webfact Posted July 7, 2016 Share Posted July 7, 2016 Ex 'Sabado Gigante' actor gets 153-year child porn sentenceMIAMI (AP) — The comedic actor who played gray-haired grandma Dona Concha on Univision's "Sabado Gigante" has been sentenced to 153 years in prison for possessing child pornography.Adonis Losada, 52, learned his fate on Wednesday, several months after a Miami-Dade jury convicted him on 51 counts of possession of child porn images on his computer.Losada still insists "there is plenty of evidence" that he didn't commit the crime, according to The Miami Herald (http://hrld.us/29i0Jdl ).Prosecutors say Losada met an undercover detective in a chat room called "Baby Toddler Love." Investigators later found sexual photos of babies and toddlers that left jurors shaken during the trial.Losada was first arrested in 2009. The same investigation led to other charges in Palm Beach County, where Losada is serving a 10-year sentence.___Information from: The Miami Herald, http://www.herald.com-- (c) Associated Press 2016-07-07 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phantomfiddler Posted July 7, 2016 Share Posted July 7, 2016 How ridiculous can America get ! Obviously kiddie porn is a disgusting and punishable crime, but 153 years !! while here in sunny Thailand someone can kill people or, as in the case of trafficking, destroy lives, and the worst they will get will be a slap on the wrist. America AND Thailand, wake up ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuaBS Posted July 7, 2016 Share Posted July 7, 2016 153 years ?? Ridiculous ! 1,53 years , or 153 days ...ok. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Global Guy Posted July 7, 2016 Share Posted July 7, 2016 What are you suggesting? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robblok Posted July 7, 2016 Share Posted July 7, 2016 153 years ?? Ridiculous ! 1,53 years , or 153 days ...ok. Crazy sentence if its only for child pornography. I am not saying that there should be no punishment but 153 years for around 50 pictures. Bit crazy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neverdie Posted July 7, 2016 Share Posted July 7, 2016 153 years ?? Ridiculous ! 1,53 years , or 153 days ...ok. Crazy sentence if its only for child pornography. I am not saying that there should be no punishment but 153 years for around 50 pictures. Bit crazy. Should be 153 years for each image. Bloody grubby lowlife deserve no mercy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robblok Posted July 7, 2016 Share Posted July 7, 2016 153 years ?? Ridiculous ! 1,53 years , or 153 days ...ok. Crazy sentence if its only for child pornography. I am not saying that there should be no punishment but 153 years for around 50 pictures. Bit crazy. Should be 153 years for each image. Bloody grubby lowlife deserve no mercy. I cant really agree with that sorry, murderers get even less, these are just images (repulsive ones illegal ones ect) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neverdie Posted July 7, 2016 Share Posted July 7, 2016 153 years ?? Ridiculous ! 1,53 years , or 153 days ...ok. Crazy sentence if its only for child pornography. I am not saying that there should be no punishment but 153 years for around 50 pictures. Bit crazy. Should be 153 years for each image. Bloody grubby lowlife deserve no mercy. I cant really agree with that sorry, murderers get even less, these are just images (repulsive ones illegal ones ect) Both murderers and rock spiders destroy lives. People that look at child pornography are rock spiders, I'm sure u understand that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neverdie Posted July 7, 2016 Share Posted July 7, 2016 They should be executed, folk that destroy the lives of innocent children rate lower to me than folk that kill other folk in say a fist fight. Just sayin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sanukjim Posted July 7, 2016 Share Posted July 7, 2016 How ridiculous can America get ! Obviously kiddie porn is a disgusting and punishable crime, but 153 years !! while here in sunny Thailand someone can kill people or, as in the case of trafficking, destroy lives, and the worst they will get will be a slap on the wrist. America AND Thailand, wake up ! Or in England the average murder convection gets 8 years and is out in 5.UK Wake up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IAMHERE Posted July 7, 2016 Share Posted July 7, 2016 153 years ?? Ridiculous ! 1,53 years , or 153 days ...ok. Crazy sentence if its only for child pornography. I am not saying that there should be no punishment but 153 years for around 50 pictures. Bit crazy. Especially when the FBI could well have planted the pictures on his computer. They do that kind of thing, manufacture criminals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuaBS Posted July 7, 2016 Share Posted July 7, 2016 "Prosecutors say Losada met an undercover detective in a chat room called "Baby Toddler Love." Investigators later found sexual photos of babies and toddlers that left jurors shaken during the trial." Entrapment , planting false "evidence" , you're typical FBI stuff , you know ...while they mute the wrongdoings of clintons,.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andaman Al Posted July 7, 2016 Share Posted July 7, 2016 (edited) They should be executed, folk that destroy the lives of innocent children rate lower to me than folk that kill other folk in say a fist fight. Just sayin Well there is the dichotomy. There are plenty of parents out there doing a great job of destroying the lives of innocent children, plenty of politicians sending soldiers in to destroy the lives of innocent children, plenty of commanders using drones to destroy the lives of innocent children, plenty of social welfare people in the UK destroying the lives of innocent children. Are they on a par with some rock spider looking at images on a computer? well they all destroy the lives of innocent children. I am all for standardisation. there are a lot of 153 year sentences hanging around a lot of peoples necks. Just sayin Edited July 7, 2016 by Andaman Al Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nausea Posted July 7, 2016 Share Posted July 7, 2016 Seems a little bit ridiculous. Those images must've been pretty bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andaman Al Posted July 7, 2016 Share Posted July 7, 2016 Meanwhile, as this guy gets 153 years for looking at images two 50 yr old Australian guys have just been arrested for raping a 10 month old girl. Should be on a 1000 years I guess. Cyanide or a bullet is cheapest. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3677326/Two-50-year-old-men-charged-raping-10-month-old-baby-girl-home-extradited-Victoria-appear-court.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manarak Posted July 7, 2016 Share Posted July 7, 2016 if the reporting is accurate, the courts have lost all contact with reality and reason Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andaman Al Posted July 7, 2016 Share Posted July 7, 2016 if the reporting is accurate, the courts have lost all contact with reality and reason I guess in a country where prisons are for profit this guy has just become a million dollar plus asset! A few people are cashing in on his life time incarceration !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KMartinHandyman Posted July 7, 2016 Share Posted July 7, 2016 It's pretty simple math,, 51 individual counts of possession of kiddie porn,, a single picture ,,times 3 years per picture equals his 153 year sentence. Now argue amongst yourselves if three years is appropriate for possession of a porn picture of a child. For the record I'm okay with the sentence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nausea Posted July 7, 2016 Share Posted July 7, 2016 Those images must've been pretty bad. I was thinking they can't help themselves, you know genetics or developmental problems, the sex instinct is pretty strong, but then I thought about Xnian monks and nuns, chastity is always an option (ok, I know, priests, child abuse, and all that, but I'm talking about normal heterosexual people who choose it as a positive lifestyle, not a refuge from normal life). Also, I used to think this was aberrant behaviour, confined to a tiny minority of the population, now I'm not so sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lvr181 Posted July 7, 2016 Share Posted July 7, 2016 OMG. The law is an ass sometimes. Who lives 153 years? A simple lifetime sentence without release/parole was all that was needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
balo Posted July 7, 2016 Share Posted July 7, 2016 153 years for storing illegal pictures on the computer is just ridiculous . Would be like 2-4 years in any other country . Make sure to format your laptop before you visit the US , you never know... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ggt Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 (edited) This takes the cake! Toddlers? These people are truly mentally ill... Edited July 8, 2016 by ggt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hawker9000 Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 OMG. The law is an ass sometimes. Who lives 153 years? A simple lifetime sentence without release/parole was all that was needed. Relax. It won't cost the taxpayers one penny more. Find something worthwhile to whine about already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOLDBUGGY Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 How ridiculous can America get ! Obviously kiddie porn is a disgusting and punishable crime, but 153 years !! while here in sunny Thailand someone can kill people or, as in the case of trafficking, destroy lives, and the worst they will get will be a slap on the wrist. America AND Thailand, wake up ! I agree with what you said in that this is disgusting as it gets and punishable as a crime, but also that 153 year prison sentence just for possession seems way over the top. The Big Fish here are the ones that Produce and Sell this disgusting garbage. But what they have done is like giving a life sentence to a guy for buying cocaine for his own use while the sellers and importers walk around freely, . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dagnabbit Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 153 years ?? Ridiculous ! 1,53 years , or 153 days ...ok. Crazy sentence if its only for child pornography. I am not saying that there should be no punishment but 153 years for around 50 pictures. Bit crazy. Not at all. Every picture or video is of a child being damaged physically and psychologically. The kids got a life sentence Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Grumpy Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 to be fair, best for society that this sicko is off the streets and away from children for the rest of his life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcfish Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 There is an Australian footballer just arrested in the US by the FBI in a sting after handing over the money for a little girl.. He is in for a world of pain if just looking gets you 150 Sent from my SC-01D using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gretsch5555 Posted July 17, 2016 Share Posted July 17, 2016 Death penalty for each image Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lvr181 Posted July 17, 2016 Share Posted July 17, 2016 Death penalty for each image You can only die once. What is the point of a number of death penalties? Just to satisfy the judiciary or someone else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hawker9000 Posted July 17, 2016 Share Posted July 17, 2016 Death penalty for each image You can only die once. What is the point of a number of death penalties? Just to satisfy the judiciary or someone else. What is the point of moaning about it? Just to have something to moan about? Who the heck cares!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now