Jump to content

Thai farmer hangs self because he has no money to pay creditor's bank


webfact

Recommended Posts

Farmer hangs self because he has no money to pay creditor's bank

19-3-2558-15-32-37-wpcf_728x413.jpg

SUKHOTHAI: -- An aging rice farmer committed suicide by hanging himself at his house for being unable to settle his debt with the Bank of Agriculture and Agricultural Cooperatives.

The tragic incident took place this morning at house No 100/5 in Village 5, Tambon Ban Mai Sookkasem, Sukhothai’s Kong Krailat district. The victim was identified as Mr Duangchan Uttamano, 66.

Mr Duangchan’s wife, Mrs Sanim told Kong Krailat police that her husband was taking a bath while she was cooking in the kitchen this morning. But after finishing with the cooking, she went out through the front door to water plants but found the victim’s body dangling with a rope around his neck and tied to the ceiling beam.

She said she screamed for help and neighbours rushed in to untie the rope but it was too late to save Mr Duangchan.

Two last letters written by the victim were found inside the room. One reads: “no rice farming and hence no money to repay the debt with the BAAC. No water in the well and, therefore, no rice farming and no money to repay the debt on March 20. Pity for my own fate, there is no way out and don’t know where to find the money. Good bye. No need to take dad to see doctor because I did it myself.”

Mrs Sanim said her husband owed the bank 350,000 baht and on March 20 he has to pay the bank at least 100,000 baht.

Source: http://englishnews.thaipbs.or.th/farmer-hangs-self-because-he-has-no-money-to-pay-creditors-bank

thaipbs_logo.jpg
-- Thai PBS 2015-03-19

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Indeed we see yet again the tragic inheritance from the Great Rice pledging Scam Scheme.

The previous administration indeed do have ''blood upon their hands.''

This has nothing with the previous government to do. Many rice farmers have two harvest a year but Prayut ordered to cut down on the water and not release water for the 2nd harvest. He wanted to have one harvest a year for all farmers.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Indeed we see yet again the tragic inheritance from the Great Rice pledging Scam Scheme.

The previous administration indeed do have ''blood upon their hands.''

Someone has already provided a reply and it applies to you and your uninformed comment

Because there was no water.. the guy did not have water in his well. Did you actually read it or not ? Not a word to blame the previous government.. the guy himself blames the drought. But no you had to drag the previous government in. Says a lot about you.

. No water in the well and, therefore, no rice farming

Its hard to grow rice without water (impossible) so he would have lost even more if he had.

thanks robblok.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A very sad story and outcome for those left to pick - up the pieces.

Would be interesting to know why he had such a massive debt before making any further comments.

They borrow ahead of harvest time to finance purchase of seed crops, fertilizers, pesticides etc. They also use the future crop to pay past debts. If he's like most farmers, he's still in debt on plantings from a few years ago. It's a never ending cycle of debt.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a great deal of farmers who have been in debt and they didn't qualify to join the Missmanaged and ineptly handled rice scheme, but that doesn't suit many people as its always about politics.

People need to think before they post at times, NOBODY here knows what and how his debts occurred and for how many years he's had those debts.

He couldn't diversify from rice as he still needs water for cultivation of whatever crop was to replace it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a great deal of farmers who have been in debt and they didn't qualify to join the Missmanaged and ineptly handled rice scheme, but that doesn't suit many people as its always about politics.

People need to think before they post at times, NOBODY here knows what and how his debts occurred and for how many years he's had those debts.

He couldn't diversify from rice as he still needs water for cultivation of whatever crop was to replace it.

But some crops use a LOT LESS water!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a great deal of farmers who have been in debt and they didn't qualify to join the Missmanaged and ineptly handled rice scheme, but that doesn't suit many people as its always about politics.

People need to think before they post at times, NOBODY here knows what and how his debts occurred and for how many years he's had those debts.

He couldn't diversify from rice as he still needs water for cultivation of whatever crop was to replace it.

But some crops use a LOT LESS water!

You are clearly ignorant. Paddy land is only suitable for rice. You cannot just switch to a less water intensive crop.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What crops use NO water ? As this was the case with this poor bloke!!

Sorry. That you can't read my comment.. I said less water. And if farmers changed last year when they were told. He / they would have had water.. but that's just semantics!

Thailand as a whole needs to do more for the agriculture sector. Prayuth, agricultural ministry and department of irrigation are trying to sector farming to ensure manageable water supplies. Eg lower water consumption crops in areas that tend to have drought and also build more local water storage sources. This problem didn't just occur within the last 10 months!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What part of the OP hasn't quite caught on to you yet when rhe poor blokes stated he had NO water in his well?

That's not a little bit less for a different crop, that's NO water for any crop, hence why I asked you what crops don't need water?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But the rice pledging scheme enriched all the farmers. After all, as we are told ad infinitum, it was designed to lose money and the poor farmers were paid double the market price for all that rice sitting in storage, so how could he have been in debt? Or, just maybe, the whole scheme was a scam from the top down, and the vast majority of the poor farmers received not one sataeng extra from it, but instead had to borrow heavily to pay for the fertiliser and other necessities that mysteriously increased in price the same time the scam scheme began?

And for the tens of thousands of farmers NOT in the scheme what do you say to them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Indeed we see yet again the tragic inheritance from the Great Rice pledging Scam Scheme.

The previous administration indeed do have ''blood upon their hands.''

Someone has already provided a reply and it applies to you and your uninformed comment

Because there was no water.. the guy did not have water in his well. Did you actually read it or not ? Not a word to blame the previous government.. the guy himself blames the drought. But no you had to drag the previous government in. Says a lot about you.

. No water in the well and, therefore, no rice farming

Its hard to grow rice without water (impossible) so he would have lost even more if he had.

thanks robblok.

How much money did the previous gov't allocate for water management systems to be put in place?

What was done with that money?

Has their inaction helped matters

Yes TS and TS have blood on their hands

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I give up. Some here are determined to pin the blame for this unfortunate souls suicide on one or other of the sides un Thailands political conflict.

Ir only makes the whole affair more tragic. He was in debt.He despaired. It was neither Thaksin, Yingluck or the Juntas doing.

I often wonder why these type of news articles are even posted here other than to antagonize people. People commit suicide all the time and they are not recognized. IMO threads like this should not be posted if for no other reason than common courtesy and respect for the deceased family.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I give up. Some here are determined to pin the blame for this unfortunate souls suicide on one or other of the sides un Thailands political conflict.

Ir only makes the whole affair more tragic. He was in debt.He despaired. It was neither Thaksin, Yingluck or the Juntas doing.

I often wonder why these type of news articles are even posted here other than to antagonize people. People commit suicide all the time and they are not recognized. IMO threads like this should not be posted if for no other reason than common courtesy and respect for the deceased family.

In the last 2 weeks how many topics has there been about farangs leaping off buildings committing suicide for many various reasons and they never turn into finger pointing political blame sessions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.









×
×
  • Create New...
""