ThaiVisa Poster of the Year 2014 Vote Now!

[smokie36]

Time for a Pimns No1

Hell yeah...I had a couple of mulled wines yesterday.

[David48]

Time for a Pimns No1

Pip, Pip ...

.

[snottgoblin]

I hope Jingthing wins.

I hope Nancy second.

Not sure how to place David and Costas2008......gerbils,badgers and babies. Such a hard decision.

David is a gentleman, he deserves 3rd place.

I think Costas has moved on to milking in greener pastures anyway.

He he

[snottgoblin]

Time for a Pimns No1

Hell yeah...I had a couple of mulled wines yesterday.

He he.

Cannabis is illegal.....mulled wines....you are funny.

[WhamBam]

If UG didn't see it. It didn't happen.

The problem is that I didn't see it and don't know exactly what she said. She maintains that it was fairly innocent and when I PMed several members that were complaining about it, they admitted that they had not seen it either. They succumbed to peer pressure as so many of us are prone to do.

She has also been accused of bashing Brits, but when you look at what she said, she was actually referring to only a few British con artists, not Brits in general. In such a close election for such a highly regarded position, you have to be careful about taking some of these sordid rumors at face value.

But not a rumour.

You can defend something you and those you Pm'd did not see against others who did see it?

Smoke and mirrors? Trying your best to say she is such a nice, sweet old lady?

[transam]

Vote for David48, clean cut, hansum, funny and not at all scary - unlike some !!

You have had a meet thennnnnnnnnnnnn, ......... ...................

[snottgoblin]

Can I nominate Ulyssesseses G For POTY 2015 yet. He is a man of wisdom and good looks.

I think neverdie should be excluded for all future polls and Geronimo and wham bam. I think they are all a bit loopy, especially neverdie. He's a few kangaroos loose in the top paddock I feels he he na he.

Jingthing should be poll lordette.

CharlieH should be executioner.

He he na he.

So funny this thread....

[WhamBam]

Vote for David48, clean cut, hansum, funny and not at all scary - unlike some !!

You have had a meet thennnnnnnnnnnnn, ......... ...................

Seen his photo. No wonder JT is jealous

Vote David48

[benalibina]

If UG didn't see it. It didn't happen.

The problem is that I didn't see it and don't know exactly what she said. She maintains that it was fairly innocent and when I PMed several members that were complaining about it, they admitted that they had not seen it either. They succumbed to peer pressure as so many of us are prone to do.

She has also been accused of bashing Brits, but when you look at what she said, she was actually referring to only a few British con artists, not Brits in general. In such a close election for such a highly regarded position, you have to be careful about taking some of these sordid rumors at face value.

As i posted before......i saw the deleted comments....i even replied to 1 post of her.....it was written with a strange impolite use of words....attacking the man but for all to understand....nothing against his gf or kids....The man thus.......Emotional, biassed, responses by others were way out of the context it was written

in by NancyL. Her downplaying of what she had written come to me across as very insincere....i would say ....they pair well together.

[David48]

If UG didn't see it. It didn't happen.

The problem is that I didn't see it and don't know exactly what she said. She maintains that it was fairly innocent and when I PMed several members that were complaining about it, they admitted that they had not seen it either. They succumbed to peer pressure as so many of us are prone to do.

UG ... oh please ...

You expect people to believe that.

Next, you will be saying that Jingthing didn't call my boys 'Bogan Kids'.

I really want to draw a line in the sand on this ... the 3rd time, I believe I've said it now.

Bit you you try and pretend that it didn't happen ...

Lets move forward Gentlemen, and have a fun discussion.

.

[SoiBiker]

If UG didn't see it. It didn't happen.

The problem is that I didn't see it and don't know exactly what she said. She maintains that it was fairly innocent and when I PMed several members that were complaining about it, they admitted that they had not seen it either. They succumbed to peer pressure as so many of us are prone to do.

She has also been accused of bashing Brits, but when you look at what she said, she was actually referring to only a few British con artists, not Brits in general. In such a close election such a highly regarded position, you have to be careful about taking some of these sordid rumors at face value.

I saw it. She didn't call David a perv or insult his family.

People have done their best to paint it as something nasty, but all she was doing was giving advice about what's appropriate to post in a public forum.

[David48]

If UG didn't see it. It didn't happen.

The problem is that I didn't see it and don't know exactly what she said. She maintains that it was fairly innocent and when I PMed several members that were complaining about it, they admitted that they had not seen it either. They succumbed to peer pressure as so many of us are prone to do.

She has also been accused of bashing Brits, but when you look at what she said, she was actually referring to only a few British con artists, not Brits in general. In such a close election for such a highly regarded position, you have to be careful about taking some of these sordid rumors at face value.

As i posted before......i saw the deleted comments ...

May I ask ... did UG PM you?

[snottgoblin]

If UG didn't see it. It didn't happen.

The problem is that I didn't see it and don't know exactly what she said. She maintains that it was fairly innocent and when I PMed several members that were complaining about it, they admitted that they had not seen it either. They succumbed to peer pressure as so many of us are prone to do.

She has also been accused of bashing Brits, but when you look at what she said, she was actually referring to only a few British con artists, not Brits in general. In such a close election for such a highly regarded position, you have to be careful about taking some of these sordid rumors at face value.

As i posted before......i saw the deleted comments....i even replied to 1 post of her.....it was written with a strange impolite use of words....attacking the man but for all to understand....nothing against his gf or kids....The man thus.......Emotional, biassed, responses by others were way out of the context it was written

in by NancyL. Her downplaying of what she had written come to me across as very insincere....i would say ....they pair well together.

This man is honest. I saw him write it before, the truth.

RESPECT Sir Mr Bealbinab. You saw strange impolite use of words by who sir?

[snottgoblin]

If UG didn't see it. It didn't happen.

The problem is that I didn't see it and don't know exactly what she said. She maintains that it was fairly innocent and when I PMed several members that were complaining about it, they admitted that they had not seen it either. They succumbed to peer pressure as so many of us are prone to do.

She has also been accused of bashing Brits, but when you look at what she said, she was actually referring to only a few British con artists, not Brits in general. In such a close election such a highly regarded position, you have to be careful about taking some of these sordid rumors at face value.

I saw it. She didn't call David a perv or insult his family.

People have done their best to paint it as something nasty, but all she was doing was giving advice about what's appropriate to post in a public forum.

He he na he.

I think mr Bealbinab has more credibility than you. You are in that club of old boys or whatever it's called. Please stand down and allow mr Bealbinab to answer questions without your intimidation.

Many thankyou.

[WhamBam]

If UG didn't see it. It didn't happen.

The problem is that I didn't see it and don't know exactly what she said. She maintains that it was fairly innocent and when I PMed several members that were complaining about it, they admitted that they had not seen it either. They succumbed to peer pressure as so many of us are prone to do.

She has also been accused of bashing Brits, but when you look at what she said, she was actually referring to only a few British con artists, not Brits in general. In such a close election such a highly regarded position, you have to be careful about taking some of these sordid rumors at face value.

I saw it. She didn't call David a perv or insult his family.

People have done their best to paint it as something nasty, but all she was doing was giving advice about what's appropriate to post in a public forum.

Yes she did.

Partial memory failure in play here?

And who is she to 'advise' anyone what to post in a public forum.

What is wrong with being proud of your children and posting innocent photos of them? Please tell me.

[SoiBiker]

If UG didn't see it. It didn't happen.

The problem is that I didn't see it and don't know exactly what she said. She maintains that it was fairly innocent and when I PMed several members that were complaining about it, they admitted that they had not seen it either. They succumbed to peer pressure as so many of us are prone to do.

She has also been accused of bashing Brits, but when you look at what she said, she was actually referring to only a few British con artists, not Brits in general. In such a close election such a highly regarded position, you have to be careful about taking some of these sordid rumors at face value.

I saw it. She didn't call David a perv or insult his family.

People have done their best to paint it as something nasty, but all she was doing was giving advice about what's appropriate to post in a public forum.

He he na he.

I think mr Bealbinab has more credibility than you. You are in that club of old boys or whatever it's called. Please stand down and allow mr Bealbinab to answer questions without your intimidation.

Many thankyou.

Believe me, I'm not in their little club.

Neither am I old, thankyou.

[snottgoblin]

I voted for Jingthing. He's always fair and funny.

[SoiBiker]

If UG didn't see it. It didn't happen.

The problem is that I didn't see it and don't know exactly what she said. She maintains that it was fairly innocent and when I PMed several members that were complaining about it, they admitted that they had not seen it either. They succumbed to peer pressure as so many of us are prone to do.

She has also been accused of bashing Brits, but when you look at what she said, she was actually referring to only a few British con artists, not Brits in general. In such a close election such a highly regarded position, you have to be careful about taking some of these sordid rumors at face value.

I saw it. She didn't call David a perv or insult his family.

People have done their best to paint it as something nasty, but all she was doing was giving advice about what's appropriate to post in a public forum.

Yes she did.

Partial memory failure in play here?

And who is she to 'advise' anyone what to post in a public forum.

What is wrong with being proud of your children and posting in photos of them? Please tell me.

No she didn't. She used the word perv I believe, but not in reference to David.

Her comments were perhaps a little misguided, but they were nowhere close to how they've been portrayed since.

[David48]

For the 4th time ... please ... enough of the comments by Nancy and the other members who commented on them, which have been hidden.

We can't see them, the Mods know what was written ... so, do I, in part.

What was said, was said ... let's move the debate forward please.

Thanks

[snottgoblin]

For the 4th time ... please ... enough of the comments by Nancy and the other members who commented on them, which have been hidden.

We can't see them, the Mods know what was written ... so, do I, in part.

What was said, was said ... let's move the debate forward please.

Thanks

You should have children. He he.

You sound just like my father.

[SoiBiker]

For the 4th time ... please ... enough of the comments by Nancy and the other members who commented on them, which have been hidden.

We can't see them, the Mods know what was written ... so, do I, in part.

What was said, was said ... let's move the debate forward please.

Thanks

Considering the way you overreacted and tried to twist the comments to smear the poor woman, I'm not surprised you'd prefer we forgot the whole thing.

[WhamBam]

too much text.

I saw it. She didn't call David a perv or insult his family.

People have done their best to paint it as something nasty, but all she was doing was giving advice about what's appropriate to post in a public forum.

Yes she did.

Partial memory failure in play here?

And who is she to 'advise' anyone what to post in a public forum.

What is wrong with being proud of your children and posting in photos of them? Please tell me.

No she didn't. She used the word perv I believe, but not in reference to David.

Her comments were perhaps a little misguided, but they were nowhere close to how they've been portrayed since.

Answer the rest of it.

What is wrong with a proud parent - any parent - posting photos of their child(ren) on a forum?

You seem to be insinuating their is something wrong in it.

[snottgoblin]

For the 4th time ... please ... enough of the comments by Nancy and the other members who commented on them, which have been hidden.

We can't see them, the Mods know what was written ... so, do I, in part.

What was said, was said ... let's move the debate forward please.

Thanks

Considering the way you overreacted and tried to twist the comments to smear the poor woman, I'm not surprised you'd prefer we forgot the whole thing.

Poor woman?

If money is a problem, should she really waste baht on alcohol?

[mrtoad]

For the 4th time ... please ... enough of the comments by Nancy and the other members who commented on them, which have been hidden.

We can't see them, the Mods know what was written ... so, do I, in part.

What was said, was said ... let's move the debate forward please.

Thanks

Considering the way you overreacted and tried to twist the comments to smear the poor woman, I'm not surprised you'd prefer we forgot the whole thing.

Are you upset that you didn't qualifyvfor the rin off?

[benalibina]

If UG didn't see it. It didn't happen.

The problem is that I didn't see it and don't know exactly what she said. She maintains that it was fairly innocent and when I PMed several members that were complaining about it, they admitted that they had not seen it either. They succumbed to peer pressure as so many of us are prone to do.

She has also been accused of bashing Brits, but when you look at what she said, she was actually referring to only a few British con artists, not Brits in general. In such a close election such a highly regarded position, you have to be careful about taking some of these sordid rumors at face value.

I saw it. She didn't call David a perv or insult his family.

People have done their best to paint it as something nasty, but all she was doing was giving advice about what's appropriate to post in a public forum.

What a total nonsense......it was....nasty...impolite...and very strange use of words....to give advice....put your blinkers off young man.

[Jingthing]

...

Next, you will be saying that Jingthing didn't call my boys 'Bogan Kids'.

...

.

You have actually misquoted me though I did use the word BOGAN in obvious jest yet you disingenuously tried to make a federal case about it.

If you're going to attack people, at least get your facts straight.

Dude, the days of you posting inaccuracies about me without pushback are over. Months and months of putting you on IGNORE sadly didn't work as you shamelessly took advantage of that to relentlessly bait me as you knew you would get away with it unchallenged, and many would actually believe your version of things and take no reply as proof of that.

That is proof I suppose that using the IGNORE function only works if the other person respects the desire for lack of communication.

In special cases, see above, it is not only useless, it is a hazard.

On the bogan thingie, well maybe the Aussies may consider voting for me for promoting their "culture"!

Edited December 26, 2014 by Jingthing

[SoiBiker]

too much text.

I saw it. She didn't call David a perv or insult his family.

People have done their best to paint it as something nasty, but all she was doing was giving advice about what's appropriate to post in a public forum.

Yes she did.

Partial memory failure in play here?

And who is she to 'advise' anyone what to post in a public forum.

What is wrong with being proud of your children and posting in photos of them? Please tell me.

No she didn't. She used the word perv I believe, but not in reference to David.

Her comments were perhaps a little misguided, but they were nowhere close to how they've been portrayed since.

Answer the rest of it.

What is wrong with a proud parent - any parent - posting photos of their child(ren) on a forum?

You seem to be insinuating their is something wrong in it.

I'm not commenting on that either way. Like I said, her comments might have been misguided, but that's as bad as it got.

[Anthony5]

Now I understand why this thread isn't posted in Farang Pub - fun, entertainment and Expat life.....................because the fun in this thread is hard to find.

[WhamBam]

For the 4th time ... please ... enough of the comments by Nancy and the other members who commented on them, which have been hidden.

We can't see them, the Mods know what was written ... so, do I, in part.

What was said, was said ... let's move the debate forward please.

Thanks

Considering the way you overreacted and tried to twist the comments to smear the poor woman, I'm not surprised you'd prefer we forgot the whole thing.

Actually, it was me in the main who kicked off on it the most, not David48.

It was me and others who called for a public apology for the comments before they were deleted by the mods.

Your memory really is playing tricks with you SB and it seems you are determined to smear others. Why?

Or can you not answer that question either?

[snottgoblin]

If UG didn't see it. It didn't happen.

The problem is that I didn't see it and don't know exactly what she said. She maintains that it was fairly innocent and when I PMed several members that were complaining about it, they admitted that they had not seen it either. They succumbed to peer pressure as so many of us are prone to do.

She has also been accused of bashing Brits, but when you look at what she said, she was actually referring to only a few British con artists, not Brits in general. In such a close election such a highly regarded position, you have to be careful about taking some of these sordid rumors at face value.

I saw it. She didn't call David a perv or insult his family.

People have done their best to paint it as something nasty, but all she was doing was giving advice about what's appropriate to post in a public forum.

What a total nonsense......it was....nasty...impolite...and very strange use of words....to give advice....put your blinkers off young man.

A real honest poster.

Are you in the old mans club sir?

Wow. The forum celebrates somebody like you.

I nominate you for next years election.