World considers a Trump presidency, and many shudder

[Jingthing]

You think Obama divided the country more than Dubya?

You think it will be the end of the lobbying industry if Trump gets in?

You think Trump will get in?

I stand by my statement.

I never said anything about the lobbying industry ending. I did say they wouldn't be able to influence Trump. Yes, it does look like Trump may be the next president.

No way. Prepare for a massive uprising of all minorities to make a majority to resist the fall of America to Trumpet fascism. We've got his number. He'll never be president.

The passion against that horror show will overwhelm the passion for him.

Edited March 11, 2016 by Jingthing

[mopar71]

Looks like the Trump base is trying to keep uppity negros in place.

Maybe just uppity A-holes - no matter what their color!

Yeah, possibly and perhaps, but these types of things just reinforce the hillbilly cracker constituency image.

Not that age matters, but the puncher is apparently 78 years old. Wow.

[keemapoot]

Looks like the Trump base is trying to keep uppity negros in place.

Maybe just uppity A-holes - no matter what their color!

Yeah, possibly and perhaps, but these types of things just reinforce the hillbilly cracker constituency image.

Not that age matters, but the puncher is apparently 78 years old. Wow.

A tough old cracker!

[thaibeachlovers]

Thank God for Trump. The only people who are shuddering over Trump becoming the next president, are corrupt politicians and the people who want something for nothing. Once Trump gets into the White House, the gravy train will be over for the lobbyist and the greedy, corrupt, soul-less, politicians who accept their money.

How naive........

Naive??? Really??? Lets give that a little thought. A large segment of the population (naive people) voted for Obama, who had been a community organiser and had warmed a seat in the U.S. Senate. Obama had never held a real job, and was totally void of any leadership skills. Obama devastated the American economy, weakened the military, and divided the country as no one who served before him. These same people voted for him twice, and now support Hillary who wants to continue Obama's idiotic policies. So you think I'm naive because I support a successful business man, who can't be influenced by lobbyist or other vermin? How naive......

Out comes the tired old broken record "It's all Obama's fault". And it didn't take long for the racist stuff to reappear. Why is that? The White Right, the Supremacists, the Originalists are all about integration. The great 'Melting Pot' that only melted white Europeans together had definitely gone off the boil by the 20th century. So what do these supremacists want with their integration? That American culture be a monoculture defined by those who control the institutions. That is, the Whites. The Males. No multiculturalism allowed. No diversity here. And when a black man was elected President, the howls of anguish when Obama didn't turn white on 20 January 2009. This was meant to be a post racial America. All Blacks were meant to have become White, or at least honorary Whites and compliant to White culture.

But what happened? Obama forced the Supremacists to look into the abyss of their racism and they didn't like what they saw staring back. They saw minorities who demanded access to the American culture and require that culture to be inclusive of them. So the Supremacists fought back, inventing nasty terms like 'race baiting' to throw at anyone who dares to suggest that there is not a monoculture in America and there should not be either.

Obama did not divide America. He shone a light on the divisions that already existed. He showed the racists, supremacists, nativists and bigots for what they are. Naturally you do not like that. This constant immoderate anti-Obama crap is stupid. I fully expect it to continue under Hillary Clinton because the sad old white men don't seem to like women either; at least not as an equal deserving of respect.

Long live the Obama legacy.

Oy, stop it with the "black man" BS. He is only half black and was raised as a WHITE boy. His upbringing had BA to do with the experience of blacks in America.

[thaibeachlovers]

You think Obama divided the country more than Dubya?

You think it will be the end of the lobbying industry if Trump gets in?

You think Trump will get in?

I stand by my statement.

I never said anything about the lobbying industry ending. I did say they wouldn't be able to influence Trump. Yes, it does look like Trump may be the next president.

No way. Prepare for a massive uprising of all minorities to make a majority to resist the fall of America to Trumpet fascism. We've got his number. He'll never be president.

The passion against that horror show will overwhelm the passion for him.

Prepare for a massive uprising of all minorities to make a majority

Dreaming again?

You can rant against the Donald all you want, but he keeps getting more popular.

[thaibeachlovers]

Looks like the Trump base is trying to keep uppity negros in place.

The toxic environment that’s become a trademark of Donald Trump’s raucous campaign turned violent again on Wednesday when a protester at the Republican frontrunner’s rally in Fayetteville, N.C., was sucker-punched by one of Trump’s supporters.

In a video of the incident posted to YouTube, Rakeem Jones, a 26-year-old black protester, was seen being led out of the event by security when he was punched in the face by what appeared to be a white Trump supporter. The audience cheered, and Jones was thrown to the ground by police.

https://www.yahoo.com/politics/trump-protester-sucker-punched-at-rally-172427733.html

How do you know that a WHITE protester wouldn't have been punched? Typical leftie propaganda trying to make everything about race.

Unless Donald was telling the crowd to punch him, what does it have to do with him anyway?

The way this race is going, the Dems will be blaming black on black violence in Chicago on the Donald as well.

[neverdie]

It's about time the Americans outsourced the position of POTUS, since they have proven time and time again they can't find a capable person for the job.

If they increase the pay and benifits I will consider the position myself.

Sir Les Patterson would be an excellent president and is available. He could share the role with Dame Edna 55555

[keemapoot]

Looks like the Trump base is trying to keep uppity negros in place.

The toxic environment that’s become a trademark of Donald Trump’s raucous campaign turned violent again on Wednesday when a protester at the Republican frontrunner’s rally in Fayetteville, N.C., was sucker-punched by one of Trump’s supporters.

In a video of the incident posted to YouTube, Rakeem Jones, a 26-year-old black protester, was seen being led out of the event by security when he was punched in the face by what appeared to be a white Trump supporter. The audience cheered, and Jones was thrown to the ground by police.

https://www.yahoo.com/politics/trump-protester-sucker-punched-at-rally-172427733.html

How do you know that a WHITE protester wouldn't have been punched? Typical leftie propaganda trying to make everything about race.

Unless Donald was telling the crowd to punch him, what does it have to do with him anyway?

The way this race is going, the Dems will be blaming black on black violence in Chicago on the Donald as well.

Watch the video and decide for yourself, then report back. About 5 seconds into the vid. I'm not here to defend blacks. I am here to show the representative class of Trump supporters.

http://news.yahoo.com/video/trump-supporter-punched-protester-arrested-210919105.html

http://news.yahoo.com/video/trump-supporter-punched-protester-arrested-210919105.html

Edited March 11, 2016 by keemapoot

[thaibeachlovers]

Again JD, you may want give Fox News a rest for a few days.

YUUUUGE!

You are WAY behind the times - completely out of touch with what is happening now in America ... your comment is circa 2008 ... You got to keep up. Fox news ? hahahahah... I have not watched Fox in 6-7 years and then only when changing channels ... I have a plethora of news sources from all over the world. I also keep in touch with Conservatives groups all over America... those who support Trump and those who do not ... Those who support Cruz and those who do not... and a host of other related subject matters... Your political acumen is that of a scratched 45 rpm record that just keeps skipping back to the beginning ... You will see in November of this year... Millions of voters who have not voted in 10-12 years are coming out of the woodwork to support the Anti-Democrat - Anti-Leftist - Anti-Socialist - Anti-Establishment candidates who will sweep Hillary into her jail cell ... and put Sanders in a assisted living home... If your lack of awareness of current events involved in the American political scene of 2016 were a vacuum all the air in Thailand would be sucked out..

Drudge and Breitbart, then? No Fox for 6-7 years? I thought that was daily bible study in wingnuttia?

Millions of voters coming out of the woodwork...? HOLY MACKEREL! That's scary. Old white man zombie voters. To be honest I think after 10-12 years they're probably dead. They weren't spring chickens to begin with.

Who told you there were going to be millions of Americans coming out of the woodwork? Leave any link that describes a scenario where any of these upstanding Republican candidates wins this thing. Not your usual nonsense, I mean a real journalism link.

I love the way this "HRC is frog marched off to jail nonsense" runs through every thread. BENGHAZI! It's the rights, ace in the hole for winning.

"If all your lack of awareness was a vacuum...all the air would be sucked out of Thailand?" Anybody?

Yes, do keep up with the good work.

The far out whingenut right is already nuts but you've gone and got right under their thin white skin.

To include on their red necks.

oh my my my, this is getting soooooooo far out. Claiming that only rednecks are supporting Trump is like saying HRC is a socialist, 55555555555555. Just not true.

Being naturally more inclined to socialism than capitalism I should be supporting her ( Bernie has no chance against HRC's superpacks- sorry guys ), but she is such a bad politician that I'd vote for a rock instead of her. At least the rock couldn't make things worse, like she will.

[thaibeachlovers]

Looks like the Trump base is trying to keep uppity negros in place.

In a video of the incident posted to YouTube, Rakeem Jones, a 26-year-old black protester, was seen being led out of the event by security when he was punched in the face by what appeared to be a white Trump supporter. The audience cheered, and Jones was thrown to the ground by police.

https://www.yahoo.com/politics/trump-protester-sucker-punched-at-rally-172427733.html

How do you know that a WHITE protester wouldn't have been punched? Typical leftie propaganda trying to make everything about race.

Unless Donald was telling the crowd to punch him, what does it have to do with him anyway?

The way this race is going, the Dems will be blaming black on black violence in Chicago on the Donald as well.

Watch the video and decide for yourself, then report back. About 5 seconds into the vid. I'm not here to defend blacks. I am here to show the representative class of Trump supporters.

http://news.yahoo.com/video/trump-supporter-punched-protester-arrested-210919105.html

http://news.yahoo.com/video/trump-supporter-punched-protester-arrested-210919105.html

I watched it and.............................

I stand by my statement. Trump didn't encourage the guy. The hall was packed and only that one guy got up, so how does that make him representative?

[keemapoot]

^You're right. That puncher is not representative of Trump supporters. Trump is endorsed by academic, business and political leaders, as well as global leaders throughout the world. The world welcomes his stewardship.

[thaibeachlovers]

^You're right. That puncher is not representative of Trump supporters. Trump is endorsed by academic, business and political leaders, as well as global leaders throughout the world. The world welcomes his stewardship.

Ignoring the sarcasm, Chris Christie endorsed him- is he not a political leader? There are others, but I can't be bothered looking them up now.

Go Donald go. Give those professional pigs in the trough politicians a good kicking.

[keemapoot]

^You're right. That puncher is not representative of Trump supporters. Trump is endorsed by academic, business and political leaders, as well as global leaders throughout the world. The world welcomes his stewardship.

Ignoring the sarcasm, Chris Christie endorsed him- is he not a political leader? There are others, but I can't be bothered looking them up now.

Go Donald go. Give those professional pigs in the trough politicians a good kicking.

Sure. Christie is a study in even-handed non-boorish leadership. He endorsed Trump because he truly believed in the brilliance of the man, and you could see it that night when he stood behind Trump and his photo became the face of those who have endorsed Trump because they really believed in him.

[lostboy]

Naive??? Really??? Lets give that a little thought. A large segment of the population (naive people) voted for Obama, who had been a community organiser and had warmed a seat in the U.S. Senate. Obama had never held a real job, and was totally void of any leadership skills. Obama devastated the American economy, weakened the military, and divided the country as no one who served before him. These same people voted for him twice, and now support Hillary who wants to continue Obama's idiotic policies. So you think I'm naive because I support a successful business man, who can't be influenced by lobbyist or other vermin? How naive......

Out comes the tired old broken record "It's all Obama's fault". And it didn't take long for the racist stuff to reappear. Why is that? The White Right, the Supremacists, the Originalists are all about integration. The great 'Melting Pot' that only melted white Europeans together had definitely gone off the boil by the 20th century. So what do these supremacists want with their integration? That American culture be a monoculture defined by those who control the institutions. That is, the Whites. The Males. No multiculturalism allowed. No diversity here. And when a black man was elected President, the howls of anguish when Obama didn't turn white on 20 January 2009. This was meant to be a post racial America. All Blacks were meant to have become White, or at least honorary Whites and compliant to White culture.

But what happened? Obama forced the Supremacists to look into the abyss of their racism and they didn't like what they saw staring back. They saw minorities who demanded access to the American culture and require that culture to be inclusive of them. So the Supremacists fought back, inventing nasty terms like 'race baiting' to throw at anyone who dares to suggest that there is not a monoculture in America and there should not be either.

Obama did not divide America. He shone a light on the divisions that already existed. He showed the racists, supremacists, nativists and bigots for what they are. Naturally you do not like that. This constant immoderate anti-Obama crap is stupid. I fully expect it to continue under Hillary Clinton because the sad old white men don't seem to like women either; at least not as an equal deserving of respect.

Long live the Obama legacy.

Oy, stop it with the "black man" BS. He is only half black and was raised as a WHITE boy. His upbringing had BA to do with the experience of blacks in America.

Well, my question still remains. What did the White Right expect from the election of a Half Black Man as President? I believe their expectation was that this demonstrated that black people, at least the half black people were now accepted by the White Right because they committed to the White Monoculture and accepted the status quo in American culture. This did not happen. Having a half black man as President focussed attention on the demands of blacks, half blacks and other minorities. These demands were not for acceptance into the White monoculture; they were for the White monoculture to embrace diversity and to respect their voices. This is what the White Right now calls Race Baiting. This is what the Right White call PC. They were prepared to accept half black people into their culture but this did not "fix racism". The half black people did not want to integrate and accept the status quo. They wanted changes. So did other oppressed minorities.

How do you 'fix' racism? The claim that America entered a post racial environment on 21 January 2009 I believe is an attempt by the Right White to avoid confronting the real issues of racism and the difficult choices that are needed to address a long history of racial oppression. We are now being led further away from the core of the issue by the anti-PC mob. The old white men who sucker punch black guys at Trump rallies, while Trump endorses such viciousness by claiming some 'bad' people disrupt his Places of Worship.

You fix racism by respecting diversity. You fix it by institutional and power structures that are inclusive and wholly respectful of individual voices and concerns. You fix it by owning up to the past, confronting it and, if necessary, apologising for it. Australia did. It hasn't fixed racism. Neither has 40 years of multiculturalism. But it is certainly going in the right direction. Talk with young Australians and you will see this.

If find the half black reference distasteful. I did not make it the subject of my response but I will say that you do not get to define the identify of any individual apart from yourself. If Obama identifies as black, that is his right and his heritage. Your expectation that all black people should experience and exhibit the 'gangsta' heritage is self-evidently a racially inspired comment. It demonstrates to me the distance yet to be travelled in 'fixing' racism.

[thaibeachlovers]

Naive??? Really??? Lets give that a little thought. A large segment of the population (naive people) voted for Obama, who had been a community organiser and had warmed a seat in the U.S. Senate. Obama had never held a real job, and was totally void of any leadership skills. Obama devastated the American economy, weakened the military, and divided the country as no one who served before him. These same people voted for him twice, and now support Hillary who wants to continue Obama's idiotic policies. So you think I'm naive because I support a successful business man, who can't be influenced by lobbyist or other vermin? How naive......

Out comes the tired old broken record "It's all Obama's fault". And it didn't take long for the racist stuff to reappear. Why is that? The White Right, the Supremacists, the Originalists are all about integration. The great 'Melting Pot' that only melted white Europeans together had definitely gone off the boil by the 20th century. So what do these supremacists want with their integration? That American culture be a monoculture defined by those who control the institutions. That is, the Whites. The Males. No multiculturalism allowed. No diversity here. And when a black man was elected President, the howls of anguish when Obama didn't turn white on 20 January 2009. This was meant to be a post racial America. All Blacks were meant to have become White, or at least honorary Whites and compliant to White culture.

But what happened? Obama forced the Supremacists to look into the abyss of their racism and they didn't like what they saw staring back. They saw minorities who demanded access to the American culture and require that culture to be inclusive of them. So the Supremacists fought back, inventing nasty terms like 'race baiting' to throw at anyone who dares to suggest that there is not a monoculture in America and there should not be either.

Obama did not divide America. He shone a light on the divisions that already existed. He showed the racists, supremacists, nativists and bigots for what they are. Naturally you do not like that. This constant immoderate anti-Obama crap is stupid. I fully expect it to continue under Hillary Clinton because the sad old white men don't seem to like women either; at least not as an equal deserving of respect.

Long live the Obama legacy.

Oy, stop it with the "black man" BS. He is only half black and was raised as a WHITE boy. His upbringing had BA to do with the experience of blacks in America.

Well, my question still remains. What did the White Right expect from the election of a Half Black Man as President? I believe their expectation was that this demonstrated that black people, at least the half black people were now accepted by the White Right because they committed to the White Monoculture and accepted the status quo in American culture. This did not happen. Having a half black man as President focussed attention on the demands of blacks, half blacks and other minorities. These demands were not for acceptance into the White monoculture; they were for the White monoculture to embrace diversity and to respect their voices. This is what the White Right now calls Race Baiting. This is what the Right White call PC. They were prepared to accept half black people into their culture but this did not "fix racism". The half black people did not want to integrate and accept the status quo. They wanted changes. So did other oppressed minorities.

How do you 'fix' racism? The claim that America entered a post racial environment on 21 January 2009 I believe is an attempt by the Right White to avoid confronting the real issues of racism and the difficult choices that are needed to address a long history of racial oppression. We are now being led further away from the core of the issue by the anti-PC mob. The old white men who sucker punch black guys at Trump rallies, while Trump endorses such viciousness by claiming some 'bad' people disrupt his Places of Worship.

You fix racism by respecting diversity. You fix it by institutional and power structures that are inclusive and wholly respectful of individual voices and concerns. You fix it by owning up to the past, confronting it and, if necessary, apologising for it. Australia did. It hasn't fixed racism. Neither has 40 years of multiculturalism. But it is certainly going in the right direction. Talk with young Australians and you will see this.

If find the half black reference distasteful. I did not make it the subject of my response but I will say that you do not get to define the identify of any individual apart from yourself. If Obama identifies as black, that is his right and his heritage. Your expectation that all black people should experience and exhibit the 'gangsta' heritage is self-evidently a racially inspired comment. It demonstrates to me the distance yet to be travelled in 'fixing' racism.

Does Obama identify as "black"? I have never heard him say so. His heritage is white, not black, as he was raised by a solo parent white woman.

You are the only one talking about "gangsta". Did Sidney Poitier exhibit the "gangsta culture"? Was he not a black man? Martin Luther King Jr? Etc etc etc.

[Gulfsailor]

I watched it and.............................

I stand by my statement. Trump didn't encourage the guy. The hall was packed and only that one guy got up, so how does that make him representative?

You might want to reconsider your statement that Trump didn't encourage this. See this compilation of the most recent and past violent incidents at Trump rally's as Trump encourages this violence and even promising to pay legal fees!

Edited March 11, 2016 by Gulfsailor

[Publicus]

What happens when delegates are won, but, the politician eventually quits the race.

Who do those delegates go to?

I think if a candidate "suspends" his race, rather than withdraw, he will retain his delegates. That is why you see most of them announce suspension rather than withdrawal. They can then use those delegates in their "basket" of power for negotiation later which he can pledge to another candidate. (If I explained this wrong, one of our pundits will be along to correct me)

I think that is what is happening now with Florida looming, as the winner-take-all state. Jeb Bush is acting as a power broker, announcing he will meet with 3 candidates (NOT INCLUDING TRUMP) to decide who he will back, then endorse, and throw his family dynasty's weight behind that candidate to defeat Trump. Note: Bush considers Rubio a traitor after having mentored him coming up in Florida. But as we all know, politics is thicker than water or somethin like that.

Not sure I like or understand the merits of the American political system. How democratic is it for the people who think they are voting for a candidate but are actually voting for a delegate who then votes for whoever he likes? Do voters ever get to really vote for a candidate?

A bit cranky this campaign season or so it could seem. Alienated even.

Everything is bad and wrong and must be rejected and brought down (using a question mark of course). To be smashed by the guy who quotes Mussolini. The political virus is already approaching localised epidemic proportions as The Donald proclaims to his mobs it's good to punch people in the face.

Indeed, the cure being promoted is Donald Trump the billionaire with an obligatory kind word from the freestanding free radicals for Bernie Sanders the socialist.

Bizarre for sure from out there on the floating margins. Out in the shimmering distance.

[MZurf]

^You're right. That puncher is not representative of Trump supporters. Trump is endorsed by academic, business and political leaders, as well as global leaders throughout the world. The world welcomes his stewardship.

Ignoring the sarcasm, Chris Christie endorsed him- is he not a political leader? There are others, but I can't be bothered looking them up now.

Go Donald go. Give those professional pigs in the trough politicians a good kicking.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cutting_off_the_nose_to_spite_the_face

[willyumiii]

[keemapoot]

For all you guys defending your good ol' boy spry deliverance-like 78 year old brawler, he was of course arrested for assault, and more:

McGraw also was charged with disorderly conduct and communicating threats. Detectives added the latter charge after seeing video of McGraw saying he enjoyed hitting "that loudmouth" and threatening next time "to kill him," the sheriff's office said.

And in typical classy fashion, when Trump was asked about the incident, rather than immediately condemn physical assault on his behalf had this to say:

Asked about the incident during the Republican debate Thursday night, Trump said he did not condone violence but said that some protesters "are bad dudes."

http://news.yahoo.com/north-carolina-man-charged-assaulting-protester-trump-rally-030906665.html

[Linzz]

What happens when delegates are won, but, the politician eventually quits the race.

Who do those delegates go to?

I think if a candidate "suspends" his race, rather than withdraw, he will retain his delegates. That is why you see most of them announce suspension rather than withdrawal. They can then use those delegates in their "basket" of power for negotiation later which he can pledge to another candidate. (If I explained this wrong, one of our pundits will be along to correct me)

I think that is what is happening now with Florida looming, as the winner-take-all state. Jeb Bush is acting as a power broker, announcing he will meet with 3 candidates (NOT INCLUDING TRUMP) to decide who he will back, then endorse, and throw his family dynasty's weight behind that candidate to defeat Trump. Note: Bush considers Rubio a traitor after having mentored him coming up in Florida. But as we all know, politics is thicker than water or somethin like that.

Not sure I like or understand the merits of the American political system. How democratic is it for the people who think they are voting for a candidate but are actually voting for a delegate who then votes for whoever he likes? Do voters ever get to really vote for a candidate?

A bit cranky this campaign season or so it could seem. Alienated even.

Everything is bad and wrong and must be rejected and brought down (using a question mark of course). To be smashed by the guy who quotes Mussolini. The political virus is already approaching localised epidemic proportions as The Donald proclaims to his mobs it's good to punch people in the face.

Indeed, the cure being promoted is Donald Trump the billionaire with an obligatory kind word from the freestanding free radicals for Bernie Sanders the socialist.

Bizarre for sure from out there on the floating margins. Out in the shimmering distance.

Shimmering distance? Are you losing it Pub, you're coming over all poetic.

Mmmm nothing bizarre about acknowledging the two independents (of Wall street donors) and listening to both, while ignoring those who are in positions of obligation to special interest groups. Is it unsettling for your time cemented mindset to understand the swing voter? Even you were indignant when I suggested you might be in the pay of HRC and you thought I should be ignored. Similarly I ignore Hillary and Cruz for the self same reason. Like him or hate him Trump has unsettled the political establishment who fear their power and relevance is disappearing into thin air. nothing to do with his hair or bad manners. He doesn't fit the template and might renegotiate business deals that cannot be bought like a Clinton foundation.

Edited March 11, 2016 by Linzz

[Pinot]

The swing voter? Yeah, what's wrong with you Publicus not understanding the swing voter?

Normal people reading these wingnut posts must be slapping their foreheads saying, "Ohhhhhh, now I see."

Donald Trump the cure for what ails America?

One absurd post after another. How do you talk people off the ledge of voting Republican? Hey watch that first step, it's a doozy.

Is there something in the water over there in wingnuttia? Probably just the heat, turn off Fox News, try and chill. Jeesh.

[CWMcMurray]

Pretty much sums it up..

Demoblican - think that sums up Hillary pretty well..

http://thesaker.is/the-next-presidential-election-a-meaningful-choice-for-the-first-time/

[Publicus]

Indeed, it is difficult for the hardcore conservative right to criticise Trump (Cruz also) while simultaneously stepping forward gently to say something kind about Sanders, then jumping out at Clinton while tossing the net over Clinton's supporters.

Quite the obvious contradiction or so it could seem.

The tact and approach of the hard conservative right in this campaign are indeed unmistakable.

In your paranoia you imagine conspiracy and ulterior motives. In my case rightfully or wrongfully I find Sanders and Trump suitable candidates simply because they are not visibly bought off by corporate interests. So you missed the point entirely.

Even Cruz's wife works for Goldman Sachs. (there's a criticism) .On this score Hillary is beyond the pale. That was the reason alone I've criticized them. Nothing to do with left or right and if the left won't criticize Hillary on that score and I do then automatically in your eyes I'm from the extreme right. Nuts. All it does is reveal your extreme bias through speaking nonsense and riddles in verbose language. You say I target the left so that reveals my position. No I target 'holier than thou' arrogance. Somehow the left like to display their 'superior' learning and will tell everyone about it. It's a trait.

Similarly, it was because of corruption and corporate welfare and an anti democratic movement in the GOP I quoted Stalin because taking away choices and presuming to know what's the best for the great unwashed, your vote actually means less and less. If you value your vote as much as you say then why are you not concerned? But you can't see that because you're sold out on Hillary come what may.

It may be helpful for you to know that if you meet people who incessantly enjoy lambasting others with whom they do not agree, with tags and labels because they get off on it everyday, then it's no more than a daily w@nk. Do you know anyone who does that?

In your paranoia you imagine conspiracy and ulterior motives.

Ah but I'm afraid ｗｉｔｈ youse guyz I can recognise common themes that equal and aggregate to a campaign strategy from over there on the recently ｅｍｅｒｇｅｎｔ　ａｎｄ　assertive conservative hard core right. Hey, some others among us read some of the well funded mass of highly financed right wing media. Ｙｅ　ｓｕｐｐｏｒｔ　Ｔｒｕｍｐ，　ｃｏｎｎｅｃｔ　ｈｉｍ　ｔｏ　Ｓａｎｄｅｒｓ　ｉｎ　ｍｉｌｄｌｙ　ｐｏｓｉｔｉｖｅ　ｗａｙｓ　ｔｏ　ｉｎｃｌｕｄｅ　ｓａｙｉｎｇ　ｙｏｕｓｅ　ｇｕｙｚ　ｃａｎ　ｏｒ　ｗｏｕｌｄ　ｖｏｔｅ　ｆｏｒ　ｈｉｍ；　ｓｌａｍ　Ｃｌｉｎｔｏｎ．　Ｉｇｎｏｒｅ　ｔｈｅ　ｒｅｓｔ　ｏｆ　＇ｅｍ．　Ｉｔ　ｉｓ　ｐａｔｅｎｔｌｙ　ｏｂｖｉｏｕｓ　ａｎｄ　ｉｔ　ｉｓ　ｔｈｅ　ｐａｔｔｅｒｎ　ｏｆ　ｔｈｅ　ｐｏｓｔｓ　ｂｙ　ｔｈｅ　ｃｏｎｓｅｒｖａｔｉｖｅ　ｈａｒｄ　ｃｏｒｅ　ｒｉｇｈｔ　ｔｈａｔ　ａｌｌ　ｔｈｅ　ｗｈｉｌｅ　ｃｌａｉｍｓ　ｉｎｄｅｐｅｎｄｅｎｃｅ　ｏｆ　ｐａｒｔｉｅｓ，　ｉｄｅｏｌｏｇｙ，　ｓｃｈｅｍｅｓ．　

You say I target the left so that reveals my position. No I target 'holier than thou' arrogance. Somehow the left like to display their 'superior' learning and will tell everyone about it. It's a trait.

Yep, confirmed. The recently emergened conservative hard core right targets liberals aka progressives aka liberals ie the 'left.' One does not hear instead any of the conservative hard rightists ｗｈｏ　ｃｌａｉｍ　ｉｎｄｅｐｅｎｄｅｎｃｅ　criticising Cruz or Rubio or ａｎｙｏｎｅ　ｏｎ　ｔｈｅ　ｒｉｇｈｔ．　 No time or attention to them. Conversely, the progressive ＨＲ　Ｃｌｉｎｔｏｎ　ｉｓ　ｈｏｕｒｌｙ　ｔｈｅ　ｆｉｅｒｃｅ　ａｎｄ　ｒｅｐｅａｔｅｄ　ｔａｒｇｅｔ　ｏｆ　ｔｈｅ　ｄｅｔｅｒｍｉｎｅｄ　ｒｉｇｈｔ，ｆｒｏｍ　ｔｈｅ　ｒｅｃｅｎｔｌｙ　ｅｍｅｒｇｅｎｔ　ｃｏｎｓｅｒｖａｔｉｖｅ　ｈａｒｄ　ｒｉｇｈｔ　ａｌｌ　ｔｈｅ　ｗａｙ　ｏｕｔ　ｔｏ　ｔｈｅ　ｕｓｕａｌ　ｒｉｇｈｔｗｈｉｎｇｅｎｕｔｓ．Ｔｈｅ　ｓｏｃｉａｉｓｔ　Ｂｅｒｎｉｅ　Ｓａｎｄｅｒｓ　ｇｅｔｓ　ｃｏｍｐｌｉｍｅｎｔｓ　ｏｒ　ａ　ｋｉｎｄ　ｗｏｒｄ　ｆｏｒ　ｆｏｒｍ　ｉｆ　ｎｏｔ　ｃｏｎｔｅｎｔ．Ｔｈｅ　ｒｉｇｈｔ　ｄｏｅｓ　ｍｉｓｔａｋｅｎｌｙ　ｂｅｌｉｅｖｅ　ｉｔ　ｃａｎ　ｒａｔｉｏｎａｌｌｙ　ｃｏｎｎｅｃｔ　Ｔｒｕｍｐ　ａｎｄ　Ｓａｎｄｅｒｓ，　ｗｈｉｃｈ　ｉｓ　ｔｈｅ　ｐｏｌｉｔｉｃａｌ　ｇｅｏｍｅｔｒｙ　ｔｈａｔ　ｓｈｏｗｓ　ｕｓ　ｈｏｗ　ｆａｒ　ｏｕｔ　ｉｎ　ｏｒｂｉｔ　ａｌｌ　ｏｆ　＇ｅｍ　ａｒｅ．　　

I quoted Stalin because taking away choices and presuming to know what's the best for the great unwashed, your vote actually means less and less.

Ｄｏｎａｌｄ　Ｔｒｕｍｐ　ｑｕｏｔｅｓ　Ｍｕｓｓｏｌｉｎｉ　ａｎｄ　ｔｈｅ　ｒｅｃｅｎｔｌｙ　ｅｍｅｒｇｅｎｔ　ｃｏｎｓｅｒｖａｔｉｖｅ　ｈａｒｄ　ｃｏｒｅ　ｒｉｇｈｔ　ｑｕｏｔｅｓ　Ｓｔａｌｉｎ　ｗｈｉｌｅ　ｌｅａｎｉｎｇ　ｏｎ　ｂｏｔｈ　ｅｎｔｈｕｓｉａｓｔｉｃａｌｌｙ．Ｓｔｒｏｎｇ　ｌｅａｄｅｒ　ｓｔｕｆｆ．　Ｓｏ　ｔｈｅ　ｒａｄｉｃａｌ　ｗｉｌｄｎｅｓｓ　ｃｏｎｔｉｎｕｅｓ　ｕｎａｂａｔｅｄ　ａｎｄ　ｗｉｔｈｏｕｔ　ｌｉｍｉｔｓ．　Ｒｅｖｅａｌｉｎｇｌｙ　ｓｏ　ｔｈｘ．

a daily w@nk. Do you know anyone who does that?

Ｗｅ　ｓｅｅ　ｔｈａｔ　ｔｈｅ　ｌｅｖｅｌ　ｏｆ　ｄｉｓｃｏｕｒｓｅ　ｏｎ　ｔｈｅ　ｉｓｓｕｅｓ　ｃｅｎｔｒａｌ　ｔｏ　ａ　ｃａｍｐａｉｇｎ　ｆｏｒ　Ｐｏｔｕｓ　ａｒｅ　ｗｅｌｌ　ｂｅｙｏｎｄ　Ｔｈｅ　Ｄｏｎａｌｄ　ａｎｄ　ｈｉｓ　ａｄｍｉｒｅｒ　ｍｉｎｉｏｎｓ　ａｌｉｋｅ．Ｔｈｅ　ｍｏｄｅ　ｏｆ　ｃｏｍｍｕｎｉｃａｔｉｏｎ　ｉｓ　ｓｃｈｏｏｌｙａｒｄ　ｒａｔｈｅｒ　ｔｈａｎ　ｔｈｅ　ｈａｌｌｓ　ｏｆ　ｇｏｖｅｒｎｍｅｎｔ　ｏｒ　ｇａｉｎｉｎｇ　ｔｈｅ　ｒｅｓｐｅｃｔ　ｏｆ　ｔｈｅ　ｓｏｃｉｅｔｙ　ａｎｄ　ｂｏｄｙ　ｐｏｌｉｔｉｃ．　Ｔｏ　ｉｎｃｌｕｄｅ　ｔｈｅ　ｔｅｌｅｖｉｓｉｏｎ　ｓｔａｇｅ　ｆｒｏｍ　ｗｈｉｃｈ　ｔｈｅｙ　ｈｕｒｌ　ｉｎｖｅｃｔｉｖｅ．　Ｓｏ　ｇｏｏｄ　ｌｕｃｋ　ｗｉｔｈ　ｔｈａｔ．

（Ｄｏ　ｐａｒｄｏｎ　ｔｈｅ　ｆｏｎｔ　ｉｓｓｕｅ　ｂｕｔ　ｔｈｅ　ｄｅｓｋｔｏｐ　ｉｓ　ｈａｖｉｎｇ　ｌａｎｇｕａｇｅ　ｃｏｎｆｕｓｉｏｎ　ｉｓｓｕｅｓ　ｉｎ　ｔｈｅ　ｓｏｆｔｗａｒｅ，　ｓｏｏｎ　ｔｏ　ｂｅ　ｒｅｍｅｄｉｅｄ．）

Edited March 11, 2016 by seedy
font

[Ulysses G.]

^You're right. That puncher is not representative of Trump supporters. Trump is endorsed by academic, business and political leaders, as well as global leaders throughout the world. The world welcomes his stewardship.

Trump has been endorsed by Ben Carson. That makes a big difference to me. Christie is an opportunist. Ben Carson is sincere. If Carson says Trump is a very intelligent man who cares deeply about America, I believe him.

[Linzz]

Indeed, it is difficult for the hardcore conservative right to criticise Trump (Cruz also) while simultaneously stepping forward gently to say something kind about Sanders, then jumping out at Clinton while tossing the net over Clinton's supporters.

Quite the obvious contradiction or so it could seem.

The tact and approach of the hard conservative right in this campaign are indeed unmistakable.

In your paranoia you imagine conspiracy and ulterior motives. In my case rightfully or wrongfully I find Sanders and Trump suitable candidates simply because they are not visibly bought off by corporate interests. So you missed the point entirely.

Even Cruz's wife works for Goldman Sachs. (there's a criticism) .On this score Hillary is beyond the pale. That was the reason alone I've criticized them. Nothing to do with left or right and if the left won't criticize Hillary on that score and I do then automatically in your eyes I'm from the extreme right. Nuts. All it does is reveal your extreme bias through speaking nonsense and riddles in verbose language. You say I target the left so that reveals my position. No I target 'holier than thou' arrogance. Somehow the left like to display their 'superior' learning and will tell everyone about it. It's a trait.

Similarly, it was because of corruption and corporate welfare and an anti democratic movement in the GOP I quoted Stalin because taking away choices and presuming to know what's the best for the great unwashed, your vote actually means less and less. If you value your vote as much as you say then why are you not concerned? But you can't see that because you're sold out on Hillary come what may.

It may be helpful for you to know that if you meet people who incessantly enjoy lambasting others with whom they do not agree, with tags and labels because they get off on it everyday, then it's no more than a daily w@nk. Do you know anyone who does that?

In your paranoia you imagine conspiracy and ulterior motives.

Ah but I'm afraid ｗｉｔｈ youse guyz I can recognise common themes that equal and aggregate to a campaign strategy from over there on the recently ｅｍｅｒｇｅｎｔ　ａｎｄ　assertive conservative hard core right. Hey, some others among us read some of the well funded mass of highly financed right wing media. Ｙｅ　ｓｕｐｐｏｒｔ　Ｔｒｕｍｐ，　ｃｏｎｎｅｃｔ　ｈｉｍ　ｔｏ　Ｓａｎｄｅｒｓ　ｉｎ　ｍｉｌｄｌｙ　ｐｏｓｉｔｉｖｅ　ｗａｙｓ　ｔｏ　ｉｎｃｌｕｄｅ　ｓａｙｉｎｇ　ｙｏｕｓｅ　ｇｕｙｚ　ｃａｎ　ｏｒ　ｗｏｕｌｄ　ｖｏｔｅ　ｆｏｒ　ｈｉｍ；　ｓｌａｍ　Ｃｌｉｎｔｏｎ．　Ｉｇｎｏｒｅ　ｔｈｅ　ｒｅｓｔ　ｏｆ　＇ｅｍ．　Ｉｔ　ｉｓ　ｐａｔｅｎｔｌｙ　ｏｂｖｉｏｕｓ　ａｎｄ　ｉｔ　ｉｓ　ｔｈｅ　ｐａｔｔｅｒｎ　ｏｆ　ｔｈｅ　ｐｏｓｔｓ　ｂｙ　ｔｈｅ　ｃｏｎｓｅｒｖａｔｉｖｅ　ｈａｒｄ　ｃｏｒｅ　ｒｉｇｈｔ　ｔｈａｔ　ａｌｌ　ｔｈｅ　ｗｈｉｌｅ　ｃｌａｉｍｓ　ｉｎｄｅｐｅｎｄｅｎｃｅ　ｏｆ　ｐａｒｔｉｅｓ，　ｉｄｅｏｌｏｇｙ，　ｓｃｈｅｍｅｓ．　

You say I target the left so that reveals my position. No I target 'holier than thou' arrogance. Somehow the left like to display their 'superior' learning and will tell everyone about it. It's a trait.

Yep, confirmed. The recently emergened conservative hard core right targets liberals aka progressives aka liberals ie the 'left.' One does not hear instead any of the conservative hard rightists ｗｈｏ　ｃｌａｉｍ　ｉｎｄｅｐｅｎｄｅｎｃｅ　criticising Cruz or Rubio or ａｎｙｏｎｅ　ｏｎ　ｔｈｅ　ｒｉｇｈｔ．　 No time or attention to them. Conversely, the progressive ＨＲ　Ｃｌｉｎｔｏｎ　ｉｓ　ｈｏｕｒｌｙ　ｔｈｅ　ｆｉｅｒｃｅ　ａｎｄ　ｒｅｐｅａｔｅｄ　ｔａｒｇｅｔ　ｏｆ　ｔｈｅ　ｄｅｔｅｒｍｉｎｅｄ　ｒｉｇｈｔ，ｆｒｏｍ　ｔｈｅ　ｒｅｃｅｎｔｌｙ　ｅｍｅｒｇｅｎｔ　ｃｏｎｓｅｒｖａｔｉｖｅ　ｈａｒｄ　ｒｉｇｈｔ　ａｌｌ　ｔｈｅ　ｗａｙ　ｏｕｔ　ｔｏ　ｔｈｅ　ｕｓｕａｌ　ｒｉｇｈｔｗｈｉｎｇｅｎｕｔｓ．Ｔｈｅ　ｓｏｃｉａｉｓｔ　Ｂｅｒｎｉｅ　Ｓａｎｄｅｒｓ　ｇｅｔｓ　ｃｏｍｐｌｉｍｅｎｔｓ　ｏｒ　ａ　ｋｉｎｄ　ｗｏｒｄ　ｆｏｒ　ｆｏｒｍ　ｉｆ　ｎｏｔ　ｃｏｎｔｅｎｔ．Ｔｈｅ　ｒｉｇｈｔ　ｄｏｅｓ　ｍｉｓｔａｋｅｎｌｙ　ｂｅｌｉｅｖｅ　ｉｔ　ｃａｎ　ｒａｔｉｏｎａｌｌｙ　ｃｏｎｎｅｃｔ　Ｔｒｕｍｐ　ａｎｄ　Ｓａｎｄｅｒｓ，　ｗｈｉｃｈ　ｉｓ　ｔｈｅ　ｐｏｌｉｔｉｃａｌ　ｇｅｏｍｅｔｒｙ　ｔｈａｔ　ｓｈｏｗｓ　ｕｓ　ｈｏｗ　ｆａｒ　ｏｕｔ　ｉｎ　ｏｒｂｉｔ　ａｌｌ　ｏｆ　＇ｅｍ　ａｒｅ．　　

I quoted Stalin because taking away choices and presuming to know what's the best for the great unwashed, your vote actually means less and less.

Ｄｏｎａｌｄ　Ｔｒｕｍｐ　ｑｕｏｔｅｓ　Ｍｕｓｓｏｌｉｎｉ　ａｎｄ　ｔｈｅ　ｒｅｃｅｎｔｌｙ　ｅｍｅｒｇｅｎｔ　ｃｏｎｓｅｒｖａｔｉｖｅ　ｈａｒｄ　ｃｏｒｅ　ｒｉｇｈｔ　ｑｕｏｔｅｓ　Ｓｔａｌｉｎ　ｗｈｉｌｅ　ｌｅａｎｉｎｇ　ｏｎ　ｂｏｔｈ　ｅｎｔｈｕｓｉａｓｔｉｃａｌｌｙ．Ｓｔｒｏｎｇ　ｌｅａｄｅｒ　ｓｔｕｆｆ．　Ｓｏ　ｔｈｅ　ｒａｄｉｃａｌ　ｗｉｌｄｎｅｓｓ　ｃｏｎｔｉｎｕｅｓ　ｕｎａｂａｔｅｄ　ａｎｄ　ｗｉｔｈｏｕｔ　ｌｉｍｉｔｓ．　Ｒｅｖｅａｌｉｎｇｌｙ　ｓｏ　ｔｈｘ．

a daily w@nk. Do you know anyone who does that?

Ｗｅ　ｓｅｅ　ｔｈａｔ　ｔｈｅ　ｌｅｖｅｌ　ｏｆ　ｄｉｓｃｏｕｒｓｅ　ｏｎ　ｔｈｅ　ｉｓｓｕｅｓ　ｃｅｎｔｒａｌ　ｔｏ　ａ　ｃａｍｐａｉｇｎ　ｆｏｒ　Ｐｏｔｕｓ　ａｒｅ　ｗｅｌｌ　ｂｅｙｏｎｄ　Ｔｈｅ　Ｄｏｎａｌｄ　ａｎｄ　ｈｉｓ　ａｄｍｉｒｅｒ　ｍｉｎｉｏｎｓ　ａｌｉｋｅ．Ｔｈｅ　ｍｏｄｅ　ｏｆ　ｃｏｍｍｕｎｉｃａｔｉｏｎ　ｉｓ　ｓｃｈｏｏｌｙａｒｄ　ｒａｔｈｅｒ　ｔｈａｎ　ｔｈｅ　ｈａｌｌｓ　ｏｆ　ｇｏｖｅｒｎｍｅｎｔ　ｏｒ　ｇａｉｎｉｎｇ　ｔｈｅ　ｒｅｓｐｅｃｔ　ｏｆ　ｔｈｅ　ｓｏｃｉｅｔｙ　ａｎｄ　ｂｏｄｙ　ｐｏｌｉｔｉｃ．　Ｔｏ　ｉｎｃｌｕｄｅ　ｔｈｅ　ｔｅｌｅｖｉｓｉｏｎ　ｓｔａｇｅ　ｆｒｏｍ　ｗｈｉｃｈ　ｔｈｅｙ　ｈｕｒｌ　ｉｎｖｅｃｔｉｖｅ．　Ｓｏ　ｇｏｏｄ　ｌｕｃｋ　ｗｉｔｈ　ｔｈａｔ．

（Ｄｏ　ｐａｒｄｏｎ　ｔｈｅ　ｆｏｎｔ　ｉｓｓｕｅ　ｂｕｔ　ｔｈｅ　ｄｅｓｋｔｏｐ　ｉｓ　ｈａｖｉｎｇ　ｌａｎｇｕａｇｅ　ｃｏｎｆｕｓｉｏｎ　ｉｓｓｕｅｓ　ｉｎ　ｔｈｅ　ｓｏｆｔｗａｒｅ，　ｓｏｏｎ　ｔｏ　ｂｅ　ｒｅｍｅｄｉｅｄ．）

Haha! Well you normally make no sense and weird fonts make it even more hard work trying to understands your loopy rambles so I gave up.

Better luck next time!

[keemapoot]

^You're right. That puncher is not representative of Trump supporters. Trump is endorsed by academic, business and political leaders, as well as global leaders throughout the world. The world welcomes his stewardship.

Trump has been endorsed by Ben Carson. That makes a big difference to me. Christie is an opportunist. Ben Carson is sincere. If Carson says Trump is a very intelligent man who cares deeply about America, I believe him.

That was an interesting and surprising endorsement last night. The second believer or capitulator to the inevitable?

Sent from my GT-N5100 using Thaivisa Connect Thailand mobile app

[NeverSure]

In your paranoia you imagine conspiracy and ulterior motives.

Ah but I'm afraid ｗｉｔｈ youse guyz I can recognise common themes that equal and aggregate to a campaign strategy from over there on the recently ｅｍｅｒｇｅｎｔ　ａｎｄ　assertive conservative hard core right. Hey, some others among us read some of the well funded mass of highly financed right wing media. Ｙｅ　ｓｕｐｐｏｒｔ　Ｔｒｕｍｐ，　ｃｏｎｎｅｃｔ　ｈｉｍ　ｔｏ　Ｓａｎｄｅｒｓ　ｉｎ　ｍｉｌｄｌｙ　ｐｏｓｉｔｉｖｅ　ｗａｙｓ　ｔｏ　ｉｎｃｌｕｄｅ　ｓａｙｉｎｇ　ｙｏｕｓｅ　ｇｕｙｚ　ｃａｎ　ｏｒ　ｗｏｕｌｄ　ｖｏｔｅ　ｆｏｒ　ｈｉｍ；　ｓｌａｍ　Ｃｌｉｎｔｏｎ．　Ｉｇｎｏｒｅ　ｔｈｅ　ｒｅｓｔ　ｏｆ　＇ｅｍ．　Ｉｔ　ｉｓ　ｐａｔｅｎｔｌｙ　ｏｂｖｉｏｕｓ　ａｎｄ　ｉｔ　ｉｓ　ｔｈｅ　ｐａｔｔｅｒｎ　ｏｆ　ｔｈｅ　ｐｏｓｔｓ　ｂｙ　ｔｈｅ　ｃｏｎｓｅｒｖａｔｉｖｅ　ｈａｒｄ　ｃｏｒｅ　ｒｉｇｈｔ　ｔｈａｔ　ａｌｌ　ｔｈｅ　ｗｈｉｌｅ　ｃｌａｉｍｓ　ｉｎｄｅｐｅｎｄｅｎｃｅ　ｏｆ　ｐａｒｔｉｅｓ，　ｉｄｅｏｌｏｇｙ，　ｓｃｈｅｍｅｓ．　

You say I target the left so that reveals my position. No I target 'holier than thou' arrogance. Somehow the left like to display their 'superior' learning and will tell everyone about it. It's a trait.

Yep, confirmed. The recently emergened conservative hard core right targets liberals aka progressives aka liberals ie the 'left.' One does not hear instead any of the conservative hard rightists ｗｈｏ　ｃｌａｉｍ　ｉｎｄｅｐｅｎｄｅｎｃｅ　criticising Cruz or Rubio or ａｎｙｏｎｅ　ｏｎ　ｔｈｅ　ｒｉｇｈｔ．　 No time or attention to them. Conversely, the progressive ＨＲ　Ｃｌｉｎｔｏｎ　ｉｓ　ｈｏｕｒｌｙ　ｔｈｅ　ｆｉｅｒｃｅ　ａｎｄ　ｒｅｐｅａｔｅｄ　ｔａｒｇｅｔ　ｏｆ　ｔｈｅ　ｄｅｔｅｒｍｉｎｅｄ　ｒｉｇｈｔ，ｆｒｏｍ　ｔｈｅ　ｒｅｃｅｎｔｌｙ　ｅｍｅｒｇｅｎｔ　ｃｏｎｓｅｒｖａｔｉｖｅ　ｈａｒｄ　ｒｉｇｈｔ　ａｌｌ　ｔｈｅ　ｗａｙ　ｏｕｔ　ｔｏ　ｔｈｅ　ｕｓｕａｌ　ｒｉｇｈｔｗｈｉｎｇｅｎｕｔｓ．Ｔｈｅ　ｓｏｃｉａｉｓｔ　Ｂｅｒｎｉｅ　Ｓａｎｄｅｒｓ　ｇｅｔｓ　ｃｏｍｐｌｉｍｅｎｔｓ　ｏｒ　ａ　ｋｉｎｄ　ｗｏｒｄ　ｆｏｒ　ｆｏｒｍ　ｉｆ　ｎｏｔ　ｃｏｎｔｅｎｔ．Ｔｈｅ　ｒｉｇｈｔ　ｄｏｅｓ　ｍｉｓｔａｋｅｎｌｙ　ｂｅｌｉｅｖｅ　ｉｔ　ｃａｎ　ｒａｔｉｏｎａｌｌｙ　ｃｏｎｎｅｃｔ　Ｔｒｕｍｐ　ａｎｄ　Ｓａｎｄｅｒｓ，　ｗｈｉｃｈ　ｉｓ　ｔｈｅ　ｐｏｌｉｔｉｃａｌ　ｇｅｏｍｅｔｒｙ　ｔｈａｔ　ｓｈｏｗｓ　ｕｓ　ｈｏｗ　ｆａｒ　ｏｕｔ　ｉｎ　ｏｒｂｉｔ　ａｌｌ　ｏｆ　＇ｅｍ　ａｒｅ．　　

I quoted Stalin because taking away choices and presuming to know what's the best for the great unwashed, your vote actually means less and less.

Ｄｏｎａｌｄ　Ｔｒｕｍｐ　ｑｕｏｔｅｓ　Ｍｕｓｓｏｌｉｎｉ　ａｎｄ　ｔｈｅ　ｒｅｃｅｎｔｌｙ　ｅｍｅｒｇｅｎｔ　ｃｏｎｓｅｒｖａｔｉｖｅ　ｈａｒｄ　ｃｏｒｅ　ｒｉｇｈｔ　ｑｕｏｔｅｓ　Ｓｔａｌｉｎ　ｗｈｉｌｅ　ｌｅａｎｉｎｇ　ｏｎ　ｂｏｔｈ　ｅｎｔｈｕｓｉａｓｔｉｃａｌｌｙ．Ｓｔｒｏｎｇ　ｌｅａｄｅｒ　ｓｔｕｆｆ．　Ｓｏ　ｔｈｅ　ｒａｄｉｃａｌ　ｗｉｌｄｎｅｓｓ　ｃｏｎｔｉｎｕｅｓ　ｕｎａｂａｔｅｄ　ａｎｄ　ｗｉｔｈｏｕｔ　ｌｉｍｉｔｓ．　Ｒｅｖｅａｌｉｎｇｌｙ　ｓｏ　ｔｈｘ．

a daily w@nk. Do you know anyone who does that?

Ｗｅ　ｓｅｅ　ｔｈａｔ　ｔｈｅ　ｌｅｖｅｌ　ｏｆ　ｄｉｓｃｏｕｒｓｅ　ｏｎ　ｔｈｅ　ｉｓｓｕｅｓ　ｃｅｎｔｒａｌ　ｔｏ　ａ　ｃａｍｐａｉｇｎ　ｆｏｒ　Ｐｏｔｕｓ　ａｒｅ　ｗｅｌｌ　ｂｅｙｏｎｄ　Ｔｈｅ　Ｄｏｎａｌｄ　ａｎｄ　ｈｉｓ　ａｄｍｉｒｅｒ　ｍｉｎｉｏｎｓ　ａｌｉｋｅ．Ｔｈｅ　ｍｏｄｅ　ｏｆ　ｃｏｍｍｕｎｉｃａｔｉｏｎ　ｉｓ　ｓｃｈｏｏｌｙａｒｄ　ｒａｔｈｅｒ　ｔｈａｎ　ｔｈｅ　ｈａｌｌｓ　ｏｆ　ｇｏｖｅｒｎｍｅｎｔ　ｏｒ　ｇａｉｎｉｎｇ　ｔｈｅ　ｒｅｓｐｅｃｔ　ｏｆ　ｔｈｅ　ｓｏｃｉｅｔｙ　ａｎｄ　ｂｏｄｙ　ｐｏｌｉｔｉｃ．　Ｔｏ　ｉｎｃｌｕｄｅ　ｔｈｅ　ｔｅｌｅｖｉｓｉｏｎ　ｓｔａｇｅ　ｆｒｏｍ　ｗｈｉｃｈ　ｔｈｅｙ　ｈｕｒｌ　ｉｎｖｅｃｔｉｖｅ．　Ｓｏ　ｇｏｏｄ　ｌｕｃｋ　ｗｉｔｈ　ｔｈａｔ．

（Ｄｏ　ｐａｒｄｏｎ　ｔｈｅ　ｆｏｎｔ　ｉｓｓｕｅ　ｂｕｔ　ｔｈｅ　ｄｅｓｋｔｏｐ　ｉｓ　ｈａｖｉｎｇ　ｌａｎｇｕａｇｅ　ｃｏｎｆｕｓｉｏｎ　ｉｓｓｕｅｓ　ｉｎ　ｔｈｅ　ｓｏｆｔｗａｒｅ，　ｓｏｏｎ　ｔｏ　ｂｅ　ｒｅｍｅｄｉｅｄ．）

I KNEW one of your posts would eventually damage my monitor. It's totaled.

[NeverSure]

Trump is having a rally in Chicago tonight. The police are worried about disruptive behavior and are out in force. It's too damn bad that people don't love free speech and the right to peacefully assemble and choose to be so rude at what is legally a private gathering.

[keemapoot]

(Reuters) - A reporter for the conservative website Breitbart News filed a criminal complaint on Friday against Republican presidential election front-runner Donald Trump's campaign manager, saying he grabbed her arm at a rally with such force that he left bruises.

Trump campaign is facing criminal complaints and bullying charges from both left and right.

There's a rumor the Sopranos family has agreed to provide security at events going forward.

http://news.yahoo.com/reporter-files-criminal-charge-battery-against-trump-campaign-204819412.html

Edited March 11, 2016 by keemapoot