Talk about moving the goalposts! You are now attempting to change the definition of 'Ethnic English' which you yourself put forward!😂 Notwithstanding that error - which rather puts the kibosh on your whole argument - how long does an individual have to live in England for them to have "historic links" and therefore, to be considered "ethnically English"? Using your revised definition, why shouldn't the descendents of black slaves/ servants brought to England in the 18th/19th century be considered 'Ethnically English'? Is that too recent? Btw: The Vikings and Normans did not arrive in England "tens of thousands of years ago". I'm not - and have never - suggested that black people are 'ethnically English'. You introduced the phrase into the conversation. I have said all along that the phrase is essentially meaningless in 21st century England as so few people have a 100% blood line dating back to the indigenous tribes of England who are, by definition, ethnically English. Once you argue that those descendants of immigrant Norman blood are 'Ethnically English', you must also allow for the possibility that those of other immigrant groups such as Nigerian, Igbo, Kenyan, Haitian etc. can also be 'ethnically English'. As I say, the phrase becomes effectively meaningless. I use the term, 'identity' which covers both nationality and ethnic background. Therefore, I don't deny Andrew Joshua - or any other black person - either their African identity or their British (English) one. I'm not - and never have been - the one race-baiting, Jonny, you are. You are now trying to completely redefine not just accepted terminology, but also the terminology which you proposed in the first place! Once again, we return to the same issue. The Anglo-Saxons, Vikings and Normans were not indigenous to England; they were invaders and immigrants. How then - apart from skin colour and timing - do they differ from latter-day immigrants from Africa and Asia? If you allow for Anglo-Saxons, Normans and Vikings to be incorporated into - and shape the culture of - an 'Ethnic English group ', why then should these later groups of immigrants be excluded from being members of that group and shaping its' culture? So much twisting and turning, Jonny. You are tying yourself in knots trying to defend the indefensible. I'm (almost) feeling embarrassed for you. Logically, you have a simple binary choice: Either admit to your racism or disown it.