Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
12 minutes ago, smokie36 said:

As Alfredo says give them time....I'd include Sissoko in this as he's not had a decent run of games for us....same with Janssen.

 

Give them all time but in Sissoko's case he's not even producing the effort that gets him on the bench.  He's been nothing short of diabolical

Posted
18 minutes ago, smokie36 said:

As Alfredo says give them time....I'd include Sissoko in this as he's not had a decent run of games for us....same with Janssen.

 

The only thing that worries me about Sissoko is that for Poch not to put him in the squad  then perhaps he isn't putting the effort in in training and we all know what that generally leads too !

 

P.S Crikey, wrote that before i saw your post carms.

Posted
14 minutes ago, alfieconn said:

 

The only thing that worries me about Sissoko is that for Poch not to put him in the squad  then perhaps he isn't putting the effort in in training and we all know what that generally leads too !

 

P.S Crikey, wrote that before i saw your post carms.

 

Hopefully not 5 years of watching the game on the telly like some we have had before.

 

The price tag too.....whooooosh.

Posted

Don't know who i'm replying to as this software installed on Thai Visa is complete and utter crap.  Still cant post on some threads either.  i wonder, have Thai Visa actually paid these useless clowns?

  • Like 2
Posted
26 minutes ago, alfieconn said:

 

The only thing that worries me about Sissoko is that for Poch not to put him in the squad  then perhaps he isn't putting the effort in in training and we all know what that generally leads too !

 

P.S Crikey, wrote that before i saw your post carms.

 

Just saying mate, for Spurs to pay 30m for a player and not even have him on the bench in favor of untried teenagers is a very bad sign and if as you say he's not putting in the effort then he's going to be on his way out.

 

Also possibly one of the weirdest signings we have ever made and for that sum of money i just can't fathom it.

  • Like 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, smokie36 said:

Looks like Poch has put the boot in as well carms....much deservedly!

 

Interesting to hear carms opinion, considering his on Maureen throwing players under the bus :whistling:

Posted
On 11/28/2016 at 4:30 AM, carmine said:

A worry for me looking back at saturdays game was the way our heads seem to drop when Chelsea leveled. Up to that point we looked quite dominant but the manner in which it seemed to change us could almost be described as dramatic.

 

Which is exactly what I implied.

 

In the first half I could see it being a 3 or 4 nil leathering, but not only did you fall to bits,  Conte's hairdryer obviously worked.

 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Chicog said:

 

Which is exactly what I implied.

 

In the first half I could see it being a 3 or 4 nil leathering, but not only did you fall to bits,  Conte's hairdryer obviously worked.

 

 

 

What  !!!! another who watches a different game !

Posted
1 hour ago, BangrakBob said:

 

Interesting to hear carms opinion, considering his on Maureen throwing players under the bus :whistling:

 

Its highly unusual for Poch so he really must need a kick up the backside!

Posted

I think top 4 should be the target to get some more CL play next year .  I can't see us finish better than last season.  

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, alfieconn said:

 

What  !!!! another who watches a different game !

 

Er... what?

 

It was nine shots to one in the tiny totts favour prior to Pedro's strike.

What game were you watching?

 

Posted
37 minutes ago, Chicog said:

 

Er... what?

 

It was nine shots to one in the tiny totts favour prior to Pedro's strike.

What game were you watching?

 

 

And after it was 8 shots to 3 in the chavs favour so 5 more shots than the opposition  automatically means the opposition fell to bit's or are saying that if a teams shot count goes from 9 to 3  that they fell to bits :shock1::cheesy:

 

Incidently shot's doesn't really mean anything, shots on target tells you a bit more.

Posted
9 hours ago, alfieconn said:

 

And after it was 8 shots to 3 in the chavs favour so 5 more shots than the opposition  automatically means the opposition fell to bit's or are saying that if a teams shot count goes from 9 to 3  that they fell to bits :shock1::cheesy:

 

Incidently shot's doesn't really mean anything, shots on target tells you a bit more.

 

You know I wonder what the ---- you are on sometimes.

The tiny totts totally dominated the first half.

They were gobshite in the second.

I can't tell from the drivel you're posting whether you agree or disagree.

 

 

Posted
5 hours ago, Chicog said:

 

You know I wonder what the ---- you are on sometimes.

The tiny totts totally dominated the first half.

They were gobshite in the second.

I can't tell from the drivel you're posting whether you agree or disagree.

 

 

 

Sorry but i just find it amusing you saying a team fell to bit's and using there shot count to prove the fact  :biggrin:

Posted
13 hours ago, alfieconn said:

 

Sorry but i just find it amusing you saying a team fell to bit's and using there shot count to prove the fact  :biggrin:

 

I really can't debate with morons.

 

 

Posted

Danny Rose is back and Toby should be also so thats the defense back in place.

 

Sounds like we've also signed up all key players now on new contracts which is very good news.

 

After a tough november compounded by important injuries lets hope today kick starts us off again.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, carmine said:

Danny Rose is back and Toby should be also so thats the defense back in place.

 

Sounds like we've also signed up all key players now on new contracts which is very good news.

 

After a tough november compounded by important injuries lets hope today kick starts us off again.

 

Don't talk to me about November.

 

:post-4641-1156694606:

Posted
On 11/30/2016 at 2:59 AM, Chicog said:

 

You know I wonder what the ---- you are on sometimes.

The tiny totts totally dominated the first half.

They were gobshite in the second.

I can't tell from the drivel you're posting whether you agree or disagree.

 

 

 

typo

Posted
6 hours ago, Chicog said:

 

That is good news!

 

:smile:

 

I know your jealous Chico :biggrin: 

 

BUT

 

Off coarse it is, Vertonghen has been transformed since his mate Toby paired 

up with him and became the best centre back partnership in the league

last season, and are continuing where they left off.

 

Only need Toby to extend his contract together with Hugo and that completes 

a full house. 

Happy Days!

 

  • Like 1
Posted
16 hours ago, sotsira said:

 

I know your jealous Chico :biggrin: 

 

BUT

 

Off coarse it is, Vertonghen has been transformed since his mate Toby paired 

up with him and became the best centre back partnership in the league

last season, and are continuing where they left off.

 

Only need Toby to extend his contract together with Hugo and that completes 

a full house. 

Happy Days!

 

 

Add to that when the first choice back four in fit its the best back four in the league.

 

Chicog needs to keep up!!!:smile:

  • Like 1
Posted
28 minutes ago, Bredbury Blue said:

A decent defence but you guys happy up top?

 

No we are devastated at not scoring at least seven goals yesterday.

  • Like 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...