians.

Now I do not agree with ISIS torturing and beheading Americans captured while trying to do charity work or help those suffering. Soldiers targeting militants also should not be tortured for doing their jobs. Now if soldiers are intentionally targeting innocent civilians, I have no sympathy for them.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was a tough time for the US. The country was responding to an attack on it's soil. Yes, there was a period when the gloves came off. Many government's around the globe looked the other way during this time.

and many helped. Which was a good thing. it saved lives and punished those who took lives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This maybe of some interest to readers:

Competing claims of torture effectiveness

The Senate Intelligence Committee's report on the CIA program that included torturing al-Qaida detainees provides eight "primary" examples in which the CIA said it obtained good intelligence as a result of what it called "enhanced interrogation techniques," and the Senate panel's conclusions that the information was available elsewhere and without resorting to brutal interrogations.

A look at those examples of the CIA's claims and the Senate's counterclaims, according to the Senate report:

JOSE PADILLA

THE CIA SAID U.S. citizen Jose Padilla was implicated in the so-called Dirty Bomb/Tall Buildings plotting.

More here: http://news.yahoo.com/competing-claims-torture-effectiveness-180825288--politics.html

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

An interesting article for those with an open mind; http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2014/dec/09/senate-committee-cia-torture-does-not-work

"The report finds that CIA detainees subjected to what were then called “enhanced interrogation techniques” either produced no intelligence, or they “fabricated information, resulting in faulty intelligence”. It says that the CIA’s own interrogators “assessed that the most effective method for acquiring intelligence from detainees, including from detainees the CIA considered to be the most ‘high-value’, was to confront the detainees with information already acquired by the intelligence community”.

“This is an authoritative conclusion,” said Philippe Sands, a law professor at University College, London and the author of Torture Team, an account of how torture came to be used increasingly on al-Qaida suspects in the wake of 9/11. “The Senate intelligence commission has been looking into this for several years. I know that they went into it with an open mind. Those who were engaged in the analysis followed the evidence. What it confirmed is what I was always told by US military psychologists, that torture produces information, but it does not produce reliable information.”"

More 'food for thought' http://edition.cnn.com/2014/12/09/politics/cia-reports-shocking-passages/

I guess I grew up thinking that we were supposed to show more character than them.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...