onthesoi Posted January 4, 2017 Posted January 4, 2017 2 hours ago, Wilsonandson said: Yingluck tweeted this picture on twitter to prove she was being followed. It's no wonder she has legal problems if that's her definition of proof!
Bureaucrat Posted January 4, 2017 Posted January 4, 2017 1 minute ago, onthesoi said: If she has nothing to hide then why does she care? Some people might view this as an invasion of personal privacy as in the case of Diana Spencer although her experience in no way compares with Yingluck's pathetic experience - bu it is the thin edge of the wedge.
onthesoi Posted January 4, 2017 Posted January 4, 2017 11 minutes ago, Bureaucrat said: Some people might view this as an invasion of personal privacy as in the case of Diana Spencer although her experience in no way compares with Yingluck's pathetic experience - bu it is the thin edge of the wedge. & similarly, Diana was only too willing to have her privacy invaded when promoting her celebrity status in the public sphere....when it suited her agenda. Although, I'm not sure you can compare the two, as Diana wasn't out on bail pending criminal charges pertaining to huge amounts of public money going missing, nor did she have family members on the run from the police.
Eric Loh Posted January 4, 2017 Posted January 4, 2017 9 minutes ago, onthesoi said: It's no wonder she has legal problems if that's her definition of proof! Prayut has apologized to Yingluck. Her defination of proof was spot on.
onthesoi Posted January 4, 2017 Posted January 4, 2017 3 minutes ago, Eric Loh said: Prayut has apologized to Yingluck. Her defination of proof was spot on. Prayutt did not confirm the people in the back ground were police officers he simply offered a generic apology & even if he did confirm they were, a pic with some unidentified people circled in red pen, is not, as per her claim, proof in any way shape or form ....btw you might want to check your defination of definition.
Eric Loh Posted January 4, 2017 Posted January 4, 2017 1 minute ago, onthesoi said: Prayutt did not confirm the people in the back ground were police officers he simply offered a generic apology & even if he did confirm they were, a pic with some unidentified people circled in red pen, is not, as per her claim, proof in any way shape or form ....btw you might want to check your defination of definition. Are you a comedian.
onthesoi Posted January 4, 2017 Posted January 4, 2017 Just now, Eric Loh said: Are you a comedian. No, but you're a joke.
Eric Loh Posted January 4, 2017 Posted January 4, 2017 1 minute ago, onthesoi said: No, but you're a joke. Agree, you are a comedian and a joke.
jayboy Posted January 4, 2017 Posted January 4, 2017 If she has nothing to hide then why does she care?I suppose for the same reason that anyone would object to goons following them around.Sent from my iPhone using Thaivisa Connect
onthesoi Posted January 4, 2017 Posted January 4, 2017 5 minutes ago, jayboy said: I suppose for the same reason that anyone would object to goons following them around. But, she is not just anyone. She is a celebrity who is out on bail from maybe the biggest government corruption trial in the country's history not to mention her close family members on the run from the law. Or are you saying the police should not be allowed to follow & investigate criminals ...lest they get all pouty and whine on twitter to their fan club?
sharecropper Posted January 4, 2017 Posted January 4, 2017 What does she expect? She now lives in a Totalitarian state run by fascists, who shamefully have some cheerleaders on this forum. Bet they wouldn't be singing the same tune if it happened in their country would they? But it's OK for the Thais apparently.
onthesoi Posted January 4, 2017 Posted January 4, 2017 2 minutes ago, sharecropper said: Bet they wouldn't be singing the same tune if it happened in their country would they? But it's OK for the Thais apparently. That is a bet you would lose ..if my government started going after the rich, powerful and corrupt within government, they would receive a standing ovation from me followed by many calls for encore.
sharecropper Posted January 4, 2017 Posted January 4, 2017 Just now, onthesoi said: That is a bet you would lose ..if my government started going after the rich, powerful and corrupt within government, they would receive a standing ovation from me followed by many calls for encore. But that's probably just you. Dictatorships in foreign countries (for the avoidance of doubt, there's not one here, of course) don't generally get a warm hand on their entrance.
Basil B Posted January 4, 2017 Posted January 4, 2017 42 minutes ago, onthesoi said: If she has nothing to hide then why does she care? She maybe concerned that public money is being wasted on paying people to spy on her... But there again, she may want to slip over the boarder with a few truckloads of dosh, or have a clandestine meeting or two with enemies of the government.
jayboy Posted January 4, 2017 Posted January 4, 2017 But, she is not just anyone. She is a celebrity who is out on bail from maybe the biggest government corruption trial in the country's history not to mention her close family members on the run from the law. Or are you saying the police should not be allowed to follow & investigate criminals ...lest they get all pouty and whine on twitter to their fan club?She is not a "celebrity", just the country's most popular politician.She is not out on bail.It is not a corruption trial.Her brother's exile is nothing to do with her.She is not a criminal not least because she has not been found guilty of anything.She is not being investigated.Prayuth has apologised for the goons' intrusiveness.Your comment in summary was so ignorant and foolish that a period of quiet reflection is recommended.Difficult I know for someone suffused with hate and on the evidence not the sharpest knife in the toolbox.Sent from my iPhone using Thaivisa Connect
Bureaucrat Posted January 4, 2017 Posted January 4, 2017 2 hours ago, onthesoi said: & similarly, Diana was only too willing to have her privacy invaded when promoting her celebrity status in the public sphere....when it suited her agenda. Although, I'm not sure you can compare the two, as Diana wasn't out on bail pending criminal charges pertaining to huge amounts of public money going missing, nor did she have family members on the run from the police. A very good example of victim blame - you are just a mindless hater.
Scott Posted January 4, 2017 Posted January 4, 2017 Off-topic posts and replies removed. Please stay on topic.
bangrak Posted January 4, 2017 Posted January 4, 2017 Please, be charitable, tolerant, let the Shins' fans be a bit over-agitated, like a bunch of catfish for a handfull of pellets, the poor guys hadn't had anything to feed on recently, you know, and their gale must be full of bile they need to evacuate. Sad for Yingluck though, on the pictures taken during her 'private' holydays of yore, there was always an organised group of people around her, some with red roses and so, and look at her now: all alone at a table, only one cup with the teapot... One wonders whether the poor guy(?) who had to take this picture for her even got a small bottle of water to drink... Tsss. Even her son, this 'private' holyday is said to have been all about, had something more interesting to do at the time the picture was taken... ...Or was this 'private' holyday picture put in scene, too, for a propaganda purpose, like in all the so many other photo-ops, she will probably, and hopefully only, remain famous for? 'Sic transit Gloria Mundi'? LOL
bangrak Posted January 4, 2017 Posted January 4, 2017 8 hours ago, A1Str8 said: She should wai and say thank you that at least the police is still interested in her if nobody else is. 'Thank you three times'? LOL
wakeupplease Posted January 4, 2017 Posted January 4, 2017 8 hours ago, worgeordie said: Yes that's sarcasm. regards Worgeordie Is that Thai Sarcasm or Thailand 4 stupidity give it A Rest You Have Worn Out This subject Time To Move On We should be living in the First world but alass this is Thailand heading for the 4th world
anotheruser Posted January 4, 2017 Posted January 4, 2017 In related news half this web site would stalk here and shag her.
berybert Posted January 4, 2017 Posted January 4, 2017 Q. How did she know she was being followed ? A. The police dog forgot to take its helmet off.
Elkski Posted January 4, 2017 Posted January 4, 2017 I'm in need of some history on this subject. seems to be two sides to this story among the TV Farang? She is a <deleted> to me. So she has never been taken to trial for anything? I guess her brother took some money and fled. She comes from HISO. What type of person represent the millions who like her? thanks for some history lessons.
candide Posted January 4, 2017 Posted January 4, 2017 1 hour ago, Elkski said: I'm in need of some history on this subject. seems to be two sides to this story among the TV Farang? She is a <deleted> to me. So she has never been taken to trial for anything? I guess her brother took some money and fled. She comes from HISO. What type of person represent the millions who like her? thanks for some history lessons. Wikipedia, Google search, ......
bobmac10 Posted January 5, 2017 Posted January 5, 2017 She would walk it in if an election was held tomorrow. The general and his clowns have shown how useless they are despite 4 years of total control.
bobmac10 Posted January 5, 2017 Posted January 5, 2017 3 hours ago, candide said: Wikipedia, Google search, ...... Three books published overseas by expat journalists who lived here for many years with extensive contacts in the upper echelons of Thail politics and society, combined with the verbatim extracts from USA diplomatic communications from Thai embassy. sorry cannot give titles, they are banned here. Look Kindle.
SOTIRIOS Posted January 5, 2017 Posted January 5, 2017 ....for obvious reasons....... ....can't get more 'northernmost' than the location she chose..... ...good for them....!!!
ALLSEEINGEYE Posted January 5, 2017 Posted January 5, 2017 Sum Num Na you fascist,!! She didn't seem bothered when she brought the riot squad into parliament to remove the opposition so that her corrupt team could try and pass an amnesty bill to let her brother and 25,000 other corrupt cases be swept under the table.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now