Jump to content








Trang deputy governor to petition Palace against alleged unfair reshuffle


webfact

Recommended Posts

Trang deputy governor to petition Palace against alleged unfair reshuffle

 

12814296_162498227468731_406590645676126

 

TRANG: -- Trang deputy governor Sayant Intharapak has vowed to petition the Palace and to take his case to the Administrative Court to seek justice over what he alleged as unfair reshuffle of governors.

 

Sayant insisted that he was qualified to be promoted as a governor because he has the seniority and has only one year left in the service before his compulsory retirement next year.

 

The deputy governor argued that he didn’t petition his case for himself but for many of his peers in the Interior Ministry who were not fairly treated in the annual reshuffle.

 

Full story: http://englishnews.thaipbs.or.th/trang-deputy-governor-petition-palace-alleged-unfair-reshuffle/

 
thaipbs_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright Thai PBS 2016-09-20
Link to comment
Share on other sites


"...Sayant insisted that he was qualified to be promoted as a governor because he has the seniority and has only one year left in the service before his compulsory retirement next year..."

 

There is a lot in this sentence that sums up a critical problem pervading the country's bureaucratic system, and only helps to confirm that the Dunning–Kruger effect continues to flourish in Thailand! (http://www.patheos.com/blogs/crossexamined/2015/02/the-dunning-kruger-effect-are-the-stupid-too-stupid-to-realize-theyre-stupid/)

 

Firstly, an inflated opinion of one's own abilities; then, the national focus on seniority over ability; and finally, the presumption of promotion regardless of performance (in this case because of approaching compulsory retirement). Although, "retirement" may actually be the only way the country is able to replace its civil service squeaky wheels.

 

If Thailand placed more importance of putting the best people in key positions in the civil service, and promoting on merit and achievement rather than seniority and connection it may find itself far better off.

 

But then again, if all else fails, petition the Palace!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, waldroj said:

"...Sayant insisted that he was qualified to be promoted as a governor because he has the seniority and has only one year left in the service before his compulsory retirement next year..."

 

There is a lot in this sentence that sums up a critical problem pervading the country's bureaucratic system, and only helps to confirm that the Dunning–Kruger effect continues to flourish in Thailand! (http://www.patheos.com/blogs/crossexamined/2015/02/the-dunning-kruger-effect-are-the-stupid-too-stupid-to-realize-theyre-stupid/)

 

Firstly, an inflated opinion of one's own abilities; then, the national focus on seniority over ability; and finally, the presumption of promotion regardless of performance (in this case because of approaching compulsory retirement). Although, "retirement" may actually be the only way the country is able to replace its civil service squeaky wheels.

 

If Thailand placed more importance of putting the best people in key positions in the civil service, and promoting on merit and achievement rather than seniority and connection it may find itself far better off.

 

But then again, if all else fails, petition the Palace!

So you don't see him as a wunnerful, wunnerful human being as he's not doing this for himself but for all the others unfairly treated in the reshuffle ?  :rolleyes:

Let's hear it for the boy !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't doubt that having one year left before retirement is a requirement for being promoted. We've got an old retired hag lingering on at out main office. She was rehired after retired to take a high position. Just so happens to be the old hag of a high ranking general too. Anyways, the man complaining in this story is right to go to the palace. That's where the power really is. General Prayuth started with cronies and nepots being appointing in his regime if you remember the early issues with his regime. That hasn't changed. This is all a sham.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"He said that he wanted a good precedent to be set because previous reshuffles were done in a way which disregard regulations and without transparency."

 

Well at some point challenges will be needed to test the new/altered laws and chain of command. Good luck Sayant, either a win or a few months having your thoughts readjusted at the pleasure of the General. :clap2: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...