CDC decides to remove 10 touchy items from draft charter

[webfact]

NEW CHARTER
CDC decides to remove 10 touchy items from draft charter
THE NATION

BANGKOK: -- THE CONSTITUTION Drafting Committee (CDC) has agreed to remove 10 contentious issues from the draft charter as well as amend more than a hundred articles, a source said yesterday.

As for the controversial issue of allowing a non-elected premier to take the reins, the CDC has added a clause stipulating that the PM candidate must attain votes from at least two-thirds of all MPs to secure the position in every case.

It has also suspended the open-list system, maintained the Election Commission's power to organise elections and decided not to merge the National Human Rights Commission with the Office of the Ombudsman, though their overlapping responsibilities would be considered.

The drafters have also removed Article 182, which would have given the PM the authority to propose important bills, and they would have been considered approved if MPs did not issue a no-confidence vote within 48 hours.

Article 181 has been amended to allow the PM to seek a vote of confidence from the House of Representatives, while the opposition will not be deprived of the right to launch a no-confidence bill.

The CDC decided to cut down on the power of senators, though it maintains that senators should be indirectly elected.

The drafters have chosen to maintain the mixed-member proportional election system, though the number of constituency MPs will be increased from 200 to 250 and the number of party-list MPs cut from 200 to 150.

The committee has also accepted a suggestion from the Cabinet to merge the Independent Reform Promoting Committee and the National Reform Strategy Committee, and agreed to only stipulate necessary reforms in the charter. Other reform agenda would be put in the charter organic law.

CDC spokesman Kamnoon Sidhisamarn admitted that the CDC had made a lot of changes and that more than 100 articles might need to be amended.

He added that the final draft would be written by August 22.

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/CDC-decides-to-remove-10-touchy-items-from-draft-c-30262991.html


-- The Nation 2015-06-24

[BritTim]

If the changes are as reported, they certainly seem an improvement to me.

[oneday]

Finally some sanity has appeared giving hope this draft may actually one day be finished and approved, but I think it still needs a little more work.

[chainarong]

One wonders why they were installed in the first place , now the CDC knows that not everyone is an idiot , treading the waters on public opinion is one thing , stupidity is another.

[elgordo38]

If the changes are as reported, they certainly seem an improvement to me.

They were taking to much flak they had to do something to save face. Still kind of reminds me of a Iron Maiden.

[Fat Haggis]

One wonders why they were installed in the first place , now the CDC knows that not everyone is an idiot , treading the waters on public opinion is one thing , stupidity is another.

Easy to answer, simply to delay any election penned in for early 2016 ?

[Srikcir]

No matter how democratic the new draft constitution might appear in language and intent, it cannot guarantee the sovereignty of the Thai people.

The current draft version ominously deletes the language of Article 68, Part 13, "Right To Protect the Constitution" of the 2007 Constitution:

"No person shall exercise the rights and liberties prescribed in the Constitution to overthrow the democratic regime of the government with the King as Head of State under this Constitution or to acquire the power to rule the country by any means which is not in accordance with the modes provided in this Constitution."

Only when ALL Thai people are empowered to hold and protect their sovereignty can a constitution have any meaningful existence. Only when the Thai people have the right to resist unconstitutional loss of their rights and liberties can they truly be deemed a democratic society. Only when the power of people like General Prayut is no greater than the Thai farmer can there be equality in Thailand.