Jonathan Fairfield Posted December 25, 2015 Share Posted December 25, 2015 Queen Elizabeth II's Christmas message: Light can triumph LONDON (AP) — Queen Elizabeth II will use her Christmas broadcast to emphasize that light can triumph over darkness after a difficult year. The queen will note there have been "moments of darkness" in the last year, which has been marked by extremist attacks and a migrant crisis that has overwhelmed Europe, but cites the Bible as offering solace. "The Gospel of John contains a verse of great hope, often read at Christmas carol services: 'The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it,'" the queen plans to say, according to excerpts released by Buckingham Palace. The prerecorded speech will be broadcast on radio and television in Britain at 3 p.m. (1500 GMT, 10 a.m. EST) and in many parts of the British Commonwealth on Christmas Day. It will also be posted on the royal YouTube channel. The 89-year-old queen writes the brief speech herself, often reflecting on her own personal beliefs and stressing the importance of family. She plans to note the 70th anniversary this year of the end of World War II by thanking those who served in the conflict. The queen, her husband Prince Philip and senior members of the royal family plan to attend church services Christmas morning and spend most of the day at her sprawling Sandringham estate in Norfolk, 110 miles (175 miles) north of London. There is usually a gala Christmas lunch after church, followed by a walk outside. -- (c) Associated Press 2015-12-25 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brit_Doggie Posted December 25, 2015 Share Posted December 25, 2015 1 word ABDICATE move on for the good of the people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stoneyboy Posted December 25, 2015 Share Posted December 25, 2015 (edited) 1 word ABDICATE move on for the good of the people. Do you apply the same logic for Royals the world over,in essence Ma'am hasn't ruled over her subjects as long as some Royals. What is your reasoning for this talk of abdication ? Edited December 25, 2015 by stoneyboy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chiang mai Posted December 25, 2015 Share Posted December 25, 2015 1 word ABDICATE move on for the good of the people. You move on, I like the royals and the monarchy, they're good for the people and the people want them to remain. "Whatever republicans might wish, less than a fifth of the Queen's subjects in the UK say they want to get rid of the Royal Family - a proportion that has barely changed across decades". http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-18237280 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve187 Posted December 25, 2015 Share Posted December 25, 2015 if she abdicated, who would/should take over, the son or the grandson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robertson468 Posted December 25, 2015 Share Posted December 25, 2015 1 word ABDICATE move on for the good of the people. Trying hard to be controversial are we? Why not try something more up your street - is Star Wars true, or did Willy Wonka really exists. I am sure your rich fantacising mind can dream up many, many more illusions to entertain yourself, but please keep them to yourself and stop attacking people who cannot defend themselves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squeegee Posted December 25, 2015 Share Posted December 25, 2015 Oh, so she saw the new Star Wars as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SOTIRIOS Posted December 25, 2015 Share Posted December 25, 2015 .......Lucifer....Lucifer........Lucifer ......!!! (...it means 'light bearer'.....) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpa Posted December 25, 2015 Share Posted December 25, 2015 if she abdicated, who would/should take over, the son or the grandson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gandalf12 Posted December 25, 2015 Share Posted December 25, 2015 1 word ABDICATE move on for the good of the people. Do you apply the same logic for Royals the world over,in essence Ma'am hasn't ruled over her subjects as long as some Royals. What is your reasoning for this talk of abdication ? You may consider yourself a lesser person than her but I dont consider myself like that. She does nothing that wouldnt be done if we didnt have her. Get rid of her and all te hangers on we dont need them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pitrevie Posted December 25, 2015 Share Posted December 25, 2015 if she abdicated, who would/should take over, the son or the grandson There is no dispute her son would take over unless he himself decided to step aside. I gather he does not want to be known as Charles III given what happened to Charles I but might adopt the name George, it is in there, he has four all told. I personally like the Queen's broadcasts they give you time to nip out and make a coffee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Usernames Posted December 25, 2015 Share Posted December 25, 2015 Hi queen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lokie Posted December 25, 2015 Share Posted December 25, 2015 God save the Queen! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gandalf12 Posted December 25, 2015 Share Posted December 25, 2015 God save the Queen! Why would God (if one exists) save her? What has she done to be considered superior to everyone else? Get real for goodness sake Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gandalf12 Posted December 25, 2015 Share Posted December 25, 2015 if she abdicated, who would/should take over, the son or the grandson There is no dispute her son would take over unless he himself decided to step aside. I gather he does not want to be known as Charles III given what happened to Charles I but might adopt the name George, it is in there, he has four all told. I personally like the Queen's broadcasts they give you time to nip out and make a coffee. Why do we need any of them? There combined IQ is their shoe size. Get rid of the lot of them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eclipse Posted December 25, 2015 Share Posted December 25, 2015 if she abdicated, who would/should take over, the son or the grandson There is no dispute her son would take over unless he himself decided to step aside. I gather he does not want to be known as Charles III given what happened to Charles I but might adopt the name George, it is in there, he has four all told. I personally like the Queen's broadcasts they give you time to nip out and make a coffee. Why do we need any of them? There combined IQ is their shoe size. Get rid of the lot of them Any reason why you would want to get rid of an amazing woman who has served her country far more than you or I have. You should be proud of her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Basil B Posted December 25, 2015 Share Posted December 25, 2015 if she abdicated, who would/should take over, the son or the grandson So what's the story behind the photo? (Probably does not suffer fools, gladly...) At least if you are in the UK you can say what you want about the Royals within reason... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simon43 Posted December 25, 2015 Share Posted December 25, 2015 For those of you who are physically in Thailand, bear in mind that Thai LM law applies not only to insulting the Thai Royal Family, but also the Royal Family of the UK and other countries Personally I like her. Britain wouldn't be Britain without her. Happy Xmas Ma'am Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theguyfromanotherforum Posted December 26, 2015 Share Posted December 26, 2015 I'll show you the dark side Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Credo Posted December 26, 2015 Share Posted December 26, 2015 A great lady who has served her country well. She will be a hard act to follow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KC 71 Posted December 26, 2015 Share Posted December 26, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Basil B Posted December 26, 2015 Share Posted December 26, 2015 UK polls have been very much consistent on the fact that 75% of the population wants to retain the monarchy, with only 13% in it's abolition, even the Republican flag bearer Corbyn has now switched to a diet of Humble Pie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lokie Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 God save the Queen! Why would God (if one exists) save her? What has she done to be considered superior to everyone else? Get real for goodness sake No you get real pal, your entitled to your own minority opinion, mine is if you are a UK subject then you commit Treason and should be hung by your Gonads until they wither and drop off. If you not a Brit or hail from one of the dominions then keep your pie hole shut. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpa Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 You should be proud of her. Is this a Pink Floyd avatar you carry there? I'm sure you are aware about their admiration for her... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brewsterbudgen Posted December 29, 2015 Share Posted December 29, 2015 Is there really any need for another fawning royal thread about the monarchy? We have enough already! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lostboy Posted December 29, 2015 Share Posted December 29, 2015 God save the Queen! Why would God (if one exists) save her? What has she done to be considered superior to everyone else? Get real for goodness sake No you get real pal, your entitled to your own minority opinion, mine is if you are a UK subject then you commit Treason and should be hung by your Gonads until they wither and drop off. If you not a Brit or hail from one of the dominions then keep your pie hole shut. Just so we know who is allowed to post on this topic, perhaps you could tell us which citizens of which countries are from the British dominions? And are there other rules that they/we must follow? Perhaps their/our beneficent imperial masters would provide some guidance to we mere subjects. I guess when a person is so dependent on an anachronism for identity, then over-the-top arrogant abuse is considered normal. The rest of us will act like grown-ups and take responsibility for our own governance. Thank you for your advice. It will be treated as it deserves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Posted December 29, 2015 Share Posted December 29, 2015 Please keep it civil and please remember that all members are welcome to post their opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpa Posted December 29, 2015 Share Posted December 29, 2015 (edited) Only a privileged few have this right according to some folk. Edited December 29, 2015 by mpa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lokie Posted December 30, 2015 Share Posted December 30, 2015 God save the Queen! Why would God (if one exists) save her? What has she done to be considered superior to everyone else? Get real for goodness sake No you get real pal, your entitled to your own minority opinion, mine is if you are a UK subject then you commit Treason and should be hung by your Gonads until they wither and drop off. If you not a Brit or hail from one of the dominions then keep your pie hole shut. Just so we know who is allowed to post on this topic, perhaps you could tell us which citizens of which countries are from the British dominions? And are there other rules that they/we must follow? Perhaps their/our beneficent imperial masters would provide some guidance to we mere subjects. I guess when a person is so dependent on an anachronism for identity, then over-the-top arrogant abuse is considered normal. The rest of us will act like grown-ups and take responsibility for our own governance. Thank you for your advice. It will be treated as it deserves. Well first shot of OTT arrogant abuse came from gandalf against HRRM, slightly twisting the argument no? go figure... To be part of the UK and commonwealth is a privilege, if your not then you will not understand, is what sets us apart from other peoples. We are proud of our queen, now run along there's a good fellow! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpa Posted December 30, 2015 Share Posted December 30, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now