Jump to content

Iceland's PM refuses to resign over Panama Papers scandal


webfact

Recommended Posts

Iceland's PM refuses to resign over Panama Papers scandal

606x341_329034.jpg

REYKJAVIK: -- Under mounting pressure from the opposition, Iceland’s Prime Minister Sigmundur Gunnlaugsson is adamant he has no plans to resign over the Panama Papers leaks.

He and his wife, Anna Sigurlaug Palsdotti, are alleged to have hidden millions of dollars in investments behind secretive offshore company Wintris, which they bought in 2007 and operates from the British Virgin Islands.

Gunnlaugsson entered parliament in 2009 without declaring an interest in the company.

Eight months after he entered parliament, his wife bought his share of the company for one dollar. It was allegedly then used to invest millions in inherited money.

“Now I’m starting to feel a bit strange about these questions because it’s like you’re accusing me of something taciturn,” he said in an interview recorded in March, but aired on Sunday (April 3).



According to court records, Wintris had heavily invested in three major Icelandic banks which collapsed during the financial crisis.

Wintris was listed as a creditor to the banks and therefore could have stood to gain from their collapse. Gunnlaugsson’s opponents allege his reluctance to fully repay the deposits of foreign investors following the bankruptcies amounts to a conflict of interest.

If he had fully repaid, it could have negatively affected both the Icelandic banks and the value of the company’s bonds.

The opposition have called for a confidence vote in parliament. Despite their protests, all signs suggest the prime minister would survive the ballot.

euronews2.png
-- (c) Copyright Euronews 2016-04-05

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I doubt Iceland will stand for this. He'll be gone within a couple of weeks. Hopefully the domino effect will take hold and we'll see a whole bunch of them fall. Not holding my breath for the more corrupt countries though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't declare his assets - tut, tut, sounds familiar. Then sold them for $1 to wifey.

Surely not declaring is fraud, unless an honest mistake of course.

He can, presumably provide proof of where all this money came from?

The conflict of interest is separate. But he looks in deep poo on that one.

Wonder if the US, UK, Aussie, Ukraine, Russia and Thailand will all follow up on their citizens included in this info? whistling.gif

Don't think China will, too dangerous!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...