Jump to content

Thai police urge patience as lack of equipment hampers bomb probe


Lite Beer

Recommended Posts

The basic problem is lack of training. The biggest problem, however, is sheer laziness. They rely on CCTV instead of actual police work. CCTV is a part, one part, of actual police work. They need to get off their rear ends and start policing on a regular, constant basis.

This will result on a 'crackdown' which will last a month or so and then everything will be back to normal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 127
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The Thai Royal Police have no problem in seeking training from outside sources, they do have a problem with accepting that fact in the glare of publicity

The US Department of State, along with the Thai Royal Police, and other foreign governments, pay for and sponsor the International Law Enforcement Academy (ILEA) in Bangkok, which provides additional training for law enforcement personnel

http://www.state.gov/j/inl/c/crime/ilea/c11280.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's ironic that police are prepared to pay a reward for an arrest result but not prepared to pay for new equipment such as facial-recognition software that would lead to a arrest result. The reactive approach is preferred against the proactive one, it would seem, due to the pay later reward policy approach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amazing so much bashing going on in here.

But was thinking about a thing here today, wouldnt it be fairly easy to track the phone records ? they know the exact time of both blasts and guess it would be a call with a special signature ( calling, phone dead instantly ).

That ofcourse if it was done by a call, guess it could also have been a internet packet and not a call, which probably would make it impossible to track.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's ironic that police are prepared to pay a reward for an arrest result but not prepared to pay for new equipment such as facial-recognition software that would lead to a arrest result. The reactive approach is preferred against the proactive one, it would seem, due to the pay later reward policy approach.

Accurate facial recognition units should be mounted at almost eye level to be effective. It is not common to have these out in busy uncontrolled public places due to easy vandalism and difficult maintenance. Even if they were mounted at every street corner, these guys would have surveyed the scene based on minimal coverage before carrying anything through.

I'm personally surprised, considering the tourist site, nobody in the public has any go-pro (10fps) or walking selfie stick footage from an iphone or equivalent that could be handed over (and likely more useful than the pixelated footage we've seen already)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Foreign police forces can probably only offer help to the Thai government after approval from their government. Afterall we are still under a NCPO installed NLA and government. Democratic governments dislike cooperating with juntas and so, allegedly that is.

"General Prayut also turned down UK Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond's offer to assist in the investigations. "Do you want foreign countries to intervene in every issue? No country will do this. It is a breach of sovereignty ... There is no need to get outsiders involved. They are welcome to give advice, but they can't take part in the investigation because it happened in Thailand.""

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/bangkok-blast-prime-minister-prayut-chan-ocha-spurns-uk-help-plays-down-uighur-link-1516217

Could be also that the current gov. is involved, as they needed a good excuse for the down-spiral of the economy and tourism.

In that case they would never allow any outsiders to look into it.

It would also explain the much to quick clean up of the crime scene ........

And last but not least, they have the knowledge and the material .....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Foreign police forces can probably only offer help to the Thai government after approval from their government. Afterall we are still under a NCPO installed NLA and government. Democratic governments dislike cooperating with juntas and so, allegedly that is.

"General Prayut also turned down UK Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond's offer to assist in the investigations. "Do you want foreign countries to intervene in every issue? No country will do this. It is a breach of sovereignty ... There is no need to get outsiders involved. They are welcome to give advice, but they can't take part in the investigation because it happened in Thailand.""

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/bangkok-blast-prime-minister-prayut-chan-ocha-spurns-uk-help-plays-down-uighur-link-1516217

you are contradicting yourself Britain (and other countries) offered HELP and were turned down, as you quoted, it's not about "democratic governments disliking cooperating" they wanted to HELP but the Junta, you support, turned this HELP down

Tjeez, you mean democratic countries actually offer help to a junta ?

BTW 'help' and 'assistance' are not the same and neither is equal to 'observing'. Legally active participation of foreigners in an investigation also requires a base in laws.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Foreign police forces can probably only offer help to the Thai government after approval from their government. Afterall we are still under a NCPO installed NLA and government. Democratic governments dislike cooperating with juntas and so, allegedly that is.

"General Prayut also turned down UK Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond's offer to assist in the investigations. "Do you want foreign countries to intervene in every issue? No country will do this. It is a breach of sovereignty ... There is no need to get outsiders involved. They are welcome to give advice, but they can't take part in the investigation because it happened in Thailand.""

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/bangkok-blast-prime-minister-prayut-chan-ocha-spurns-uk-help-plays-down-uighur-link-1516217

Could be also that the current gov. is involved, as they needed a good excuse for the down-spiral of the economy and tourism.

In that case they would never allow any outsiders to look into it.

It would also explain the much to quick clean up of the crime scene ........

And last but not least, they have the knowledge and the material .....

Thank you for your contribution. I will file it with the "9/11 Insider Job", "NASA Moon Deception" and "the JFK answer".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Foreign police forces can probably only offer help to the Thai government after approval from their government. Afterall we are still under a NCPO installed NLA and government. Democratic governments dislike cooperating with juntas and so, allegedly that is.

"General Prayut also turned down UK Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond's offer to assist in the investigations. "Do you want foreign countries to intervene in every issue? No country will do this. It is a breach of sovereignty ... There is no need to get outsiders involved. They are welcome to give advice, but they can't take part in the investigation because it happened in Thailand.""

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/bangkok-blast-prime-minister-prayut-chan-ocha-spurns-uk-help-plays-down-uighur-link-1516217

You're quote,.."Democratic governments dislike cooperating with juntas and so, allegedly that is."....is wrong,. all governments constantly do business with undemocratic governments, selling arms and so on.....and the funny part is there is so much proof of this on the net......!

Best regards...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hint to Somyot: Special thought processes FIRST. Special procedures second. Special equipment third.

NOT hosing down the site before all evidence is collected would have produced the trigger mechanism, which is sadly absent from the forensics now.

I have a Ouija board I would be glad to lend them complete with instructions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a new week so we ready ourselves for a new load of official BS !

I wonder if it will have been prepared over the weekend or will officialdom rely on the their ability to talk spontaneous crap on a day to day basis ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Me thinks the RTP have been outsmarted. If you are going to carry out an attack like this you would be well organised. For example, change your appearance afterwards, leave country shortly afterwards, don't leave any clues behind. Then the big question: motive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's ironic that police are prepared to pay a reward for an arrest result but not prepared to pay for new equipment such as facial-recognition software that would lead to a arrest result. The reactive approach is preferred against the proactive one, it would seem, due to the pay later reward policy approach.

When clearing Thai Immigration, whether it be at the airport or a land border, foreigners are asked to look into a digital camera. This is presumably to create a photographic record of that person or to match that photo against existing records.

If they don't have facial recognition equipment in place, then whatever is this exercise about?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Thai police urge patience as lack of equipment hampers bomb probe"

Agree,

A lack of quality up to date CCTV cams comes to mind.

I did notice yesterday that the police told "the malls" that they need to get better CCTV cams and install them properly.

Is this a case of the pot calling the kettle black, or what?

Catching shoplifters vs catching murdering bombers....pick your priority!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"...because they have shortage of some the modern equipment like police in foreign countries to find the prime suspect captured on security camera..."

Plenty of other countries that do have this equipment have offered to help, but "no", Thailand is too proud to accept assistance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Foreign police forces can probably only offer help to the Thai government after approval from their government. Afterall we are still under a NCPO installed NLA and government. Democratic governments dislike cooperating with juntas and so, allegedly that is.

"General Prayut also turned down UK Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond's offer to assist in the investigations. "Do you want foreign countries to intervene in every issue? No country will do this. It is a breach of sovereignty ... There is no need to get outsiders involved. They are welcome to give advice, but they can't take part in the investigation because it happened in Thailand.""

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/bangkok-blast-prime-minister-prayut-chan-ocha-spurns-uk-help-plays-down-uighur-link-1516217

you are contradicting yourself Britain (and other countries) offered HELP and were turned down, as you quoted, it's not about "democratic governments disliking cooperating" they wanted to HELP but the Junta, you support, turned this HELP down

Tjeez, you mean democratic countries actually offer help to a junta ?

BTW 'help' and 'assistance' are not the same and neither is equal to 'observing'. Legally active participation of foreigners in an investigation also requires a base in laws.

he makes up the 'law' as he goes stop making excuses for arrogance, racism and nationalism when countries have offered help with VASTLY more experience than Thailand who now says it doesn't have the "equipment" and they admit (GASP!) it is 'hampering' the probe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cameras are cheap and can go down to just above zero light level. I have done a lot of systems around the world butt Thailand even if they had them probably wouldnt have a dedicated control room where they ar viewed 24/7

Edited by gandalf12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am afraid the chicken has come home to roost. Thainess rules and the public well they are just a hindrance as long as we can continue to offer purile excuses and have at our disposal numerous other excuses that WILL be believed because we ARE THE POLICE then we really do not have to investigate anything. SO WE WONT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...