Jump to content

Toppled Thai PM 'can't eat noodles' without our say: Prayut


webfact

Recommended Posts

from just a couple weeks ago, ...

"Today, have I ever restricted anyone's rights? Have I ever done that?" asked Gen. Prayuth,

It looks like the General is "outing" himself...

Toppled Thai PM 'can't eat noodles' without our say: junta chief

Yes but he is not restricting her movements. Just watching them. So I guess he isn't "outing" himself after all.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So there we have it. All those referring to Orwell were actually over-estimating what is actually the double-speak of a mere bouncer, with "security" for noodles. Noodles on a world stage. Fine thing indeed.

Edited by Squeegee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"If she wants to go to eat noodles then she can go but if we prohibit her then she cannot go,"

disgusting treatment of the ex-PM

Again. Did you hear that in Thai?
If the NEPM thought he was being misquoted by journalists he would have them arrested and intimidated.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"If she wants to go to eat noodles then she can go but if we prohibit her then she cannot go,"

disgusting treatment of the ex-PM

Again. Did you hear that in Thai?
If the NEPM thought he was being misquoted by journalists he would have them arrested and intimidated.

Really .. AFP journalist!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

from just a couple weeks ago, ...

"Today, have I ever restricted anyone's rights? Have I ever done that?" asked Gen. Prayuth,

It looks like the General is "outing" himself...

Toppled Thai PM 'can't eat noodles' without our say: junta chief

I have to find the actual Thai text as inside the article it says "If she wants to go to eat noodles then she can go but if we prohibit her then she cannot go" rather than "can't eat noodles". Now the "cannot go" seems to fall under Martial Law and as such the PM isn't restricting.

I'm sure the legal advisors of Ms. Yingluck, those knowledgible chaps, would agree with this rolleyes.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"If she wants to go to eat noodles then she can go but if we prohibit her then she cannot go,"

disgusting treatment of the ex-PM

Again. Did you hear that in Thai?
If the NEPM thought he was being misquoted by journalists he would have them arrested and intimidated.

A new abbreviation? I missed that, what does it stand for wai.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"If she wants to go to eat noodles then she can go but if we prohibit her then she cannot go,"

disgusting treatment of the ex-PM

Again. Did you hear that in Thai?

I guess since its an english language forum, and the OP is in English, and the statement is made in the OP, its reasonable to assume that posters might respond to it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"If she wants to go to eat noodles then she can go but if we prohibit her then she cannot go,"

disgusting treatment of the ex-PM

Again. Did you hear that in Thai?

I guess since its an english language forum, and the OP is in English, and the statement is made in the OP, its reasonable to assume that posters might respond to it.

True.. my comments are to do with miss translation and deliberate change in emphasis.

Just because it's from AFP doesn't mean it's 100% accurate, does it?

Edited by casualbiker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

from just a couple weeks ago, ...

"Today, have I ever restricted anyone's rights? Have I ever done that?" asked Gen. Prayuth,

It looks like the General is "outing" himself...

Toppled Thai PM 'can't eat noodles' without our say: junta chief

Yes but he is not restricting her movements. Just watching them. So I guess he isn't "outing" himself after all.

"If she wants to go to eat noodles then she can go but if we prohibit her then she cannot go," Prayut told reporters Thursday, indicating the military would continue to monitor her movements.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"If she wants to go to eat noodles then she can go but if we prohibit her then she cannot go," Prayut told reporters Thursday, indicating the military would continue to monitor her movements.

Why would they do that? Do they think she might try skip the country?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.







×
×
  • Create New...