Jump to content

Thai generals push for 'golden era' when elite held sway


Recommended Posts

Posted

Thai generals push for 'golden era' when elite held sway
AFP

BANGKOK: -- A new Thai constitution being drafted by the ruling junta is a throwback to an era when a royalist and military elite had a stranglehold on politics, analysts and politicians say, warning of dire consequences for democracy.

In the legislative building that once used to house elected MPs, Paiboon Nititawan is one of a core group of military appointees charting Thailand's future.

A year ago the veteran conservative was giving rousing speeches to crowds of protesters clamouring for the toppling of prime minister Yingluck Shinawatra and a military takeover.

Thailand's generals did just that in May. And Paiboon, like many prominent establishment figures, was rewarded with a seat on the influential committee redrafting the kingdom's constitution.

"We have designed this constitution based on countering the problems of the last 10 years," Paiboon told AFP, a draft copy of the document on the table in front of him.

"Thai political parties are different to other countries'... they can be bought," he adds.

In the eyes of the country's elite, democratically elected politicians have ruined Thailand with populist policies and cronyism that lead the poor astray.

They long for what they regard as a golden era when parliament was overseen by unelected elders who kept such populism in check.

For many Thais the constitutional debate has a sense of deja vu. The charter has undergone more than a dozen rewrites in the last 80 years, either by democrats trying to consolidate parliamentary power or counter moves by the royalist elite to create a more pliant democracy.

The current junta led by former army chief-turned-premier Prayut Chan-O-Cha is aiming for the latter.

But they insist their reforms will finally end the political bickering and protests that have dogged what used to be one of Southeast Asia's most vibrant economies.

- Large parties targeted -

The first draft is expected on April 17 and the final document should receive royal approval from Thailand's 87-year-old King Bhumibol in September. Elections are slated for early next year.

But enough details have been published to see what kind of political future the generals envisage.

Paiboon explains two key reforms. A senate with the power to impeach elected politicians will be appointed and dominated by the old guard -- including judges, former prime ministers and military figures.

Parliament will be elected through a proportional representation voting system similar to Germany's that will favour smaller parties and coalition governments.

Analysts say those moves are designed to break the backs of large parties and -- above all -- ensure no group loyal to ousted premiers Thaksin Shinawatra and his sister Yingluck ever form an outright majority.

"Elected politicians will be intensively monitored by a small band of bureaucrats, academics, and other technocrats from a moralistic-conservative wing," explains Khemthong Tonsakulrungruang, a constitutional scholar at Bangkok's Chulalongkorn University.

Cultivating a staunch following among the country's urban working-class voters and farmers in the north, parties linked to the Shinawatra family have won every election since 2001.

- 'A step back' -

Commentators say the new constitution is an attempt to return Thailand to a pre-Thaksin era.

"This is surely a step back into what Thailand experienced in the 1980s -- when the power was firmly in the hands of non-elective institutions," Pavin Chachavalpongpun, a Thai academic at Kyoto University, tells AFP.

During that decade Thailand was led by ultra-royalist former general Prem Tinsulanonda, now head of the king's hugely influential Privy Council.

Paul Chambers, director of research at the Institute of South East Asian Affairs in Chiang Mai, says control over the senate would give "arch-royalists a means of vetoing progressive legislation coming from a popularly elected lower house".

But even the junta's natural allies are wary.

Senior members of the Democrat Party, historical opponents of the Shinawatras, have reacted with growing alarm to the charter draft.

At a recent debate in Bangkok, former diplomat and Democrat Party heavyweight Kasit Piromya accused Thailand's generals of pushing the "regression of democratic aspiration".

"What I am seeing at the moment... is the fear that we are going back," he added.

That raises question marks over whether the new constitution will be the silver bullet of stability that the military promises.

A cartoonist for Thai Rath, the country's largest circulation newspaper, recently offered his own take on that question. He drew the constitution as a ticking time bomb.

afplogo.jpg
-- (c) Copyright AFP 2015-03-27

  • Like 1
Posted

Clearly, this article was written by someone who does not understand Thailand.

Yes, in other countries water will always flow downhill.

But Thailand is special.

But that water flowing in Thailand makes the Kool Aid taste mega!!

  • Like 1
Posted

A new Thai constitution being drafted by the ruling junta is a throwback to an era when a royalist and military elite had a stranglehold on politics, analysts and politicians say, warning of dire consequences for democracy.

To all the junta lovers/ anti election posters here, please read the above twice and reconsider your support to the Thai elite!!

Your are supporting people and a system belonging in a long gone century!!

And cut your "but Yingluck" BS.

but Yingluck.......................

What democracy are you referring to JOC?

Democracy never existed in Thailand and I very much doubt that it will ever exist.

At least an effort is being made now to bring Thailand to a more civilized world with less corruption and better police force.

Ideals are for the masses, reality and common sense applies more to the right thinking person.

A more civilised Thailand with less corruption and a better police force ?

Ah yes, that would be the other Thailand, you know the one in the parallel universe.

Others might call that alternate Thailand ....Vietnam :D

Costas, what makes you believe Democracy never existed in Thailand? The 65,000,000 voters might disagree with you.

Democracy according to the disgruntled farangs never existed, because their views of democracy was different to what Thais see as democracy.

If Thailand is such a basket case, why are you living here?

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

"The charter has undergone more than a dozen rewrites in the last 80 years, either by democrats trying to consolidate parliamentary power"

Just the Democrats? Don't think so

"In the eyes of the country's elite, democratically elected politicians have ruined Thailand with populist policies and cronyism that lead the poor astray."

So AFP thinks populism and cronyism are good things?

"A year ago the veteran conservative was giving rousing speeches to crowds of protesters clamouring for the toppling of prime minister Yingluck Shinawatra and a military takeover.

Thailand's generals did just that in May."

Really? I thought yingluck had been removed before then.

AFP take on things, always at right angles to the truth, not lies {well not always} but never the whole truth.

Whoever cites AFP as a credible 'news' source? Thaivisa and the predominantly 'mericun viewers on Yahoo 'News' laugh.png

Edited by jpeg
  • Like 1
Posted

Clearly, this article was written by someone who does not understand Thailand.

Yes, in other countries water will always flow downhill.

But Thailand is special.

I disagree with you an believe you are totally wrong. Water (Democracy) flows the same way in any country provided people don't block it. It is this attitude that you have that has kept Thailand from blossoming into one of the best nations, if not the best in Asia. The country has rich resources but it is the attitude that you have written here, that has held it back.

Posted

Clearly, this article was written by someone who does not understand Thailand.

Yes, in other countries water will always flow downhill.

But Thailand is special.

I disagree with you an believe you are totally wrong. Water (Democracy) flows the same way in any country provided people don't block it. It is this attitude that you have that has kept Thailand from blossoming into one of the best nations, if not the best in Asia. The country has rich resources but it is the attitude that you have written here, that has held it back.

Costas, you are not alone.

  • Like 2
Posted

Golden eras where the elites hold sway always seem to end in tears - elite tears.

The difference is this century that the Thai people have experienced the chance to choose their government on what, 4 occasions so far. They have seen their choice dismissed by the elite 3 out of those 4 times. As several here have already said,they now have access to an unrestricted means of communication and ideas in the internet. Sure the Junta could remove their access to the internet, but does anyone believe that such a move would be anything than the spark which would light a fuze?

The days of golden eras where elite hold sway have gone, and they if they come back it will only be temporary.

I remember the rumbles to just the RUMORS that facebook was banned (turned out to be a technical error). If the elites tried such a thing as internet restriction now that Thais from all spectrums have tried it, they'd have an uprising on their hands from Thais that used to support them, to ones that were ambivalent towards them and of course their many detractors.

But with their arrogance I wouldn't put it past them to try it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...