Lite Beer Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 Man faces deportation as UK wife's salary too lowA man faces deportation from the UK after a judge said his British wife's salary was not high enough.Michael Engel, from South Africa, said the "bizarre" immigration system rules were "attacking British citizens".Mr Engel, a 31-year-old yacht engineer living in Cornwall, said he and wife Natalie plan to go back to South Africa with 18-month-old daughter Nyana.A Home Office spokesman said the rules were designed to stop foreign spouses becoming reliant on UK taxpayers. Read More: http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-cornwall-30439592 -- BBC 2014-12-12 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post canopus1969 Posted December 13, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted December 13, 2014 Good job, well done the UK Gov. for once 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 Don't they usually prevent them from entering the country in the first place if the financial situation isn't sufficient to support them? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post phuket Mike Posted December 13, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted December 13, 2014 "A Home Office spokesman said the rules were designed to stop foreign spouses becoming reliant on UK taxpayers." That just great foreign spouses can't become reliant on UK taxpayers but everyone else who sets foot in the country can. 38 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rixalex Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 A Home Office spokesman said the rules were designed to stop foreign spouses becoming reliant on UK taxpayers.Didn't think that a foreign spouse such as this was allowed access to any benefits or welfare. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post daveAustin Posted December 13, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted December 13, 2014 Good job, well done the UK Gov. for once Well done? And yet 200,000+ Europeans with absolutely no connection with the UK are allowed to come into the country and get benefits right off the bat; sending welfare home to kids in their home countries no less! While I understand the above is out of the UK's control -- being one of the tenets of being in the EU -- it smacks of major irony that a BRITISH SUBJECT is not allowed to keep their spouse there. This 18,600 (or 22k with kid) is simply an arbitrary figure dreamt up by that 'delightful' lady Theresa May to make it tough for British people to get their other half in. The spouse visa already stipulates 'no recourse to public funds' for crying out loud. These people are not bludgers; the wife is earning, just not enough to satisfy this figure. If I headed back and also couldn't find the right pay, it also means splitting up my family. It's a disgrace for Brits (and also that SA is a Commonwealth country) and extremely frustrating to see all the Euros piling in and bypassing the entire process. The only way for this family to circumvent is to go and live in another EU country for a while -- with her getting a job (whatever the money) and setting up home there. They then come back into the UK and, legally, UK border control can do nothing to stop them. He will then be granted an EU right to stay as her husband (bypassing all steps and fees up to permanent leave to remain) and will get full rights as a Brit and EU citizen. This is known as the Surinder Singh method that many have resorted to using. Although the UK gov is tightening up on it, stipulating that you have to have your 'centre of life' in this other EU country before returning, they really can do nothing about it as the UK signed up to the EU and all its foibles. This above scenario is so for every other EU country. It pains me to see the tens of thousands getting in from eastern European countries (including criminals) and something needs to be done to stop the rot and immediate recourse to public funds, but spare a thought for actual born and bred BRITISH people not being allowed to keep their spouse. 51 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post borisloosebrain Posted December 13, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted December 13, 2014 Sounds plain nasty to me. 12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post casualbiker Posted December 13, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted December 13, 2014 Good job, well done the UK Gov. for once Why great job? Setting arbitrary limits way above the UK minimum wage. Uk minimum wage is £6.50 an hour. So say someone working 40 hours a week, 52 weeks a year = £13,520 per year.. so I think her £19,xxx is ample .. no? 13 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Zooheekock Posted December 13, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted December 13, 2014 No wonder UKIP is doing so well - Britain really is a nation of awful, petty, small-minded little turds. Thank God I got out and never have any need to go back. 24 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daveAustin Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 Don't they usually prevent them from entering the country in the first place if the financial situation isn't sufficient to support them? Yes, they do now. I don't get how he went from a visitor visa to getting a spousal visa as he should be outside the country to receive the latter while his wife stays in UK to satisfy the financial requirements for his application. Only thing I can think of is he is still on the visitor visa but has been told he won't be able to apply for the spousal visa after he leaves to return on spousal visa. But even if she gets a pay rise and he gets in, they will be checked again in 30 months at extension time. People think we have it tough here, but this system is completely unrealistic and stinks to high heaven. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post terryp Posted December 13, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted December 13, 2014 Good job, well done the UK Gov. for once Well done? And yet 200,000+ Europeans with absolutely no connection with the UK are allowed to come into the country and get benefits right off the bat; sending welfare home to kids in their home countries no less! While I understand the above is out of the UK's control -- being one of the tenets of being in the EU -- it smacks of major irony that a BRITISH SUBJECT is not allowed to keep their spouse there. This 18,600 (or 22k with kid) is simply an arbitrary figure dreamt up by that 'delightful' lady Theresa May to make it tough for British people to get their other half in. The spouse visa already stipulates 'no recourse to public funds' for crying out loud. These people are not bludgers; the wife is earning, just not enough to satisfy this figure. If I headed back and also couldn't find the right pay, it also means splitting up my family. It's a disgrace for Brits (and also that SA is a Commonwealth country) and extremely frustrating to see all the Euros piling in and bypassing the entire process. The only way for this family to circumvent is to go and live in another EU country for a while -- with her getting a job (whatever the money) and setting up home there. They then come back into the UK and, legally, UK border control can do nothing to stop them. He will then be granted an EU right to stay as her husband (bypassing all steps and fees up to permanent leave to remain) and will get full rights as a Brit and EU citizen. This is known as the Surinder Singh method that many have resorted to using. Although the UK gov is tightening up on it, stipulating that you have to have your 'centre of life' in this other EU country before returning, they really can do nothing about it as the UK signed up to the EU and all its foibles. This above scenario is so for every other EU country. It pains me to see the tens of thousands getting in from eastern European countries (including criminals) and something needs to be done to stop the rot and immediate recourse to public funds, but spare a thought for actual born and bred BRITISH people not being allowed to keep their spouse. one of the best posts i've ever seen on TV 20 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maswov Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 Gee, good thing poor naive man had the all knowing all powerful government make his financial decisions for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisinth Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 <script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script> Good job, well done the UK Gov. for once alt=thumbsup.gif> Well done? And yet 200,000+ Europeans with absolutely no connection with the UK are allowed to come into the country and get benefits right off the bat; sending welfare home to kids in their home countries no less! While I understand the above is out of the UK's control -- being one of the tenets of being in the EU -- it smacks of major irony that a BRITISH SUBJECT is not allowed to keep their spouse there. This 18,600 (or 22k with kid) is simply an arbitrary figure dreamt up by that 'delightful' lady Theresa May to make it tough for British people to get their other half in. The spouse visa already stipulates 'no recourse to public funds' for crying out loud. These people are not bludgers; the wife is earning, just not enough to satisfy this figure. If I headed back and also couldn't find the right pay, it also means splitting up my family. It's a disgrace for Brits (and also that SA is a Commonwealth country) and extremely frustrating to see all the Euros piling in and bypassing the entire process. The only way for this family to circumvent is to go and live in another EU country for a while -- with her getting a job (whatever the money) and setting up home there. They then come back into the UK and, legally, UK border control can do nothing to stop them. He will then be granted an EU right to stay as her husband (bypassing all steps and fees up to permanent leave to remain) and will get full rights as a Brit and EU citizen. This is known as the Surinder Singh method that many have resorted to using. Although the UK gov is tightening up on it, stipulating that you have to have your 'centre of life' in this other EU country before returning, they really can do nothing about it as the UK signed up to the EU and all its foibles. This above scenario is so for every other EU country. It pains me to see the tens of thousands getting in from eastern European countries (including criminals) and something needs to be done to stop the rot and immediate recourse to public funds, but spare a thought for actual born and bred BRITISH people not being allowed to keep their spouse. one of the best posts i've ever seen on TV alt=thumbsup.gif> Yep, +1...................... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phuketboy Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 (edited) I think if they are not born in the UK, married to someone born in UK or their parents were not born in the UK then they should send them all home. I guess if that doesn't sort out the issue of every man and his dog moving to the UK from other parts of the EU, then as a last resort the UK could adopt Thailand's laws on immigration, that would certainly sort out the freeloaders. Too many people claiming rights and UK citizenship and ripping an already struggling system off, because one of their great ancestors was British… woopty f$%king doo daaa. Edited December 13, 2014 by Phuketboy 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lokie Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 (edited) He entered on a tourist visa so he is not a British national but an overstayer... Illeagal status, exactly same for us here in beautiful LOS. Abide by the rules should never have had a child in such situation or at least went through correct channels before the birth... But no, prob thought this would be an easy ticket - Tuff No sympathy, no job then off you go and build a few boats elsewhere... Edited December 13, 2014 by Lokie 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post HUAHIN62 Posted December 13, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted December 13, 2014 He entered on a tourist visa so he is not a British national but an overstayer... Illeagal status, exactly same for us here in beautiful LOS. Abide by the rules should never have had a child in such situation or at least went through correct channels before the birth... But no, prob thought this would be an easy ticket - Tuff No sympathy, no job then off you go and build a few boats elsewhere... Sorry sir but you are wrong. He was on a marriage visa which are now withdrawn because his wife doesnt earn enough. We was thus not illegal but have been made illegal by a very unfortunate law, that kicks out husbands/wives but allow crimminals in. They were married and had a child before this law was passed, so I think you should stop hating all immigrants and start to look at individual cases on merit. 13 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tchooptip Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 Good job, well done the UK Gov. for once Well done? And yet 200,000+ Europeans with absolutely no connection with the UK are allowed to come into the country and get benefits right off the bat; sending welfare home to kids in their home countries no less! While I understand the above is out of the UK's control -- being one of the tenets of being in the EU -- it smacks of major irony that a BRITISH SUBJECT is not allowed to keep their spouse there. This 18,600 (or 22k with kid) is simply an arbitrary figure dreamt up by that 'delightful' lady Theresa May to make it tough for British people to get their other half in. The spouse visa already stipulates 'no recourse to public funds' for crying out loud. These people are not bludgers; the wife is earning, just not enough to satisfy this figure. If I headed back and also couldn't find the right pay, it also means splitting up my family. It's a disgrace for Brits (and also that SA is a Commonwealth country) and extremely frustrating to see all the Euros piling in and bypassing the entire process. The only way for this family to circumvent is to go and live in another EU country for a while -- with her getting a job (whatever the money) and setting up home there. They then come back into the UK and, legally, UK border control can do nothing to stop them. He will then be granted an EU right to stay as her husband (bypassing all steps and fees up to permanent leave to remain) and will get full rights as a Brit and EU citizen. This is known as the Surinder Singh method that many have resorted to using. Although the UK gov is tightening up on it, stipulating that you have to have your 'centre of life' in this other EU country before returning, they really can do nothing about it as the UK signed up to the EU and all its foibles. This above scenario is so for every other EU country. It pains me to see the tens of thousands getting in from eastern European countries (including criminals) and something needs to be done to stop the rot and immediate recourse to public funds, but spare a thought for actual born and bred BRITISH people not being allowed to keep their spouse. Nothing to say but Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaobang Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 when Farage will win elections(i wish never) expect chit like that everyday Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KevWaters Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 Doesn't the extra 3,000 required only apply if the child is not a British Citizen?? So they actually earn enough to stay as the 18,000 threshold applies to them? Unless the girl is not her natural daughter..... I can't see there would be a financial requirement for someone who has full right to live in the Uk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve187 Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 I can not see how a self employed person could not earn enough to meet the limits, you tell the tax man how much you earned that year on a tax return, surely if you need £23,000 you show £23,000 on the tax return, every self employed person takes some cash in their business, some more than others. HUAHIN62 A link to fuller details of his permission to stay details would be nice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nithisa78 Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 Like any country, the leadership is supposed to be reflective of their good people. Maybe there is some information we're not getting about this person's situtation. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueSkyCowboy Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 Good job, well done the UK Gov. for once Well done? And yet 200,000+ Europeans with absolutely no connection with the UK are allowed to come into the country and get benefits right off the bat; sending welfare home to kids in their home countries no less! While I understand the above is out of the UK's control -- being one of the tenets of being in the EU -- it smacks of major irony that a BRITISH SUBJECT is not allowed to keep their spouse there. This 18,600 (or 22k with kid) is simply an arbitrary figure dreamt up by that 'delightful' lady Theresa May to make it tough for British people to get their other half in. The spouse visa already stipulates 'no recourse to public funds' for crying out loud. These people are not bludgers; the wife is earning, just not enough to satisfy this figure. If I headed back and also couldn't find the right pay, it also means splitting up my family. It's a disgrace for Brits (and also that SA is a Commonwealth country) and extremely frustrating to see all the Euros piling in and bypassing the entire process. The only way for this family to circumvent is to go and live in another EU country for a while -- with her getting a job (whatever the money) and setting up home there. They then come back into the UK and, legally, UK border control can do nothing to stop them. He will then be granted an EU right to stay as her husband (bypassing all steps and fees up to permanent leave to remain) and will get full rights as a Brit and EU citizen. This is known as the Surinder Singh method that many have resorted to using. Although the UK gov is tightening up on it, stipulating that you have to have your 'centre of life' in this other EU country before returning, they really can do nothing about it as the UK signed up to the EU and all its foibles. This above scenario is so for every other EU country. It pains me to see the tens of thousands getting in from eastern European countries (including criminals) and something needs to be done to stop the rot and immediate recourse to public funds, but spare a thought for actual born and bred BRITISH people not being allowed to keep their spouse. Keep her spouse from South Africa. Sure there is not enough color in GB hahhahaha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post BlueSkyCowboy Posted December 13, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted December 13, 2014 Gee, good thing poor naive man had the all knowing all powerful government make his financial decisions for him. The duds should have listened to Lady Thatcher about the EU 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonmarleesco Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 The British taxpayer has been taken for a ride for years, courtesy of ludicrous EU and UK laws, their interpretation and application by idiots, and near-unrestricted immigration, both of legal layabouts and of the illegal version. And that ignores politicians lining their own, and bankers', pockets.Yet the HO is getting in a tizz over a working British woman's salary being insufficient to support her engineer husband, whom I assume does work. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post timewilltell Posted December 13, 2014 Popular Post Share Posted December 13, 2014 This is an evil poorly thought out law to appease the majority on immigration targeting those vulnerable because the rest are protected by the EU. So now British families are split up if there is a non-EU wife but all and sundry others where neither party is a British Citizen are allowed in.The UK was a signatory to the UNHCR Convention on Political and Civil Rights which states as a foundation principal that the family is the core unit of society. And here these gutless politicians are trampling all over families and destroying them for a cheap political gain.It is nothing but a national disgrace. British people are sick of all and sundry ripping off the benefit system - since the woman cannot claim anyway what really is the point.Britain and Teresa Nay should be ashamed to their core. UKIP gets my vote next time. 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NCFC Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 So she earns 19k through her business and needs 23k. What about his income? If they are married or living as a couple doesn't his income count in the equation? There doesn't seem to be any mention of his financial circumstances other than his being a yacht engineer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrfill Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 I think if they are not born in the UK, married to someone born in UK or their parents were not born in the UK then they should send them all home. I guess if that doesn't sort out the issue of every man and his dog moving to the UK from other parts of the EU, then as a last resort the UK could adopt Thailand's laws on immigration, that would certainly sort out the freeloaders. Too many people claiming rights and UK citizenship and ripping an already struggling system off, because one of their great ancestors was British… woopty f$%king doo daaa. This should also apply to all UK expats in Spain, Italy and France. Deport the lot of them. It would improve the immigration figures (Spain alone has over a million UK expats) but would probably increase the murder rate as they are such whinging moaning minnies. It would also send Farage into apoplexy and probably make him explode (no bad thing). But, of course, none of the rules apply if you happen to be a Russian billionaire wanting to avoid tax and not be prepared to contribute in any way to their country of residence, although happy to use all the facilities.. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robertthebruce Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 I think if they are not born in the UK, married to someone born in UK or their parents were not born in the UK then they should send them all home. I guess if that doesn't sort out the issue of every man and his dog moving to the UK from other parts of the EU, then as a last resort the UK could adopt Thailand's laws on immigration, that would certainly sort out the freeloaders. Too many people claiming rights and UK citizenship and ripping an already struggling system off, because one of their great ancestors was British… woopty f$%king doo daaa. I had to jump through hoops to get my ''Thai Partner'' a UK VISITORS VISA..... We are now here for ''Christmas and New Year'' and the amount of TV Programmes that are on , about the above subject is a nightly thing.. They do seem to be cracking down, but too late, thats for sure.... For years they have been handing out ''British Citizenship'' to any Tom Dick or Harry... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robertthebruce Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 I think if they are not born in the UK, married to someone born in UK or their parents were not born in the UK then they should send them all home. I guess if that doesn't sort out the issue of every man and his dog moving to the UK from other parts of the EU, then as a last resort the UK could adopt Thailand's laws on immigration, that would certainly sort out the freeloaders. Too many people claiming rights and UK citizenship and ripping an already struggling system off, because one of their great ancestors was British… woopty f$%king doo daaa. This should also apply to all UK expats in Spain, Italy and France. Deport the lot of them. It would improve the immigration figures (Spain alone has over a million UK expats) but would probably increase the murder rate as they are such whinging moaning minnies. It would also send Farage into apoplexy and probably make him explode (no bad thing). But, of course, none of the rules apply if you happen to be a Russian billionaire wanting to avoid tax and not be prepared to contribute in any way to their country of residence, although happy to use all the facilities.. Previous to living in ''Thailand'' i lived in ''France'' for nearly 15 years, and they have big immigration problems too, mostly ''Algerians or Morrocans'', but the ''French System'' is quite hard on them and they dont get much benefits, hence they live in Squats on the Outskirts of Paris... The UK has been far too soft on Immigration laws.... thats for sure.. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wabothai Posted December 13, 2014 Share Posted December 13, 2014 Is this news or trolling? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now