Thai junta chief vows illegal fishing crackdown

Thailand's junta chief Thursday said he would invoke controversial powers to clean up his country's fishing industry after the EU threatened to ban fish imports from the kingdom unless it does more to halt illegal practices.

The world's third largest seafood producer was left red-faced on Tuesday when Brussels issued it with a 'yellow card' for failing to clamp down on illegal fishing, saying its fisheries monitoring, controls and punishments were inadequate.

A 'red card' and eventual import ban of fish would follow if the kingdom failed to clean up its fishing industry within six months, the EU Commission warned.

Prime Minister Prayut Chan-O-Cha, who seized power in a coup last May, said he would use Section 44 of the junta's interim constitution to speed up a clampdown on illegal practices.

"The government will swiftly solve problems by invoking Section 44 to authorize the military to assist officials," he told reporters after returning from a two-day visit to Indonesia.

Section 44 is a controversial provision handing Prayut power to make any executive decision in the name of national security.

Earlier this month he used it to replace martial law with a series of measures that were described by critics as even more draconian.

The moved sparked condemnation from Thailand's western allies at the time, including from the EU.

Prayut has also previously mooted plans to use the power to crack down on forest encroachment and aid his corruption fight.



- Rattled by ban prospect -



Thailand's fishing industry accounts for 40 percent of the country's food exports and is a mainstay of the economy. Its prawn industry is the world's largest.

Bangkok has been rattled by the prospect of an EU ban which Thai officials have said could cost them $1 billion a year.

Thailand's rubber stamp parliament has passed a new fishing law but there is a two month delay before it hits the statute books and junta officials are concerned the changes might not come fast enough for the EU's deadline.

Indonesia and Thailand also agreed Thursday to set up a joint taskforce on illegal fishing.

Thai companies have been linked to shadowy fishing operations in Indonesia, an industry that costs Jakarta an estimated $20 billion in losses every year.

Many vessels are suspected of enslaving foreign fishermen, hundreds of whom were returned home earlier this month after being discovered by Indonesian authorities dumped on islands in the country's remote east.

Prayut acknowledged Thailand had its own problems with illegal fishing and said previous administrations had not done enough to stop it.

"We cannot blame any one except ourselves because we neglected this for a long time and did not correct it," he said.

Labour groups say a large majority of those working in the illegal fishing industry in Indonesia are victims of trafficking. Fishermen from Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar and Thailand are among those said to have been forced to trawl.

Thailand's military says it took power to end a decade of political instability and will hand control back to a civilian government once they have rooted out corruption, rebooted the economy and rewritten the country's constitution.

But rights groups say basic freedoms have fallen off a cliff since the military took control and opponents fear the constitutional changes are designed to freeze them out of politics for good.


-- (c) Copyright AFP 2015-04-24

The EU and US buy Thai fishery products because they are cheap. Western fisheries can't compete on price. In the West, fishing is a high paying job and most fishing boats are privately owned. In the US a lot of young guys go to Alaska to work on a fishing boat because the pay is high and after a year or two they go home with their pockets full of money.

The EU and the US have lots of fishing water available but it's cheaper to import from Asia. Thailand is a major exporter because it uses slave labor. (The US has 88,000 miles/140,000 kms of saltwater shoreline.) LINK

I don't know how much the EU has but it's massive.

The US is also threatening to put an embargo on Thai seafood products. I'm betting that the people of Western countries will put pressure on retailers to stop stocking these products once it becomes widely known that they are produced with slave labor and by over fishing areas.

The EU and US buy Thai fishery products because they are cheap. Western fisheries can't compete on price. In the West, fishing is a high paying job and most fishing boats are privately owned. In the US a lot of young guys go to Alaska to work on a fishing boat because the pay is high and after a year or two they go home with their pockets full of money.

The EU and the US have lots of fishing water available but it's cheaper to import from Asia. Thailand is a major exporter because it uses slave labor. (The US has 88,000 miles/140,000 kms of saltwater shoreline.) LINK

I don't know how much the EU has but it's massive.

The US is also threatening to put an embargo on Thai seafood products. I'm betting that the people of Western countries will put pressure on retailers to stop stocking these products once it becomes widely known that they are produced with slave labor and by over fishing areas.

You are dreaming if you think the US or the Eu are gonna ban Thai seafood. This yellow card thing from the EU is all a bluff. I will bet any amount, in six months when Thailand is not compliant the EU will give an extension, and after another 3 to 6 months will give another extension, until they have no choice but to give Thailand the good to go report.

As for the US, they will definitely not upset major corporations by even considering sanctions. hell they wont even seriously sanction the Thais after last years TIP report, and they wont this year either, even after all what has happened in Indonesia. To many billions of dollars at stake and most of all to millions in campaign contributions on the line.

The EU and US buy Thai fishery products because they are cheap. Western fisheries can't compete on price. In the West, fishing is a high paying job and most fishing boats are privately owned. In the US a lot of young guys go to Alaska to work on a fishing boat because the pay is high and after a year or two they go home with their pockets full of money.

The EU and the US have lots of fishing water available but it's cheaper to import from Asia. Thailand is a major exporter because it uses slave labor. (The US has 88,000 miles/140,000 kms of saltwater shoreline.) LINK

I don't know how much the EU has but it's massive.

The US is also threatening to put an embargo on Thai seafood products. I'm betting that the people of Western countries will put pressure on retailers to stop stocking these products once it becomes widely known that they are produced with slave labor and by over fishing areas.

You are dreaming if you think the US or the Eu are gonna ban Thai seafood. This yellow card thing from the EU is all a bluff. I will bet any amount, in six months when Thailand is not compliant the EU will give an extension, and after another 3 to 6 months will give another extension, until they have no choice but to give Thailand the good to go report.

As for the US, they will definitely not upset major corporations by even considering sanctions. hell they wont even seriously sanction the Thais after last years TIP report, and they wont this year either, even after all what has happened in Indonesia. To many billions of dollars at stake and most of all to millions in campaign contributions on the line.

In Scandinavian countries many customers have stopped buying fish species caught with methods that damage the environment (and those are species that can be sold legally), same can happen with seafood from Thailand even if the EU doesn't issue a red card, customers can vote with their feet when they find out the truth about the Thai seafood industry.

The EU and US buy Thai fishery products because they are cheap. Western fisheries can't compete on price. In the West, fishing is a high paying job and most fishing boats are privately owned. In the US a lot of young guys go to Alaska to work on a fishing boat because the pay is high and after a year or two they go home with their pockets full of money.

The EU and the US have lots of fishing water available but it's cheaper to import from Asia. Thailand is a major exporter because it uses slave labor. (The US has 88,000 miles/140,000 kms of saltwater shoreline.) LINK

I don't know how much the EU has but it's massive.

The US is also threatening to put an embargo on Thai seafood products. I'm betting that the people of Western countries will put pressure on retailers to stop stocking these products once it becomes widely known that they are produced with slave labor and by over fishing areas.

You are dreaming if you think the US or the Eu are gonna ban Thai seafood. This yellow card thing from the EU is all a bluff. I will bet any amount, in six months when Thailand is not compliant the EU will give an extension, and after another 3 to 6 months will give another extension, until they have no choice but to give Thailand the good to go report.

As for the US, they will definitely not upset major corporations by even considering sanctions. hell they wont even seriously sanction the Thais after last years TIP report, and they wont this year either, even after all what has happened in Indonesia. To many billions of dollars at stake and most of all to millions in campaign contributions on the line.

The relationship between the EU/US with Thailand has changed.

No thanks to the Junta's rhetoric in response to their criticisms of crushing democracy, abolising Thai people's rights and liberties, and making trade agreements with Russia to counter its ban on EU food imports. While in the past the EU/US may have been restrained from taking action that might injure a democratic government, they may not feel so restrained if bans will undermine the Prayut's military-led government.

Vow,vow,vow!

Or as the great philosopher Yoda used to say "Try not! Do you must!