New Rules

[mrbojangles]

Just saw this on the City web site. Does anyone else know if there are any other changes this season to the rules?

Refs to decide on injury treatment

The 2006/07 Premier League season kicks off with a new directive regarding the convention of teams kicking the ball out of play when players go to the ground with an injury.

In the general convention of the last few years, teams have put the ball into touch when a player went to the ground with an injury, regaining the ball upon the restart from the opposition.

But following confusion over the extent of some of the injuries and instances where teams have used the convention to their advantage, the new instructions from the Premier League decree that the decision to suspend play must now be taken by the referee and not the players.

The issue is one that Stuart Pearce has called for clarification over before, and last season there was an incident over an injury to West Ham’s Christian Dailly in the FA Cup 6th round tie at the City of Manchester Stadium.

Premier League spokesman Dan Johnson says: “There was a general feeling that this player-led convention had gone too far.”

Tim Oscroft

http://www.mcfc.co.uk/default.sps?pagegid=...p;newsid=356176

[Jockstar]

Eh? Surely it was gentlemanly conduct to put the ball out if a player is down. Thus the team then kick or through the ball back to the oposition. Though in theory they dont have to do this.

[dantilley]

This is true, yes. Players were apparently abusing this "Gentleman's agreement" in the world cup, and also have in many other top leagues.

Can't really say I've noticed it myself, but reportedly players would deliberately feign injury in order to get the ball kicked off and break up the opposition's attacking flow, or just to create a pause in the game. Said players would then be runing around tackling and challenging 2 minutes later.

Coupled with incidents such as the Sheffield United / Liverpool match a few seasons ago and the squaring up of Wenger and Jol last season, and the powers that be have decided enough is enough and will now alow play to continue if a player is down injured, unless very seriously injured, but it will be the ref's decision if play stops or not.

Interestingly, the football league (i.e. League One and League Two) wil not be introducing this rule.

Full story on BC here:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/e...rem/4796269.stm

Edited August 20, 2006 by dantilley

[Jockstar]

Scottish FA act on match controversy

The Scottish Football Association have asked players to stop kicking the ball out of play when team-mates and opponents are injured - and let referees stop the game.

Celtic manager Gordon Strachan has aired his concerns on the controversial subject, having found himself in trouble at Inverness last season and sent to the stand at Hearts recently.

Caley threw the ball back to Celtic, after they had put the ball out to enable their player get treatment, and then almost scored after putting their opponents under pressure.

At Tynecastle, Strachan was outraged the referee allowed Hearts to have an attempt on goal, when their player was down, and then gave them the ball back afterwards. Later in the game, play was stopped with Celtic on the ball.

But SFA chief executive David Taylor said: 'It is for the match referee to decide whether a break in play is necessary for treatment to be given to injured players.

'In accordance with the laws of the game, the referee controls the match and allows play to continue until the ball is out of play if a player is, in his opinion, only slightly injured. The referee will stop the match if, in his opinion, a player may be seriously injured.

'The practice of kicking the ball out has grown in recent years, but rather than aid fair play it has led to problems. Already this season there have been matches in Scotland where sides have disagreed over whether to kick the ball out, leading to arguments on the touchline and on the pitch.'

Strachan, who will serve the second of a two-match touchline ban against Hibernian this weekend, urged the SFA to make the situation clear for all managers and players after English football bosses told clubs that their referees would decide when a game is stopped.

Taylor added: 'Whilst a referee cannot dictate what a player can or cannot do with the ball, the practice of deliberately kicking the ball out of play to secure attention for an injured player is unnecessary.

'Frequent instances of this practice can disrupt the flow of a game and can even be used as a tactical ploy.

'This can create disagreements and tensions, particularly regarding whether, and in what manner, the ball is returned to play.

'The Scottish FA is therefore encouraging clubs to make their coaching and playing staff aware of the role and responsibilities of the match referee in order to remove any possible confusion about where responsibility lies for the treatment of injured players.'