cumgranosalum Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 (edited) it occurs to me that the large majority of Thaivisa members themselves have no real idea of what critical thinking is - (the is an evidenced-based conclusion from reading posts for a few years!) this video gives a quick introduction to what is a life-long and life changing process https://youtu.be/6OLPL5p0fMg Edited May 16, 2016 by cumgranosalum Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Briggsy Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 It is worth adding that control of the Ministry of Education and thus control over the national syllabus has been a key battleground in the struggle between the Royalist-Military-Elite nexus on one side and the Parliamentary-Regional Godfather-Grassroots factions on the other since the end of the Second World War. I think you can forget any real push for critical thinking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
willyumiii Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 Critical thinking and criticizing others are not always the same thing! can you think about that critically.. without criticizing it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtls2005 Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 The absolute last thing the Amart/Military want is an educated, critical-thinking Prai. Look what happened in 1932 when a few educated (in the west) "commoners" "saw the light". Better to keep Somchai dumb, "sufficient" and down on the farm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daoyai Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 Critical thinking without freedom of speech and expression, what is the point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toybits Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 This is an own goal. I suspect more AA classrooms will be required after this is implemented. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gandalf12 Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 This sounds like a small but very positive step in the right direction, and I welcome the announcement. However, such a fundamental change in the education process will require a sustained, long term effort that will require teacher re-training and a re-write of the current curriculum. There needs to be a well researched roadmap and significant funding to achieve this, so I can only hope this statement is going to be followed up with the necessary resources, comittment and effort to make it happen. And an openness to criticism after all critical thinking requires you to take an opposing point of view and then work to a common point Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boomerangutang Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 I teach my students that they must think by them selves but sadly to say only about 20% of them are really interested. Even when I just give them a small problem to salve they want clues how to solve it, so then I just tell them that all they need is in the papers that I have given to them or if they want to do it the buffalo way... google it. Usually they try to solve the problem after that conversation as no one wants to be a buffalo... When I taught at a Thai U, here was one of the patterns: If I asked a question, whether to the whole class or to a specific student, immediately all heads would turn to the one student in the class who had a reputation for knowing answers. I taught 7 different groups of students, and the same dynamic happened in each classroom - that is, until I cautioned them not to do that. There were other odd patterns, but that's one that came to mind when I read the post above. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaltsc Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 (edited) Critical thinking and criticizing others are not always the same thing! can you think about that critically.. without criticizing it? Both terms tend to be intertwined. Unfortunately the term "criticizing" has come to mean "putting down". Criticizing, at its root, encompasses examining a statement or pattern of thought, pointing out the effects of either or both, analyzing why the effects occurred, and, finally, how to make constructive changes in order to achieve outcomes which will benefit the majority of those affected. That being said, societies in which free thought is emphasized are still struggling to achieve the desired outcomes of critical thinking. Thailand hasn't even stepped up to the plate, let alone started rounding the bases. Edited May 16, 2016 by jaltsc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baboon Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 The absolute last thing the Amart/Military want is an educated, critical-thinking Prai. Look what happened in 1932 when a few educated (in the west) "commoners" "saw the light". Better to keep Somchai dumb, "sufficient" and down on the farm. Problem for them is, Somchai does not want to be sufficient and down on the farm in this internet era. That toothpaste is not going back in the tube and the sooner they realise this the better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phuketandsee Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 "But don't you dare be critical of me" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtls2005 Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 Schools in crisis as new year begins Schools in crisis as new year beginsserious shortage of teachers around the country; class hours to be cut. SOME schools in Krabi province have no teacher at all due to technical problems related to the Education Ministry's recent structural overhaul. The problem persists just as the new academic year for state schools across the country kicks off today. "There's not a single teacher at some schools here," Narin Saro said late last week as the acting education chief of Krabi, which needed 90 more teachers for its 219 schools. http://www.nationmultimedia.com/national/Schools-in-crisis-as-new-year-begins-30286021.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DuiDui48 Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 First off,a good video to reflect and talk around (teachers and students).BUT how are the teachers going to do to try and "translate"this so the students understand this subject. And yes,PM wish so many things but the bigger part of Thai population just want...sabai sabai. Have a good day everyone..PM too..;-) it occurs to me that the large majority of Thaivisa members themselves have no real idea of what critical thinking is - (the is an evidenced-based conclusion from reading posts for a few years!) this video gives a quick introduction to what is a life-long and life changing process https://youtu.be/6OLPL5p0fMg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klauskunkel Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 I believe he means "selective critical thinking", with the selections being Science, Math, Engineering, IT, Economy... to win medals in international competitions, but critical thinking is undesired for social issues, tradition, culture, politics, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
comeondoit Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 It is again one of these unreflected Thai shortcuts (we say, "saddle the horse from the back"). Before one can reduce time in classes the school must be able to offer other activities. To be able to develop these actiuvites teachers must be teached/trained how to do and need incentives for it. This needs a well thought longtime planning. Critical thinking might be the goal, but again to reach it, the teachers must be trained and get tools to teach the children how to think. Can somebody tell me how you can think critically, if you never learnt to think!!!. So the sentence of Mr Ochoa should read like that: "Spend less time in classrooms learning by heart, spend more time learning how to think and use the free time out of the classroom to develop other skills (which could be theater, marching bands, music, sports, painting and so on). There should be a longtime program starting with teaching the teachers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cardinalblue Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 (edited) One needs to teach teachers first before the students..it's the same problem with expecting drivers to comply..police need to be taught what the rules and how to enforce before expecting drivers to comply... A vicious cycle that needs to be interrupted Edited May 16, 2016 by cardinalblue Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leeneeds Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 Not so long ago the critical thinking students (14 ) of them were arrested you can not deny that the younger students wold have seen this coverage and its result, forcing conversations into whispers for fear of attitude adjustment , when students question reasons it is a way of learning Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dominique355 Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 Please quote the General correctly. He only advocated critical "THINKING", but in no words did he ask the students, or any other Thai citizen for that matter, to "SPEAK". Remember his 2nd in command Prawit: " You can think, but you don't talk!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doggie1955 Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 (edited) Without education you have no critical thinking, but what you do have is a lot of sheep....LOS will now stand for; Land of Stupidly... Edited May 16, 2016 by doggie1955 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aneliane Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 Schools in crisis as new year begins Schools in crisis as new year beginsserious shortage of teachers around the country; class hours to be cut. SOME schools in Krabi province have no teacher at all due to technical problems related to the Education Ministry's recent structural overhaul. The problem persists just as the new academic year for state schools across the country kicks off today. "There's not a single teacher at some schools here," Narin Saro said late last week as the acting education chief of Krabi, which needed 90 more teachers for its 219 schools. http://www.nationmultimedia.com/national/Schools-in-crisis-as-new-year-begins-30286021.html Who cares about kids? They don't need education. Let's keep the money to ourselves instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cumgranosalum Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 Critical thinking and criticizing others are not always the same thing! can you think about that critically.. without criticizing it? ..in other words it's a false syllogism? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cumgranosalum Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 This sounds like a small but very positive step in the right direction, and I welcome the announcement. However, such a fundamental change in the education process will require a sustained, long term effort that will require teacher re-training and a re-write of the current curriculum. There needs to be a well researched roadmap and significant funding to achieve this, so I can only hope this statement is going to be followed up with the necessary resources, comittment and effort to make it happen. Actually, i think it would be a massive step, but on past performance one that this admin is incapable of taking, largely because they show little evidence of even understanding what that step is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Khun Paul Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 PM should practice what he preaches then shouldn't he !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TallGuyJohninBKK Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 (edited) Critical thinking ! Isn't being critical a massive No No these days ? No... not at all!! Folks can do all the critical "thinking" they want without fear of repression. It's just when they start writing, speaking, acting, meeting, clicking, etc. that where the trouble begins. Edited May 16, 2016 by TallGuyJohninBKK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davedub Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 This sounds like a small but very positive step in the right direction, and I welcome the announcement. However, such a fundamental change in the education process will require a sustained, long term effort that will require teacher re-training and a re-write of the current curriculum. There needs to be a well researched roadmap and significant funding to achieve this, so I can only hope this statement is going to be followed up with the necessary resources, comittment and effort to make it happen. Actually, i think it would be a massive step, but on past performance one that this admin is incapable of taking, largely because they show little evidence of even understanding what that step is. Implementing it would indeed be a massive step - announcing it is a small, but very positive step ;-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trainman34014 Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 What he wants is unobtainable in the existing education structure. Even if he tore it right down and started again it would take several generations to put things right. Sadly; he has no magic wand, so he just puts his dreams into words and hopes someone who does have one is listening, happens almost every time he speaks ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
willyumiii Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 Critical thinking ! Isn't being critical a massive No No these days ? No... not at all!! Folks can do all the critical "thinking" they want without fear of repression. It's just when they start writing, speaking, acting, meeting, clicking, etc. that where the trouble begins. Thank you so much! I was starting to think that no TV members knew the difference between critical thinking and criticizing things! I wonder how many know that "Critical Thinking" is actually the name of a reaching method used by most of the world outside Thailand, where students are encouraged to and expected to ask questions? Thailand still uses the rote method of teaching where students are taught to just repeate like parrots and memorize what is fed to them. This topic is about teaching methods, not freedom of speech or politics! It has nothing to do with expressing your opinions about the government or anyone else. Thank you again! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kabula Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 What is Critical Thinking? Most have never researched that term. Wow....HEADACHE How about also teaching students, excercise, nature walks, getting some sunshine, understanding boys and girls, men and women...they are different, how to balance a check book, sales, saving, investing, two languages, self defense, empathy, how to make and keep friends, caring for animals, how crime can destroy your life, smoking and drug dangers, and much, much more. Other Definitions of Critical Thinking:"Critical thinking is reasonable, reflective thinking that is focused on deciding what to believe and do." A SUPER-STREAMLINED CONCEPTION OF CRITICAL THINKINGRobert H. Ennis, 6/20/02 Assuming that critical thinking is reasonable reflective thinking focused on deciding what to believe or do, a critical thinker: 1. Is open-minded and mindful of alternatives2. Tries to be well-informed3. Judges well the credibility of sources4. Identifies conclusions, reasons, and assumptions5. Judges well the quality of an argument, including the acceptability of its reasons, assumptions, and evidence6. Can well develop and defend a reasonable position7. Asks appropriate clarifying questions8. Formulates plausible hypotheses; plans experiments well9. Defines terms in a way appropriate for the context10. Draws conclusions when warranted, but with caution11. Integrates all items in this list when deciding what to believe or do Critical Thinkers are disposed to: 1. Care that their beliefs be true, and that their decisions be justified; that is, care to "get it right" to the extent possible. This includes the dispositions to 2. Care to present a position honestly and clearly, theirs as well as others'. This includes the dispositions to a. Seek alternative hypotheses, explanations, conclusions, plans, sources, etc., and be open to themb. Endorse a position to the extent that, but only to the extent that, it is justified by the information that is availablec. Be well informedd. Consider seriously other points of view than their own 3. Care about the dignity and worth of every person (a correlative disposition). This includes the dispositions to a. Be clear about the intended meaning of what is said, written, or otherwise communicated, seeking as much precision as the situation requiresb. Determine, and maintain focus on, the conclusion or questionc. Seek and offer reasonsd. Take into account the total situatione. Be reflectively aware of their own basic beliefs Critical Thinking Abilities: a. Discover and listen to others' view and reasonsb. Avoid intimidating or confusing others with their critical thinking prowess, taking into account others' feelings and level of understandingc. Be concerned about others' welfare Ideal critical thinkers have the ability to(The first three items involve elementary clarification.) 1. Focus on a question a. Identify or formulate a questionb. Identify or formulate criteria for judging possible answersc. Keep the situation in mind 2. Analyze arguments 3. Ask and answer questions of clarification and/or challenge, such as, a. Identify conclusionsb. Identify stated reasonsc. Identify unstated reasonsd. Identify and handle irrelevancee. See the structure of an argumentf. Summarize (The next two involve the basis for the decision.) a. Why?b. What is your main point?c. What do you mean by…?d. What would be an example?e. What would not be an example (though close to being one)?f. How does that apply to this case (describe a case, which might well appear to be a counter example)?g. What difference does it make?h. What are the facts?i. Is this what you are saying: ____________?j. Would you say some more about that? 4. Judge the credibility of a source. Major criteria (but not necessary conditions): 5. Observe, and judge observation reports. Major criteria (but not necessary conditions, except for the first): a. Expertiseb. Lack of conflict of interestc. Agreement among sourcesd. Reputatione. Use of established proceduresf. Known risk to reputationg. Ability to give reasonsh. Careful habits a. Minimal inferring involvedb. Short time interval between observation and reportc. Report by the observer, rather than someone else (that is, the report is not hearsay)d. Provision of records.e. Corroborationf. Possibility of corroborationg. Good accessh. Competent employment of technology, if technology is usefuli. Satisfaction by observer (and reporter, if a different person) of the credibility criteria in Ability # 4 above. (The next three involve inference.) 6. Deduce, and judge deduction a. Class logicb. Conditional logicc. Interpretation of logical terminology in statements, including(1) Negation and double negation(2) Necessary and sufficient condition language(3) Such words as "only", "if and only if", "or", "some", "unless", "not both". 7. Induce, and judge induction a. To generalizations. Broad considerations:(1) Typicality of data, including sampling where appropriate(2) Breadth of coverage(3) Acceptability of evidenceb. To explanatory conclusions (including hypotheses)(1) Major types of explanatory conclusions and hypotheses:(a) Causal claims( Claims about the beliefs and attitudes of people© Interpretation of authors’ intended meanings(d) Historical claims that certain things happened (including criminal accusations)(e) Reported definitions(f) Claims that some proposition is an unstated reason that the person actually used(2) Characteristic investigative activities(a) Designing experiments, including planning to control variables( Seeking evidence and counter-evidence© Seeking other possible explanations(3) Criteria, the first five being essential, the sixth being desirable(a) The proposed conclusion would explain the evidence( The proposed conclusion is consistent with all known facts© Competitive alternative explanations are inconsistent with facts(d) The evidence on which the hypothesis depends is acceptable.(e) A legitimate effort should have been made to uncover counter-evidence(f) The proposed conclusion seems plausible Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tuanku Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 I am surprised there are even words for critical thinking in Thai. The mans lips move and sounds come out, but he knows full well that instructing the Ministry of education to teach critical thinking is like asking an elephant to jump through a high, small hoop - all he is doing is deflecting the blame. Now he can say - "Well I gave the instruction but it wasn't carried out so it is not my fault the sheeple don't know how to criticise!" Anyone capable of critical thinking, like most of us on this forum, see through him straight away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MZurf Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 Give him a break. At least he's actually on the right track on this one. Do you actually believe he means it??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now