Trump defends Muslim entry ban as “the right thing to do”

[chuckd]

That proverbial crow will taste the same if Hillary finally implodes under the weight of her scandals

[Steely Dan]

That proverbial crow will taste the same if Hillary finally implodes under the weight of her scandals

The regressives have neglected to factor in the impending plummet of the stock markets the minute interest rates are raised even by the merest fraction. Trump will seem like a safe pair of hands come election time, all imho.

[AZBill]

I don't agree with this as we do have Muslim friends over there we shouldn't alienate. But there are a lot of people here in the U.S. that agree with him.

[CMNightRider]

There are currently active investigations of ISIS in all 50 states. While these investigations are on going, Obama is allowing Syrian Muslims to continue to enter the U.S. without being able to properly vet these people. Stopping the flow of these people would be "the right thing to do."

[metisdead]

A post in violation of fair use policy has been removed as well as the inflammatory replies.

[Boon Mee]

In many polls and combined polls Trump is still leading by a wide margin... one poll said he broke 41%...

Trump is going to be the next U.S. President and he will cut the U.S. Budget in many ways even by cutting entire departments of government and scaling back others by 50%, government regulations will be gutted, government will get out of the way of the lives of Americans, Obama's Executive Orders will be thrown in the trash bin, Illegal Immigrants will be slowly pushed back home, Muslim 'refugees' will be sent back, the TSA will be gutted - then done away with over 2-3 years, Homeland Security will be gutted and streamlined if possible or responsibilities sent back to their original Departments, The FBI will begin again full blown surveillance of Mosques to determine which ones are dealing in fostering jihad, ISIS will be flattened, those who betrayed American under Obama will be investigated, prosecuted and punished... And that is about 30% of what Trump will do in the first 4 years...

ISIS will be flattened, those who betrayed American under Obama will be investigated, prosecuted and punished..

Let's start with GW Bush and his Dick Cheney at the Hague.

Regardless, the rightwhinge nutosphere is in for a huge change of plan. That is because America's National Front is also in for a big and decisive bust. Deservedly.

Sixty percent of Americans don’t think Donald Trump is qualified to be president

Sixty percent of Americans don't consider Donald Trump to be qualified to be president, according to new polling from the Washington Post and ABC News. Of registered voters, 56 percent hold that position, including over a third of Republicans.

That's a pretty remarkable figure. There's certainly an element of partisanship at play -- more than three-quarters of Democrats think he's unqualified -- but over 60 percent of independents think Trump is not qualified, compared to 37 percent who think he is.

https://www.washingt...o-be-president/

These numbers spell political d-o-o-m for Trump if he's nominated. The sentiment extends to Raphael "Ted" Cruz too btw. And the Republican party regardless of who the nominee may be.

Political polls conducted by Liberal News Media saying a Democrat would beat a Republican are as predictable as saying the Sun will rise in the morning.. The people who structure polls at Liberal news outfits are often leftists and socialist who see it is their duty to engineer what the populace gets to see. When they want a Democrat to be shown as a winner ... the poll sample is skewed to over sample likely Democrat voters by polling in voting precincts that have shown in the past to have heavy Democrat voting ... hardly guess work ... not even remotely random or balanced... They might as well say they did a poll and just post the numbers they want ... What is actually occurring in America is the largest conservative - real moderate populist uprisings in memory even including the involvement of blacks, hispanics and Democrats ... far eclipsing the pro Republican Congressional voting turnout of 2010 and 2014 - but the American political left just wants to pretend it does not exist..

Definitely bears re-posting.

Well done, JD

[Publicus]

Republicans and other right whingers are notoriously anti-science.

This includes of course public opinion scientific survey research, commonly known as polling.

The post referenced and reposted is a superb example of the Republican and other rightwing rejection of science. Youse guyz can't even count accurately the number of years planet earth has existed.

Fundamentalist radicals anywhere aren't at all good in these matters nohow.

[Chicog]

HATE when you quote legitimate journalistic sources at them. They only recognize right wing news sources for facts and opinions, like Fox News, that bastion of credibility.

What a moronic statement. Do you actually believe your own silly partisan spin?

Absolutely, how could he forget Breitbart?

[ClutchClark]

Republicans and other right whingers are notoriously anti-science.

This includes of course public opinion scientific survey research, commonly known as polling.

The post referenced and reposted is a superb example of the Republican and other rightwing rejection of science. Youse guyz can't even count accurately the number of years planet earth has existed.

Fundamentalist radicals anywhere aren't at all good in these matters nohow.

I am anti-democrat.

Does that make me a republican?

But I am pro-science.

Its so hard to be a stereotype.

[Pinot]

Republicans and other right whingers are notoriously anti-science.

This includes of course public opinion scientific survey research, commonly known as polling.

The post referenced and reposted is a superb example of the Republican and other rightwing rejection of science. Youse guyz can't even count accurately the number of years planet earth has existed.

Fundamentalist radicals anywhere aren't at all good in these matters nohow.

I am anti-democrat.

Does that make me a republican?

But I am pro-science.

Its so hard to be a stereotype.

You can be pro-science and anti-democrat. I'm sure there are a few sane, logical Republicans. It's just that none of them are running for President.

You're a Republican if you're against the following:

- Women's right to chose

- Equal rights for LBGT including Gay Marriage

- Freedom of Religion including Muslims

- Higher taxes on corporations and the wealthy

- Voting rights for everyone

- Medicare

- Social Security

- Obamacare

- Universal healthcare

- Strict gun control that limits ownership

- Increasing the minimum wage

- Welfare, unemployment benefits and food stamps

- Alternative energy solutions

- Lighter sentences for non-violent crime

- Decreasing military spending

- Government regulations to protect consumers

- Reduction of carbon emissions by countries to halt global warming.

Democrats don't always agree on all the above. They don't have a Ministry of Propaganda (Fox News) to tell them exactly what to believe, so democrats can be all over the place, till the figure out what's right.

Republicans believe people are fundamentally bad and Democrats believe people are good. Every decision revolves around that. It's why the two parties agree on so little.

So, you can be pro-science and anti-democrat, but it's the rest of the philosophical garbage the really makes you a Republican.

[Linzz]

Republicans and other right whingers are notoriously anti-science.

This includes of course public opinion scientific survey research, commonly known as polling.

The post referenced and reposted is a superb example of the Republican and other rightwing rejection of science. Youse guyz can't even count accurately the number of years planet earth has existed.

Fundamentalist radicals anywhere aren't at all good in these matters nohow.

I am anti-democrat.

Does that make me a republican?

But I am pro-science.

Its so hard to be a stereotype.

You can be pro-science and anti-democrat. I'm sure there are a few sane, logical Republicans. It's just that none of them are running for President.

You're a Republican if you're against the following:

- Women's right to chose

- Equal rights for LBGT including Gay Marriage

- Freedom of Religion including Muslims

- Higher taxes on corporations and the wealthy

- Voting rights for everyone

- Medicare

- Social Security

- Obamacare

- Universal healthcare

- Strict gun control that limits ownership

- Increasing the minimum wage

- Welfare, unemployment benefits and food stamps

- Alternative energy solutions

- Lighter sentences for non-violent crime

- Decreasing military spending

- Government regulations to protect consumers

- Reduction of carbon emissions by countries to halt global warming.

Democrats don't always agree on all the above. They don't have a Ministry of Propaganda (Fox News) to tell them exactly what to believe, so democrats can be all over the place, till the figure out what's right.

Republicans believe people are fundamentally bad and Democrats believe people are good. Every decision revolves around that. It's why the two parties agree on so little.

So, you can be pro-science and anti-democrat, but it's the rest of the philosophical garbage the really makes you a Republican.

Against the following. ALL of the following? Some of the following? What are you if you believe one or some and not others? Life is not as simple as you would like to believe

[sirineou]

Republicans and other right whingers are notoriously anti-science.

This includes of course public opinion scientific survey research, commonly known as polling.

The post referenced and reposted is a superb example of the Republican and other rightwing rejection of science. Youse guyz can't even count accurately the number of years planet earth has existed.

Fundamentalist radicals anywhere aren't at all good in these matters nohow.

I am anti-democrat.

Does that make me a republican?

But I am pro-science.

Its so hard to be a stereotype.

You can be pro-science and anti-democrat. I'm sure there are a few sane, logical Republicans. It's just that none of them are running for President.

You're a Republican if you're against the following:

- Women's right to chose

- Equal rights for LBGT including Gay Marriage

- Freedom of Religion including Muslims

- Higher taxes on corporations and the wealthy

- Voting rights for everyone

- Medicare

- Social Security

- Obamacare

- Universal healthcare

- Strict gun control that limits ownership

- Increasing the minimum wage

- Welfare, unemployment benefits and food stamps

- Alternative energy solutions

- Lighter sentences for non-violent crime

- Decreasing military spending

- Government regulations to protect consumers

- Reduction of carbon emissions by countries to halt global warming.

Democrats don't always agree on all the above. They don't have a Ministry of Propaganda (Fox News) to tell them exactly what to believe, so democrats can be all over the place, till the figure out what's right.

Republicans believe people are fundamentally bad and Democrats believe people are good. Every decision revolves around that. It's why the two parties agree on so little.

So, you can be pro-science and anti-democrat, but it's the rest of the philosophical garbage the really makes you a Republican.

Against the following. ALL of the following? Some of the following? What are you if you believe one or some and not others? Life is not as simple as you would like to believe

I guess an independant

[Publicus]

Republicans and other right whingers are notoriously anti-science.

This includes of course public opinion scientific survey research, commonly known as polling.

The post referenced and reposted is a superb example of the Republican and other rightwing rejection of science. Youse guyz can't even count accurately the number of years planet earth has existed.

Fundamentalist radicals anywhere aren't at all good in these matters nohow.

I am anti-democrat.

Does that make me a republican?

But I am pro-science.

Its so hard to be a stereotype.

Keep tryin Clutch. You can do it. It just takes a committment of time and effort to become a stereotype. But it's actually not much time or effort. Take my word for it cause you can find so many of us so assigned by others.

BTW, are you "anti-democrat" or are you 'anti-Democrat'? The right whingers aren't always clear in their use of the two different words that have a distinctive difference. If you're both then I'd suspect few around here would be surprised.

And do your refer to "republican" as in the form of government, or do you mean to refer to 'Republican' as in the political party in the USA.

Form of government is not necessarily capitalised. Names of political parties anywhere are capitalised. Those who would be aware are numerous, so the Trump and also the Putin fanboyz who are equally oblivious leave the rest of us to 'translate'and to interpret meaning in context, which is wholly unnecessary.

So give the rest of us a break, okay Clutch. Posting on the fly virtually every time does have its drawbacks.

Knew I could count on you.

Edited December 21, 2015 by Publicus