Jump to content

New US sanctions illustrate sprawling Islamic State network


Recommended Posts

Posted

New US sanctions illustrate sprawling Islamic State network
By KEN DILANIAN

WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. government announced sanctions Tuesday against 25 people and five groups connected to the Islamic State, disclosing intelligence that depicts a sprawling international organization with tentacles across Europe, Asia and the Middle East.

The moves by the Treasury and State departments are aimed at disrupting the activities of Islamic State financial, logistical and recruiting operatives who may not be suitable targets of American bombs or drone strikes. Many of them reside outside the theaters of war in Iraq and Syria.

The sanctions, the largest such effort against the Islamic State, also serve to demonstrate how far and wide the group's ideology has spread.

The State Department designated as foreign terrorist organizations Islamic State regional spin-offs in Russia's Caucasus region, Algeria, Indonesia and Egypt's Sinai Peninsula. Among the individuals designated as terrorists was Sally Jones, a British native and the widow of an operative killed recently in an American drone strike.

The State Department also designated as terrorists three French nationals and a Russian. Russia, France and other countries cooperated with the U.S. in supplying information that contributed to the sanctions, officials said.

Also Tuesday, the State Department announced a reward of up to $5 million for information leading to the significant disruption of commerce in oil and antiquities by, for, on behalf of, or to benefit the Islamic State. It was a first for the Rewards for Justice Program, which typically offers rewards for information leading to wanted individuals.

The Treasury Department, meanwhile, slapped financial sanctions on Islamic State officials who operate in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Libya, Yemen and Tunisia. Among the individuals it sanctioned in Syria was British national Aqsa Mahmood, who is accused of recruiting three British schoolgirls in February to flee the United Kingdom to become wives of Islamic State fighters. She is believed to be in Syria.

Previously, Treasury had sanctioned just four Islamic State officials, one of whom was killed in a U.S. drone strike in June.

Some of those sanctioned by Treasury are also expected to be placed Tuesday on the United Nations' al-Qaida Sanctions List, officials said in a news release.

The announcement came before a meeting between President Barack Obama and other world leaders on countering the Islamic State on the margins of the U.N. General Assembly meetings in New York.

The financial sanctions are designed to make it harder for the Islamic State to use its immense wealth, Daniel Glaser, Treasury's assistant secretary for terrorist financing, said in an interview.

"These sanctions will prevent them from engaging in financial transactions and make it harder for them to travel," he said.

Financial institutions around the world tend to honor U.S. sanctions, he said. The State Department designations mean that anyone who supports the individuals or groups can be prosecuted under U.S. law.

Much of the Islamic State's income is generated internally, Glaser said, from oil sales, taxation and extortion, so sanctions can't cut that off. Instead, they are meant "so that they can't get supplies, parts, things that you need to run a state, things that you need to engage in a war," he said.

Given the extensive smuggling networks across the region, it's unclear how effective the sanctions will be in doing that.

In July, Glaser said the Islamic State is clearing as much as $500 million per year from oil sales, more than enough to meet a payroll he estimated at a high of $360 million a year.

The public announcement of sanctions, which draws on intelligence gathered by the CIA and other agencies, offers a window into insights the U.S. has garnered about the Islamic State.

Notably, the U.S. believes al-Qaida and the Islamic State have been working together on a tactical level, despite official hostility to one another.

Yemeni national Mu'tassim Yahya 'Ali al-Rumaysh, for example, is described by Treasury as "a financial and foreign fighter facilitator" for the Islamic State "who also has held membership in al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP)."

He helped an Islamic State member procure funds for the travel of foreign fighters from Yemen to Syria transiting Turkey, Treasury said in a news release, coordinating AQAP and the Syrian al-Qaida affiliate, the Nusra Front, to facilitate the travel of Islamic State members.

In November 2013, al-Rumaysh sent a group of Yemeni extremists to Turkey, Treasury said, and they made their way to an AQAP facilitator in Syria.

aplogo.jpg
-- (c) Associated Press 2015-09-30

Posted

So they can't bomb these operatives because they mostly reside outside the theatre of war in Syria and Iraq. If Syria and Iraq are not in the theatre of war, then why are we already bombing them? And they don't know who is buying the oil that IS exports? And they don't know that Saudi and Turkey are actively supporting IS? But we can't criticise our allies can we or stop their aid. This war is a joke. Exit stage left rapidly or defeat them using proper methods. ie cut off the supply and financial routes even if it upsets your dubious allies. And engage the enemy on the ground. And have a mission statement to exit.

Posted

if they make money with drugs, human trafficking, i hardly doubt they will put those assets in a bank, the US could order to shut down or freeze

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

I don't disagree with what the US has done here

What scares me is that they have the right to prosecute someone in a foreign country who commits an act

breaking US law, he/she can be prosecuted for breaking this law in the foreign country even though it is not illegal in that foreign country

do they have the power, are they actually a world wide court making laws for the world

or do these foreign countries just lack balls to stand up

In Central America foreign aid seems to be just bribe money so the politicians there can drive new Mercedes and become total yes men to the State Department

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...