Jump to content

On 9th day, Kerry says Iran nuke talks could go either way


webfact

Recommended Posts

On 9th day, Kerry says Iran nuke talks could go either way
By BRADLEY KLAPPER

VIENNA (AP) — Nine days into marathon nuclear talks, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry on Sunday said the diplomatic efforts "could go either way," cutting off all potential pathways for an Iranian atomic bomb or ending without an agreement that American officials have sometimes described as the only alternative to war.

The EU's top foreign policy official, Federica Mogherini, said agreement was "very close." But Kerry said there was still a ways to go.

"We are not yet where we need to be on several of the most critical issues," Kerry told reporters outside the 19th-century Viennese palace that has hosted the negotiations.

World powers and Iran are hoping to clinch a deal by Tuesday, setting a decade of restrictions on Iran's nuclear program and granting Iran significant relief from international sanctions. Kerry met for 3 ½ hours on Sunday with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, as top diplomats from the five other negotiating countries planned to return to Austria's capital later in the evening.

"It is now time to see whether or not we are able to close an agreement," Kerry said, after hobbling on crutches through 97-degree heat to a podium set up in a city square.

While "genuine progress" had been made and the sides "have never been closer, at this point, this negotiation could go either way. If the hard choices get made in the next couple of days, and made quickly, we could get an agreement this week," Kerry said. "But if they are not made, we will not."

The talks had appeared to be moving forward. On Saturday, diplomats reported tentative agreement on the speed and scope of sanctions relief for Iran in the accord, even as issues such as inspection guidelines and limits on Iran's nuclear research and development remained contentious.

German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier spoke of "sharper" deal contours.

"But that shouldn't deceive us," he said. "There's still a possibility that there will be a lack of courage and readiness in crucial points to build the bridges that we need to find to each other."

Mogherini, formally the convener of the talks between Iran and six world powers, told reporters that as of Monday, foreign ministers and other top diplomats "are here to check and assess if the deal can be closed."

Tuesday's deadline is the latest that has been set for a comprehensive pact that would replace the interim deal world powers and Iran reached in November 2013. That package was extended three times, most recently on June 30, and Kerry appeared to be partly addressing critics of the diplomacy in the United States who've argued that President Barack Obama's administration has been too conciliatory over the course of the negotiations.

Obama and U.S. officials say that is untrue. But they've also fiercely defended their overtures to Tehran and their willingness to allow the Iranians to maintain significant nuclear infrastructure, on the argument that a diplomatic agreement is preferable to military conflict.

Speaking at the same time as Sunday news shows aired in the U.S., Kerry said that "if we don't have a deal, if there's absolute intransigence with the things that are important, President Obama has always said we would walk away."

"It's not what anybody wants. We want to get an agreement," he said. "What I have said from the moment I became involved in this: We want a good agreement, only a good agreement and we are not going to shave anywhere at the margins in order just to get an agreement. This is something that the world will analyze, experts everywhere will look at. There are plenty of people in the nonproliferation community, nuclear experts who will look at this and none of us are going to be content to do something that can't pass scrutiny."

Appearing on a nationally broadcast interview show Sunday, Sen. Bob Corker, chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, said he had spoken to Kerry Saturday and voiced his concerns about rushing too quickly toward a settlement.

"Well, obviously they're very anxious," the Tennessee Republican said of Obama administration officials. "I mean, I think they look at this as a legacy issue."

"I've had several conversations with him (Kerry) in meetings to say, 'Look, you create just as much as a legacy walking away from a bad deal as you do head-long rushing into breaking into a bad deal," Corker said on CBS' "Face the Nation."

While talks continue in Vienna, Iranian media reported that a high-level delegation from the U.N. nuclear agency would meet senior Iranian officials in Tehran on Sunday night.
___

AP writers Matthew Lee and George Jahn contributed to this report.

aplogo.jpg
-- (c) Associated Press 2015-07-06

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Why are the US even discussing it? The answer should be NO NUKES FOR IRAN.

And I do believe that is the whole point.

The question is whether that objective is achieved with the pen or the bomb.

And AGAIN, the US are one of six parties negotiating this with Iran.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have high hopes. bah.gif

Taken together, the catalogue of capitulations is breathtaking: spot inspections, disclosure of previous nuclear activity, gradual sanctions relief, retention of non-nuclear sanctions. What’s left? A surrender document of the kind offered by defeated nations suing for peace. Consider: The strongest military and economic power on earth, backed by the five other major powers, armed with what had been a crushing sanctions regime, is about to sign the worst international agreement in American diplomatic history.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/420707/iran-nuclear-deal-obama-sanctions-inspections-capitulates

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obama is not even "bombing the crap" out of ISIS when they are beheading US citizens and burning them alive. What are the chances of him doing it to Iran, before they can go nuclear? The man is Neville Chamberlain on female hormones

Edited by Ulysses G.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obama is not even "bombing the crap" out of ISIS when they are beheading US citizens and burning them alive. What are the chances of him doing it to Iran, before they can go nuclear? The man is Neville Chamberlain on female hormones

I think carpet bombing innocent people to weed out ISIS members is a stupid strategy, even if it might seem an effective one.

You're only going to enrage more people into joining.

Coincidentally I believe Obama is due to make a speech on the subject sometime today.

Also you have to look hard for news of current strikes.

US-Led Coalition Against ISIS Carries Out 38 Airstrikes

The US-led international coalition against ISIS attacked 38 targets in Syria and Iraq over the weekend. Twelve of the attacks occurred in Syria and 20 in Iraq.

According to military sources, the strikes hit bridges, military vehicles, and individual fighters. There is no information yet about civilian casualties, or what measures the coalition took to ensure that uninvolved people would be protected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The usual Red Herring. I don't think I've seen anyone suggesting carpet bombing innocent people besides YOU. rolleyes.gif .

I'll ask how you would fight IS but obviously not in this thread. So I posed the question in this one.

Edited by Chicog
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why are the US even discussing it? The answer should be NO NUKES FOR IRAN.

Dear John. I am getting that "your selling the farm" feeling. These guys have never ever kept a treaty they signed. They are playing you John and soon they will reel you in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, sorry, that was a typo. It should have read, Obama is not even "bombing the crap" out of ISIS when they are beheading US citizens and burning people alive.

ISIS burned 50 people alive, but you set the record straight that they only beheaded Americans. Now do you feel better? rolleyes.gif

Edited by Ulysses G.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, sorry, that was a typo. It should have read, Obama is not even "bombing the crap" out of ISIS when they are beheading US citizens and burning people alive.

ISIS burned 50 people alive, but you set the record straight that they only beheaded Americans. Now do you feel better? rolleyes.gif

Not to mention drowning them and throwing them off buildings.

They are utter sadists, but what they are looking for is an over-reaction that brings more people onto their side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...