Jump to content

Clinton backers 'feel the Bern' of angry Sanders supporters


webfact

Recommended Posts

Clinton backers 'feel the Bern' of angry Sanders supporters
By LISA LERER

WASHINGTON (AP) — Nancy Schumacher says she just wanted to do her civic duty, and so she heeded the call to become a superdelegate for Hillary Clinton. But in the year of the angry voter, not even an administrative assistant from Elk River, Minnesota, can escape the outrage.

"Some of the (phone and email) messages called me names. Some of them called Hillary names. And others said I was a stupid bitch and something bad will happen to me," said Schumacher, a Democratic committee member. "It's kind of hard to take sometimes."

Bernie Sanders defied expectations to turn his long-shot presidential bid into a real threat for the Democratic nomination. Now, as his path to the White House becomes all-but-impossible, some of his supporters are lashing out at a system they believe was engineered against them from the start.

While Sanders decries a "rigged" economy, some of his backers see signs of corruption everywhere — even in the party their candidate hopes to lead. Some have turned their frustration on superdelegates, the party insiders whose ability to back either candidate give them an outsized role in picking the nominee.

The superdelegates include public officials: governors, former presidents and even Sanders himself. But they also include people like Schumacher, volunteers who've generally stayed behind the scenes.

The Sanders campaign assures everyone that it doesn't condone harassment.

Yet Schumacher says she's received vitriolic phone and email messages from self-identified Sanders backers and doesn't quite understand how things got quite so nasty. Eight years ago, she backed Clinton but said she "cheerfully" switched to Illinois Sen. Barack Obama. She'd do the same, she said, if Sanders won the popular vote or pledged delegates from state primary elections.

"I got five emails on Easter Sunday. I mean, give me a break," she said.

Barry Goodman, a personal injury lawyer in Detroit, suddenly found his firm's Yelp business review page besieged by bad ratings.

"You deserve this rating. Why does some random lawyer get more sway than the citizens," read one comment.

Gus Bickford, the former executive director of the Massachusetts Democratic Party, was taken aback by the threats that flowed into his inbox and onto his Facebook page.

"Someone put up a list of the superdelegates and a person from Rhode Island posted a response that basically said, 'They should all be assassinated' and then said 'I'm only joking,'" recalled Bickford. "With the way people are talking, you never know who's going to take something like that seriously."

Bickford said many of the callers were Sanders supporters who asked him to side with the will of the people, even though Clinton narrowly won Massachusetts in March.

Democrats aren't the only ones facing this kind of barrage: Some Republican delegates say they have also found themselves at the receiving end of death threats and other personal attacks from supporters of GOP front-runner Donald Trump.

But Clinton won the support of many superdelegates even before votes were cast in the primaries, and that has drawn the wrath of many Sanders partisans.

Clinton is 91 percent of the way to capturing the nomination, meaning that she can lose every remaining primary by a wide margin and still become the party's standard-bearer, according to an Associated Press analysis. It also means Sanders would need to flip hundreds of superdelegates to his side to have a shot at the nomination — including many from states that Clinton won.

Though they've been part of Democratic presidential elections since 1984, the superdelegates have never been a determining factor. Even in 2008, when several dozen switched to Barack Obama from Clinton, Obama won enough pledged delegates to make superdelegate support largely irrelevant.

Several liberal organizations have circulated petitions asking superdelegates to align their choice with the vote in their state. Even if that happened, Clinton would still likely be the nominee, given her lead in the popular vote.

That leaves Sanders' most ardent fans — many of whom are relatively new to the political process — looking for someone to blame.

A Sanders backer named Spencer Thayer created the "Superdelegate Hit list," a website to share the contact information of superdelegates so they can be pressed to switch their votes. Thayer later dropped the word "hit" after it attracted criticism.

The name change didn't reassure Clinton-backing superdelegates..

"It's not comforting to be on anything that's called a hit list," said Wendy Davis, a city commissioner from Rome, Georgia.

In 2007, Davis was tasked with wooing superdelegates for the presidential candidate of former New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson. Now, a superdelegate herself, she was shocked when Sanders supporters accused her of being bribed by Clinton for her support.

"I have been a loyal volunteer for this party. You impugn my integrity and suddenly think there's something you can say that will draw me to you," she said. "It's that a whole bunch of people who haven't been involved in the details of presidential campaigns started paying attention and suddenly don't like the rules."

aplogo.jpg
-- (c) Associated Press 2016-04-29

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Clinton is sitting at 2168 WITH the unpledged. (502 are unpledged) Sanders is sitting at 1401 WITH the unpledged. (42 are unpledged)

By my math; 502 unpledged switching to Sanders puts HIM in the lead with HRC playing catch-up.

2168 - 502 = 1666 1401 + 502 = 1903

Yea, I can see why Sanders' supporters are a little angry at having the unpledged posting against them even before the race began. tongue.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sanders' supporters should sue Bernie for fraud. I'm actually semi-serious.

He solicited donations from people based on claiming to want to be president. But since the beginning he has refused to hit his debate opponent where she is weakest (too long of a list for here).

It's not that much different than if he said, "give me your money so I can be president" then he sits on the couch playing video games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

mopar71 - I am a staunch Sanders supporter and COULDN'T agree with you more! It's been frustrating. As you pointed out, you can't swing a dead cat without hitting an issue he could have used to CRUCIFY that witch.

The voter fraud/suppression by itself should have been enough to halt the election process, but 'Merica has been lied to so long that they're dead from the neck up about it. If Crooked Hillary gets the white house, we're all screwed. If Trump gets it, we're all REALLY screwed. Time to stock up on anal lube cuz it's coming down the pike.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clinton is sitting at 2168 WITH the unpledged. (502 are unpledged) Sanders is sitting at 1401 WITH the unpledged. (42 are unpledged)

By my math; 502 unpledged switching to Sanders puts HIM in the lead with HRC playing catch-up.

2168 - 502 = 1666 1401 + 502 = 1903

Yea, I can see why Sanders' supporters are a little angry at having the unpledged posting against them even before the race began. tongue.png

That is some strange math. You may as well say if they took away all of Clintons delegates and

gave them to Bernie, he would have wrapped up the Democrats party nomination. I can see

an argument for taking away the super delegate position, I can see an argument for super

delegates having to vote with their states majority, what I can't see is any argument for

crediting one delegate with another delegates "Super Delegates" and being able to keep

his own "Super Delegates" and arriving at the statement that "IF" that happened Bernie

would be ahead. After all "IF" a pig had wings it would be an eagle. tongue.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sanders' supporters should sue Bernie for fraud. I'm actually semi-serious.

He solicited donations from people based on claiming to want to be president. But since the beginning he has refused to hit his debate opponent where she is weakest (too long of a list for here).

It's not that much different than if he said, "give me your money so I can be president" then he sits on the couch playing video games.

You're seriously criticising him for not stooping to the level of Republican whackjobs banging on about all the faux scandals?

BENGHAZIIIIIIIIIIIII!

What a joke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...