LannaGuy Posted June 7, 2016 Author Share Posted June 7, 2016 (edited) 80cm???? 2.5 feet???? Surely not. Should this read 8cm? go to the back of the classroom for not reading the thread where this point was made and a correction given a loooooooong way back Nothing constructive or useful to say? Then zip it. I am the OP and you have not read the thread where this mistake was spotted and CORRECTED now go and spoil someone else's thread with your moronic comments PS post number 7 Edited June 7, 2016 by LannaGuy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hugh2121 Posted June 8, 2016 Share Posted June 8, 2016 80cm???? 2.5 feet???? Surely not. Should this read 8cm? go to the back of the classroom for not reading the thread where this point was made and a correction given a loooooooong way back Nothing constructive or useful to say? Then zip it. I am the OP and you have not read the thread where this mistake was spotted and CORRECTED now go and spoil someone else's thread with your moronic comments PS post number 7 with your true comments Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dingdongrb Posted June 8, 2016 Share Posted June 8, 2016 Don't laugh..... you just can't make this chit up..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now