Jump to content

Myanmar says workers innocent of murdering Britons on Koh Tao


Recommended Posts

Posted

Myanmar says workers innocent of murdering Britons in Thailand
Reuters
Yangon

BANGKOK: -- Myanmar investigators said on Thursday they believe two Myanmar men accused of murdering two British tourists in Thailand are innocent, but witnesses who might be able to prove their innocence will not testify as they fear the Thai police.

Hannah Witheridge, 23, and David Miller, 24, were found dead on Sept. 15 on a beach on the southern Thai island of Koh Tao. Post-mortem examinations showed both suffered severe head wounds and Witheridge was raped.

The murders dealt a blow to Thailand’s vital tourism industry, which is struggling to recover after months of political unrest and a May 22 coup, and the government called on police to solve the case quickly.

Myanmar migrant workers Zaw Lin and Win Phyo, both 21, initially confessed to the murders but later retracted their confessions saying they had been beaten and threatened by Thai police.

But Thai police deny those accusations and say they have solid evidence, including DNA evidence, against the two men who were arrested in October.

A committee set up by Myanmar’s embassy in Thailand to investigate the case said they had interviewed about 40 Myanmar nationals who were working on Koh Tao at the time of the murders.

Some of those interviewed were "strong witnesses" who might provide evidence to exonerate the accused, said Kyaw Thaung, who heads the committee, but they were reluctant to testify and had returned to Myanmar for fear of being implicated in the crime.

"If they go to court and speak as witnesses, they’ll have problems with the Thai police and Thai bosses," Kyaw Thaung told reporters in Yangon, Myanmar’s largest city.

Thai Police Major General Suwat Jaengyordsuk, defended the investigation, which he led, and said Myanmar was welcome to present witnesses.

The two pleaded not guilty on Dec. 8 to charges including conspiracy to commit murder and rape. The first hearing in the case will take place on Dec. 26.

"Whatever the Thai government decides in this case, we believe these two young people did not commit this crime," said Htoo Chit, the Myanmar committee’s spokesman.

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/national/Myanmar-says-workers-innocent-of-murdering-Britons-30250162.html

nationlogo.jpg
-- The Nation 2014-12-18

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

Because of the well founded concerns of witnesses and track record of Thai Police this makes it difficult for a fair trial if there were deep problems like this in Australia a Royal Commission could be called.

(Royal Commissions are called to look into matters of great importance and usually controversy. These can be matters such as government structure, the treatment of minorities, events of considerable public concern or economic questions).

A witness protection programmes seems a waste of time unless the army were willing to act on behalf of the witnesses .

Really the PM should be stepping and using his powers for a full investigation again from the start , how can these boys get a fair trial from the start if mafia are controlling everything.

The Defence needs to put the pressure back onto the prosecutors and force them to answer every concerning question before the trial starts , for example have phone and bank records of suspects forensically examined, all security footage and anything thing else of concern.

All thai governments are responsible as nothing has ever been done to stop police corruption .

All info from scotland yard should be made available .

Edited by StealthEnergiser
  • Like 1
Posted

From Post #1 above: Some of those interviewed were "strong witnesses" who might provide evidence to exonerate the accused, said Kyaw Thaung, who heads the committee, but they were reluctant to testify and had returned to Myanmar for fear of being implicated in the crime.

From the screenplay for :A Few Good Men' (Tom Cruise as Kaffee)

Capt. Ross: Airmen Cecil O'Malley and Anthony Rodriguez, what exactly were these guys going to testify to?
Kaffee: Unless I'm mistaken, they were both going to testify under oath that they had absolutely no recollection of anything.
Capt. Ross: Strong witnesses.
  • Like 2
Posted

Hope the witnesses are brave enough to do the right thing, despite the intimidation and threats from the Headman and his gang!!

  • Like 1
Posted
Some of those interviewed were "strong witnesses" who might provide evidence to exonerate the accused, said Kyaw Thaung, who heads the committee, but they were reluctant to testify and had returned to Myanmar for fear of being implicated in the crime.

"If they go to court and speak as witnesses, they’ll have problems with the Thai police and Thai bosses," Kyaw Thaung told reporters in Yangon, Myanmar’s largest city.

Doesn't make sense, if they are back in Myanmar why would they have problems with the Thai police and Thai bosses?

Posted

Thai government will give the impression of being helpful (like they did with agreeing with PM Cameron, to allow Brit experts to assist in the investigation), but beneath the surface, top Thai officials will continue doing all it can to stymie the defense (similar to changing the word 'assist' to 'observe' re; the Brit experts).

  • Like 1
Posted
Some of those interviewed were "strong witnesses" who might provide evidence to exonerate the accused, said Kyaw Thaung, who heads the committee, but they were reluctant to testify and had returned to Myanmar for fear of being implicated in the crime.

"If they go to court and speak as witnesses, they’ll have problems with the Thai police and Thai bosses," Kyaw Thaung told reporters in Yangon, Myanmar’s largest city.

Doesn't make sense, if they are back in Myanmar why would they have problems with the Thai police and Thai bosses?

I may be wrong, but I think witnesses in a crime case have to appear in person. I don't think witnesses would be allowed to submit a 'friend of the court' sort of thing in the form of certified testimony. I hope I'm wrong. If so, the someone like Sean could do that, as well as other farang who were witnesses (and have returned to their home countries), .....and the Burmese who are justifiably spooked about returning to Thailand to testify against the government ....oops, I meant; in support of the defense. Must have been a freudian slip.

Posted

I think the Burmese need to back up these claims and get the witnesses to testify.

Otherwise this kind of journalism just backs up the RTP supporters when nothing materializes.

  • Like 1
Posted

I totally understand those witnesses not willing to come forward. Their whole life would change. The police even from their own country cannot protect them forever. I am so proud of the Myanmar government is standing up for it's people. I doubt they would have anything to do with this if they thought the boys guilty at all. If those investigators believe them innocent. That's good enough for me. I believe them innocent also.

Yes, and must not forget to mention that people with money have very long arms.

  • Like 2
Posted

If Thailand really want to see real justice in this case, how difficult can it be to guarantee the security and safety of the witnesses??

Let them be escorted to the courthouse by Embassy staff and HRW staff, and after their testimony escorted back to the border by the same people.

Whatever small charges the witnesses my face in Thailand should be voided in the interest of justice in the all important murdercase.

Or is that too simple??

Walk a mile in buffalo dung up to your hips and you'll see how difficult it is to see justice in Thailand.

  • Like 1
Posted

I'm just wondering where the Scottish clown guy who had blood on his guitar and on his body, with a wound at his body, right after the killing, is hiding now.

Would you really let somebody go out of this country, who could have been more than just a witness?

Even when they're threatening him, he could stay somewhere in Thailand. But no, they let him go.

BTW, I never had blood on my guitar. Why does the whole story smell so god damned fishy?

Please explain why you think he is a clown.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...