80cm????

2.5 feet????

Surely not.

Should this read 8cm?

go to the back of the classroom for not reading the thread where this point was made and a correction given a loooooooong way back

Nothing constructive or useful to say?

Then zip it.

I am the OP and you have not read the thread where this mistake was spotted and CORRECTED now go and spoil someone else's thread with your moronic comments

PS post number 7

80cm????

2.5 feet????

Surely not.

Should this read 8cm?

go to the back of the classroom for not reading the thread where this point was made and a correction given a loooooooong way back

Nothing constructive or useful to say?

Then zip it.

I am the OP and you have not read the thread where this mistake was spotted and CORRECTED now go and spoil someone else's thread with your moronic comments

PS post number 7

with your true comments

Don't laugh..... you just can't make this chit up.....