IS controlling Sirte, Libya: City used to plot terror attacks

[webfact]

IS controlling Sirte, Libya: City used to plot terror attacks
Debra Killalea and wiresnews.com.au

SYDNEY: -- MUSIC is no longer played here and the first public beheadings have already taken place.

But this isn’t Iraq or Syria. In fact, this city is thousands of kilometres away on Europe’s doorstep — but Islamic State is fully in control.

Local radio stations blast the benefits of IS terror group leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, Islamic police stations are operating and commanders from Syria and Iraq are already on the ground.

Now fears are growing that Sirte, a coastal town on the Mediterranean Sea, could become the next IS major stronghold as its leaders look for a “fallback option” away from the Middle East according to the New York Times.

The city, claimed by IS in February last year, is the first such place to be governed by militants outside of Syria and Raqqa.

Full story: http://www.news.com.au/world/middle-east/is-controlling-sirte-libya-city-used-to-plot-terror-attacks/news-story/d66855b635a6075fd676c1daf47569eb


-- News.com.au 2015-11-30

[trainman34014]

Next target for bombing practice !

[Confuscious]

Next target for bombing practice !

Bombing them will only add oil on the hot plate of ISIS.

Violence is not the answer to violence.

ISIS was created because of the bullying of the US and the destroying of the powers that were controlling the area.

The only way to restore peace in the Middle East is to join forces and rebuild the countries to what they were BEFORE the US came in.

By doing so, the population will no longer support ISIS and ISIS will cease to be.

Instead of spending millions of Euro on taking refugees in, spend the money on rebuilding Iraq and Syria.

Then the world will know peace.

[shirtless]

They will be sending ISIS operatives to the EU via Greece , sorry that has already happened.

[Steely Dan]

I guess ISIS must be being 'contained' again.

[Steely Dan]

Next target for bombing practice !

Bombing them will only add oil on the hot plate of ISIS.

Violence is not the answer to violence.

ISIS was created because of the bullying of the US and the destroying of the powers that were controlling the area.

The only way to restore peace in the Middle East is to join forces and rebuild the countries to what they were BEFORE the US came in.

By doing so, the population will no longer support ISIS and ISIS will cease to be.

Instead of spending millions of Euro on taking refugees in, spend the money on rebuilding Iraq and Syria.

Then the world will know peace.

Before the U.S came in the states you mentioned were controlled by tyrannical despots. Intervention was wrong only in having no exit plan. To build a democracy in the way we understand it would require a new Marshall plan taking probably a generation or more. Short of that best not to interfere at all or else appoint your own secular tyrant to keep things under control.

[donnybay]

Next target for bombing practice !

Bombing them will only add oil on the hot plate of ISIS.

Violence is not the answer to violence.

ISIS was created because of the bullying of the US and the destroying of the powers that were controlling the area.

The only way to restore peace in the Middle East is to join forces and rebuild the countries to what they were BEFORE the US came in.

By doing so, the population will no longer support ISIS and ISIS will cease to be.

Instead of spending millions of Euro on taking refugees in, spend the money on rebuilding Iraq and Syria.

Then the world will know peace.

As great that sounds we are far to far down the road for that, how can you rebuild something in a country in the middle of civil war? the fighting has to stop first, unfortunately ISIS only know extreme violence, and have one aim to turn the world into what they believe is right, they are far worse than anything mankind has been up against before, kill these people first , then rebuild the countries.

The allies bombed the Germans into submission in WW2, sometimes its the only way,

[craigt3365]

Next target for bombing practice !

Bombing them will only add oil on the hot plate of ISIS.

Violence is not the answer to violence.

ISIS was created because of the bullying of the US and the destroying of the powers that were controlling the area.

The only way to restore peace in the Middle East is to join forces and rebuild the countries to what they were BEFORE the US came in.

By doing so, the population will no longer support ISIS and ISIS will cease to be.

Instead of spending millions of Euro on taking refugees in, spend the money on rebuilding Iraq and Syria.

Then the world will know peace.

ISIS is but the latest group created by Muslim fanatics. It's been going on for years. Read up on the history of Syria and the uprisings they had some 40 years ago. And how they were brutally quelled by Assad's father.

[JingerBen]

Next target for bombing practice !

Bombing them will only add oil on the hot plate of ISIS.

Violence is not the answer to violence.

ISIS was created because of the bullying of the US and the destroying of the powers that were controlling the area.

The only way to restore peace in the Middle East is to join forces and rebuild the countries to what they were BEFORE the US came in.

By doing so, the population will no longer support ISIS and ISIS will cease to be.

Instead of spending millions of Euro on taking refugees in, spend the money on rebuilding Iraq and Syria.

Then the world will know peace.

Before the U.S came in the states you mentioned were controlled by tyrannical despots. Intervention was wrong only in having no exit plan. To build a democracy in the way we understand it would require a new Marshall plan taking probably a generation or more. Short of that best not to interfere at all or else appoint your own secular tyrant to keep things under control.

The war against Libya was a result of multiple factions among the Washington warhawk elite, including the Zionists, coming together with the French, British, and German militarists to smash the most modern, secular, independent state in Africa under President Muammar Gaddafi.

The war succeeded in destroying Libya's economy, state, and society. It unleashed scores of armed terrorist groups and uprooted two million black contract workers and Libyan citizens of South Saharan origin forcing them to flee the rampaging militias to the refugee camps of Europe.

The entire war was carried out to the giddy delight of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her "humanitarian interventionist" supporters who were utterly ignorant as to who and what the Libyan "opposition" represented. Eventually, even Hillary's own Ambassador to Libya would be slaughtered by the same victorious US-backed "rebels" in the newly liberated Bengasi.

Gaddafi and his regime were annihilated, eliminating another real adversary of Israel and supporter of Palestinian rights. The US got nothing positive - not even a secure naval, air, or training base - only a dead Ambassador, millions of desperate refugees flooding Europe and thousands of trained and armed jihadists for the next target: Syria.

[craigt3365]

Ummm....I believe the initial uprisings were a result of the citizens of Libya protesting the rule of the dictator Gaddafi and his brutal crackdown on their protests. The west was involved, but not until after things spiraled down into a real mess.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_Spring

The Arab Spring (Arabic: الربيع العربي‎, ar-rabīˁ al-ˁarabī) was a revolutionary wave of demonstrations and protests (both non-violent and violent), riots, and civil wars in the Arab world that began on 18 December 2010 in Tunisia with the Tunisian Revolution, and spread throughout the countries of the Arab League and its surroundings. While the wave of initial revolutions and protests faded by mid-2012, some started to refer to the succeeding and still ongoing large-scale discourse conflicts in the Middle East and North Africa as the Arab Winter. The most radical discourse from Arab Spring into the still ongoing civil wars took place in Syria as early as the second half of 2011.

By the end of February 2012, rulers had been forced from power in Tunisia,^[2]Egypt,^[3]Libya,^[4] and Yemen;^[5] civil uprisings had erupted in Bahrain^[6] and Syria;^[7] major protests had broken out in Algeria,^[8]Iraq,^[9]Jordan,^[10]Kuwait,^[11]Morocco,^[12] and Sudan;^[13] and minor protests had occurred in Mauritania,^[14]Oman,^[15]Saudi Arabia,^[16]Djibouti,^[17]Western Sahara,^[18] and Palestine. Weapons and Tuareg fighters returning from the Libyan Civil War stoked a simmering conflict in Mali which has been described as "fallout" from the Arab Spring in North Africa.^[19]

The protests shared some techniques of civil resistance in sustained campaigns involving strikes, demonstrations, marches, and rallies, as well as the effective use of social media^[20][21] to organize, communicate, and raise awareness in the face of state attempts at repression and Internet censorship, most notably used by the youth members of the Arab population.^[22][23]

And the intervention was initiated by the UN and a multinational force.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_Resolution_1973

[nahkit]

Next target for bombing practice !

Bombing them will only add oil on the hot plate of ISIS.

Violence is not the answer to violence.

ISIS was created because of the bullying of the US and the destroying of the powers that were controlling the area.

The only way to restore peace in the Middle East is to join forces and rebuild the countries to what they were BEFORE the US came in.

By doing so, the population will no longer support ISIS and ISIS will cease to be.

Instead of spending millions of Euro on taking refugees in, spend the money on rebuilding Iraq and Syria.

Then the world will know peace.

Before the U.S came in the states you mentioned were controlled by tyrannical despots. Intervention was wrong only in having no exit plan. To build a democracy in the way we understand it would require a new Marshall plan taking probably a generation or more. Short of that best not to interfere at all or else appoint your own secular tyrant to keep things under control.

The war against Libya was a result of multiple factions among the Washington warhawk elite, including the Zionists, coming together with the French, British, and German militarists to smash the most modern, secular, independent state in Africa under President Muammar Gaddafi.

The war succeeded in destroying Libya's economy, state, and society. It unleashed scores of armed terrorist groups and uprooted two million black contract workers and Libyan citizens of South Saharan origin forcing them to flee the rampaging militias to the refugee camps of Europe.

The entire war was carried out to the giddy delight of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her "humanitarian interventionist" supporters who were utterly ignorant as to who and what the Libyan "opposition" represented. Eventually, even Hillary's own Ambassador to Libya would be slaughtered by the same victorious US-backed "rebels" in the newly liberated Bengasi.

Gaddafi and his regime were annihilated, eliminating another real adversary of Israel and supporter of Palestinian rights. The US got nothing positive - not even a secure naval, air, or training base - only a dead Ambassador, millions of desperate refugees flooding Europe and thousands of trained and armed jihadists for the next target: Syria.

"two million black contract workers"

Where exactly were these 2 million contract workers employed?

I ask because in the twenty plus years I spent in Libya I can count the number of black contract workers I met in the oil industry on one hand.

[vogie]

If music is not allowed, how do they hear the ice cream vans?

[JingerBen]

The war against Libya was a result of multiple factions among the Washington warhawk elite, including the Zionists, coming together with the French, British, and German militarists to smash the most modern, secular, independent state in Africa under President Muammar Gaddafi.

The war succeeded in destroying Libya's economy, state, and society. It unleashed scores of armed terrorist groups and uprooted two million black contract workers and Libyan citizens of South Saharan origin forcing them to flee the rampaging militias to the refugee camps of Europe.

The entire war was carried out to the giddy delight of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her "humanitarian interventionist" supporters who were utterly ignorant as to who and what the Libyan "opposition" represented. Eventually, even Hillary's own Ambassador to Libya would be slaughtered by the same victorious US-backed "rebels" in the newly liberated Bengasi.

Gaddafi and his regime were annihilated, eliminating another real adversary of Israel and supporter of Palestinian rights. The US got nothing positive - not even a secure naval, air, or training base - only a dead Ambassador, millions of desperate refugees flooding Europe and thousands of trained and armed jihadists for the next target: Syria.

"two million black contract workers"

Where exactly were these 2 million contract workers employed?

I ask because in the twenty plus years I spent in Libya I can count the number of black contract workers I met in the oil industry on one hand.

The two million figure for contract workers is conservative.

There are numerous sources.

www.csmonitor.com/World/Africa /2011/0307/Who-are-Libya-s-s

Edited November 30, 2015 by JingerBen

[eggers]

The Western Leaders are once again left shrugging their shoulders & saying "We'll destroy ISIS"...... When????

They're full of rhetoric & empty words, no real actions!

Sure US has supposedly been bombing, as has France and ............ ISIS moved to Libya!!

Hello!! great intelligence gathering; they're bombing, but ISIS has apparently left the building!

So much for a coalition force...pathetic, not a leader amongst them..... just self interested <deleted> politicians !!

Only Ruttin'Totin' Putin is getting on w/ the job, with little or no assistance from Western forces.

It seems ISIS/ISIL/Daesch can take control in countries, where turmoil exists, as prior dictators were removed by West Coalition forces, leaving a void of power that ISIS takes up.

Now have a further source of funding as the oilfields in Sirte represent 80% of Libya's oil resources.

Nobody is addressing the issue of ISIS funding & how to stem the flow either through sanctions/actions against countries or organisations dealing with them, i.e. someone is selling arms, weapons, vehicles, etc....Who????

Bombs alone will not destroy them; they are extremely persuasive, tech savvy & very mobile!!

[otherstuff1957]

Russia is bombing ISIS, but most of their bombs are directed at other rebel forces:

After the Turkish Jet shoot-down, I suspect that even more intense bombing will be directed at the ethnic Turkish rebels in the Northeast.

[nahkit]

The war against Libya was a result of multiple factions among the Washington warhawk elite, including the Zionists, coming together with the French, British, and German militarists to smash the most modern, secular, independent state in Africa under President Muammar Gaddafi.

The war succeeded in destroying Libya's economy, state, and society. It unleashed scores of armed terrorist groups and uprooted two million black contract workers and Libyan citizens of South Saharan origin forcing them to flee the rampaging militias to the refugee camps of Europe.

The entire war was carried out to the giddy delight of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her "humanitarian interventionist" supporters who were utterly ignorant as to who and what the Libyan "opposition" represented. Eventually, even Hillary's own Ambassador to Libya would be slaughtered by the same victorious US-backed "rebels" in the newly liberated Bengasi.

Gaddafi and his regime were annihilated, eliminating another real adversary of Israel and supporter of Palestinian rights. The US got nothing positive - not even a secure naval, air, or training base - only a dead Ambassador, millions of desperate refugees flooding Europe and thousands of trained and armed jihadists for the next target: Syria.

"two million black contract workers"

Where exactly were these 2 million contract workers employed?

I ask because in the twenty plus years I spent in Libya I can count the number of black contract workers I met in the oil industry on one hand.

The two million figure for contract workers is conservative.

There are numerous sources.

www.csmonitor.com/World/Africa /2011/0307/Who-are-Libya-s-s

Your link doesn't work.

[DaddyWarbucks]

Ummm....I believe the initial uprisings were a result of the citizens of Libya protesting the rule of the dictator Gaddafi and his brutal crackdown on their protests. The west was involved, but not until after things spiraled down into a real mess.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_Spring

The Arab Spring (Arabic: الربيع العربي‎, ar-rabīˁ al-ˁarabī) was a revolutionary wave of demonstrations and protests (both non-violent and violent), riots, and civil wars in the Arab world that began on 18 December 2010 in Tunisia with the Tunisian Revolution, and spread throughout the countries of the Arab League and its surroundings. While the wave of initial revolutions and protests faded by mid-2012, some started to refer to the succeeding and still ongoing large-scale discourse conflicts in the Middle East and North Africa as the Arab Winter. The most radical discourse from Arab Spring into the still ongoing civil wars took place in Syria as early as the second half of 2011.

By the end of February 2012, rulers had been forced from power in Tunisia,^[2]Egypt,^[3]Libya,^[4] and Yemen;^[5] civil uprisings had erupted in Bahrain^[6] and Syria;^[7] major protests had broken out in Algeria,^[8]Iraq,^[9]Jordan,^[10]Kuwait,^[11]Morocco,^[12] and Sudan;^[13] and minor protests had occurred in Mauritania,^[14]Oman,^[15]Saudi Arabia,^[16]Djibouti,^[17]Western Sahara,^[18] and Palestine. Weapons and Tuareg fighters returning from the Libyan Civil War stoked a simmering conflict in Mali which has been described as "fallout" from the Arab Spring in North Africa.^[19]

The protests shared some techniques of civil resistance in sustained campaigns involving strikes, demonstrations, marches, and rallies, as well as the effective use of social media^[20][21] to organize, communicate, and raise awareness in the face of state attempts at repression and Internet censorship, most notably used by the youth members of the Arab population.^[22][23]

And the intervention was initiated by the UN and a multinational force.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_Resolution_1973

The implication that the UN instigated the invasion of Libya is either naïve or disingenuous.

The US, UK, France, and Germany used the UN as a cover to legitimize the dismemberment of Libya.

In order to understand the current endless wars, we have to examine the shifting coalitions of elites who make decisions in Washington, but not always primarily for Washington. An example is the Zionist lobby who push their agenda in the face of repeated foreign policy disasters for the US and suffer no consequences or costs.

The debacle in Libya was a sideshow. "Unfinished wars", mounting casualties and spiraling costs, with no end in sight, undermined the agreement between the militarist and the Zionist factions in the executive branch. However, the massively powerful Zionist presence in the US Congress provides a platform to bray for new and bigger wars.

[chuckd]

Ummm....I believe the initial uprisings were a result of the citizens of Libya protesting the rule of the dictator Gaddafi and his brutal crackdown on their protests. The west was involved, but not until after things spiraled down into a real mess.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_Spring

The Arab Spring (Arabic: الربيع العربي‎, ar-rabīˁ al-ˁarabī) was a revolutionary wave of demonstrations and protests (both non-violent and violent), riots, and civil wars in the Arab world that began on 18 December 2010 in Tunisia with the Tunisian Revolution, and spread throughout the countries of the Arab League and its surroundings. While the wave of initial revolutions and protests faded by mid-2012, some started to refer to the succeeding and still ongoing large-scale discourse conflicts in the Middle East and North Africa as the Arab Winter. The most radical discourse from Arab Spring into the still ongoing civil wars took place in Syria as early as the second half of 2011.

By the end of February 2012, rulers had been forced from power in Tunisia,^[2]Egypt,^[3]Libya,^[4] and Yemen;^[5] civil uprisings had erupted in Bahrain^[6] and Syria;^[7] major protests had broken out in Algeria,^[8]Iraq,^[9]Jordan,^[10]Kuwait,^[11]Morocco,^[12] and Sudan;^[13] and minor protests had occurred in Mauritania,^[14]Oman,^[15]Saudi Arabia,^[16]Djibouti,^[17]Western Sahara,^[18] and Palestine. Weapons and Tuareg fighters returning from the Libyan Civil War stoked a simmering conflict in Mali which has been described as "fallout" from the Arab Spring in North Africa.^[19]

The protests shared some techniques of civil resistance in sustained campaigns involving strikes, demonstrations, marches, and rallies, as well as the effective use of social media^[20][21] to organize, communicate, and raise awareness in the face of state attempts at repression and Internet censorship, most notably used by the youth members of the Arab population.^[22][23]

And the intervention was initiated by the UN and a multinational force.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_Resolution_1973

The implication that the UN instigated the invasion of Libya is either naïve or disingenuous.

The US, UK, France, and Germany used the UN as a cover to legitimize the dismemberment of Libya.

In order to understand the current endless wars, we have to examine the shifting coalitions of elites who make decisions in Washington, but not always primarily for Washington. An example is the Zionist lobby who push their agenda in the face of repeated foreign policy disasters for the US and suffer no consequences or costs.

The debacle in Libya was a sideshow. "Unfinished wars", mounting casualties and spiraling costs, with no end in sight, undermined the agreement between the militarist and the Zionist factions in the executive branch. However, the massively powerful Zionist presence in the US Congress provides a platform to bray for new and bigger wars.

" However, the massively powerful Zionist presence in the US Congress provides a platform to bray for new and bigger wars."

The US Congress did not approve the Libyan adventure. That action was taken by the Obama administration, including his then Secretary of State, without Congressional approval.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

House Spurns Obama on Libya, but Does Not Cut Funds

By JENNIFER STEINHAUER

JUNE 24, 2011

WASHINGTON — The House dealt a symbolic blow to President Obama on Friday by resoundingly rejecting a bill to authorize United States military operations in Libya. But the chamber also defeated a measure that would have limited financing to support those efforts.

The result, coming after weeks of tension between Congress and the White House over authorization of American military aid for the NATO mission in Libya, was a mixed message to the Obama administration, with Republicans and Democrats forming alliances that splintered customary party lines.

The resolution to support the mission failed 295 to 123, with 70 Democrats joining Republicans in a rebuff to Mr. Obama.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/25/us/politics/25powers.html?_r=0

[Steely Dan]

Next target for bombing practice !

Bombing them will only add oil on the hot plate of ISIS.

Violence is not the answer to violence.

ISIS was created because of the bullying of the US and the destroying of the powers that were controlling the area.

The only way to restore peace in the Middle East is to join forces and rebuild the countries to what they were BEFORE the US came in.

By doing so, the population will no longer support ISIS and ISIS will cease to be.

Instead of spending millions of Euro on taking refugees in, spend the money on rebuilding Iraq and Syria.

Then the world will know peace.

Before the U.S came in the states you mentioned were controlled by tyrannical despots. Intervention was wrong only in having no exit plan. To build a democracy in the way we understand it would require a new Marshall plan taking probably a generation or more. Short of that best not to interfere at all or else appoint your own secular tyrant to keep things under control.

The war against Libya was a result of multiple factions among the Washington warhawk elite, including the Zionists, coming together with the French, British, and German militarists to smash the most modern, secular, independent state in Africa under President Muammar Gaddafi.

The war succeeded in destroying Libya's economy, state, and society. It unleashed scores of armed terrorist groups and uprooted two million black contract workers and Libyan citizens of South Saharan origin forcing them to flee the rampaging militias to the refugee camps of Europe.

The entire war was carried out to the giddy delight of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her "humanitarian interventionist" supporters who were utterly ignorant as to who and what the Libyan "opposition" represented. Eventually, even Hillary's own Ambassador to Libya would be slaughtered by the same victorious US-backed "rebels" in the newly liberated Bengasi.

Gaddafi and his regime were annihilated, eliminating another real adversary of Israel and supporter of Palestinian rights. The US got nothing positive - not even a secure naval, air, or training base - only a dead Ambassador, millions of desperate refugees flooding Europe and thousands of trained and armed jihadists for the next target: Syria.

Of course the Zionists, how else could they ensure Syria and the Sinai would be flooded with jihadists using arms captured from what was the Libyan army?

[Chicog]

The implication that the UN instigated the invasion of Libya is either naïve or disingenuous.

The US, UK, France, and Germany used the UN as a cover to legitimize the dismemberment of Libya.

In order to understand the current endless wars, we have to examine the shifting coalitions of elites who make decisions in Washington, but not always primarily for Washington. An example is the Zionist lobby who push their agenda in the face of repeated foreign policy disasters for the US and suffer no consequences or costs.

The debacle in Libya was a sideshow. "Unfinished wars", mounting casualties and spiraling costs, with no end in sight, undermined the agreement between the militarist and the Zionist factions in the executive branch. However, the massively powerful Zionist presence in the US Congress provides a platform to bray for new and bigger wars.

EIther you don't know what an UN resolution is, or you're simply ignoring the history. And there was no "invasion".

February 2011:

Libya’s major cities were in the hands of opposition forces on Monday night as Col Muammar Gaddafi, for so long feared at home and loathed abroad, turned his air force on his people in a last-ditch bid to stay in power.

Libyan Air Force jets bombed airfields and other military targets as he left the city, initially to Sebha, the town where he grew up, to prevent the weapons falling into rebel hands.

Among the targets was said to be the fortified encampment in the capital Tripoli where he lived.

Civilian areas were also said to have been hit. The regime had “declared war on its people,” its own deputy ambassador to the United Nations, Ibrahim Omar al-Dabashi, said in disgust.

“What we are witnessing today is unimaginable,” one resident, named as Adel Mohammed Saleh said. “Warplanes and helicopters are indiscriminately bombing one area after another. There are many, many dead.” “Our people are dying. It is the policy of scorched earth.”

March 2011:

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973, on the situation in Libya, is a measure that was adopted on 17 March 2011. The Security Council resolution was proposed by France, Lebanon, and the United Kingdom.

Ten Security Council members voted in the affirmative (Bosnia and Herzegovina, Colombia, Gabon, Lebanon, Nigeria, Portugal, South Africa, and permanent members France, the United Kingdom, and the United States). Five (Brazil, Germany, and India, and permanent members China and Russia) abstained, with none opposed.

The resolution formed the legal basis for military intervention in the Libyan Civil War, demanding "an immediate ceasefire" and authorizing the international community to establish a no-fly zone and to use all means necessary short of foreign occupation to protect civilians.

The "elite", "zionist" tin foil hat nonsense has no basis in fact.

Edited December 1, 2015 by Chicog

[craigt3365]

Come on Chicog. All the world's problems are due to zionists, big corporations, brainwashing by the western media, and of course the US. LOL

[Thorgal]

Come on Chicog. All the world's problems are due to zionists, big corporations, brainwashing by the western media, and of course the US. LOL

Perhaps you don't know French Jew Bernard Henry Levy. He made a documentary of his personal involvement in the Lybian civil war, named 'The Oath of Tobruk'. Just google it.

He tried the same in Bosnia, Iraq and Syria.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article36927.htm

[h90]

Next target for bombing practice !

Bombing them will only add oil on the hot plate of ISIS.

Violence is not the answer to violence.

ISIS was created because of the bullying of the US and the destroying of the powers that were controlling the area.

The only way to restore peace in the Middle East is to join forces and rebuild the countries to what they were BEFORE the US came in.

By doing so, the population will no longer support ISIS and ISIS will cease to be.

Instead of spending millions of Euro on taking refugees in, spend the money on rebuilding Iraq and Syria.

Then the world will know peace.

How do you think that can be done, practically in a war zone? You need peace first.

[Steely Dan]

Come on Chicog. All the world's problems are due to zionists, big corporations, brainwashing by the western media, and of course the US. LOL

Perhaps you don't know French Jew Bernard Henry Levy. He made a documentary of his personal involvement in the Lybian civil war, named 'The Oath of Tobruk'. Just google it.

He tried the same in Bosnia, Iraq and Syria.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article36927.htm

How very revealing. The article is sowing a subliminal seed that all Jews share a common philosophy and work towards a shared goal. If you believe that of course you can believe Jews devised both communism and the Rothschild's to subvert events to their advantage. Ironically were you to criticize Islamic supremacist ideology the same people who fall for antisemitic conspiracy theories are often the quickest to accuse people of condemning all Muslims.

P.s the author is Palestinian, this is simply Mahoud Mouse for 'grown ups'.

Edited December 1, 2015 by Steely Dan

[Scott]

Please stay on topic. Continued off-topic, conspiratorial posts will result in suspensions.