THAI POLITICS: Why we cannot place our faith in ‘good people’

[Bob12345]

6 minutes ago, trogers said:

 

Degree met with degree. Nothing is ridiculous.

 

What was ridiculous was using thugs to fire on unarmed protesters who did not threatened violence nor burn the city while one is in the government. The keyword is 'thugs'.

 

 

It goes quicker if you just admit your reply didn't make any sense, because you are digging your hole deeper and deeper and things you are saying are becoming more absurd by the minute.

[trogers]

3 minutes ago, Bob12345 said:

It goes quicker if you just admit your reply didn't make any sense, because you are digging your hole deeper and deeper and things you are saying are becoming more absurd by the minute.

 

My earlier reply refers to events of the 70's. It would make sense for those with ages past 40...or the Youngs who follow history.

[jamesbrock]

33 minutes ago, trogers said:

Degree met with degree. Nothing is ridiculous.

 

What was ridiculous was using thugs to fire on unarmed protesters who did not threatened violence nor burn the city while one is in the government. The keyword is 'thugs'.

 

Thugs in military fatigues with army issued weapons? Under the command of the current PM and Interior Minister? Bl#%dy ridiculous.

 

20 minutes ago, trogers said:

My earlier reply refers to events of the 70's. It would make sense for those with ages past 40...or the Youngs who follow history.

 

Funny, your reply to Alive, "The 'real' people where shot and bombed by the previous power holder..." doesn't refer to events of the 70's...

 

Alive's reply to that,  "you know who shot the most 'real' people" doesn't refer to events of the 70's...

 

 

But, for some reason, your reply to that does refer to events of the 70's? Ridiculous.

[Srikcir]

2 hours ago, trogers said:

no Thai word to represent strong moral principles and adherence to them.

Granted Buddhism of the Theravada school is not Thai in origin, does its principles then fail to serve the Thai People in matters of moral principles, how ever it may be translated into Thai? 

[metisdead]

A post containing Thai language has been removed.  English is the only acceptable language anywhere on ThaiVisa including Classifieds, except within the Thai language forum, where of course using Thai is allowed.

[trogers]

9 hours ago, Alive said:

trogers you know who shot the most 'real' people. I can't say it here because my post will be deleted to please this regime. History knows who has blood on their hands in Thailand. There are 50 million people outside of Bangkok but if Bangkok people don't see them outside their window they forget they exist.

 

History knows...

 

Is history of the 70's ridiculous? If Alive had been specific about events of 2010, then this issue would not have arose.

 

But casualties of 2010 is minuscule compared to the 70's.

 

[jamesbrock]

1 hour ago, trogers said:

 

History knows...

 

Is history of the 70's ridiculous? If Alive had been specific about events of 2010, then this issue would not have arose.

 

But casualties of 2010 is minuscule compared to the 70's.

 

He was specifically replying to your post, of course he was referring to the same history - why on earth would he suddenly switch from the history referred to in your post "the previous power holder"  and suddenly talk about the 70's, without ever mentioning the 70's?

 

Your constant squirming is even more ridiculous than the dodgy analogy in the post you're trying to rewrite. 

 

This bickering is tiresome. Good night. Krub.

[trogers]

14 minutes ago, jamesbrock said:

 

He was specifically replying to your post, of course he was referring to the same history - why on earth would he suddenly switch from the history referred to in your post "the previous power holder"  and suddenly talk about the 70's, without ever mentioning the 70's?

 

Your constant squirming is even more ridiculous than the dodgy analogy in the post you're trying to rewrite. 

 

This bickering is tiresome. Good night. Krub.

 

Because he was referring to the military in particular...

 

While events of 2010 occurred with a PM and Parliament.

Edited September 27, 2016 by trogers

[trogers]

15 minutes ago, jamesbrock said:

 

He was specifically replying to your post, of course he was referring to the same history - why on earth would he suddenly switch from the history referred to in your post "the previous power holder"  and suddenly talk about the 70's, without ever mentioning the 70's?

 

Your constant squirming is even more ridiculous than the dodgy analogy in the post you're trying to rewrite. 

 

This bickering is tiresome. Good night. Krub.

 

Because he was referring to the military in particular...

 

While events of 2010 occurred with a PM and Parliament.

Edited September 27, 2016 by trogers

[Acharn]

12 hours ago, ChidlomDweller said:

Suthep's "good people" talk was always a crock of #*%¥.  As if anyone ever took that for anything more than self-serving nonsense.  

 

Well, you have to understand the language. Suthep used the phrase "good people" meaning high society, rich, influential people who are ardent supporters of the monarchy. You also have to support the monarchy in certain ways, which I'm not about to explain. Back immediately after the coup, when so many posters were rejoicing than now the corrupt police would get their comeuppance from the noble Army I knew they were going to be disappointed. We've seen this many times.

[jamesbrock]

39 minutes ago, trogers said:

 

Because he was referring to the military in particular...

 

While events of 2010 occurred with a PM and Parliament.