webfact Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 Recent visit by US top diplomat strains relationBANGKOK: -- The recent visit to Thailand by a top US diplomat to strengthen the over 180 years old relations between the two countries was a failure and even strained the relation.This was what the chief of the Centre for ASEAN Studies of Thammasat University believed.Associate professor Dr Prapat Thepchatree, director of the centre, said the recent visit to Thailand by the US assistant secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Daniel Russel and his speech at Chulalongkorn university inappropriately criticising Thailand was considered an interference of the country’s internal affairs.His visit was a failure if he thought his visit would strengthen the long history of the relation, he said.He said what the top diplomat said has even strained the good ties which the two countries have enjoyed and it was upset.He viewed it was a normal diplomatic protocol for the Thai deputy foreign minister to summon the US Charge d’ affaires Patrick Murphy for clarification of any unhappy issue.The National Legislative Assembly’s foreign affairs commission met yesterday to discuss topics to raise when it is to invite the US Charge d’ affaires for talk on February 11.Source: http://englishnews.thaipbs.or.th/recent-visit-us-top-diplomat-strains-relation -- Thai PBS 2015-02-05 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post smutcakes Posted February 5, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted February 5, 2015 Jesus are they still going on about this. Just forget it for christ sake, it was meaningless diplomatic clap trap. Surely the NLA has better things to be doing than this. Its as if there is some kind of agenda to intentionally keep this issue going..... 14 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post jaltsc Posted February 5, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted February 5, 2015 (edited) "The recent visit to Thailand by a top US diplomat to strengthen the over 180 years old relations between the two countries was a failure and even strained the relation." I'm sure it didn't strain the relations as much as Thailand declaring war against the U.S. during WW II. Or was that just convenient amnesia? Edited February 5, 2015 by jaltsc 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post stickyrice2000 Posted February 5, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted February 5, 2015 Get over it. You cannot accept criticism at all. If it makes you happy, I can white lie and say Thailand is perfect in all aspects. I hope Patrick Murphy decline to meet the NLA. Let them continue to whine like a baby. 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Costas2008 Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 No point of reiterating this subject over and over. The best action would be to ignore them and their remarks. It was an attempt on behalf of Daniel Russel only for internal consumption. They know that Thai/American relationships will always be good. But I would have liked to see what happens if Thais turn to China next....... Will Mr Russel choke on his words? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeverSure Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 The US is shaking in its boots. Wherever will it buy rice now? Oh wait. It grows rice too. Thainess at its best. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Just1Voice Posted February 5, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted February 5, 2015 It only "strained" things due to Thai's notable lack of understanding English, and because they feel it made them lose "face". Russell said the actions of the junta "MIGHT be perceived as politically motivated". Thai need to learn the meaning of "might" before they open their mouths and make even bigger fools of themselves. Get over it, grow up, and try joining the rest of the world in the 21st Century. 13 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post NeverSure Posted February 5, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted February 5, 2015 But I would have liked to see what happens if Thais turn to China next....... Will Mr Russel choke on his words? About the same thing the US would do if Greece turned to China. Nothing at all. The US is the second largest buyer of Thai exports behind only Japan who would follow the US because Japan is afraid of China. China threatened ownership of certain Japanese Islands, threatened fishing rights, shipping lanes and airline routes. The US made China back down. Thailand could lose its two biggest customers AND its two biggest industrial investors. I'd think the Thai government would shut its mouth but it's not that smart. I fully expect to see some industrial investment pulling out of Thailand rather than increasing. The US and Japan bought large chunks of industrial land at Yangon, Burma and the US cut a deal to move back into Clark Air Force Base and Subic Bay in The Phils. I think Thailand is actually slipping. 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post NongKhaiKid Posted February 5, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted February 5, 2015 Are people afraid if they don't criticise the US they will be accused of not being a good Thai ? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pedro01 Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 "The recent visit to Thailand by a top US diplomat to strengthen the over 180 years old relations between the two countries was a failure and even strained the relation." I'm sure it didn't strain the relations as much as Thailand declaring war against the U.S. during WW II. Or was that just convenient amnesia? There's a story behind that, very well known & in the public domain. You should look it up. Then you might have a different perspective of what was really strained. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post wow64 Posted February 5, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted February 5, 2015 Reminds me of TrueVision.. always playing the same thing over and over and over and over and over. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caveat Emptor Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 All of this will be going back to the State Dept from the US Embassy and it may occur to them that Thailand has become uppity since China became their new best friend. I'm not suggesting China is in anyway involved but it may just embolden the Thais. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post lewy67 Posted February 5, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted February 5, 2015 Mr Russel may have upset the Dr from Thammassat, a few generals, the NLA and the elite in general but I don't think his comments meant much the to the other 66 million Thais. If all were allowed to air an opinion we may find that a few agree with Mr Russel. 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kokesaat Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 The cartoon in Thai Rath newspaper a few days ago..... "Your meddling in Thai affairs makes me (us) think that in reality you're part of IS (Islamic State)" "What grounds do you have to say that I'm part of IS?" "Because you behave like an "I" - idiot, and "S" - stupid." My apologies if my Thai is a bit off the mark. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post chainarong Posted February 5, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted February 5, 2015 Unfortunately the finger of suspicion points at Thailand , you have no-body to blame but yourself, after weeks of denying there would be any military involvement , bang 4am in the morning, Thailand is now being controlled by a Junta, Thailand needs to have a good look at themselves if they want to mix with the international community , Countries and institutions with Democracy as their platform use the word respectability, there's nothing respectable about staging a Coup even if the majority Thai Expats agreed that this was possibly the only way out of a bad situation , under the US ,Un and democracy rule of law you removed a elected government, this Thailand now has to live with , what part do you not understand. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaltsc Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 (edited) "The recent visit to Thailand by a top US diplomat to strengthen the over 180 years old relations between the two countries was a failure and even strained the relation." I'm sure it didn't strain the relations as much as Thailand declaring war against the U.S. during WW II. Or was that just convenient amnesia? There's a story behind that, very well known & in the public domain. You should look it up. Then you might have a different perspective of what was really strained. Which part? The part where:“Thailand began moving in the opposite direction, creating a 'friendship' with Japan and adding to its school textbooks a futuristic map of Thailand with a 'Greater Thailand' encroaching on Chinese territory…." OR the part where: "The Japanese had assistance: Thailand's prime minister, Lang Pipul, collaborated with the Japanese, embracing the Axis power's war goal of usurping territory in China and ruling over the South Pacific. Pipul wanted to partake in the spoils; toward that end, he declared war on the United States and England. In October, he took dictatorial control of Thailand and became a loyal puppet of the Japanese." ? I do have a different perspective now. Very brave when standing behind the bully in order to possibly receive whatever he discards without partaking in the battle itself. No matter what the general population might have wanted, the government, then as now, did whatever it wanted to do. The major difference is that there doesn't appear to be much of an impassioned resistance movement today as there was then. Edited February 5, 2015 by jaltsc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yellowboat Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 Such a touchy junta. Complaining about Mr. Russel is easier than working on those promised reforms. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
binjalin Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 and this is a top academic? *sigh* we all know the USA was right, apart from a few elite fanatics (you know who you are), to point out that Junta's are unacceptable in the international, democratic community 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
binjalin Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 Mr Russel may have upset the Dr from Thammassat, a few generals, the NLA and the elite in general but I don't think his comments meant much the to the other 66 million Thais. If all were allowed to air an opinion we may find that a few agree with Mr Russel. most would... even amongst a few Thais I know who supported the Junta initially their enthusiasm is dwindling. Mostly, it is worth adding, because they think he is 'rude' not for some 'high ideal' but that's Thainess for you lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leonardo Madison Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 This article is basic political rhetoric. America and allies want democracy returned to the citizens of Thailand. The Thai citizens, if they didn't fear retribution, would also agree. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baerboxer Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 Jesus are they still going on about this. Just forget it for christ sake, it was meaningless diplomatic clap trap. Surely the NLA has better things to be doing than this. Its as if there is some kind of agenda to intentionally keep this issue going..... "This was what the chief of the Centre for ASEAN Studies of Thammasat University believed. Associate professor Dr Prapat Thepchatree, director of the centre" Is this gentleman part of the NLA too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thaiready Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 Been here 16 years....have Thai Citizenship. ....am I proud of my leaders HELL NO.......bunch of freaking cry babies. Get on with the damn elections. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baerboxer Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 (edited) and this is a top academic? *sigh* we all know the USA was right, apart from a few elite fanatics (you know who you are), to point out that Junta's are unacceptable in the international, democratic community Any self appointed government or leader is unacceptable to the international democratic community. As are those who blatantly rig elections such as the Kim family and Mr. Mugabe. The US diplomat chose his words carefully saying who things could look and might be interpreted. All democracies would like to see Thailand become a democracy - not governed by a military junta or a convicted criminal godfather and his family. Of course the Shin apologist Thaksin supporters on here (you all know who you are, and welcome to the new "recruits") want to spin this as some sort of support for Thaksin, Yingluck and PTP. Edited February 5, 2015 by Baerboxer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
expat888 Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 Thailand takes it's marching orders from China, takes money from the US and claims relations are "strained" with the US. Thailand is meaningless to the US. US has much better friends in the neighborhood. US, cut the money to Thailand. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baerboxer Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 Mr Russel may have upset the Dr from Thammassat, a few generals, the NLA and the elite in general but I don't think his comments meant much the to the other 66 million Thais. If all were allowed to air an opinion we may find that a few agree with Mr Russel. most would... even amongst a few Thais I know who supported the Junta initially their enthusiasm is dwindling. Mostly, it is worth adding, because they think he is 'rude' not for some 'high ideal' but that's Thainess for you lol Most Thais I know are still reserving judgement - they still don't believe much will really change for the vast majority of the population. But, they will be very disappointed if as usual everyone, on all sides, escape with little slaps on the wrist. Most think the current PM is a typical career military leader / senior rank in the way he speaks and acts. But a lot of elites are rude like that too - Plod, Chalerm, spring to mind for example. The reality is there is no real political representation for the majority of the Thai people. Only self interested elites and local power brokers out for themselves. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
expat888 Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 Mr Russel may have upset the Dr from Thammassat, a few generals, the NLA and the elite in general but I don't think his comments meant much the to the other 66 million Thais. If all were allowed to air an opinion we may find that a few agree with Mr Russel. most would... even amongst a few Thais I know who supported the Junta initially their enthusiasm is dwindling. Mostly, it is worth adding, because they think he is 'rude' not for some 'high ideal' but that's Thainess for you lol Most Thais I know are still reserving judgement - they still don't believe much will really change for the vast majority of the population. But, they will be very disappointed if as usual everyone, on all sides, escape with little slaps on the wrist. Most think the current PM is a typical career military leader / senior rank in the way he speaks and acts. But a lot of elites are rude like that too - Plod, Chalerm, spring to mind for example. The reality is there is no real political representation for the majority of the Thai people. Only self interested elites and local power brokers out for themselves. You are reciting history for the past decades. Nothing changes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baerboxer Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 "The recent visit to Thailand by a top US diplomat to strengthen the over 180 years old relations between the two countries was a failure and even strained the relation." I'm sure it didn't strain the relations as much as Thailand declaring war against the U.S. during WW II. Or was that just convenient amnesia? There's a story behind that, very well known & in the public domain. You should look it up. Then you might have a different perspective of what was really strained. Which part? The part where:“Thailand began moving in the opposite direction, creating a 'friendship' with Japan and adding to its school textbooks a futuristic map of Thailand with a 'Greater Thailand' encroaching on Chinese territory…." OR the part where: "The Japanese had assistance: Thailand's prime minister, Lang Pipul, collaborated with the Japanese, embracing the Axis power's war goal of usurping territory in China and ruling over the South Pacific. Pipul wanted to partake in the spoils; toward that end, he declared war on the United States and England. In October, he took dictatorial control of Thailand and became a loyal puppet of the Japanese." ? I do have a different perspective now. Very brave when standing behind the bully in order to possibly receive whatever he discards without partaking in the battle itself. No matter what the general population might have wanted, the government, then as now, did whatever it wanted to do. The major difference is that there doesn't appear to be much of an impassioned resistance movement today as there was then. Did he really declare war on England? What a fool! Guess no one explained its the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Perhaps he only wanted to fight the English part? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baerboxer Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 (edited) Mr Russel may have upset the Dr from Thammassat, a few generals, the NLA and the elite in general but I don't think his comments meant much the to the other 66 million Thais. If all were allowed to air an opinion we may find that a few agree with Mr Russel. most would... even amongst a few Thais I know who supported the Junta initially their enthusiasm is dwindling. Mostly, it is worth adding, because they think he is 'rude' not for some 'high ideal' but that's Thainess for you lol Most Thais I know are still reserving judgement - they still don't believe much will really change for the vast majority of the population. But, they will be very disappointed if as usual everyone, on all sides, escape with little slaps on the wrist. Most think the current PM is a typical career military leader / senior rank in the way he speaks and acts. But a lot of elites are rude like that too - Plod, Chalerm, spring to mind for example. The reality is there is no real political representation for the majority of the Thai people. Only self interested elites and local power brokers out for themselves. You are reciting history for the past decades. Nothing changes. Correct - and why will it change for the future? Who do you think is going to drive that transformation - the current military appointed government, the old elites and the Dems or the Shin clan and their mates? I mean real transformation in the interests of Thailand and all Thai people, not the selfish elite and corrupt. Ever hears the expression " History repeats". Without intervention it certainly will. Edited February 5, 2015 by Baerboxer 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smutcakes Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 Jesus are they still going on about this. Just forget it for christ sake, it was meaningless diplomatic clap trap. Surely the NLA has better things to be doing than this. Its as if there is some kind of agenda to intentionally keep this issue going..... "This was what the chief of the Centre for ASEAN Studies of Thammasat University believed. Associate professor Dr Prapat Thepchatree, director of the centre" Is this gentleman part of the NLA too? No, but if you read the OP, you may have noted this paragraph "The National Legislative Assembly’s foreign affairs commission met yesterday to discuss topics to raise when it is to invite the US Charge d’ affaires for talk on February 11". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cookee68 Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 Who gives a Shit, get over it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now