Jump to content

Thai politics: Guilty execs must pay price over insider-trading scandal


Recommended Posts

Posted

BURNING ISSUE
Guilty execs must pay price over insider-trading scandal

SASITHORN ONGDEE

BANGKOK: -- Thai investors were shocked by a statement issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on December 2 that it had imposed fines on four individuals totalling Bt33.34 million for using insider information to buy up shares of Siam Makro.

Two other persons were also fined Bt333,333.33 each for aiding and abetting the insider trading.

The SEC release also named the six penalised persons - three of whom were executives of CP All and Siam Makro. Among them was Korsak Chairasmisak, currently vice chairman of CP All and executive director of Siam Makro. However, he has not shown any accountability to the shareholders, like many others did when they were involved in scandals.

There have been scandals in the past involving executives of listed companies and related securities businesses that were slapped with "criminal" and "social" sanctions by the SEC for different violations.

In many cases, the executives were legally forced to quit their posts, especially if the SEC filed a criminal complaint against them.

But this case is an exception, with fines imposed on those found guilty without the imperative to resign.

The release revealed that findings showed share-purchase transactions by those six individuals from April 10-22, 2013, which was the period when CP All was in negotiations with SHV Nederland BV to acquire a majority stake in Siam Makro. The negotiated price was also higher than the market price.

Korsak, however, told reporters the following day that he intended to continue in his posts at both companies even though he accepted the SEC's decision. He reasoned that he had "honestly" made a mistake, and that he had acquired the Siam Makro shares with an unconcealed stock trading account before the Charoen Pokphand group purchased the shares. The CP group was negotiating and then assigned CP All to conclude the transaction later.

SEC secretary-general Rapee Sucharitakul recently commented that whether executives who have been sanctioned should stay or quit their positions depended on how well they could explain their situation to investors.

This could be a hint that investors should take further steps towards checks and balances to ensure good corporate governance in listed companies.

In this case, one senior executive continues to hold high office despite being fined for insider trading, but there has been very little criticism of this behaviour.

The case of Korsak stands out, as CP ALL - operator of the country's largest convenience-store chain, 7-Eleven - is one of the top performers in terms of "good" corporate governance as ranked by institutional investors in addition to its good business results.

The Association of Investment Management Companies (AIMC) has so far played an appropriate role by raising the issue of higher standards of social ethics. The association has been pushing for Korsak to take responsibility by resigning from his posts.

AIMC chairwoman Voravan Tarapoom said recently that good corporate governance was the foundation of the capital market, reflecting both quality and confidence of investors in the organisations.

"Good performance or good |corporate governance is not a |choice; both are needed to make organisations perfect," she said.

Moreover, she said on Wednesday that if there were no action she would ask CP All to hold an extraordinary meeting of shareholders to consider this matter. If there is still nothing, the individual investors may propose that the annual general shareholders' meeting to be held next year remove all of its board members.

It remains to be seen how many will still be in the fray to demand action on this issue of ethics.

How about the Stock Exchange of Thailand? Should the organisation play a bigger role as a regulator, especially on insider-trading scandals involving executives of listed companies?

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/Guilty-execs-must-pay-price-over-insider-trading-s-30275171.html

nationlogo.jpg
-- The Nation 2015-12-18

Posted

Insider trading here in Thailand is simply the way it works for some....stock manipulation has been a major thorn for the local market, and rarely are there any prosections that cause effect.

It's as though the guilty are exempt from trouble......

The latest issues with these 2 majors has at least caused some concern.....but will exectutives of major companies in Thailand ever be barred from trading or forced to leave their positions?........Never happen....they are just too high up the chain!

Posted

Ahhh...that 'it's an honest mistake' again!

Seems top posts in Thailand are riddled with executives making honest mistakes. Must be something taught in their schools...

Posted

"Honest mistake", well it worked for a former PM,

two were fined THB 333,333,333,?,must be the

judges lucky number.

regards Worgeordie

Posted

Insider trading here in Thailand is simply the way it works for some....stock manipulation has been a major thorn for the local market, and rarely are there any prosections that cause effect.

It's as though the guilty are exempt from trouble......

The latest issues with these 2 majors has at least caused some concern.....but will exectutives of major companies in Thailand ever be barred from trading or forced to leave their positions?........Never happen....they are just too high up the chain!

"It's as though the guilty are exempt from trouble" ... you and I both know that once you reach a certain "social" position and/or have a ton of cash, then you ARE exempt from serious consequences most of the time. And that's the way they like it and want it to stay, cos if things ever DID become more equal and fair here, 99% of those at the top would be behind bars.

Posted

In the US I believe congressmen are legally allowed to engage in insider trading! In the private sector it goes on all the time, occasionally a small fish gets busted the maintain the illusion of justice.

Inside knowledge in both stocks and real estate is where the big money gets made. No mystery why the wealthy sponsor politicians, the investment comes back in spades.

Posted

In the US I believe congressmen are legally allowed to engage in insider trading! In the private sector it goes on all the time, occasionally a small fish gets busted the maintain the illusion of justice.

Inside knowledge in both stocks and real estate is where the big money gets made. No mystery why the wealthy sponsor politicians, the investment comes back in spades.

You may have overlooked the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge, or STOCK Act passed in 2012 and amended in 2013. The law outlawed trading on nonpublic information by members of Congress, the Executive Branch and their staffs, and even candidates for Congress.

Posted

Hummm, throwing the unconnected or overly-greedy under the bus. Play nice, share, no problems. Just look at the West.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...